« August 2007 | Main | October 2007 »

September 29, 2007

Weekly Reader: 23Sep07

Well the big deal the week end 9/23 was the launch of Alan Greenspan’s memoirs. Just kidding it was the cut in the Fed rates by an unexpectedly large 50 basis points. Though to judge by the media blitz, including the Jon Stewart Show, it wasn’t. Which was actually good news because it provided a lot of air cover for a difficult, contentious and uncertain policy decision. While my suspicion is that problems in the world credit markets were the proximate cause since, judging by interest rate spreads, adjustments are being made, the much worse than expected jobs numbers and the accelerating implosion of housing  gave a certain flavor to things. Amusing isn’t it that prior to July all things were for the best in the best of all possible worlds, Dr. Pangloss was treating Goldilocks for recessive tendencies and now you can’t turn around without someone whispering, actually shouting, the R-word. Oh my, we aren’t in Kansas in any more ?

 

Or are we – judging by by the markets reaction and near recovery of previous highs we’re on the Yellow Brick Road for sure. Not sure what song we’re singing…maybe Lucy in Sky with Diamonds, catering by Timothy Leary ? Speaking of credit crunches the Special section contains as usual the ‘must-reads’, and the article by Jim Jubak on the recurrent  credit markets booms and busts of the last ten years in a relatively otherwise flat market is well worth reading. As is his advice on positioning. The theme continues with an exceptionally interesting column on how widespread structured credit products are, how little understood and how much farther we’ve got to get them under control, based on the work and thinking of Satayajit Das, one of the original thinkers and creators of those same products and markets.

 

The rest of the Markets section basically takes the disharmonic themes and looks at their consequences – rapidly escalating pressures on the dollar, credit crunch implosions in England (Northern Rock) and the on-going re-thinking of the deal-making business that underpinned so much of the last two years of market uptick. Now we have to unravel the existing deals and get them re-priced, clear the clogged pipeline of deals and financings by re-pricing or otherwise adjusting them and also dealing with the longer-term consequences. Ironically one of the progenitors, Goldman-Sachs, was the only contrarian smart enough to play against the game and win in Q3 !

 

We start the Economy section off by focusing on Greenspan’s Memoirs – which has gotten a lot of press because it turns out he can speak clearly when he wants to. There’s the autobiography, the policy and history reviews and so forth. But the most important and timely section is Uncle Allen’s look at the state and course of the economy. If he can get serious, well-informed discussion of the simple characteristics he lays out into the wider discussion he will indeed have left a legacy. The section continues with a look at the outlook for this “puzzling” economy and the accelerating housing crunch but also considerable on the weakening signs abroad as well as major adjustments in various foreign economies including India, China and Japan as well as major new structural shifts in SE Asian trade patterns as China moves up the value stack. There are also interesting tidbits on the fact that inflation hasn’t gone away nor have oil prices increases; in fact as the ME Oil Exporters develop their economies, for the first time of four opportunities they’ve squandered remember, they’re becoming major consumers of their own product.

 

As worldwide competitive pressures continue to mount companies are re-discovering the need for strategic HR development (on which we’ve waxed eloquently several times) and improved customer service. Both are starred articles. The discussion of leadership is interesting in that it flags a re-awakened interest in HR issues but the conclusions, particularly given some of the companies used as examples, need to be checked. In my experience with several if they’re leaders the rest must be really bad. In addition to the starred articles two sets of related business are really worth thinking about. The first is more in the on-going epic saga of the Airbus-Boeing confrontation which embodies one of the biggest structural competitions in a major worldwide industry. The 2nd is the mounting challenges to MSFT’s core from people discovering that Mac OS X and/or Linux can be viable alternatives. As if that weren’t bad enough, and given the on-going open source wars, new challenges are emerging in the core Office applications arena. IBM has just announced a “new” Symphony product that puts a vastly improved front-end on the OpenOffice engines. This attacks MS at the heart of it’s franchise and could become critically important.

 

General & Special

The Credit Crunch Continues At long last, financial markets have lurched toward higher risk premiums, the extra interest that lenders receive for eschewing Treasuries in favor of less-safe loans. Nor has the leveraged lending business been spared. The spigot of new commitments has shut tight. The average risk premium on high yield bonds leapt to a recent high of 4.87 percentage points above Treasuries, compared to June's record low of 2.63 percentage points, an almost seismic adjustment for the tortoise-like debt market. But unlike the seeming free fall in the mortgage market, the waves of worry in the high-yield arena have been more episodic, far less fear than is needed to raise risk premiums to sensible levels. Tuesday's aggressive rate reduction by the Federal Reserve, while perhaps desirable to shore up the economy, complicates this adjustment process. When the music stopped in July, $330 billion or more of these commitments was outstanding. By comparison, that's in the range of the total annual lending volume to similar borrowers as recently as 2005. Only a few billion dollars of these commitments have come to market, and lenders have been able to push them through with relatively modest sweeteners. Now more deals -- including a fistful of mega-buyouts like First Data and TXU -- are beginning to close. In a normal world, perhaps the banks would succeed in offloading this paper, as badly structured and mispriced as it is. But one consequence of the turmoil in the housing-finance market has been the shriveling up of securitizations, the process by which banks package up loans and sell them in slices to investors. As intimidating as it may seem, the supply overhang is not our biggest worry, which is the prospect of many of these loans going bad (the seminal reason for the collapse of the mortgage market.) Never before in the history of capital markets has so much money been lent to so many challenged borrowers.

How to ride the boom-panic cycle The market's roller-coaster pattern might be with us for years. The current panic is, by my count, the fourth of the past 10 years. On that evidence it's at least worth considering that "normal" now consists of a recurring pattern of market booms driven by excess global cash that leads to a global mispricing of risk and is punctuated at regular intervals by panics. If a pattern of boom, panic, boom, panic is indeed the new normal, it has profound implications for how we should invest. On the surface, these panics seem significantly different because they all have involved different players and different market vehicles. But note the similarities below those surface differences:

Each was rooted in a surplus of global cheap money. Each required a massive mispricing of risk. Investors put so much money to work at relatively low rates of return because they underestimated the risk involved in those investments. And each cycle led the world's central banks, often led by the U.S. Federal Reserve, to limit the fallout from the panic by flooding the market with cash, thus setting up conditions for the next turn in the cycle.

Markets & Investments

Are we headed for an epic bear market? The credit bubble is just starting to unwind, a credit-derivative insider says. And while U.S. borrowers are being blamed for the mess, they were really just pawns in a global game. Das is pretty droll for a math whiz, but his message is dead serious. He thinks we're on the verge of a bear market of epic proportions. The cause: Massive levels of debt underlying the world economy system are about to unwind in a profound and persistent way. He's not sure if it will play out like the 13-year decline of 90% in Japan from 1990 to 2003 that followed the bursting of a credit bubble there, or like the 15-year flat spot in the U.S. market from 1960 to 1975. But either way, he foresees hard times as an optimistic era of too much liquidity, too much leverage and too much financial engineering slowly and inevitably deflates. [Satyajit Das was discussed earlier on Mefi. This interview with him is a great explanation of the financial skullduggery that we're knee-deep in. ]

  • Banks' dark off-balance-sheet world Financial institutions have been running virtual savings and loans through special-purpose entities with flexible accounting and little oversight. No wonder they're in trouble now. With all of the problems that we have experienced thus far in structured credit, one might think that there would be more people scratching their heads about why there are so many off-balance-sheet entities in the financial community in the first place. I wish I had a good answer. It's pretty obvious that little attention had been paid to these entities, at least from the perspective of potential problems. Of course, the fact that conduits, and special-purpose entities generically, reside off balance sheets is a reason why everyone has been caught by surprise. Because if mountains of this paper are away from plain sight, potential problems can't be anticipated, as you can't attempt to understand what you can't see.
  • What the big banks aren't telling you – yet The third quarter could end up as the worst in the past decade for the financial-services industry, but you wouldn't know it from the earnings forecasts. The banks are in denial. With credit markets still largely frozen, unemployment rising and major corporate expenditures slowing to a halt, every indication suggests that a surprising number of major financial firms, including Wachovia (WB, news, msgs), Washington Mutual (WM, news, msgs) and Bank of America (BAC, news, msgs), will come up short of expectations in October, kicking off an unpleasant autumn for investors. Investors need to care more about financial stocks than any others because they make up more than 20% of the broad market indexes. So let's get some clarity on exactly what they're facing.

Fears of dollar collapse as Saudis take fright Saudi Arabia has refused to cut interest rates in lockstep with the US Federal Reserve for the first time, signalling that the oil-rich Gulf kingdom is preparing to break the dollar currency peg in a move that risks setting off a stampede out of the dollar across the Middle East. The Fed's dramatic half point cut to 4.75pc yesterday has already caused a plunge in the world dollar index to a fifteen year low, touching with weakest level ever against the mighty euro at just under $1.40. There is now a growing danger that global investors will start to shun the US bond markets. The latest US government data on foreign holdings released this week show a collapse in purchases of US bonds from $97bn to just $19bn in July, with outright net sales of US Treasuries. The danger is that this could now accelerate as the yield gap between the United States and the rest of the world narrows rapidly, leaving America starved of foreign capital flows needed to cover its current account deficit -- expected to reach $850bn this year, or 6.5pc of GDP. Mr Redeker said foreign investors have been gradually pulling out of the long-term US debt markets, leaving the dollar dependent on short-term funding. Foreigners have funded 25pc to 30pc of America's credit and short-term paper markets over the last two years.

·         Few Asian Nations Will Celebrate `Bernanke Put': Andy Mukherjee To most Asian policy makers, the larger-than-expected cut this week in the U.S. Federal Reserve's target for overnight interest rates is just the return of an all-too-familiar headache: unwanted liquidity. Following the Fed's move, currency strategists are already advising clients to buy Asian currencies, though it's highly unlikely that the Bank of Korea or the Reserve Bank of India will allow their currencies to surge against a weakening dollar.

 

  • The long gold boom  Metal may be due for correction, but that could spike price to $2,000, analysts say .After reaching their highest level since 1980, gold prices may be due for a correction soon, but that could help feed what many expect to be a long-term boom -- to $800 and then inflation-adjusted highs past $2,000 in the years to come. The most immediate influence on gold prices this week has been the Federal Reserve's decision Tuesday to cut its overnight interest rate target by a half percentage point to 4.75%. Gold's rally has been built on longer-term inflationary pressures that could be unleashed due to the prospect of, and now actually declining U.S. and then global interest rates, said Patrick Lafferty, a commodities broker at Capital Trading Group.

·         European Bonds Drop Most in Almost Two Years Amid Higher Inflation Outlook European government bonds fell the most in almost two years this past week after the Federal Reserve's interest-rate cut rekindled speculation global inflation will quicken. The Fed's rate cut prompted several companies to sell bonds in Europe as investor concern about rising corporate borrowing costs was allayed. The risk of owning European corporate bonds fell yesterday, according to traders of credit-default swaps.

·         Yen Falls Against Dollar, Euro as Investors Seek Returns on Riskier BetsThe yen fell against the dollar and touched a six-week low versus the euro after stocks and bonds in the U.S. and Europe rallied. Japan's yen declined against all 16 major currencies as investors jumped back into carry-trade bets that involve borrowing funds in Japan to purchase higher-yielding assets elsewhere. The cost of overnight loans in dollars decreased a third day, after the Federal Reserve cut its benchmark interest rate by a half-percentage point to 4.75 percent on Sept. 18.

 

U.K. Central Bank to Offer Support To Mortgage Lender Northern Rock The News: Northern Rock, one of the U.K.'s largest mortgage lenders, turns to the country's central bank for an emergency funding arrangement. Street Scene: Customers line up at the bank's branches to withdraw money despite efforts by Northern Rock CEO Adam Applegarth (above) to reassure them.  Bottom Line: The global liquidity crunch, which has caught financial firms in the U.S. and Europe, is showing minimal signs of improving. Panic Spreads Among Northern Rock Customers Hundreds of customers lined up outside branches of Northern Rock to withdraw their savings.

Deal-Making Ties Unravel In the hypercompetitive world of Wall Street, investment banks are normally willing to do whatever it takes to keep their clients happy. But these aren't normal times. Witness the fate of PHH Corp., which General Electric Co. and Blackstone Group LP agreed in March to buy for $1.7 billion. The mortgage lender and corporate vehicle fleet manager said yesterday that J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. "revised [their] interpretations as to the availability of debt financing" that could result in a shortfall of as much as $750 million needed by Blackstone to fund its part of the deal. While the fate of leveraged buyouts such as First Data Corp. and TXU Corp. have been attracting the most attention, the banks underwriting buyouts have proved more comfortable wiggling out of smaller deals. The banks "run the risk that some place down the road, they will pay for it," said Kevin O'Mara, a mergers-and-acquisitions lawyer at Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft, because buyout firms such as Blackstone might take their business elsewhere. "These guys have long memories." People in the Blackstone camp are described as "shocked" at the development. A week ago, the banks "dropped a bomb" on Blackstone, GE and PHH, one person familiar with the matter said, informing the group that they would shave their funding commitment.

·         How Goldman Sachs defies gravity It is one of the most stunning bets Wall Street has seen in decades. As the credit markets fell apart over the summer, causing the prices of hundreds of billions of dollars of mortgage-backed bonds to plunge, Goldman Sachs had already positioned itself so that it would profit massively from a decline in those securities. Thursday, Goldman reported earnings for its fiscal third quarter that were far above expectations. While several businesses were surprisingly strong in a difficult period, the chief contributor to the earnings blowout were trades that made money from price drops in mortgage-backed securities.

  • Deals backlog nears $500bn A backlog of nearly $500bn in outstanding financial deals – including leveraged loans to fund private equity buy-outs, delayed initial public offerings and corporate bond issues – has built up over the summer because of the market turbulence. Private Equity Giant KKR Faces Mortgage Crisis The delayed repayment by KKR Financial Holdings, an affiliate of  Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., of its commercial paper is the latest sign that the mortgage loan crisis is spilling over into the broader financial markets.

Bondholders Hoisted by Own Petards as Company Sales Depress Seasoned Debt During the summer of subprime discontent, bondholders refused to purchase the debt of the most creditworthy borrowers unless they could be compensated with extraordinary yields. The companies are returning the favor with the proviso: Be careful what you wish for. Offering higher yields enabled companies to sell a record $92 billion of investment-grade debt in August, after they raised less than $40 billion in July, the lowest in more than two years, data compiled by Bloomberg show. This month's $50 billion is 16 percent ahead of the September 2006 pace. By contrast, high-yield, high-risk issuers have been shut out of the market. More than 45 companies were forced to cancel, delay, or postpone debt offerings in June and July because of speculation that losses in mortgages to people with poor credit would slow the economy, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

Economy

(10*) Greenspan charts our economic course  What, then, can we reasonably project for the U.S. economy for, say, the year 2030? Little, unless we first specify certain assumptions. If we smooth through the raw data on output per hour, a remarkably stable pattern of growth emerges, going back to 1870. Annual growth of nonfarm business output per hour has averaged close to 2.2 percent. Even without adjusting for the business cycle, wars, and other crises, the range of overlapping consecutive fifteen-year averages of the annual increase in output per hour stays consistently between 1 and 3 percent. Our historical experience strongly suggests that as long as the United States remains at technology's cutting edge, annual productivity growth over the long run should range between 0 and 3 percent. Which brings us to our bottom line. Coupled with the projected 0.5 percent annual increase in hours worked between 2005 and 2030 that follows from the demographic assumptions cited earlier, a slightly less than 2 percent annual average growth in GDP per hour implies a real GDP growth rate of slightly less than 2.5 percent per year, on average, between now and 2030. That compares with 3.1 percent per year, on average, over the past quarter century, when labor force growth was considerably faster. As awesomely productive as market capitalism has proved to be, its Achilles' heel is a growing perception that its rewards, increasingly skewed to the skilled, are not distributed justly. Market capitalism on a global scale continues to require ever-greater skills as one new technology builds on another. Given that raw human intelligence is probably no greater today than in ancient Greece, our advancement will depend on additions to the vast heritage of human knowledge accumulated over the generations. A dysfunctional U.S. elementary and secondary education system has failed to prepare our students sufficiently rapidly to prevent a shortage of skilled workers and a surfeit of lesser-skilled ones, expanding the pay gap between the two groups. Unless America's education system can raise skill levels as quickly as technology requires, skilled workers will continue to earn greater wage increases, leading to ever more disturbing extremes of income concentration.

  • 'The Age of Turbulence' by Alan Greenspan Greenspan is world famous because he was very good and very lucky at this role. During his tenure at the Federal Reserve, he made roughly 36 substantive decisions about the direction interest rates should go. Six times I disagreed with him. Five of those six times, I was wrong. (The sixth? In the summer and fall of 2000, as the dot-com stock-market bubble crashed, I would have been cutting interest rates had I been sitting in Greenspan's chair; he waited for more information to see how much the fall in stock-market values would affect high-tech investment spending before he acted.) That is an amazing record -- much better than Barry Bonds', and Greenspan clearly has never been on steroids. It is certainly much better than most economists I know could have done.

Americans wonder which way their economy is heading Across the United States, the impact of the turmoil in the housing and credit markets on the broader economy has been relatively modest so far. But just as some of the customers who go to Cox's restaurant are becoming more cautious and Tuberman is holding back on hiring, many people are preparing to hit some economic headwinds. Whether that caution on the part of consumers and business translates into little more than a modest economic slowdown or turns into a full-blown recession will depend on a variety of factors. But perhaps the most important is whether jobs remain plentiful and consumers keep spending. That is what was so ominous about the government's recent report that businesses reduced total employment by 4,000 jobs in August. Another important labor market indicator - the share of the working-age population that reports holding a job - has fallen to its lowest level in nearly two years. And consumer spending, while it continues to grow, has slowed in recent months. Economists on Wall Street now put the risk of a recession at about one-third, which is significantly higher than earlier this year but far from a sure thing.  Reports of the Death of Inflation Have Been Greatly Exaggerated

U.S. Downshift Puts Trade in Flux The long-widening U.S. current-account deficit appears to have begun reversing course, as growth slows. A gradual shift could correct imbalances in the global economy, but a rapid one could be painful to U.S. consumers. For years, economists have warned that the U.S. can't run up endless charges on the national credit card to cover its huge appetite for imported cars, oil, electronics and other goods. Someday, they said, the bill will come due. It looks like someday may have finally arrived. After 16 years during which the U.S. mainly borrowed and bought while much of the rest of the world lent and sold, the global economy appears to be undergoing a fundamental shift. The result: Instead of depending as heavily on the U.S. for demand, the world economy could become more evenly balanced. In the background is a U.S. dollar that has grown weaker against the euro, British pound, and many other currencies. The euro hit $1.39 this month, the strongest it has been since its birth in 1999. If foreign money turns scarce and the trade deficit narrows suddenly, Americans could face a tumbling dollar, soaring interest rates and an economic downturn. That could send shock waves back through Europe and Asia if their own consumers don't make up for lost demand from the U.S., the world's largest national economy. If the turnaround persists, the implications for the U.S. could be profound. The weak dollar makes imports more expensive and raises an inflation risk. Interest rates are also likely to be higher than they otherwise would, as Americans have to offer higher yields to induce foreigners to put their money in the U.S.

Housing Starts in U.S. Fall More Than Economists Forecast to 12-Year Low Builders in the U.S. began work on the fewest homes in 12 years in August, raising the risk the real-estate recession will spread to other parts of the economy. The 2.6 percent decline to a lower-than-forecast annual rate of 1.331 million followed July's 1.367 million, the Commerce Department said today in Washington. Building permits dropped 5.9 percent to a 1.307 million pace, also the lowest since 1995. The housing slump may deepen after borrowing costs rose and lenders shut off access to credit, causing growth to slow even more, economists said. Federal Reserve policy makers yesterday lowered the benchmark rate by a half point to prevent a broader economic slowdown.

Big home price drops loom Over the next few years, more than three-quarters of the nation's housing markets will suffer some decline in home prices. Many will experience double-digit hits in a forecast that has worsened considerably in recent months. According to an analysis conducted by Moody's Economy.com, declines will exceed 10 percent in 86 of the 379 largest housing markets. And 290 of the cities will experience price drops of 1 percent or more. The survey attempted to identify the high and low points of housing prices in each of the markets, some of which started declining from their peak in the third quarter of 2005. All are median prices for single-family houses. Nationally, Moody's is projecting an average price decline of 7.7 percent. That's a jump from the 6.6 percent total price drop that the company was forecasting in June and more than twice that of last October's forecast of a 3.6 percent price decrease.

  • Moody's Forecasts House Prices to Fall 7.7% Nationwide Look at the price bottoms; Moody's is mostly forecasting the price bottoms to happen in late 2008. That would make this one of the shortest duration housing busts with similar price declines in history. Historically declines of this magnitude have taken 5 to 7 years because house prices are sticky. My guess is prices will decline further than Moody's is expecting, and the duration of the bust will be longer.

Asia Will Lose as `Made in China' Goes Local: Andy Mukherjee Much of the analysis of China's bloated trade surplus focuses on exports, when it's the imports that deserve greater scrutiny. In the first eight months of this year, China's exports grew 28 percent. That's less than the annual export growth of 35 percent recorded in both 2003 and 2004. More importantly, the 20 percent increase in imports so far this year pales in comparison with the 36 percent expansion in 2004 and the 40 percent surge in 2003. Slower import growth, according to Louis Kuijs, a World Bank economist in Beijing, is a key reason why China's trade surplus is spiraling out of control, creating an avalanche of domestic liquidity that's fueling inflation and asset bubbles. Chinese imports have decoupled from exports since 2005 because assembly lines in the country are increasingly purchasing intermediate parts from local suppliers. The substitution of imports with locally produced components has important implications for the rest of Asia, which has become more and more reliant on Chinese factories to tap final demand in the U.S., Europe and Japan.  According to the Asian Development Bank, more than 70 percent of the trade between China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, South Korea, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan and Thailand includes ``intermediate goods'' -- parts, components and semi- finished material. These are then used to manufacture products that are ultimately sold outside the continent. China is the ``driver'' of this regional trade, even though only 6 percent of it is on account of final consumption on the mainland.

Eurozone suffers ‘worst’ jolt since 9/11 The eurozone economy has this month suffered its biggest jolt since the aftermath of the September 2001 terrorist attacks, with global financial turmoil hitting the services sector particularly hard, according to a closely watched survey. The unexpectedly steep fall on Friday in the eurozone purchasing managers’ index – the third consecutive monthly drop – could knock policymakers’ previous confidence that the 13-country eurozone economy would escape largely unscathed from the US subprime mortgage crisis. Although the slowdown may prove temporary – and the survey showed companies continuing to take on staff at a rapid rate – it coincides with the euro’s rise to record levels against the dollar and on a trade-weighted basis, which will hit eurozone exports.

·         Growth slowed in the euro zone's manufacturing and services sectors, while exporters took a hit from the strong euro.

The oil squeeze has just begun Think the market is already tight? It's going to get tighter over the next five years under pressure from both the supply and demand ends. Here's why. The market for oil will get even tighter over the next five years. (And in case you're looking for a way out, natural-gas markets may be even tighter.) As much as I'd like to believe that the agency has made a mistake, the logic behind its pessimistic assessment of supply and demand is impeccable. In the best case, the International Energy Agency calculates, supply will grow at 1% annually. Even that might be optimistic, though, because global oil production grew by just 0.4% in 2006. That creates just a teeny-weeny problem, because the agency projects that demand will grow by 2.2% a year over the next five years. Thanks to years of underinvestment, mismanagement, lack of technology or political interference -- or all of the above -- oil production is dropping faster than anyone expected at some of the world's biggest oil exporters. In 2006, oil production fell by 6.9% in Norway, 10% in the United Kingdom (which shares North Sea oil fields with Norway), 2.1% in Mexico and an estimated 5% in Venezuela. In all of those cases, the rate of decline is accelerating. The problem is geology, not politics (as it is in places such as the Niger Delta, where a collapse of order has shut down 25% of Nigeria's oil production). Any fix for a geologic problem is expensive and can take years to implement.

OPEC drives up oil prices in a new way. The oil-producing nations' fast-growing, subsidized economies and soaring consumption of petroleum are big reasons the rest of world is paying more for its crude. This time, OPEC really is to blame for higher oil prices. There's a huge debate inside the oil industry and in the commodity pits about the status of Saudi oil reserves.  The Saudis carry great clout inside that organization, but they have faced fierce opposition this year from an OPEC faction headed by Venezuela and Iran that is adamant about keeping prices as high as possible. Both countries desperately need high oil prices: Oil revenue is the only thing that stands between the regimes that rule in Caracas and Tehran and huge, possibly uncontainable protests. But there's a third part of the global energy demand story that hasn't received much attention until lately -- and it explains why higher oil prices haven't slowed global economic growth more rapidly and why OPEC is getting badly beaten by the energy traders these days. From 2000 through 2006, OPEC countries themselves accounted for 22% of global growth in oil demand. From 2000 through 2006, oil consumption by OPEC countries climbed by 1.8 million barrels a day, or 29%. Consumption is projected to climb 400,000 more barrels a day this year. OPEC consumption has been growing at 2.5 times the rate of global consumption. By the end of this year, consumption growth in OPEC countries will just about wipe out all the 2.2 billion barrels a day in increased production that OPEC has added since 2000.

Good Morning, Japan -- Time Your Leaders Woke Up: William PesekRemember that credit-rating upgrade for which Japanese officials were hoping? Well, they can forget it. Investors, too. Hopes were buttressed in July, when Moody's Investors Service put Japan on review for a higher rating, citing prospects for lowering the government's debt burden. Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's resignation on Sept. 12 ensured the status quo would prevail for a while longer. To officials in Tokyo, it has always been unfair that Moody's rates Japan's long-term local-currency debt A2, the same as Bahrain, Lithuania and South Africa. Standard & Poor's grades Japan at AA, the same as Slovenia and Chile. Their rationale is that Japan is a Group of Seven nation and a uniquely rich one. The idea that the second-biggest economy would default on debt is almost unthinkable. Yet ratings upgrades are rewards for good fiscal deeds, not continued profligacy. Even though Japan has enjoyed steady growth since 2002, it has made no noticeable progress in reducing public debt. Officially, it hovers at about 150 percent of gross domestic product; observers such as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development put it at around 170 percent.

India Brokers Desert CLSA, JPMorgan for Local Firms, Millions in Bonuses Domestic brokerages are winning staff with signing bonuses of $2.7 million and more, plus equity stakes. The competition is about to worsen as unlisted local brokers plan initial public offerings to fund expansion and as India's largest companies enter the industry. Indian brokerage shares are surging. India Infoline has jumped 174 percent this year, with almost all the increase coming after the announcement of its new hires in May. JM Financial Ltd., which lured five sales traders from JPMorgan in August, has risen 92 percent in 2007. The nation's benchmark Sensitive Index is up 12 percent this year. Tata Group, with interests in steel, automobiles and software, and Aditya Birla Group, whose main businesses are in commodities, say they may start brokerage and other financial services. India in May became the third emerging stock market after China and Russia to surpass $1 trillion in value as the economy grows at its fastest pace since independence 60 years ago. Experienced local traders are attracted to Indian firms because they get the chance to guide the destiny of the company and share its profits, said Ma Foi's Balaji.

Business

(***???) How top companies breed stars You couldn't be blamed for rolling your eyes when American Express chief Ken Chenault says, "People are our greatest asset." CEOs always say that. They almost never mean it. Most companies maintain their office copiers better than they build the capabilities of their people, especially the ones who are supposed to be future leaders, and for decades they've gotten away with it. But now their world is changing profoundly - and at long last we're going to find out which self-proclaimed people-cherishers actually mean it. Of the many powerful forces driving companies to develop leaders more effectively, the most important is the world economy's long-term shift from dependence on financial capital toward human capital. Even given the credit crunch, money for investment is more abundant than ever. It isn't the scarce resource in business anymore; human ability is. Companies are finding that the advantages of building a reputation for developing talent are greater than they may have thought - "a first-pick advantage," as the RBL Group calls it, an edge in attracting the cream of college and business-school students. By continually attracting the most promising graduates and then developing them, these firms become higher-performing organizations, enhancing their ability to attract the best - a self-reinforcing cycle that makes the company more dominant every year. A close look at the companies on our list reveals a set of best practices that seem to work in any environment. These companies operate in every kind of industry and are based all over the world. But what's most striking are traits they share - specifically, nine practices that combine to create world-class leadership development. [Top Companies for Leaders ]

Numbers Game Won't Die, Even If Net Income Does In just a few years, corporate balance sheets and income statements may look a lot more like today's cash-flow statements do, with separate sections showing operating, financing and investing activities. Net income as we know it might no longer be the bottom line, replaced by a more inclusive line called total comprehensive income. Even earnings per share might disappear from the face of the income statement. When beating Wall Street analysts' earnings estimates became all the rage during the 1990s, companies responded by managing their earnings to give the analysts what they wanted. When the market's demands shifted, and it became popular to fixate on, say, operating cash flow as a gauge for earnings quality, companies found new ways to manipulate their cash flow.

Cross-Border Deals Take New Direction Western multinationals may have pioneered cross-border mergers, but the latest chapter in globalization is being written by a new breed of deal makers from places like Russia, China, Brazil and the Mideast with an appetite for acquisitions in the developed world. The recent deals mark a fundamental change from only a few years ago, when nearly all the investment flow went from the developed world to the developing one. This year could be on pace to be the first ever in which companies and investment funds based in developing countries spend more on mergers and acquisitions in the developed world than vice versa. The trend, which is expected to continue, could accelerate in the wake of the recent turmoil in global credit markets. Credit woes have put the brakes on the takeover frenzy led by Western multinationals and private-equity firms in the past three years. Of course, the vast bulk of cross-border deals continue to take place between companies based in the industrialized West. But many companies in the developing world have ready access to large pools of capital at relatively low cost in their home-country debt markets, which means they can step up their buying sprees.

Worst Wall Street Quarter Since 2001 Tempered by Timely Goldman Sachs Gain Wall Street's third quarter would be the worst since 2001 if it weren't for the timely sale of a power company by Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Bear Stearns Cos. probably will report a 41 percent drop in earnings per share, Morgan Stanley may post an 11 percent decline and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. may say profit fell 5.1 percent, according to a Bloomberg survey of analysts. Goldman's earnings probably jumped 33 percent after a gain of as much as $1 billion from the sale of Horizon Wind Energy LLC. Fixed-income trading, the industry's biggest source of revenue, faltered as sales of mortgage and asset-backed securities dropped 36 percent in the quarter, Lehman estimates. Banks also stopped financing new leveraged buyouts, which provided $8.4 billion of fees in the first half, as they struggle to clear a backlog of $350 billion in loan commitments. While revenue from takeover advice, stock trading and underwriting probably rose, it may not make up for writedowns to reflect the declining value of corporate loans and mortgage bonds.

GM and union continue marathon talks Negotiators for the United Automobile Workers and General Motors resumed bargaining Saturday after a marathon session that went past a midnight contract deadline. GM's 73,000 workers at local unions nationwide were told to wait for updates rather than strike. Several major issues appeared to remain unresolved in the talks, notably whether GM would establish a health care trust that would be administered by the union. The trust, which would require tens of billions of dollars in financing, would assume responsibility for $55 billion in liabilities for GM's active and retired workers and their families. Along with the trust, the union is said to be seeking job guarantees for its workers who remain after GM completes a restructuring plan that calls for it to cut 30,000 jobs through 2008. The size of GM's work force is now a small fraction of where it stood in 1990, when it had 320,000 workers. That is 50 percent more than GM, Ford and Chrysler now employ collectively. Contracts between the union and the Detroit auto companies officially expired at 12:01 a.m. Saturday, but the negotiations continued at GM, which was selected by the union as its strike target on Thursday.

 
Airbus Bets on Composite Frame for A350 In a switch that could make Airbus's next jetliner more competitive with rival Boeing Co.'s new 787 Dreamliner, the European plane maker plans to build the frame of its planned A350 model from advanced composite materials instead of metal. The lighter structure -- similar to that of the Boeing plane -- reduces fuel consumption, increases a plane's range and reduces wear on key parts such as landing gear. The shift also cuts the need for costly maintenance inspections. For months, Airbus had been telling customers that attaching skin panels made of carbon-fiber composites to an aluminum-alloy skeleton was superior to Boeing's method of making both the frame and fuselage of the Dreamliner from composites. Airbus intends to complete its designs of the A350 late next year. It expects to deliver the first A350 in 2013. Although Boeing recently said it expects as much as a four-month delay in the planned first flight of the Dreamliner, the Chicago-based aerospace company still is hoping to deliver the first Dreamliner on schedule in May.

Boeing's Tall Order: On-Time 787 Boeing Co.'s top leaders say it is possible to overcome a nearly four-month delay in the 787 Dreamliner program and deliver the first jet on time in May. Industry observers and a number of the plane's suppliers say it would be the aerospace equivalent of hitting a hole in one on a golf course. After running into a critical shortage of aerospace fasteners to hold the airplane together, Boeing was forced to delay the first flight of the Dreamliner from August to what now looks like sometime in mid-November to mid-December. Company officials surprised many people in the aerospace industry -- including some of Boeing's suppliers -- when they said two weeks ago that they nevertheless still plan to deliver the first airplane on time.

My 'Stupid Business' Europe's leading low-fare airline CEO has choice words for his competition, politicians, environmentalists and others. There's a bit of P.T. Barnum in Michael O'Leary, the chief executive of Irish low-fare air carrier Ryanair. He's pulled such stunts as driving a tank to a competitor's headquarters to declare a price war and dressing up as the pope to promote new routes to Rome. Most recently, when Britain's Advertising Standards Authority said Ryanair was incorrectly claiming that its flights were faster and cheaper than the Eurostar train for traveling between London and Brussels, he sent the frowning officials a copy of "Mathematics for Dummies." Along the way, he's built Ryanair into Europe's largest airline by passenger volume and, along with such rivals as easyJet, transformed travel on the Continent. Most of Ryanair's rivals? "Doomed." Mr. O'Leary has plenty more to say about all of these people and more, but the difference between him and other airline executives is as good a place to start as any. "Generally the problem with the airline industry is it's so populated with people who grew up in the '40s or '50s who got their excitement looking at airplanes flying overhead," Mr. O'Leary explains in his spartan office at Dublin airport, dressed not in fatigues or papal robes but his usual blue jeans and open-collar shirt. "They wanted to be close to airplanes. You know, I wasn't. Mercifully I was a child of the '60s and a trained accountant, so aircraft don't do anything for me.

Is a Web Bubble Bursting? The rise of Internet video is prompting fresh forecasts that global Internet traffic could double every 100 days. A researcher who debunked the hype behind the first bubble, though, says traffic growth may be slowing world-wide. Remember the catchphrase from the late 1990s, "Internet traffic is doubling every 100 days"? Well, the true growth rate was around 100% annually. The Internet-stock bubble burst when investors realized telecom companies had spent hundreds of billions of dollars building capacity that wasn't needed. Now, the rise of Internet video is prompting fresh forecasts that -- you guessed it -- global traffic could double every 100 days. Trouble is, Internet traffic growth may be slowing world-wide, according to the researcher who debunked the hype behind the first bubble. Andrew Odlyzko, a professor at the University of Minnesota, has collected data showing traffic growth has fallen to more like 50% per year.

The slowdown might be temporary. The adoption of Internet TV could be stunningly fast. Or the Chinese could develop Korean patterns of extraordinarily high Internet usage. But if subdued growth set in for years, many of the victims of the last downturn could be in for a second helping. Communications carriers Level 3 Communications and Global Crossing, for example, are two surviving former highfliers. They are heavily in debt and their operating profits don't yet cover interest payments or needed capital expenditures. Slowing traffic growth could damp revenue growth -- making it harder for them to manage their debt loads. There could be indirect casualties as well. Less data traffic means less demand for the telecom equipment that carries it. Cisco Systems boss John Chambers, who has said video could cause Internet traffic to grow as much as 500% annually, would be proven too optimistic. Companies with high stock multiples, such as Juniper Networks, which trades at 45 times estimated 2008 earnings, could see their stocks fall. Of course, measuring traffic is tough, and the future is anybody's guess. But if investors get caught again, they'd have only themselves to blame.

Garmin Shows Difficulty of Spotting Growth Stocks The trick for growth companies is trying to figure out when the growth is about to end. That little exercise is more of an art than a science, and has stung more than its share of investors who have either held on too long only to watch the stock price fall, or made a prematurely bearish bet against a company's rising fortunes. There is no better example of this than Garmin Ltd., best known for its global-positioning systems and portable navigation devices. For more than a year, the company has confounded critics who thought it was vulnerable to competition and falling prices, which it is. Or should be. But so far, in the face of rapidly falling prices and mushrooming competition, Garmin's performance has continued to set its own course, with its stock more than doubling in the past year. The company is doing so well that six weeks ago, in reporting its last quarter, management boosted earnings and revenue forecasts for this year. So why, in the face of this, would anybody gamble that reality is catching up with Garmin? Well, for one thing, while sales and earnings are forecast to be higher than original expectations, the guidance for operating margin -- an important measure of how much money a company really makes -- was unchanged. And by year's end, margins are expected to fall in the fast-growing auto/mobile sector, which last quarter generated 68.4% of Garmin's revenue.

Pondering a New PC Now I'm finding myself paying attention again -- only this time, there's a difference. My old recipe -- buy a reasonably current Dell, minus accessories -- no longer holds much interest. And that's because of Apple. The Windows and Apple worlds, practically matter and antimatter not so long ago, now coexist and overlap in all manner of ways. Readers Endorse Switch to Apple Last week's column on pondering a new PC, and the possibility of throwing over Windows for Apple, brought in a tidal wave of forum posts and email -- and more evidence that the consumer-PC market is turning in Apple's favor.

Free IBM Software Is Bid to Challenge Microsoft Office Resuming an old rivalry, International Business Machines Corp. is launching a software giveaway that takes aim at Microsoft Corp. on the office desktop. Today, IBM plans to post on the Internet a package of its own software with applications that square off against components of Microsoft's ubiquitous Office suite -- a word processor to rival Word, a spreadsheet to go up against Excel and business-presentation software as an alternative to PowerPoint. IBM's latest move is aimed chiefly at boosting its Notes software, which includes email and instant messaging, as a rival to Microsoft's Outlook email software. By introducing Symphony in an internationally recognized information-display standard called the Open Document Format, IBM also hopes to boost acceptance of that standard, which doesn't work well with Microsoft products. Because Symphony will be available free in the latest edition of Notes, it should get a look from organizations around the world, which have 135 million Notes users. Users will be able to use Symphony to view and edit a spreadsheet or write a presentation without having to open a new application.

Sony Delays 'Home' Virtual World In a sign of the enormous challenges that Sony Corp. continues to face with its PlayStation 3 videogame console, the company outlined a belated strategy Thursday to boost demand by working better with third-party videogame publishers to improve its lineup of games. A cautious Sony also delayed until next year the launch of a virtual-community feature called "Home," which it hopes will build excitement for the PS3. The PS3, which is packed with sophisticated technology such as a powerful processor and a Blu-ray disc recorder, was one of Sony's most highly anticipated products when it was conceived. But it has been a big disappointment so far, suffering first from a delayed launch last year and then from slow demand because of its price and lack of good titles. The PS3 has been significantly outsold world-wide by both Microsoft Corp.'s Xbox 360, which was released a year earlier, and Nintendo Co.'s Wii, which has attracted a broad base of more casual and novice players.

(***)The Accidental Thief Amid mounting theft and other merchandise loss in recent years, retailers face a daily battle against scam artists. But let the customer beware: With security on high alert, even law-abiding shoppers can fall under suspicion. I learned that on a recent family shopping trip to the Kmart in Bridgehampton, N.Y. By going through the checkout line with a pair of flip-flops I had mistakenly placed in the wrong box, I joined the ranks of thousands of shoppers detained or arrested each year -- in my case, accused of trying to cheat the store out of $8. Pronounced guilty on the spot, I soon learned there is no presumption of innocence in retail, and that's pretty much how the system is intended to work. For my part, I had no intention of trying to pull a fast one on the store, from which my extended family purchases prodigious quantities of household items, kids' toys, and beach paraphernalia. I needed a box because there was no box or price tag for my merchandise to begin with. On this particular Saturday in August, I was looking through piles of flip-flops -- most of them not in a box or the wrong size for their box -- with my step-daughter-in-law and 8-year-old step-granddaughter. There was no employee around to help. I found the perfect orange pair in size nine for another family member and looked around for their box. The only box marked size nine had tiny toddler-size shoes in it; since they seemed to be in the wrong box, I removed them and placed my nines inside. I didn't look at the price on the box. (I don't scrutinize prices in Kmart, assuming they are a bargain compared to, say, Neiman Marcus.) While my two family members went to one register, I took my haul, including the flip-flops, to another counter; between us we spent more than $800.

Home Depot CEO says no job cuts planned The Home Depot (NYSE:HD) Inc. doesn't plan to make any broad-based job cuts or reduce the number of its core retail stores in the face of a persistent housing slump that isn't expected to improve anytime soon, Chief Executive Frank Blake said Friday. Blake told The Associated Press in an exclusive interview that the Atlanta-based company's focus on customer service means more employees, not fewer, will be needed.

September 19, 2007

Weekly Reader: 16Sep07 Business

With all the turbulence in the Economic and Market environments the next question is what do we do about it ? That's a question of particular and peculiar fascination for me and I hope for my readers. At the end of the day the externals define the context while it is what business does that makes them successful or not. Earlier we spent a great deal of time on examing how well Home Depot was coping and found that major internal errors led to major strategic breakdowns in performance. Yet, in looking around at the headlines, we also found that this bizzskul exemplar was hardly alone. In surveying the headlines the number of companies that have been experiencing significant performance challenges seems to be more in the majority than not (thought admittedly that may be in my sampling :) ).

 Two major areas of under (UN ??) development are strategic HR and IT. In the special section below we find a fascinating case study of a firm that puts major emphasis on nurturing human talent at the lowest levels and sees it as a strategic advantage. IT is one of the great mysteries - the gap between the business and technology sides of the enterprise not only continues as wide as ever but seems to be increasing. Yet it's widely admitted how strategically important and how much the leading players from WMT to FDX to AmEx benefit from their systems innovations. And the problem is growing apace, as shown by an article below.

But continuing the 'companies in trouble' theme there are updates on Dell, MSFT, and AMD which dive deeper into their struggles while also pointing out some of the things Lenovo is doing. There's also a set of interesting postings on the state of the Telecom industry and key players. Finally some interesting reading on GM and the Auto Industry as well as MickeyD's ability to continue to innovate and find new value - in this case by moving up from below to challenge SBUX's value prop.

Life is interesting. Perhaps we need a great Greek Dramatist to chronicle the tragedies and comedies, no to mention the occaisional pure farce :), of the trials and tribulations. Wasn't it Aeschylus in the Oedipus series that gave us our best take on how pride, hubris and ignoring the environment led to disaster ? Though perhaps Shakespear's King Lear is a better model for how power struggles lead to performance catastrophes ?

General & Special

(5*) Randstad Bridges the Generation Gap For a pair of colleagues born four decades apart, Penelope Burns and Rinath Benjamin spend a lot of time together. Burns, 68, and Benjamin, 29, are sales agents at the Manhattan office of employment agency Randstad USA. They sit inches apart, facing each other. They hear every call the other makes. They read every e-mail the other sends or receives. Sometimes they finish each other's sentences. This may seem a little strange, but the unconventional pairing is all part of Randstad's effort to ensure that its twentysomething employees -- the flighty, praise-seeking Generation Y that we have read so much about -- fit in and, more to the point, stick around. The Dutch company, which has been expanding in the U.S., is hoping to win the hearts, minds, and loyalty of its young employees by teaming them up with older, more experienced hands. Every new sales agent is assigned a partner to work with until their business has grown to a certain size, which usually takes a few years. Then they both start over again with someone who has just joined the company. This makes the corporate world more personal, approachable, says Randstad USA Chief Executive Stef Witteveen. It's easier for the Gen Yers to identify with their jobs. They don't drown in their cubicles. Randstad has been pairing people up almost since it opened for business four decades ago.

Shooting Messengers Makes Us Feel Better But Work Dumber It was a perfect case of shooting the messenger, even if it seemed to Elliott Gordon like a protracted mugging. Last year, the former sales associate watched the fallout after one of his colleagues made a big sale that faltered. The salesman was assured that the goods would be shipped from a supplier, but only half of the inventory arrived.A receiving clerk had to tell the salesman, who responded to the bad news by vowing to the clerk, "I will ruin your life," and then throwing him against the wall. He then kicked his own cubicle wall, "which in turn collapsed onto his neighbor's cubicle wall and thus started a domino effect of wrecking everyone's office in the row," Mr. Gordon recalls.

(5*) IT Is Getting More Complex. Deal With It. When it comes to the never-ending battle against complexity in IT organizations, there's good news and there's bad news. The bad news is that information technology is in fact becoming more complex.The good news? It's not your fault. Despite some chief financial officers' belief that IT departments buy technology for technology's sake and spend too much time "playing" with it, the truth is that IT is becoming more complicated, and more costly to manage, as business becomes more complex. Trying to keep up with the rapidly changing demands of a global corporation, its clients, customers and partners is a convoluted and costly endeavor for the CIO.

Business

What the big banks aren't telling you -- yet The third quarter could end up as the worst in the past decade for the financial-services industry, but you wouldn't know it from the earnings forecasts. The banks are in denial. With credit markets still largely frozen, unemployment rising and major corporate expenditures slowing to a halt, every indication suggests that a surprising number of major financial firms, including Wachovia (WB, news, msgs), Washington Mutual (WM, news, msgs) and Bank of America (BAC, news, msgs), will come up short of expectations in October, kicking off an unpleasant autumn for investors. Investors need to care more about financial stocks than any others because they make up more than 20% of the broad market indexes. So let's get some clarity on exactly what they're facing.

McDonald's Takes on Starbucks With Cheaper Lattes, McCafes Boosting Shares McDonald's, the world's biggest restaurant chain, has added the frothy drinks at two-thirds of its 13,794 U.S. stores since introducing a stronger brew in 2006. Shares of Starbucks, the largest coffee-shop chain, are down 24 percent in 2007, on track for their worst annual performance amid the slowest sales growth in more than five years at stores open at least 13 months. McDonald's coffee is drawing new customers and spurring food sales, especially at breakfast, said President Ralph Alvarez.

General Motors, With New Models, Needs Fewer Sales Incentives, Lutz Says General Motors Corp., relying on new models to end losses, needs fewer incentives to win buyers because ``underlying demand'' for cars will support sales, Vice Chairman Bob Lutz said. GM also hopes that the new Malibu model will need less spending to encourage sales, Lutz told reporters today at the International Auto Show in Frankfurt. The largest U.S. automaker hired Lutz, 75, in 2001 to help redesign its cars and trucks. U.S. incentive spending fell in August because Detroit- based GM was able to shift promotional efforts from new models such as the Buick Enclave and GMC Acadia sport-utility vehicles to focus on large pickups where more money was required, Lutz said. The ability to continue the lower rebate strategy will depend on the strength of the U.S. market, where a decline in new home prices and restricted availability of loans for lower- income buyers is slowing the economy, Chief Executive Rick Wagoner told reporters today. The automaker is relying on sales abroad and new models to increase revenue as it loses market share at home. GM is poised to cede the title as world's biggest car manufacturer to Toyota Motor Corp. in 2007 after a 76-year reign.

Can Michael Dell Refocus His Namesake? Over the last few years, Dell, once the gold standard among PC makers, has simply overlooked major growth trends in personal computing. It missed significant shifts in notebook computer sales and the consumer market as a whole, lagged competitors in international sales, and lost the profit edge that it enjoyed from its superior procurement-and-supply network. Hewlett-Packard, having overcome its own woes, passed Dell last year as the largest seller of PCs worldwide. As the company surged to the lead in the PC industry, the “Dell model” relied on direct sales over the Internet and by telephone rather than through retail stores, cutting prices to gain market share, focusing on computer hardware rather than services, leaning heavily on the American market and avoiding acquisitions. But since Mr. Dell reclaimed the role of chief executive in late January, he has changed all that. But re-engineering the Dell model will be a daunting challenge. “Dell continued to do the same old thing, when it was no longer working,” observes David B. Yoffie, a professor at the Harvard Business School. “This is going to be about changing the way they do business at many levels.” “Dell can do it,” Mr. Yoffie adds, “but it’s going to take a lot more innovation on more fronts than the company has shown in the past.” [Dell's Consumer Focus Hits Snags ]

·         Michael Dell Says Poor Sales Forecasts Caused Laptop Delays Dell's CEO blames too-conservative sales forecasting for the long delays in getting new notebooks to consumers, but he says nothing about problems in painting the laptops, the main reason other executives have given customers. Speaking at the Citigroup Technology Conference in New York recently, founder and recently renamed CEO Michael Dell says the company underestimated demand. "If you go back six months or so when industry growth was starting to pick up, we had quite a conservative forecast for demand," Dell says.. "That turned out to be incorrect."

Running the numbers on Vista Sales of boxed copies of Windows Vista continue to significantly trail those of Windows XP during its early days, according to a soon-to-be-released report. Standalone unit sales of Vista at U.S. retail stores were down 59.7 percent compared with Windows XP, during each product's first six months on store shelves, according to NPD Group. In terms of revenue, sales are also down, but the drop has been less steep, at 41.5 percent. The findings largely mirror the sales pattern NPD saw for Vista during its first week on the market in January. Microsoft noted in a regulatory filing that more than 80 percent of its Windows revenue comes from computer makers that install the operating system on new machines, with boxed copies accounting for only a fraction of total sales. And the PC market is far larger than it was five years ago. According to research firm Gartner, roughly 239 million PCs were sold worldwide last year, compared with 128 million in 2001. In many ways, sales of Vista are tied closely to the rate of PC sales. One of the big variables is how quickly businesses move to adopt Vista. Most businesses are not moving to the operating system in significant numbers yet, though Microsoft has begun to tout a few large deployments from corporations including Infosys, Citigroup, Charter Communications and Continental Airlines.

AMD's New Chip Is Vital to Turnaround With a long-awaited product launch today, Advanced Micro Devices Inc. has a chance to prove it's not a one-hit wonder in chips for server systems. AMD's new microprocessor, code-named Barcelona, is crucial in the company's fight against Intel Corp. in providing calculating engines for the midsize machines that run Web sites and other key business programs. Intel had all but owned that market until April 2003, when AMD launched a chip called Opteron that steadily gained market share until Intel counterattacked in mid-2006 with faster products. The stiffer competition, and execution miscues, have stalled AMD's advances and contributed to a $600 million net loss in the second quarter. Barcelona, to be formally called the Quad-Core AMD Opteron Processor, is seen as important not only for an AMD turnaround, but also for server makers who want to play chip vendors off each other to get lower prices and higher performance.

Lenovo Targets Faster-Growing Consumer Segment -- Lenovo Group Ltd. plans to introduce the first desktop and laptop computers from its new consumer business unit early next year, Chairman Yang Yuanqing said Saturday. The plan comes at a crucial juncture. Lenovo is trying to sell more personal computers to consumers and small businesses, a faster-growing segment of the PC market in the U.S., and rely less on sales to large companies, particularly in markets outside China. But it faces stiff competition from rivals including Hewlett-Packard Co. and Taiwan's Acer Inc. Acer agreed last month to buy Gateway Inc. of the U.S., which will make it the third-largest PC maker by unit shipments and nudge Lenovo into fourth place. The acquisition also may sink Lenovo's plan to grow in Europe by buying a stake in Netherlands PC maker Packard Bell BV. Lenovo had been in talks to buy Packard Bell, but Gateway said last month it intends to exercise a "right of first refusal" to acquire all the shares of Packard Bell's parent company.

Yahoo's Cautious Course How Now 'Sacred Cow'? Lack of Major Overhaul Poses Test Investors who have grown impatient with Yahoo Inc. may have to wait awhile longer to see any pop in its stock. The Internet company replaced its chief executive in June and this summer kicked off a strategic review to better position it for a changing online-advertising market and compete with the likes of Google Inc. Now, partway through Yahoo's strategic soul-searching, people familiar with the matter say a major overhaul appears unlikely. When the Sunnyvale, Calif., company announced lower second-quarter profit and dropped its 2007 forecasts in July, co-founder and new CEO Jerry Yang told analysts that he planned to spend roughly the next 100 days crafting a long-term strategic plan and making any necessary changes to the company's staff and organization. In recent years, Yahoo has been eclipsed by the success of Google's search-advertising-fueled growth, faced criticism for a lack of management focus, fumbled some opportunities to capitalize on the latest high-growth Internet areas such as video and social networking and saw its revenue-growth rate fall as advertisers expanded their online spending on other sites.

Bells May Merge Local Operations, Long Distance -- The Federal Communications Commission told the three remaining Baby Bell companies that they can bring their long-distance arms in-house, ending a requirement to operate these units as separate businesses. The agency said the new rules would allow the three dominant wired phone companies, AT&T Inc., Qwest Communications International Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc., to merge their long-distance businesses with their main operations. The move lets the companies cut duplication of marketing, customer-service and other operating costs. The companies' request to merge the long-distance operations wasn't considered controversial because customers are increasingly using their wireless phones to make long-distance calls. The requirement dates from the time when it was much more common for residential customers to buy separate long-distance packages on top of their local service. It was meant to prevent local phone companies from keeping other long-distance providers out of a particular market with their own offering. Companies were required to either operate the long-distance units as separate legal companies, or subject themselves to price regulation. All three opted for the former choice.

Alcatel-Lucent Shares Plunge After Slashed Forecast Alcatel-Lucent SA, the world's biggest maker of telecommunications equipment, fell the most in more than two years in Paris trading after cutting the forecast for 2007 sales on disappointing orders in North America. The company's stock slumped as much as 14 percent to 6.24 euros, the lowest since May 2003. Sales growth may stall in 2007, third-quarter profit excluding items will be ``around break- even'' and margins will suffer, Alcatel-Lucent said today. A decline in orders for mobile-phone networks, falling prices and costs to cut 12,500 jobs have wiped out earnings at Paris-based Alcatel-Lucent. Alcatel SA and Murray Hill, New Jersey-based Lucent Technologies Inc., unable to revive sales since the technology bubble burst in 2000, combined in November last year. The stock has dropped 36 percent since the merger, erasing $11.7 billion, more than the value of the takeover. ``Two poor businesses put together do not make a good one,'' said Piers Hillier, head of European equities at WestLB Mellon Asset Management U.K. in London, which manages $35 billion. ``Alcatel is a classic example of M&A heartburn.''

 

 

Weekly Reader: 16Sep07 Economy & Outlook

Well, we were supposed to get this out around the 16th but fortunately there's backdating of entries though the Fed has made its' move rather than being anticipated. A a big move it was and is. The problem is that economic and market volatility isn't going away. The prior post on Markets & Invesments broke out that chunk so here we'll focus on the Economy and key things. But first, note the advice below, and good advice it is indeed. My interpretation is that like a fighter pilot or a martial artist we need to keep a cool head in turbulent times, that being able to do so is the result of traing and thinking ahead and the ability to do that depends on our ability to frame and analyze what's really going on.

Hence, our primary purpose here, to take a deep look at what's actually going on in the Economy, Markets and Business with a view to understanding how the criss-crossing currents are flowing and how they intereact. So we can take that look ahead. 

Fear the Roller Coaster? Embrace It In these markets, everyone's afraid. It's your response to the fear that matters most. Are you going to crack up like Howard Dean in 2004? Or detach yourself, analyze and respond like Neil Armstrong in 1969? Astronauts, firefighters and soldiers train to respond to moments of duress. The rest of us are left on our own. And in most cases, the results aren't good. We generally underestimate the true dangers arrayed against us, overplaying the dramatically violent outcomes over the more insidious ones. And in times when we lack information, we're prone to imagine the worst, scientists say. We are only as effective as our emotions allow us. Which is precisely why this current market is so daunting. Consider the unknowns still in play: The choked market for short-term corporate funding. The impossible-to-value mounds of LBO debt and equity. The daisy-chain effect between liquidating hedge funds and the broader market.

 Below are several articles on the economic outlook and current situation. Janet Yellen's recent speech is extremely well worth reading because of it's insight, it's sensible assessment and the peek at Fed thinking it gives us. A key question being asked is "are the markets pricing in a recession" and the answer has to be something on the order of hxxx no, though they are in denial. (does that make me in meta-denial since the uptrend makes no sense :) ?). The slow motion slowdown continues and is accelerating - as we've noted here before it's been visible for a while. Interesting during all this turmoil the odds of recession, in the general consensus, have been rising. The WSJ survey now put it around 1 in 3 while that notorious bullshill Larry Kudlow estimates it at 50%, as does Joe Battapaglia of Stifel, Nicholas. Even Uncle Alan is saying 30%. The problem is that we're headed for a growth recession which is increasingly likely to tip over into recession in '08 as Housing worsens. While the awareness of the depth and extent of the problem has grown by an order of magnitude it's still two orders less than what historical patterns would indicte. This is all compounded by the problems with structured leverage in the credit markets which are only barefly worked thru; and recall it's leverage-driven buyouts, buybacks and liquidities that have driven the market. As another little sidepoint everyone keeps pointing to the sea/see-change in the global economy which would continue to provide strength - while true enough in the long-term - is also not reflecting accelerating weaknesses worldwide. Oops. The slowmotion slowdown is visible in the high-frequency econ data in the accomanying chart. Which we've discussed before and here.

General & Special

 It ain't easy It is dangerous for the markets to expect too much from the Fed. LAST month's jobs figures were depressing but useful: they clarified what the Federal Reserve needs to do when it meets on September 18th. Not only did the American economy shed 4,000 jobs in August (rather than gaining some 100,000 as most forecasters had predicted), but revisions to earlier figures showed that the pace of employment growth has been slowing sharply for several months. The numbers suggest that America's economy was sputtering well before the credit crisis. America needs to create at least 100,000 jobs a month merely to absorb the growing working population. Now that the growth in employment seems to have stalled, the economy looks vulnerable. Add a credit crunch on top and the risks of a sharp slowdown, even a recession, are uncomfortably high. With inflation under control, the country's central bankers clearly ought to counter that risk by lowering their benchmark interest rate. But there's a further danger, which America's central bankers need to watch out for. The pressure is building on them to sort out the problems in both the economy and the markets, and to do it soon. Listen to the clamour for a rate cut from investors and—more ominously—from some of America's politicians, and it is clear that many people expect far too much from the Fed.

  • Economist Paul Kasriel sees party ending, hangover beginning -- You will have to pardon Paul Kasriel, chief of economic research at Northern Trust in Chicago, if he hasn't been the life of the party over the past seven or eight years. And as a forecaster, he is concerned more than ever about the economy, which he believes could be headed toward a "painful" recession. He is particularly alarmed at the relationship between personal disposable income and personal consumption expenditures and residential investment expenditures. That is eco-babble for the amount of money people take home after taxes minus the amount they are spending on everyday goods and services and what they spend on buying and fixing up their homes. According to that calculation, Americans have been running deficits in six of the past seven years.
  • Recent Financial Developments and the U.S. Economic Outlook Dr. Janet Yellen’s opening speech to the NABE is a very nice overview of the current situation by a very knowledgeable, forthright and influential member of the FOMC. It’s extremely valuable both for the good sense but also as an indicator of what the Fed is knowledgeable about.

·         Martin Feldstein on the Housing/Credit/Economic Mess …. I must put those intellectual reservations aside and direct you to Martin Feldstein's utterly dead on piece in today's Journal. In a straight-forward, no nonsense manner, Feldstein perfectly sums up how we got to where we are today: "Three separate but related forces are now threatening economic activity: a credit market crisis, a decline in house prices and home building, and a reduction in consumer spending. These developments compound the general weakening of the economy earlier in the year, marked by slowing employment growth and declining real spendable incomes.

·         See and download forecasts for growth, inflation, housing and more (*****)

Investors' View Of Risk Returns To Normal For investors hoping the markets will settle down, here is a simple, sobering message: Don't hold your breath. After a long period of unusual stability in stock and bond markets, the wrenching losses of the past few months may have merely brought investors' perceptions of risk back to where they should have been in the first place. "People were pricing things as if there was never going to be another recession, or even a financially difficult period or corporate default," says Byron Wien, chief investment strategist at hedge fund Pequot Capital Management. "We're moving toward normal." And normal might not be as stable as investors had come to believe. Similarly, junk-bond prices have fallen sharply in recent months, driving yields higher. At the beginning of June, the Merrill Lynch High Yield Bond Index yielded 2.41 percentage points more than comparable Treasurys. Friday, that "spread" over low-risk Treasurys had widened to 4.73 percentage points. That's a massive shift. But interest-rate spreads on junk bonds are still a bit smaller than the historical norm. The risk tolerance of investors had been rising for many months, in part because there was a growing perception that the economy was becoming more stable. With a recession now possibly in the cards, that view will be reassessed. Hedge funds and other large investors appear to have been reducing the amount of leverage -- or borrowed money -- they use to invest. Leverage is safe when the economy is stable, but dangerous in a downturn. If investors use less of it, that will cut back on the flow of cash into the markets. Short-term credit markets, on the other hand, are showing extreme levels of risk aversion.

Have asset markets priced in a recession?

David Rosenberg of Merrill Lynch says ‘no’ and provides an interesting table for consideration: Reading Rosenberg’s hit-lists of reasons why the economy is slowing and why it will slow much further can sometimes feel like being hit by a steam-train of pessimism. It is worth noting then, that while Rosenberg believes that it is time to adopt a highly defensive stance, he also believes that recessions do not mean the end of the world:

it pays to note that recessions are in fact part and parcel of the business cycle, and it is a mystery to us why it is considered to be the end of the world in the economics community. There have actually been as many recessions as expansions, but they just happen to be shorter in duration. They last, on average, ten months and tend to see the level of real GDP decline by 2%. Recessions are haircuts, not Armageddon. They actually are necessary because they end up wringing the excesses out of the economy. But at the same time, these are the parts of the cycle where investors should focus on high-quality assets, income-orientated securities, and capital preservation. It’s a time to be ultra-defensive.

 

Economy

Analyst: Fed rate cut won't help markets A widely watched banking analyst said late Sunday the best solution to the crisis plaguing financial markets is to let cash-strapped borrowers default and their lenders go bankrupt, rather than slashing interest rates. Punk Ziegel & Co. analyst Richard X. Bove wrote in a client report the hoped-for cut in interest rates this month will do nothing to bring money back into the U.S. financial markets. Instead, Bove said, lower interest rates will send the dollar into a tailspin and wreak havoc in the job market. Plosser Says Fed Shouldn't `Overweight' Surprise Job Loss in Setting Rates

Global Economic Growth Threatened as U.S. Contagion Infects Asia, Europe This time, when the U.S. sneezes, the rest of the world may well catch a cold. Global economic growth looks likely to slow markedly in the months ahead as further weakness in the U.S. infects Asia and Europe. That would represent a shift from the last 18 months, when the world economy proved immune to a U.S. slowdown and grew at an annual clip of more than 5 percent. What's different now is the U.S. slump is starting to spread from the domestic housing market to consumers who buy imports from companies such as Toyota Motor Corp. And the sudden increase in borrowing costs that followed the collapse of the subprime-mortgage market is now showing up overseas, raising the price tag on credit worldwide.

·         Los Angeles Home Sales Collapse in August , Commercial Real Estate: 'Cooled but not Collapsed' , Moody's Warns Housing Slump to Persist Through 2009, Sees Further Homebuilder Downgrades, Housing Slump Will Deepen as Mortgage Crisis Stifles Lending, Realtors Say

·         Those Wacky NAR Housing Forecasts The comedians at the National Association of Realtors (NAR) presented another forecast today for existing home sales in 2007. Their current forecast is for sales to be 5.92 million in 2007. This is compared to their original forecast from Dec '06 of 6.4 million units in 2007. (My forecast was for existing home sales to be between 5.6 and 5.8 million units).

·         Housing Starts and Demographics  Both the UCLA Anderson Forecast and Goldman Sachs have recently revised down their estimates for housing starts for the next couple of years. UCLA is now forecasting starts falling to 1 million units annually. Goldman Sachs' forecast is for starts to fall to 1.1 million units in Q4 '07 and Q1 '08 (see bottom of this post for Goldman's housing forecast by quarter). Two Key Points: 1. If these forecasts are accurate, starts have fallen less than 60% from the recent peak annual rate in 2005 (2.07 million units) to the eventual bottom. We are barely more than half way, in terms of starts, from the peak to the trough! 2. Demographics are NOT currently favorable for housing as compared to the late '60 through early '80s.

  • Back-to-School Sales: *Weaker Than They Appear Last week, I noted that the Back-to-School Sales were, at first glance, Surprisingly Strong. I should have known better.It turns out that a the retail data came with a big fat *asterisk, which (as happens all too often) presented a very misleading view of the data. Why? Well, we track these numbers so as to have a good read on the strength of the consumer, and how sustainable their present spending pattens are. Given that the US consumer is 70% of the economy, their actions are quite significant. That's what makes today's asterisks so significant: Much of the volume gains came via one offs, unusual factors, and huge discounting, with retailers sacrificing margin in exchange for volume:
  • The Coming U.S. Hard Landing The utterly ugly employment figures for August (a fall in jobs for the first time in four years, downward revisions to previous months’ data, a fall in the labor participation rate, and an even weaker employment picture based on the household survey compared to the establishments survey) confirm what few of us have been predicting since the beginning of 2007: the U.S. is headed towards a hard landing. The probability of a US economic hard landing (either a likely outright recession and/or an almost certain “growth recession”) was already significant even before the severe turmoil and volatility in financial markets during this summer. But the recent financial turmoil - that has manifested itself as a severe liquidity and credit crunch - now makes the likelihood of such a hard landing even greater. There is now a vicious circle where a weakening US economy is making the financial markets’ crunch more severe and where the worsening financial markets and tightening of credit conditions will further weaken the economy via further falls of residential investment and further slowdowns of private consumption and of capital spending by the corporate sector.

·         Group: Housing Woes May Cause Recession Ongoing weakness in the housing market will push the national economy to the brink of recession, but growth in other areas should put the country back on a slow road to recovery by 2009, according to an economic forecast released Wednesday. The quarterly Anderson Forecast by the University of California at Los Angeles predicts growth in the gross domestic product of just over 1 percent for the fourth quarter of 2007 and first quarter of 2008. Economic growth will remain "tepid" for the remainder of 2008 and return to 3 percent in 2009, said David Shulman, senior economist for the forecast. That growth is just above the traditional definition of a recession -- two consecutive quarters of decline in gross domestic product.

·         Tracking the Odds of Recession Not long ago, one of our readers pointed our attention to a recent paper from the San Francisco branch of the Federal Reserve by Glenn D. Rudebusch and John C. Williams, who found that the U.S. Treasury yield curve was, by far, a better predictor of recessions in the U.S. than professional economic forecasters. Since the recent volatility in the markets combined with the extreme doom and gloom of several of these professional economic forecasters has sparked some additional interest in whether or not the U.S. economy will go into recession anytime soon, it seemed to be a good time to revisit our tools for forecasting recessions, which are based on a model developed by the Federal Reserve's Jonathan Wright, and which combine U.S. Treasury yield curve data with the level of the Federal Funds Rate set by the Fed, and develop a new ongoing feature here at Political Calculations.

  • Forecasters Increase Odds Of Recession Over Next Year Economic forecasters are boosting the odds that the U.S. will slide into recession in the next 12 months as the housing slump deepens and the credit crisis continues.The latest WSJ.com survey of economists, conducted in the days following the gloomy Sept. 7 employment report, pegged the recession risk at 36%, up from a 28% probability a month earlier. Three-fourths of the 52 economists responding to the recession question put the odds at or above 30% and 11 put the odds at 50% or better. The range was wide -- from 5% to 90%."The economy has been juiced by this rapid credit expansion, and I think that's over," said Steve East, chief economist at Friedman, Billings, Ramsey, who put recession odds at 60%. "That's the message of the credit market turmoil: The economy is not going to have as much high-octane fuel to run on."Only one out of eight economists say the credit crisis, with related market turmoil, has mostly run its course. About 60% say it is about half over, with the rest saying it is in the early stages.

Japan's Economy Contracts a More-Than-Expected 1.2% Japan's economy contracted at almost twice the pace forecast by analysts in the second quarter, reinforcing speculation the central bank will leave interest rates unchanged this year. The economy shrank at a 1.2 percent annual rate in the three months ended June 30 as business spending slumped, the Cabinet Office said in Tokyo today. The government initially forecast a 0.5 percent expansion. Bond yields fell to the lowest level since February last year on expectations the central bank will keep its overnight lending rate at 0.5 percent to prevent the economy from falling into recession. Any rebound in growth depends on the severity of the housing slowdown in the U.S., the biggest export market for Japanese companies including Toyota Motor Corp. and Sony Corp.

Chinese inflation hits 6.5%, highest rate in nearly 11 years

Russia Emerging as Haven From Subprime Collapse Nine Years After Defaults  What a difference nine years makes. Banks from New York-based JPMorgan Chase & Co. to ABN Amro Holding NV in Amsterdam are providing more loans to Russian companies than ever as memories of the country's $40 billion default in 1998 fade. Corporate loans outstanding in Russia doubled to $256 billion at the end of last year from 2004, according to data compiled by Newport Beach, California-based Pacific Investment Management Co. and securities firm Dresdner Kleinwort in London. Both are units of Munich-based Allianz SE. ``In this environment, everything is getting beaten up, and Russia has been a great way to play the volatility,'' said Jeff Grills, who manages $8 billion as co-head of emerging-market debt at JPMorgan Asset Management in New York. ``Russia looks very attractive in terms of the fundamentals and their ability to pay.''

Survey: Top Emerging Markets Expected to Cool Senior executives at multinational corporations believe some of the world’s fastest-growing markets — including parts of China and India — are likely to fade in importance in the coming years, according to a new survey about emerging economies. A report by Frontier Strategy Group says coastal Brazil, Russia, urban India and coastal China are facing slower growth rates, market saturation and higher wages. The survey of 100 executives from top multinational firms found that 71% believe corporate earnings growth in those markets is likely to decline over the next five years. About 23% said growth would increase. The first-movers in those areas built strong government relationships and joint ventures, but since then “conditions have changed and companies now face the prospect of shrinking margins and decreased revenue growth due to strong domestic and international competitors that are driving up wages and pushing down costs,” the report said. The firm, which pools research from companies operating abroad, identified five emerging economies as generating the most interest among executives: Indonesia, Mexico, the Philippines, Turkey and Vietnam. Along with rural Brazil and rural China, the markets “are critical to meeting corporate growth expectations over the coming decade,” the Frontier Strategy report said. The executives also were asked about “threats that could derail the Asian miracle.” Their top concerns: economic overheating (29%), shortage of human resources (23%), lack of access to natural resources (17%) and pollution (12%).

World Bank Downplays Risk of China’s Surplus-Labor Death Reports of the death of China’s surplus labor have been greatly exaggerated, the World Bank says. China has long had hundreds of millions of farmers eking out a marginal living, forming a massive pool of potential employees for factories and construction projects in urban areas. The size of that workforce has helped keep wages in China relatively low and Chinese-made products relatively cheap – so the idea that the pool might be shrinking has been getting a lot of attention lately. For instance, factory owners in southern and eastern China have been complaining of trouble finding enough workers for the last couple of years. But that is more a sign that the workforce is getting more mobile and more demanding, and not necessarily an indication that the absolute numbers of workers is shrinking, the World Bank argues in its latest report on the Chinese economy. One prominent Chinese demographer, Cai Fang, is also publicly arguing that China’s working population is at a crucial turning point and will soon begin shrinking. But the World Bank argues that straight-line extrapolations of population trends don’t tell us everything about what the labor market is going to look like in the future. It’s true, for instance, that the one-child policy means that fewer new workers have been born in recent years. Yet better health and social policies should also mean that current workers can stay active longer. Improvements in farm productivity will also mean that fewer and fewer workers will be required to keep up agricultural output, which means the supply of potential new workers for urban factories can still keep growing in future years. The government is also lowering the administrative barriers that rural migrants face in moving to cities, helping further add to the potential workforce. In sum, says World Bank China economist Louis Kuijs, “We do not think that China’s surplus labor, what is out there in the rural areas, will be exhausted any time soon.”

Bottom Line Faces Squeeze From China While they've drawn howls from U.S. workers, the influx of low-priced goods from China has been a boon for Wall Street, helping to keep inflation at bay and profit margins at U.S companies fat. But the party may be ending. In July, prices for imports from China were 0.9% above year-earlier levels, according to the Labor Department. That's a modest gain in comparison to the 2.4% gain in overall U.S. consumer prices over the same period, but it's a big change from February, when Chinese import prices were 0.9% below year-earlier prices. The combination of Federal Reserve interest rate cuts and product-safety concerns could make them rise even more in the months to come. The increase in prices is partly due to the rising value of the yuan, which the Chinese government has allowed to appreciate by 10% against the dollar since mid-2005, and higher raw materials costs. But rising wages in China also appear to be a factor.

September 17, 2007

Weekly Reader 16Sep07: Markets & Investing

We normally try to capture the weeks news in four sections - Key Articles (Special), Markets &  Investing, Economy and Business. While the primary focus in this blog is on what makes an enterprise perform best M&I and the Economy define the context with which a business must cope and discussions of business specifics represent those things over which it does have control. This week didn't see a huge wave of surprises but it did see a lot of interesting news (IMHO) in all areas which leads to their being broken up across four seperate entries. Here we focus on M&I, which appears to be either still in a state of denial and/or counting on yet another Fed miracle. Which, when you stop to think about it, is enormously and ironically amusing when you remember how much abuse they took for "leaving" rates too low for too long (ignoring minor details like a war, a huge oil price increase and the biggest bust in an investment boom since the Great Depression). Now that a slowmotion slowdown in the Economy is not just visible but acknowledged and credit markets almost imploded it's obviously time to make more punch and spike it. If you take a careful look at the market charts it is otherwise hard to explain them.

Just for fun we look at the NYSE average YTD and combine it one (perhaps ?) too busy graphic with the S&P sector ETFs, foreign markets and the 10-Yr Treasury. Notice that the NYSE is settling down, consolidating might be the "technical" term to a narrow-range defined by the 50-day and 200-day MAs; which also happens to be roughly the pre-Shanghai Surprise top. Correction, what correction ? If you look at the sectors we have winners and losers with Finance (XLF) the worse off at about -10% though, Discretionary (XLY) at -5% and the SP500, Healthcare (XLV) and Staples (XLP) having crept up recently to 5% YTD. On the other side of the ledger Energy (XLE) is up over 20%, Technology (XLK), Industrials (XLI) & Telecom (IYZ) up over 10%. And the wild ride of Emerging Markets (EEM) and China/Asia-Pac (EPP) continues. If you were trading those bets continued to be good opportunities for short-term gains. Treasuries say rates fall to about 4.5% for a major gain as part of the flight to quality and away from unknowable and unpriceable risky instruments.

The bottom line here appears to be a continuing, enormous (?) gap between emerging realities of the economy and the market's implicit outlook. This is all reflected in the news with Europe facing a struggle to re-place $140B of commercial paper. In this financially driven market where buybacks and buyouts it's interesting to note that LBO deals have a terrible default record and Moody's thinks the risk of corporte defaults is climbing. Which is reflected in the ever astute PIMCO starting up a distressed debt fund and KKR's struggles to re-factor the First Data debt and close out that deal. As a result one of the most exposed sectors is Finance which will see its' basic economic alter for the worse. One of the best dissections of how the sub-prime problem has been contagioned to commercial paper by structured instruments is Jim Jubak's recent discussion. All of which comes together in contrasting views on the performance outlook for the PE industry. The Economist finds that worldwide shortage of good deals combined with ready capital seeking returns indicates rising worldwide opportunities while a recent study finds that most of the average LBO funds performance is more in fees than their vaunted re-structurings capabilities.

One has to wonder what the long-term outlook really might be ? We'd suggest at least two things:

  1. A return to an emphasis on operating fundamentals, though that may be our wishful thinking.
  2. Combined with a darwinian sortation of the good PE firms (the upper decile ?) with increased pressure on the other 90% !
These are indeed going to be interesting times. Bon Appetit' ! 

Markets & Investments

Treasury Rally May Falter as Overseas Holders Flee Dollar Drop -- Treasury investors basking in the biggest rally in four years have reason to fear for their profits: The largest owners of U.S. government debt are heading for the exit. Two-year Treasuries returned 1.09 percent in August, the best monthly performance since 2003, according to indexes compiled by Merrill Lynch & Co. At the same time, holdings of U.S. bonds by governments and central banks at the Federal Reserve fell 3.8 percent, the steepest decline since 1992. The dollar's slump to a 15-year low against six of its most actively traded peers is turning the gains into losses for international bondholders, prompting China, Japan and Taiwan to sell. Overseas investors own more than half of the $4.4 trillion in marketable U.S. government debt outstanding, up from a third in 2001, according to data compiled by the Treasury Department. U.S. long-term interest rates would be about 90 basis points, or 0.90 percentage point, higher without foreign government and central bank buyers, according to a 2006 study for the Fed by Professors Francis and Veronica Warnock at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville.

Debt Market in `Pivotal' Test as $140 Billion Matures -- Banks and companies need to refinance almost $140 billion of commercial paper in Europe by the end of next week and will push up yield premiums on corporate bonds, according to Deutsche Bank AG, Germany's biggest bank. Borrowers are paying the highest costs in six years to sell commercial paper, IOUs maturing in 270 days or less, because of losses from assets related to subprime mortgages. The yield in the U.S. has soared to 6.33 percent for 30-day debt from 5.48 percent on Aug. 9. The London interbank offered rate for borrowing for one month in euros is at 4.45 percent, close to the six-year high of 4.5 percent last week. Almost $60 billion of the commercial paper due this week and next is owed by conduits, firms set up by banks and companies to invest in longer-term assets, according to Reid. The debt is backed by bonds including asset-backed securities, as well as car loans, mortgages and trade receivables. The remaining $80 billion of commercial paper is unsecured.

·         Defaults: LBO Firms Bat .500 09-10-2007 Ari Nathanson is leaving Buyouts Magazine at week’s end, which causes all sorts of “going-away party” problems, as he doesn’t drink. But at least he’s going out with a strong portfolio, like a new story (sub req.) about how private equity firms own half of all U.S. companies that have defaulted on their debt in 2007.Ari writes: “With default rates still at historic lows, and portfolio companies especially levered up these days, it could be taken as an ominous sign. That’s especially true because LBO firms can no longer rely on a generous credit market to easily secure refinancing packages and forestall defaults for struggling companies. Distressed investors are circling, predicting that default rates will climb as the debt market worsens

·         Corporate defaults to surge, Moody's says Credit crunch cuts off access to borrowing for weaker companies -- The credit crunch has cut off access to borrowing for many weak companies, which will trigger a surge in corporate defaults, rating agency Moody's Investors Service said Tuesday. What began as a subprime mortgage problem earlier this year has spread across other credit markets. Investors are still willing to lend money to financially stronger companies, but demand for new debt issued by less creditworthy firms has been "largely wiped out," Moody's said in a report. Few companies have struggled to repay debt in recent years, mainly because booming credit markets allowed weak businesses to get rescue financing to avoid bankruptcy. However, this summer's credit crunch has changed all that, Moody's said.

·         Pimco plans to launch a $2 billion distressed-debt fund, joining a growing list of money-management firms hoping to buy mortgage securities on the cheap.

  • The Ark of the Covenant: Debt Protection Surges For credit investors, trust is in short supply these days. They are holding borrowers to strict credit terms at a rate unseen in years, according to data from Dealogic. It shows that the volume of debt with covenants attached has surged to $125 billion this year, up nearly five-fold from $26.2 billion in the same period of 2006. (The 2007 number also towers over the total from every year since 2003, when the data begin.)

·         KKR's truce with its bankers on the financing of First Data could provide the model for other deals coming to market over the next few weeks. First Data Loans Delayed as KKR, Banks Keep Talking, People Say Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. may delay the sale of loans to fund its $26 billion buyout of First Data Corp. until at least next week after failing to agree on terms with its bankers, people with knowledge of the talks said. KKR, the New York-based private-equity firm run by Henry Kravis, and banks led by Credit Suisse Group couldn't agree today on pricing or how much of the debt lenders will try to sell, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the negotiations are private. The First Data sale is the biggest to be attempted since rising U.S. mortgage defaults triggered the highest leveraged buyout borrowing costs in four years. It's being watched by bankers and buyout firms as a gauge for how $320 billion in debt committed for pending LBOs may fare. The banks would have to hold the loans and bonds if they can't be sold to investors.

Wall Street's Credit Costs Surge on Exploding Spread to U.S. Market Rates Wall Street is getting no benefit from the biggest bond market rally in five years. Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. faces higher borrowing costs today than it did in June, even after the steepest quarterly drop in U.S. Treasury yields since 2002 pushed interest rates down for everyone from Procter & Gamble Co. to AT&T Inc. Investors are so leery of Bear Stearns Cos. that its 10-year bonds trade at a discount to Colombia, the South American nation that's barely investment grade. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. is being punished with a higher yield than Caterpillar Inc., the heavy-equipment maker. Bond buyers view the nation's largest securities firms as no safer than taking a flier on subprime mortgages. That's a nightmare scenario for the industry's chief executive officers, who relied on cheap financing for leveraged buyouts, real estate lending and proprietary trading to produce record profits -- and paychecks of $40 million or more for themselves. The five largest U.S. securities firms -- Goldman, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch & Co., Lehman and Bear Stearns -- will have to fund $75 billion of loan commitments to LBOs at a loss because most investors have stopped buying that kind of debt, Citigroup Inc. analyst Prashant Bhatia estimated last month. Of the group, only Goldman is likely to report an increase in third-quarter earnings when it releases results next week, according to a Bloomberg survey of analysts. Morgan Stanley, Lehman and Bear Stearns probably will say profit fell in the three months that ended in August, the survey shows. Merrill reports in October. All five companies are based in New York.

The threat to your money-market fund Ripples spreading from the financial-market crisis will bring a dip in yield for the average money-market fund in the coming months. Here's why the crisis is going to cost you. Money-market funds are huge buyers of commercial paper because it offers them a slightly higher yield than, say, Treasury notes. Money-market funds, with about $4 trillion in assets globally, make up about 30% of the commercial-paper market. The move to asset-backed commercial paper was just another step down the same road. About 40% of the commercial paper owned by money-market funds is asset-backed. In theory, all commercial paper carries very low risk. What can go wrong if you're holding paper that matures in, say, 60 days? That low risk is true, it turns out, in the traditional market for commercial paper where the "what can go wrong" is some negative event in a company's business. But it's not true, investors have discovered, in the market for asset-backed commercial paper. In that market, higher-than-expected default rates on the underlying mortgages or loans and mistakes in credit ratings that gave AA ratings to what turns out to have been risky C have cut prices of some asset-backed paper by 10%, 20% or more almost overnight. That's when there is a price at all. In the asset-backed market, specific issues of commercial paper are infrequently traded. Between trades, no one knows what they're worth at all. This has led to a buyers strike in the commercial-paper market in general. Nobody wants to buy something for $100 if it's worth only $75, of course, so you can understand why potential buyers want to sit on the sidelines.

Private equity environment rankings Private equity has enjoyed dramatic growth in recent years. In the United States and Britain in particular, private equity and public markets are no longer alien investment planets but are starting, albeit gradually, to converge. Yet the industry’s potential for expansion, in these countries and beyond, is vast. The supply of money into the industry will rise as institutional investors seek out superior returns, as funds-of-funds facilitate access to the asset class for high-net-worth individuals, and as management teams recognise the advantages and efficiency of private ownership. Globalisation will be a defining theme for the industry in the coming years, and a critical source of growth.

It's the Fees, not the Profits Private-Equity Firms Make Far More Charging Investors, Says a Study Private-equity firms say they are experts at wringing profits out of flagging businesses. It turns out they are almost twice as good at wringing fees out of their investors. This finding -- part of a study by two professors at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School -- upends one of the deepest-held notions about the buyout business: The bulk of the average private-equity firm's earnings come from profitably refashioning and reselling the businesses it buys. The study shows that, on average, leveraged-buyout funds can expect to collect $10.35 in management fees for every $100 they manage. In comparison, slightly more than half as much -- $5.41 for every $100 -- comes from carried interest. The study's conclusions put the buyout industry in an agonizing spot. While the data could buttress efforts to resist a congressional push for greater taxation of some private-equity profits, they also could anger the industry's investors, who have been griping about what they say are high fees for years. The study's findings apply to an "average" firm. Top-performing firms will buck that trend. Given the lucrative profit the top performers generate from their deals, they take in far more in total dollars in carried interest than in fees.

September 09, 2007

Weekly Reader: 9Sep07

Oddly enough this week we'll go back to target practice of putting all the pointers on the same post. Which is a way of saying, despite all the sturm und drang, at the end of the week it was a pretty non-wild week. At least in a way though judging from all the agita over the jobs report and the resulting drop in the market you'd think Armageddon was around the corner. We may get a chance to dig into that in a bit, later on this week, but in the meantime the surprise for me, and hopefully readers of this blog, was the level of surprise. First off, one has to take any given month with a grain of salt and ask what's the trend. And this has been the weekest postwar job-creation economy and the higher-frequency data has shown a clear downtrend for quite a while, including jobs as well as consumption, retail sales, etc. etc. It occurs to me that the markets may be pretty smart in the long-run but in the short-term they take today's news and think it's the trend (& no, despite the common wisdom, markets are actually a lagging not leading indicator). But when you step back an look at the market YTD one can't argue very convincingly that any of this is reflected in the indices. At least IMHO. Looking at the NYSE it seems to me that all we've done is give a haircut to the post Shanghai Surprise speculative bubble but otherwise it looks like Goldilocks is still in the house and partying away. We seem to have settle around the 200Da/30Wk MA, MACD is down by volume is light and the A/D line doesn't seem to indicate a lot of pronounced weakness. Party on, Dude.

Which brings us back to our linkfest and what others have to say. Immediately below are three Special links (the if you read no other check these out ones) while in the while in the Markets section you'll find more on the continuing struggles with buyouts, financing and credit instruments, along with an article on how stocks are cheap that illustrates the Party On perspectives. The keys to all this are Fed tactics and policy as well as the underlying outlook for the US and world economies, discussed below in the Economy section. On a broader canvas the discussion of the problems with the Yen carry trade and alledgedly incomptent Bank of Japan policy making are discussed along the grab all you can or be prudent and wise dilemma that OPEC finds itself in.

The final section, my favorite, on Business performance and cases has a bunch of interesting articles. The starred articles talk about the difficulties in remaining at the top of your game using Countrywide as the example - take the point wouldn't use that as an example of a well-rung, I mean run, business. The other starred article is on Best Buy's re-thinking it's business model and strategy by introducing more retailing niche stores that adapt to local tastes. Now THAT's big and foreshadows a huge re-thinking not just in electronics or big-box stores but in retailing in the developed world. This deserves thinking about. The technology article of interests talks about a distributed video streaming technology that started with Bass fishing, is being looked into by DoD for command and control and, if it works and becomes widespread, could really upend the technology infrastructure behind media and entertainment. Much more so than the current deep turmoil. Like the retailing article a harbiner well worth thinking thru for implications which are potentially enormous. 

General & Special

Danger: Steep drop ahead Even if the credit crunch passes without a major catastrophe, the prices of stocks, bonds and real estate have a long way to fall. Credit crises have always been painful and unpredictable. The current one is particularly hair-raising because it's occurring amid the first truly global bubble in asset pricing. It is also accompanied by a plethora of new and ingenious financial instruments. These are designed overtly to spread risk around and to sell fee-bearing products that are in great demand. Inadvertently (to be generous), they have been constructed to hide risk and confuse buyers. How this credit crisis works out and what price we end up paying has to be largely unknowable, depending as it does on hundreds of interlocking and often novel factors and how they in turn affect animal spirits. In the end it is, of course, the management of animal spirits that makes and breaks credit crises. But even if this crisis is contained, we are facing some near certainties that should be understood. [ABN Amro's Moute Cuts U.S. Stock Holdings on `Tip of Iceberg' Market Fears ]

How to ride the boom-panic cycle The market's roller-coaster pattern might be with us for years. Here's how smart investors can try to protect themselves. Soon the financial markets will return to normal. That's the current prayer on Wall Street. But what if the August panic isn't abnormal? What if a panic that threatens to shut down buying and selling is instead a part of the normal pattern of the financial markets? The current panic is, by my count, the fourth of the past 10 years. On that evidence it's at least worth considering that "normal" now consists of a recurring pattern of market booms driven by excess global cash that leads to a global mispricing of risk and is punctuated at regular intervals by panics.

·         Nine Reasons the Feds Can't Save Stocks Doug Kass questions the continued rise in equities

Markets & Investments

LBO Players Will Jockey Over Terms One of the biggest mop-up operations in financial history is about to begin. 

With institutional investors back at their desks this week, investment banks will set out to find deep-pocketed buyers for more than $350 billion of risky bonds and loans, much of it tied to pending leveraged buyouts. Market turmoil and this backlog have made buyers of LBO debt skittish. Issuance of collateralized loan obligations, which are giant pools of often-risky loans, fell in each of the past two months, to $9.2 billion in August, according to Thomson Financial, compared with a monthly average of $14.1 billion in the first half of the year. Investors recently have developed an aversion to much of the paper coming to market because it limits their protection against default. Bankers are bracing for the possibility that much of this debt will go unsold, leaving them obligated to buy, at face value in some cases, paper generally thought to be valued at as little as 85 cents on the dollar in the market. Holding all that paper on their books could keep banks from making new big LBO loans.

  • A Pill For the $350 Billion Credit Hangover Wall Street firms got into the pickle they are in now by doing deals that eliminated companies from the public scene. Now there is talk that to get out of the mess, they could create one. With investors showing little appetite for the paper, there is a new theory circulating among bankers about the creation of a new company to house the debt that can’t find a home in the market.Below is a bit more detail on how it all might work, according to a few bankers we spoke with, followed by some major caveats. The banks would come together to create a new company we will refer to as LoanCo (though we can think of a lot of more colorful names, many of them with bathroom references). They would dump into the new company all the tranches of debt they are unable to sell to investors. These would include, say, a slice of covenant-lite loans from TXU and a pik-toggle bond issue from First Data. The banks would own shares in the new company. They would then bring in outside investor(s) for some of the paper that would enable them to pay themselves a dividend. But who’s got that kind of cash lying around? Well, a number of private-equity firms are forming pools to invest in this kind of debt, and, as one banker suggests, there is always the Fed. (After all, it has shown itself eager to head off the kind of liquidity crisis the LBO debt overhang threatens to create.)

Cheapest Stocks in Almost 12 Years Greet -- U.S. investors are returning from summer vacation to the cheapest stock market in almost 12 years, and some of the biggest fund managers say they're ready to load up on shares of technology, energy and industrial companies. Software makers in the Standard & Poor's 500 Index last week were valued at an average 20.8 times estimated profit, the lowest since at least 1995, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Industrial companies traded at 18.4 times earnings, lower than their average of 23.4 this decade. Oilfield-services provider BJ Services Co. last month was the cheapest in almost six years. While the benchmark for American equity tumbled 9.4 percent between July 19 and Aug. 15 on concern the worst housing slump in 16 years would slow economic growth, the index gained in August for the first time since May. President George W. Bush and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke reassured investors last week that they would prevent losses in credit markets from ending the six year expansion.

CPDOs With AAA Ratings as Prone to Default as Junk Debt, CreditSights Says

Economy

Fed to Weigh Markets Turmoil The Federal Reserve won't bail investors out of their bad decisions but will act if recent market turmoil threatens economic growth, Chairman Ben Bernanke said Friday. Mr. Bernanke's much-anticipated speech solidified investor expectations the Fed will cut its target for the federal-funds rate -- charged on overnight loans between banks -- from 5.25% when policy makers meet Sept. 18. Markets see some probability the rate will drop to 4.75% but several economists said a drop to 5% is more likely, accompanied by a statement suggesting more cuts could come. Those expectations helped boost stocks.  [Economists React: Views From Jackson Hole  & Fed Treads Moral Hazard & Five Reasons: Why the Fed Will Cut Rates ]

What will send the U.S. into recession? A growing cadre sees it happening, but economy gets better at dodging bullet Ben Bernanke faces his toughest challenge: Keeping the economy from slipping into recession, while at the same time allowing the markets to sort out the winners and losers of the housing and credit bubbles. With job growth upended, the housing market still sinking fast and credit problems mounting on Wall Street, a growing number of economists say the risks are growing that a recession will hit the U.S. economy in the next 12 months. The majority of economists, however, say the economy will weather this storm, as it almost always does. It's hard to put the resilient U.S. economy into a recession, they say. Over the past 17 years, the economy has been in recession for just eight months. That's less than 4% of the time. The U.S. economy is extremely diverse. A slump in one sector or region can be offset by growth elsewhere. The economy is also less prone to recession than it used to be. As the economy has moved away from relying on cyclical industries, such as agriculture, mining and manufacturing, to more stable services, recessions have become less frequent and shallower. The way economists see it, there's only about a 35% chance of a recession in the next year, according to the median estimate of 25 economists surveyed by MarketWatch this past week prior to Friday's employment report. That's up from about a 23% chance estimated by economists surveyed by the Blue Chip Economic Indicators in early July, but it's still well below 50%.

  • The Big Stall Regular readers of The Big Picture will recognize the sentiment presented below. Its a simple 3 part analysis: 1) The economy is soft; 2) Job creation is weak, and getting weaker; and 3) most of the shills you see on TV are idiots. The following is via Alan Abelson's Barron's column, titled The Big Stall:

Northern Trust WIR: 8/31/07 Bernanke Keeps His Options Open, Existing Home Sales - July 2007, Real GDP, Personal Income, Consumer Spending, Measures of Consumer Confidence, Jobless Claims - Will be watched closely for early signals. NT WIR: 9/7/07 Fed Is In a Tough Spot, Ease Very Likely On September 18, Employment Situation - August 2007, Auto Sales - August 2007, ISM Surveys - August 2007. Pending Home Sales - July 2007

OECD says market turmoil will hit world growth Market turmoil and the woes in the US subprime mortgage market will crimp world economic growth this year, the Organisation of Economic Co-Operation and Development said on Wednesday, as it called for better regulation to address the “serious imperfections” in US housing markets and credit markets worldwide. Presenting its mid-point assessment between its spring and autumn Economic Outlook projections for the world’s 30 richest countries, the Paris-based think tank said prospects for the world economy were: “clearly less buoyant and more uncertain” than in its May forecasts.Although it pared back its expectation for growth in the world’s seven largest economies by only 0.1 percentage point to 2.2 per cent, it warned its estimates erred on the upside because it was still too early to assess the extent to which the repricing of risk across financial markets would reduce economic activity.

  • The OECD said the U.S. economic slowdown will be significant and the organization predicted that the crisis in the real-estate market will continue.
  • Study: Market Turmoil to Threaten Foreign Investment Volatility in financial markets will depress global foreign direct investment through next year before growth returns at the turn of the decade, according to a new study by the Columbia Program on International Investment and the Economist Intelligence Unit.The study released today says fallout from the U.S. subprime-loan debacle will reinforce a slowdown that would have occurred anyway in mergers and acquisitions, with tighter financing conditions and fewer privatization opportunities in emerging countries.Still, the study’s authors maintain a positive outlook due to a strong global economy: “Much of the M&A activity continues to be undertaken by strategic investors with healthy balance sheets and strong cash flows,” they write. “The slowdown in M&As, and FDI, is thus likely to be a soft landing, rather than a hard crash like the one that occurred in 2001.”
  • Profits of Doom: Writing for the New Yorker, James Surowiecki questions the motivations of commentators in the financial press. He points examples of bias, such as Countrywide CEO Angelo Mozilo, whose opinion may be colored by his company’s struggles and his hopes for a rate cut. Wall Street traders are also singled out for bias, since they would also benefit if a gloomier mood caused the Fed to cut rates. Meanwhile, the “perma-bears” are looking to have their forecasts confirmed.
  • Commercial Real Estate in U.S. Poised for Biggest Price Decline Since 2001
  • Payrolls in U.S. Unexpectedly Declined in August, First Drop in Four Years

Rising Japanese Investment Abroad Weakens Yen, Deepens Economic Imbalances Japan's financial-services companies are trying to coax the country's prodigious savers to think globally, urging them to invest their nest eggs abroad, where they can expect to reap much higher returns. After years of extraordinary low interest rates at home, and with a large percentage of Japan's population looking toward retirement, that advice is starting to take hold. But while investing abroad makes sense for the Japanese individually, the resulting outflow of cash had been pummeling the already-weak yen -- which only began strengthening earlier this month -- and worsening imbalances in the nation's economy. As yet, only 3.6% of Japan's $13 trillion in personal savings is invested abroad, while more than half is held in cash and domestic bank deposits. [By contrast, U.S. households keep less than 13% of their savings in cash and deposits.] With the Bank of Japan holding its key rate at 0.5%, interest paid on Japanese deposits is low, so those assets earn almost nothing. That is largely why the country's households have become important players in the so-called yen carry trade. That involves either buying mutual funds that invest abroad or borrowing yen at Japan's low interest rates and selling them to acquire investments denominated in higher-yielding currencies such as Australian and New Zealand dollars.

Guru calls on BoJ to act on 'leaderless reform' Japan's former financial services czar warns of leaderless momentum towards financial reform in the country. The architect of Japan’s resurrection from its “lost decade” of economic slump, called on the Bank of Japan to increase liquidity in money markets immediately, and attack the economic imbalances that are causing the “yen carry trade”. Heizo Takenaka, the driving force behind Japan’s recent economic reforms, said that the momentum towards serious financial reform in Japan was now effectively leaderless and in terminal decline.

The former Financial Services czar said that Japan needed to embark on a massive round of privatisations and should accelerate plans to create a near-$1 trillion “sovereign fund” to manage the country’s vast foreign exchange reserves more aggressively. Mr Takenaka – famous for forcing Japan’s banks to solve their non-performing loan problems – also launched an unprecedented public attack on Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. He told an audience of business leaders at the World Economic Forum in the North Eastern Chinese city of Dalian that the newly appointed cabinet was “old fashioned” and increasingly incapable of driving reform. But he reserved his strongest attack for the Bank of Japan – a Barclays Capital survey of financial institutions, hedge funds and other groups published yesterday found that only 16 per cent of investors said that they were “confident” they understood the BoJ’s objectives. If the central bank fails to act fast, Mr Takenaka told The Times, Japan risks falling back into the mire of deflation, policy errors and ultra-thin interest rates that will allow the indefinite extension of the so-called “carry trade” – the practice of borrowing the Japanese currency at rock-bottom interest rates to fund investments in other currencies or assets. The yen carry trade is believed by some to be behind the inflation of a large number of asset bubbles across the globe. Yen have been liberally borrowed by hedge funds and private equity firms in their efforts to enhance their “leverage” for buying assets. On the individual investor level, the yen carry trade has turned tens of thousands of previously conservative Japanese savers into highly speculative investors.

OPEC walks a tightrope as oil prices near a record The world's major oil producers have a big decision to make when they meet next week: how to deal with signs of softening global economies and the usual run up in fourth-quarter oil demand as crude prices head toward record levels. One thing's for sure. Even though members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries have quite a few options to consider, their most likely move in such a time of uncertainty would be to leave production levels alone -- for now, most analysts said.

Business

 
(**) C-Suite Strategies at Fortune.
A very good series of articles and interviews with experienced and effective sr. execs at key players. Highly recommended as bookmarkable and trackable.

Countrywide Finds No. 1 Spot Isn't Easy How could Countrywide Financial veer so badly off course? For years, the Calabasas, Calif., mortgage lender was considered the shrewdest, toughest player in the industry, with its No. 1 market share as proof. Yet in the past 120 days, the intensifying U.S. housing slump and related credit scares have sent Countrywide's stock tumbling and forced the company to scramble for liquidity. Such calamities aren't supposed to befall market leaders. Yes, they may falter a bit in tough times. But conventional wisdom regards the biggest company in any industry -- be it Intel Corp., Procter & Gamble Co. or Anheuser-Busch Cos. -- as practically indestructible. Such companies have the most customers, the largest sales forces and the broadest grasp of their industry's nuances. They are supposed to be like champion squash players holding center court and forcing weaker rivals to scurry in the corners. Jack Welch, the former chief executive officer of General Electric Co., built his career on establishing GE's operating units as the No. 1 or No. 2 player in their industries. If that proved impossible, he closed or divested those businesses. He saw market leadership as a reliable path to above-average profitability and growth. In most cases, he was right. But as Countrywide's affair shows, market leadership is becoming far more perilous than outsiders might think. New rivals keep trying to unseat the champ. Strategies that once fueled breakneck growth may backfire in hard times. And in some cases, market leaders focus so intently on what they know best -- production and sales -- that they get guillotined by unexpected changes in other arenas, such as regulation or finance. Patrick Viguerie, a McKinsey & Co. consultant, has developed what he calls the Topple Rate: a measure of how many market-leading companies lose that status during the next five years. In the early 1970s, he says, it was about 8%. By the 1997-2002 period, it had climbed to 16%. Rigorous data for the past few years aren't yet in, but Mr. Viguerie believes the rate has held steady or perhaps even climbed.

  • Countrywide to Cut Up to 12,000 Jobs Struggling lender Countrywide Financial Corp. said Friday it will cut as many as 12,000 jobs as it struggles to deal with challenging conditions in the mortgage industry. The company said the cuts, amounting to as much as 20 percent of its work force, are needed because it expects new mortgages to fall about 25 percent in 2008 from this year's levels.

Citigroup could find itself burdened by investment vehicles that issue tens of billions of dollars in commercial paper. Citigroup owns about 25% of the market for these vehicles and, if they stumble, the bank might have to step in.

Auto Makers Report Mixed August U.S. Sales GM Sales Rise 6.1%; Ford Sales Fall 14% Most major auto makers reported declines in U.S. sales in August, reinforcing a gloomy industry outlook, despite a surprise sales uptick for General Motors Corp. Detroit's beleaguered Big Three, working to reverse losses in their North American operations, may have to intensify their restructuring plans if sales don't pick up. Earlier this year, major auto makers had been counting on sales to rise in the second half of the year. Now, several major auto makers have cut their forecasts. GM said yesterday that it planned to slash its fourth quarter North American production plan by 10% from year-ago levels, and trimmed third-quarter production plans by 2%. The pain is spreading beyond Detroit. Toyota Motor Corp.'s August sales dropped 2.8%, and executives attributed the decline to continuing housing woes and reduced credit tied to the subprime-mortgage squeeze. Some industry officials renewed calls on the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates to shore up consumer confidence.

Ghosn Loses Halo as Renault Shares, Newest Models Trail Fiat, Volkswagen Renault SA shareholders are losing patience with Chief Executive Officer Carlos Ghosn, who plans to revive profit at France's second-biggest carmaker by introducing 26 new models by 2009. While the new Laguna hatchback debuts next month, the top- selling Megane compact won't be updated until the end of 2008. Fiat SpA, the fastest-growing European carmaker, and Volkswagen AG are stepping into the gap, grabbing regional market share and topping Renault's 3.9 percent stock gain this year. ``Renault knew it would be in a sales lull right now, but Fiat and Volkswagen weren't expected to do this well,'' said Matthieu Bordeaux-Groult of Paris-based Richelieu Finance, which manages $5 billion in assets including Renault shares and rates the stock ``hold.''  Ghosn pledged in February of last year to sell 3.33 million vehicles in 2009, a one-third increase from 2005, and almost double operating profit to 6 percent of revenue. Vehicle sales at Boulogne-Billancourt, France-based Renault dropped 4 percent and earnings fell 15 percent in 2006. ``There isn't much going on at Renault until the Megane launches,'' said UBS analyst Max Warburton in London, who expects the shares to fall to 92 euros by July. ``The business looks to be on a pretty awful trajectory.'' If it weren't for Ghosn's record, ``people would be incredibly negative on Renault,'' he added.

Chrysler's Toyota Tack Chrysler scored what the Detroit News described as a "coup" when the newly private auto maker filled one of its management gaps by hiring Jim Press, the top American executive at Toyota Motor, to run its U.S. sales operations. The News says Chrysler is also in talks to hire China veteran Phil Murtaugh to head its Asian operations and negotiate alliances, and it calls the Press appointment "essential to Chrysler's efforts to compete against its larger domestic rivals with big global operations" at a time when the company is "struggling with weak sales and strained relations with its dealers in North America." The Detroit Free Press notes Mr. Press was once called the secret weapon of Toyota, which has sold more cars in the U.S. this year than Ford Motor and is on its way to beating out General Motors as the No. 1 auto maker in the world. The hiring of Mr. Press, just a few weeks after new Chrysler owner Cerberus Capital Management tapped Home Depot Chief Executive Robert Nardelli as Chrysler CEO, "suggests that Cerberus is determined to accelerate Chrysler's overhaul, partly by spending freely on executive talent, The Wall Street Journal says.

VW's Detroit Exit Aims to Rally U.S. Operations Volkswagen AG signaled a renewed effort to turn around its unprofitable U.S. operations, even as it moved to separate itself geographically and thematically from the U.S. industry's traditional capital of Detroit. The German auto maker said it would move its main U.S. offices from Auburn Hills, Mich., to the Northern Virginia suburbs to be closer to its traditional customers on the East Coast. It also said it would study the possibility of a U.S. production plant. Previously, it said it was exploring building a plant in North America, its second after one in Puebla, Mexico.Both moves are aimed at helping U.S. operations. The high-volume Volkswagen brand has seen considerable market-share erosion in recent years amid tougher competition. Importing cars to the U.S. from Europe remains costly, given the strong value of the euro against the dollar.

Housing data sap home builders Beazer gets purported default notice on notes; Hovnanian posts another loss Residential builder stocks, which were hit earlier this week by a plunge in pending home sales, were under pressure again Friday on quarterly losses and renewed bankruptcy fears. Before the opening bell, Beazer Homes USA Inc. said it has received purported default notices from U.S. Bank National Association, the trustee under the indentures governing several outstanding senior notes. Atlanta-based Beazer in a press release said the notices allege the company is in default because it has not yet filed its quarterly financial report with regulators for the period ended June 30. The notices allege the defaults will become events of default if not remedied within 60 days, Beazer said.

(*****) Best Buy Boutique Strategy Turns Retailing Upside Down, Boosting Earnings Best Buy Co. became the largest U.S. electronics retailer with its trademark lookalike big-box warehouses. It plans to get bigger by opening more stores that tailor to individual customers. In a test run that started in 2004, Best Buy boosted the number of stores it operated in Dallas by 50 percent. Sales at the new outlets rose faster than expected during the three-year experiment without sapping sales as much as forecast at older stores, Chief Executive Officer Brad Anderson said in an interview. That was ``a significant development,'' Anderson said. ``It opens all sorts of doors with potentially a better return on investment.'' The experiment helped prompt Best Buy to raise its target for total U.S. stores by 40 percent to 1,400, which may lift the share price 29 percent in the next 12 months. To meet local demand, Best Buy customizes stores to customer types, catering to soccer moms at one outlet and tech geeks at another. The expansion pledge is a sign to investors there is more room for Best Buy, already the market leader, to gain share and boost sales nationally, said Anthony Chukumba, an analyst with FTN Midwest Research Securities Corp. in New York. Best Buy sales will rise 30 percent by 2010 according to estimates compiled by Bloomberg. That's two-thirds faster than the pace forecast for Circuit City.

Lowe's Popularity Can't Beat Home Depot's Locations In the battle of the big-box home centers, homeowners give a slight preference to Lowe's Cos. (LOW) but Home Depot Inc. (HD) still gets more of their money thanks to the larger chain's convenient locations, according to a recent survey. The survey by Consumer Specialists, a Germantown, Tenn., marketing research and consulting firm, found the two largest U.S. home-improvement retailers are closely matched competitors. Lowe's rated higher than Home Depot in most areas, including product selection and customer service. Asked which chain they like better, 53% of respondents chose Lowe's, while 47% chose Home Depot. That's an even wider gap than a similar survey in 2006, which found a 51%-49% preference for Lowe's. But Home Depot ranked significantly higher in having convenient locations, which turned out to be the strongest predictor of where respondents spent the biggest chunk of home-improvement dollars, the firm said.

Mattel's problems deepened as it announced another toy recall, this one for its Barbie brand. The recall covers about 775,000 Chinese-made toys, all of which are believed to contain unsafe levels of lead paint.

Apple Unveils New iPods, Lowers iPhone Price and Cuts Low-End iPhone -- Apple Inc. on Wednesday cut the price of the top iPhone by $200, discontinued the low-end model and unveiled a new version of its popular iPod media player with wireless Internet access and other iPhone features. The 8-gigabyte iPhone will sell for $399, and the 4-gigabyte model, which sold for $399, will be phased out. The new iPods with Wi-Fi -- but without cell phone capabilities -- will start at $299. Jobs also unveiled the iPod Touch, which allows users to download songs wirelessly, and, eventually, at all Starbucks in the United States that offer Wi-Fi Internet.

  • Analysis: Vendor finds out just how tough the market is A chastened Apple Inc. has now learned one fundamental truth about the wireless-phone market. It will soon discover another. The first lesson Apple is learning -- the hard way -- is that most consumers are not willing to pay a pirate's booty for a mobile phone. The company admitted as much this week when it slashed the price of its top-end iPhone to $399 from $599, a move that shaved 9% off the value of Apple stock in the past three days. See full story. A whiff of panic also was evident in Apple's hasty decision on Thursday to give previous iPhone buyers a $100 credit. The handset went on sale in late June. See full story. Although Apple had planned to gradually reduce the price, the speed of the decision and size of the cut shocked industry observers. The abrupt shift suggests demand was flagging after a burst of sales in July and early August. "It's unusual to cut the price so dramatically so soon after the introduction," said Ross Rubin, a consumer-electronics analyst at the market-research firm NPD Group. Yet mobile handsets are unlike any product -- and wireless is unlike any market -- in which Apple has gotten involved. Customers have come to expect ultra-low prices on even the most feature-packed phones, and the competition is brutal.
  • The iPhone ignited interest, but devices will remain niche products -- A couple of years back, nobody except Research In Motion Ltd. with its BlackBerry could get much traction with a so-called smart phone. Now, because of the iPhone, everybody's taking another run at the category. It's a blunder. Apple Inc. has dropped the prices for its iPhone, causing consternation among investors since this price cut seemed premature and panicky. It may be an indication that yet another smart phone will meet the fate of the rest of the lot, with just moderate sales. Because customers that shelled out for the iPhone's higher price got so irate, Apple had to offer a $100 rebate to previous buyers. See full story. Still, there is no denying that the iPhone ignited interest in a category that seemed moribund. The Apple iPhone did indeed light a fire for the smart-phone category, and it did become the cool device du jour. But at the end of the day, nothing has really changed except a moment of enthusiasm came and went. If anything, the touch-screen iPod may have killed the iPhone, because when you saw how people used the iPhone it was almost always about the iPod features, not about the phone. In fact, most users complained about the phone, about the address book inadequacies, about AT&T Inc., about the Edge network, about 300-page bills and so on.

·         The Puppet Master: Love Steve Jobs or hate him, just don't ignore him. So why did he do it? Why did he cut the price? I have no inside information here, but it seems pretty obvious to me: Apple introduced the iPhone at $599 to milk the early adopters and somewhat limit demand then dropped the price to $399 (the REAL price) to stimulate demand now that the product is a critical success and relatively bug-free. At least 500,000 iPhones went out at the old price, which means Apple made $100 million in extra profit. Had nobody complained, Apple would have left it at that. But Jobs expected complaints and had an answer waiting — the $100 Apple store credit. This was no knee-jerk reaction, either. It was already there just waiting if needed. Apple keeps an undeserved $50 million and customers get $50 million back. Or do they? Some customers will never use their store credit. Those who do use it will nearly all buy something that costs more than $100. And, most importantly, those who bought their iPhones at an AT&T store will have to make what might be their first of many visits to an Apple Store. That is alone worth the $50 per customer this escapade will eventually cost Apple, taking into account unused credits and Apple Store wholesale costs.

 (***)Swimming with the Fishes: What's good for tournament fishing may be good for the Department of Defense. The way change happens varies over time as technologies and markets mature. This column is about two examples of new directions of change for the Internet. First there is gillznfinz.com, a fishing web site that teaches us (and the Pentagon too) new lessons about niche markets and the future of television. Then there is Adobe's upcoming Flash 9 and its competition with Java. There are two key differences between watching television over the Internet and watching Nightline in your bedroom: 1) Nightline usually looks a lot better than Internet TV because of higher production values and greater available bandwidth, and; 2) an Internet TV show can serve a truly global audience while Nightline is limited to the audience of ABC affiliates in the U.S. These two factors combine to define the opportunity for Internet TV, which generally comes down to content for thinly dispersed but rabidly enthusiastic audiences who won't care if the picture is a little shaky or the jokes are bad. Another example of commercial competition leading to really significant advances in technology can be seen in the next versions of both Java and Flash. As I have written before, Java and even Microsoft's .NET suffer in comparison to Flash, which is more widely deployed than either development environment and features smaller programs with higher performance. Java and .NET, too, have suffered from the popularity of AJAX applications, which are also lighter and faster. But wait, there's more! According to Adobe, the next version of Flash -- Flash 9 -- will ship with dramatically expanded codec options allowing significantly better and faster video. There was a time not long ago when expanded Flash codec choices wouldn't have mattered. Streaming video had already failed and the market was moving to downloaded video where data rates and total file size were less immediately relevant. Then came YouTube and its commitment to Flash video. Now video streaming is again a hot idea and Flash 8's choices of the H.263 or VP6 codecs just aren't enough. Most implementations of H.263 are limited to 320-by-240, and VP6, though very efficient, just isn't a mainstream technology. In that respect it is like Essential Viewing's codec. But the next version of Flash video will support H.264, AAC audio, most HD frame sizes, and -- here's the most important part of all -- will work with your graphics card to make it all run faster and with less CPU load. This is a huge kick in the head to both QuickTime and Windows Media, though of course QuickTime has an important role in video production in most editing systems and in parts of the H.264 codec, itself. Windows Media and its VC-1 codec also have an enduring role in the production of professional content. But when it comes to video client software that is high performance, cross-platform, and available already in 97 percent of all computers, well Adobe wins this round easily.

September 04, 2007

Weekly Reader 2Sep07 III: Business

And now for the final part of the delayed Weekly Reader - Business. Or as I like to think of it where the context meets the consequences. We pick up several of the themes from prior sections with an interesting collection of Auto industry articles - the one on Mullaly's struggles with de-toxifying Ford is particularly interesting. Especially when you take Ford as representative and also realize, which his competence and openness has made visible and confirmed, how much of their problems was self-inflicted. The preceeding story discusses how Toyota appears to be going from strength to strength and the following one discusses the growing sophistication of Petrobras - the Brazilian oil company. One ought to take those in historical context - what's the oil industry look like over the next 20 years as more and more of the reserves are controlled by non-market state enterprises who are also comptent and technically sophisticated ?

Speaking of the consequences of confusing narrow technical skills with broader business competence (think forest and trees here) the next set talks about the turmoil and growing disruptions in the finance industry with S&P arguing that this will be worse than '98 and the consequences for employment, profitabilities and enterprise surival. Best exemplified by the Countrywide/B of A pair. One wonders if BofA isn't beginning to do a Weill emulation with it's recent slate of huge acquisitions.

The next two sets of articles are on Retail and Technology. In both cases many of the stories are about existing enterprise struggline to re-invent themselves both because of internal failures as well as changing external economic and marketplace conditions (stories include WMT, Ann Taylor and Wendy's). The Tech section looks at what I think is a vastly over-optimistic take on Dell in the general markets along with one of the biggest new industry wars as an entirely new debate about how to provide telecom services and content erupts.

Let me point you back to an earlier post on thinking about enterprise performance that riffs on some observations of Carl Ichan's: Kaptain Karl's Test: an Icahn-like Inventory of Enterprise Performance. Based on these readings and the tables summarizing various enterprises and classifying them into performance classes you have to wonder which companies and industries are doing well. It sure doesn't appear to be many at all.

So, given the slowing economy combined with mounting pressures, and the apparent continued widespread deterioration of enterprise performance one has to wonder...is that all an artifact of the news media coverage ? Or are there serious and widespread problems we need to be concerned about ? Feel free to chime in. 

  

Business

Big Three jockey to lead talks with UAW With this summer's auto talks entering a critical phase, Detroit's Big Three automakers are competing intensely to be picked as the lead company to negotiate a pattern-setting agreement with the United Auto Workers. General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler LLC are all asking the UAW for first crack at cutting a new labor deal that addresses their specific competitive needs, according to people close to the talks.

But UAW President Ron Gettelfinger has yet to tip his hand on which company will go first -- or even if the union will choose a front-runner for in-depth negotiations. In either case, the all-important 2007 auto talks are expected to heat up significantly by Labor Day. With the current four-year contracts set to expire Sept. 14, the clock is ticking on whether GM, Ford or Chrysler will gain the inside track on setting the agenda for a new pact with the UAW.

Rating the Chery The newly private Chrysler in the U.S. plans to export the car -- and models based on it -- around the world, selling them under its Dodge brand. Chrysler says it will start offering the car in Latin America and other developing markets by the end of 2008. The vehicles will go on sale in the U.S. and Western Europe in 2009, after they are modified to meet those markets' stricter safety and environmental rules, Chrysler says. ( Silk Road Video )

Toyota's bold plan to beat GM Automaker targets global sales of 10.4 million vehicles in 2009; success would break record held by GM. -- Toyota plans to sell 10.4 million vehicles globally in 2009, it said Friday, a sales target that would put the Japanese automaker ahead of a record hit by world leader General Motors 30 years ago. Analysts say Toyota Motor Corp. is likely on track to beat General Motors Corp. as the world's biggest automaker in global vehicle sales and production this year - a title Detroit-based GM has held for 76 years. Toyota President Katsuaki Watanabe gave the ambitious sales plan in an outline of the company's growth strategy, which includes working on product quality and introducing technological innovations such as luxury Lexus hybrids. The company plans to boost sales not only in North America and Europe, but also in emerging markets such as Brazil, India, China and Russia. Sales in Japan, though, were expected to stay relatively flat.

Mulally Tries to Focus Troubled Ford-- Good riddance to Jaguar and Land Rover. Ford Motor Co. is auctioning the celebrated British brands to bidders that include private-equity firms and two Indian automakers. The goal is to raise cash, perhaps as much as $3 billion. A bigger goal should be removal of all distractions that might impede the rescue of Ford's floundering core automotive operations. A dearth of fancy cars and trucks is one facet of Ford's troubles. Its own luxury brand, Lincoln, had been faltering for years. Instead of addressing it, Ford unwisely decided in the 1990s to spend billions of dollars buying European swanky car brands. Acquiring Jaguar, Land Rover, Volvo and Aston Martin -- since divested -- was analogous to an out-of-shape runner trying to regain championship form by buying expensive shoes. Alan Mulally, the former Boeing Co. executive who took over as chief executive officer from Bill Ford Jr. a year ago, instantly ecognized Ford as an automaker that had lost its way and stood on the brink of ruin. Mulally has openly blamed the lack of coordination among Ford's far-flung divisions and subsidiaries for the company's failure to pursue a common strategy.

Thus, Ford engineers in the U.S., Asia and Europe, each operating in their own world, didn't design common vehicle platforms that could be sold in different markets at minimum cost, a routine practice at Honda Motor Co. and Toyota Motor Corp. Though Mulally hasn't been quoted as such, Ford's engineering and design output too often were second-rate, with no one assuming responsibility for improvement. That's why buying a prestigious luxury brand like Jaguar must have seemed like a godsend: the company could acquire what no one wanted to fix.

How a Sleepy Oil Giant Became a World Player A decade ago, state-controlled oil company Petrobras was such an industry laggard that it earned a nickname: Petrosaurus. Workers were 25% less productive than the industry average, and Brazil depended on imports for nearly half its oil. Petrobras's board consisted solely of company insiders.

Today, Petrobras boasts more crude reserves than Chevron Corp., lower costs of finding oil than Exxon Mobil Corp., and a listing on the New York Stock Exchange -- with a market value of around $130 billion. It's a rare success story among state-owned oil companies as they play a growing role in an energy-hungry world. Three-quarters of the world's reserves are now in the hands of national oil companies, according to the International Energy Agency. ConocoPhillips Chairman James Mulva recently said that the top publicly owned international oil companies now have direct access to only about 5% of the world's oil reserves, with an additional 30% theoretically open through joint ventures. Other energy-producing countries are taking note. Delegations from a host of countries, including Mexico, Nigeria and Peru, have flown to Rio de Janeiro to study Brazil's energy model, says Haroldo Lima, president of Brazil's National Petroleum Agency, a regulatory body. A number of oil companies are pursuing joint ventures with Petrobras, lured by access to Brazil's reserves and Petrobras's technology. One is Norway's state-controlled Statoil ASA, which is also highly regarded for its efficiency. Statoil is studying Petrobras's techniques for installing wellheads on the sea floor, while providing Petrobras with know-how on extending the life of maturing fields. Norway's King Harald V came to Rio in 2003 to formalize the deal with Brazil.

Buyout Firms Reduce Price For Home Depot Unit to $8.5 Billion The buyout firms that agreed to buy Home Depot's supply unit a few months ago have slashed the price of the deal to $8.5 billion, an 18% reduction to what had been agreed to earlier, after the banks financing the deal balked. As part of the revised deal, which was agreed to by Home Depot's board Sunday, the Atlanta-based retailer is guaranteeing $1 billion of the debt and will take an equity stake. By guaranteeing part of the debt, Home Depot will enable the banks to avoid marking down the entire value of the debt on their own balance sheets at a time when the credit markets are in turmoil. The three private-equity firms buying the unit are expected to kick in an additional $150 million in equity as well. With a deluge of even-bigger upcoming deals, worth upwards of $400 billion, the stakes for both sides were too great and both the buyers and the banks pulled back from the precipice. If the agreement holds, the threat of mutually assured destruction in the form of litigation will recede-at least temporarily.

S&P Says Rout May Hurt Wall Street More Than in 1998 -- Standard & Poor's said business conditions for securities firms are worse than in the second half of 1998 and revenue from investment banking and trading could fall 47 percent in the final six months of this year. The rating company said it conducted a ``stress test'' designed to measure the ``ability of investment banking businesses to withstand such scenarios.'' The conclusions don't constitute a forecast, S&P said in a statement. ``This is more severe than in 1998,'' when investment- banking and trading revenue fell 31 percent in the second half following Russia's debt default, S&P analyst Nick Hill said in the statement. At the time, revenue from fixed-income, currencies and commodities was negligible or even negative, he said. As in 1998, firms are likely to cut bonuses to stay profitable, said Hill, who is based in London. In a separate report, Moody's Investors Service estimated revenue losses of 10 percent or less due to loan markdowns for the five largest U.S. investment banks in the second half of 2007. The Moody's team, led by senior vice presidents Peter Nerby and Blaine Frantz in Jersey City, said its stress tests predict ``positive, albeit depressed, earnings and a respectable level of profitability'' possibly boosted by higher equities and derivatives trading volume in volatile markets. Some banks have warned of poor results ahead. UBS AG, Switzerland's biggest lender, said on Aug. 14 that it ``will probably see a very weak trading result in the investment bank'' if turbulent conditions continue. ``This makes it likely that profits in the second half of 2007 will be lower than in the second half of last year,'' UBS said.

·        Banks set to cut 10-15% of staff

Inside the Countrywide Lending Spree ON its way to becoming the nation’s largest mortgage lender, the Countrywide Financial Corporation encouraged its sales force to court customers over the telephone with a seductive pitch that seldom varied. “I want to be sure you are getting the best loan possible,” the sales representatives would say. But providing “the best loan possible” to customers wasn’t always the bank’s main goal, say some former employees. Instead, potential borrowers were often led to high-cost and sometimes unfavorable loans that resulted in richer commissions for Countrywide’s smooth-talking sales force, outsize fees to company affiliates providing services on the loans, and a roaring stock price that made Countrywide executives among the highest paid in America. Countrywide’s entire operation, from its computer system to its incentive pay structure and financing arrangements, is intended to wring maximum profits out of the mortgage lending boom no matter what it costs borrowers, according to interviews with former employees and brokers who worked in different units of the company and internal documents they provided. One document, for instance, shows that until last September the computer system in the company’s subprime unit excluded borrowers’ cash reserves, which had the effect of steering them away from lower-cost loans to those that were more expensive to homeowners and more profitable to Countrywide. Now, with the entire mortgage business on tenterhooks and industry practices under scrutiny by securities regulators and banking industry overseers, Countrywide’s money machine is sputtering.

Bank of America CEO In Spotlight After Deal Countrywide Gives Lewis Status He Long Craved Addressing 500 managers at a meeting in New York early this year, Bank of America Corp. Chief Executive Kenneth D. Lewis ticked off the banking industry's problems. The housing market was faltering, and the interest-rate environment was difficult. Yet he foresaw a watershed year for Bank of America, a chance to inflict pain on competitors that lacked its scale, diversity and cash. "This is the time I think we could go for the jugular, really be disruptive and take market share," he said, to loud applause. Within months, Mr. Lewis agreed to buy Chicago's LaSalle Bank for $21 billion, taking advantage of a bidding war for its struggling Dutch parent. He rolled out free online stock trades nationally, bruising discount brokers. And he introduced a "no-fee" mortgage program designed to take business from competitors. Last week Mr. Lewis made one of his most dramatic moves yet, a $2 billion investment in teetering Countrywide Financial Corp. The deal at once helped stabilize the credit markets and gave Bank of America a foothold in the nation's biggest mortgage lender. It even brought a swift $445 million paper profit, as Countrywide's shares rallied on the news.

  • He rose quickly, moving every few years as the ambitious bank sought ways to expand in the face of legal barriers to doing business in other states. When it found a way to pick up a string of branches in Florida, each with its own processing system, NCNB's swashbuckling chief, Hugh McColl Jr., called in Mr. Lewis in 1985 and told him to bring order to the operation.In Florida, Mr. Lewis extracted fat margins by consolidating back-office operations and through moves like assigning a single account number to each customer for all accounts and branches.
  • Quality Eludes Bank of America While Bank of America has spent a lot of effort improving and touting its quality control, emails sent by former executives inside the operation provide a glimpse of the back-office system that broke down. (NOTE: how important will a common set of back office processes, capabilities and systems be for bringing together all the huge acquisitions recently made by BofA ? Especially when they failed so badly in ’04)

Wal-Mart looks for new executives to evaluate store formats -- Wal-Mart Stores Inc. is creating a handful of middle-management jobs to evaluate new store formats and market opportunities in the U.S. as it struggles to grow its sales and earnings, the company said Monday. The retailer is looking for senior directors to develop a "comprehensive multi-format growth strategy" and to propose new store formats, according to job postings on the company's Web site. The news gave Wal-Mart shares a small boost on an overall down day of trading as investors embraced the world's biggest retailer's efforts to tweak its formats and even dramatically reduce their size. Shares ended the session at $43.82, up 8 cents.

AnnTaylor profit tumbles, to launch boomer concept -- AnnTaylor Stores Corp. on Friday posted a nearly 27% decline in second-quarter profit, hurt by steep markdowns and fashion fumbles, but the women's apparel retailer said it was launching a new store concept targeting the "modern boomer."

How Wendy's Turnaround Faltered Triarc said it had reached a confidentiality agreement with Wendy's to review financial data in advance of a possible bid. But nine months later, the CEO's turnaround plan is floundering. Franchisees accuse her of mismanaging the chain's menu expansion and launching quirky ad campaigns that have alienated some loyal customers. Big shareholders complain that the Duke University MBA's lack of operating experience should have precluded her from the top job. And now her board is shopping for a buyer.

In 'Deluxe: How Luxury Lost Its Luster' Thomas investigates the business of designer clothing, leather goods and cosmetics, and finds it wanting. Hijacked, over the past two or three decades, by corporate profiteers with a “single-minded focus on profitability,” the luxury industry has “sacrificed its integrity, undermined its products, tarnished its history and hoodwinked its consumers.” Hoodwinked? The truth hurts. After I read “Deluxe,” suddenly my new sundress no longer looked like such a steal. Au contraire, the book’s line of argument suggested, it was I who’d been robbed.

Tech, telcos, ready to rumble? Now comes a clash of industries so momentous it threatens to make those other feuds look positively tame. We're talking about the brewing battle between phone companies such as AT&T and Verizon, and technology companies, specifically Internet-oriented companies such as Google and eBay .The reasons for the rivalry are complex and myriad, but it essentially boils down to a classic struggle between content players and distributors for the hearts, minds and wallets of American consumers - all with a digital twist. And the twist is this: Internet companies would like telecom networks, wireless networks in particular, to be more "Internet-like," meaning they'll begin to migrate away from a so-called walled garden approach on their wireless networks, and use the mobile Web as freely as they do on a PC. But the biggest and most interesting salvo in the tech v. telecom fight is Google's potential bid for wireless spectrum, and its rumored development of wireless handsets. But by thinking about bidding on licenses - and possibly deploying its own handsets - Google clearly must be thinking about ways to end-run the traditional telecommunications infrastructure. But that doesn't mean the phone companies are going to cede market share and customer relationships without a fight.

Dell profits shoot up 46 percent The company beat expectations Dell Inc. on Thursday said earnings rose sharply in the second quarter, helped by declining component costs, but the company cautioned that the gains from those lower prices would fade throughout the rest of the year.  The company reported especially strong sales of servers. The jump in server sales helped increase Dell's average revenue per unit in the quarter to $1,520 from $1,460 last year. Higher average sales prices — combined with the declining cost of parts used to build a computer — helped boost Dell's profit margin throughout the first half of 2007. But Dell said those gains could fade during the second half of the year as the decline in component costs begins to level off. The tepid forecast was anticipated by most analysts and investors. Dell shares gained 60 cents, more then 2 percent, during regular trading. And in the after-hours trading that followed the earnings report, Dell's shares added another 10 cents.

Weekly Reader 2Sep07 II: Markets & Economy

In this section we pick up and expand several of the themes that the critical articles in Part I established in terms of major changes happening deep under the surface in the financial markets and players and the continuation and extension of various economic challenges. One of the shibboleths is that the world economy is strong and more and more de-coupled from that of the US. Several of the pointers to Europe and the rest-of-the-world don't support that argument; a ammendent that is just becoming visible in the last few weeks.

Complementing those continuations are critical articles that point to bigger and longer-term structureal changes in the world economy. Specifically, despite all the agita in the developed world and certain key industries, e.g. Autos, the newly developing world is well on its' way to creating a multi-polar economic system. China's auto industry is not only become more and more capable but it is displacing the sale of used Am/European cars in places like Africa with new cars. Similarly the developed country oil companies had a major remaining advantage in getting involved in a world increasingly dominated by state-run companies with their sophistication and technologies. Well, similarly to autos, so-called 3rd world oil companies are getting more and more sophisticated. And finally we have a pointer to deep geo-political changes in the regimes that institutionally support countries like Russia.

These are all major deep currents that one needs to be aware of - otherwise in another few years we'll be having the same sort of crisis in these real-world areas that we now have in the financial industry ! 

Markets & Investments

 

(5*) A Historical Perspective of Recent Bear Markets

 

For Banks, a $300 Billion Hangover Banks and investment banks gave private-equity firms low rates on LBO deals that hadn't closed. Now they -- and their shareholders -- may be stuck with this poorly priced debt. Over the past three or four months, bankers have committed to lending LBO targets about $300 billion to fund buyouts. Their plan was to sell the loans to institutional investors. But demand for leveraged debt has evaporated in the recent market turmoil, even as yields on existing leveraged loans have risen. So bankers now have two choices: sell the debt to investors at losses that could approach 10% to 12%, or hold onto it and hope the market improves. Most market players think the banks, when possible, will opt to take their lumps sooner, rather than later. For if they hold the debt, they risk a still-worse market or deterioration of the credit quality of the corporate issuer. They also would tie up capital. Either way, earnings could come under pressure. Selling the loans at a loss would result in a writeoff, potentially cutting quarterly profits at some banks by as much as 15%. And holding the loans could hurt revenues, because the banks would have less ability to commit to new financings. That would likely dampen earnings growth from the red-hot pace of recent quarters, and crimp stock prices.

·         Far from housing, some buyers still line up loans -- For some companies trying to finance megamergers, the bank window is still open -- as long as they remember to flash an A credit rating and wads of cash. Nearly buried among prophecies for the end of the debt-financed merger boom, some companies are finding they still have access to the billions of dollars needed to fund their deals. One key to these acquirers' success may be their distance from the U.S. housing sector, where defaults in subprime mortgages have triggered huge losses at investment banks and dulled investor appetite for new debt.

Fed bends rules to help two big banks If the Federal Reserve is waiving a fundamental principle in banking regulation, the credit crunch must still be sapping the strength of America's biggest banks. Fortune's Peter Eavis documents an unusual Fed move. The Aug. 20 letters from the Fed to Citigroup and Bank of America state that the Fed, which regulates large parts of the U.S. financial system, has agreed to exempt both banks from rules that effectively limit the amount of lending that their federally-insured banks can do with their brokerage affiliates. The exemption, which is temporary, means, for example, that Citigroup's Citibank entity can substantially increase funding to Citigroup Global Markets, its brokerage subsidiary. Citigroup and Bank of America requested the exemptions, according to the letters, to provide liquidity to those holding mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities, and other securities. This unusual move by the Fed shows that the largest Wall Street firms are continuing to have problems funding operations during the current market difficulties, according to banking industry skeptics. The Fed's move appears to support the view that even the biggest brokerages have been caught off guard by the credit crunch and don't have financing to deal with the resulting dislocation in the markets. The opposing, less negative view is that the Fed has taken this step merely to increase the speed with which the funds recently borrowed at the Fed's discount window can flow through to the bond markets, where the mortgage mess has caused a drying up of liquidity.

o        Central Banks Play `Whac-A-Mole' in Credit Freeze: Mark Gilbert
o        It's Time to Meet Subprime Devil We Don't Know: Caroline Baum
o        Fed Hoped Market Would Right Itself
o        Bank of England Loaned $3.2 Billion at Highest Rate; Borrower Unidentified
o        (5*) Bernanke May Hear Call for Fed Activism on Asset Prices After Housing Bust 
o        From Bernanke, Blunt Words and a Warning Knock Markets Back 

European banks battle short-term loan crunch Analysts see conduit exposure as manageable; wider credit downturn a worry -- Until recently, the world of commercial paper and collateralized debt was considered by many to be so safe that one of its top players went by the nickname Captain Sensible.How quickly things change. In the last few weeks, turmoil in the market for asset-backed commercial paper -- a type of short-term loan secured by mortgage and credit-card debt -- has forced bailouts at two German banks, sparked fears of losses at Barclays and driven a further Europe-wide slump in banking stocks. The problems for these banks are linked to so-called conduits and structured investment vehicles (SIVs), which in essence borrow money at low interest rates to invest in pools of debt that offer a higher return. What's more, banks that set up the vehicles don't have to include them on the balance sheet, meaning more money can be loaned elsewhere. The use of SIVs and conduits has rocketed in recent years -- with the European asset-backed commercial paper market now worth around 550 billion euros ($748 billion), up from under 50 billion euros in 1998. Heavyweights such as HBOS, HSBC, ABN Amro and Deutsche Bank are among the biggest European players in the field. While the credit markets prospered, conduits and similarly structured SIVs, known as SIV-lites, were a money-spinning operation. Money was borrowed by issuing commercial paper. Commercial paper, however, generally matures after only a month or two. That meant the conduits had to continually issue more paper in order to pay off earlier debts. And that's where the wheels have come off. With the credit market in turmoil, investors are either refusing to buy the new commercial paper or demanding higher returns, leaving the conduits struggling to pay off previous investors as the paper matures. Because of the very short-term nature of such investments, these problems can quickly deteriorate into a liquidity crisis.

 The one question you must never ask an economist Simple economics, it seems, can explain everything. 

Everything, that is, except the economy. Although orthodox economics can do a good job of explaining why people get a divorce or the clap, it does a much worse job of accounting for what people think it should explain. Take last week’s tumbles in world stock markets. These raise four puzzles. First, why should the threat of default on some US sub-prime mortgages – loans to high-risk, poorer customers – be such a big deal? Conventional economics says risk should be split up into small bits and sold off to those people most willing and able to take it; all that jargon about collateralised debt obligations describes how this is done. Spread over trillions of dollars of assets, losses of even billions of dollars should be little problem. Secondly, there’s a timing problem: why should stock markets worry about the problem now? The risks of sub-prime lending have been known for months; stock markets fell (albeit temporarily) in February for just this reason. Basic economics – the idea that the market is efficient – says that information should be immediately embodied in share prices. It shouldn’t take so long for sub-prime problems to hit prices. The third puzzle came on Thursday, in the market’s reaction to the injection of €95 billion into the banking system by the European Central Bank. Investors could have thought: “There’s more money around. This is great for shares.” But they didn’t. They thought: “The ECB’s bailing out banks – things must be even worse than we knew” and shares fell as a result. Why did the latter reaction dominate?

The fourth puzzle, deepened by yesterday’s recovery in prices, is: why are shares so volatile? The past few weeks have reminded us of what Robert Shiller, of Yale University, established back in 1981, that shares move much more than their “value” – the discounted present value of future dividends – would warrant. These four puzzles all have a common root. Orthodox economics assumes that people know roughly what they are doing, that they are rational, and that rationality is unambiguous. Such assumptions are often fair enough in everyday life – hence the justified success of Levitt, Landsburg and Harford. But in financial markets, people often don’t know what they are doing. Recognising this helps to solve our puzzles.

Economy

The Expanding Credit Contagion The credit crunch has so far left most non-financial corporations unscathed. But if it drags on, companies from book retailers to homebuilders and technology firms may start feeling a pinch.

The Center for Financial Research and Analysis, an independent research firm, recently sought to identify corporations that could struggle in a prolonged credit downturn. In their findings, they include firms like Borders Group that have significant short-term debt that needs to be repaid or refinanced, and companies like Affiliated Computer Services that rely heavily on debt to fund acquisitions and growth. Another group noted by CFRA analysts includes corporations that aren’t current with their financial filings. Bond and loan agreements often dictate that companies must maintain current financial statements, and debt investors may demand to be repaid early if such covenants are breached. That was recently a concern at Beazer Homes, which this week asked a federal court to prevent its bondholders from declaring that the homebuilder was in default on its debt. “There are many situations where companies may be exposed to a credit market that’s drying up,” says Jeremy Perler, an analyst at CFRA who spearheaded the study. He adds that while most of the attention in the market has been focused on banks and financial institutions, people are starting to consider the potential impact of the strained credit environment on non-financial firms.

Economic Strength May Not Last -- Factory orders and housing may have been picking up momentum before the latest turmoil in credit markets clouded the economic outlook. Orders for durable goods, those expected to last more than three years, surged in July, and an important gauge of capital spending turned up, according to government data released Friday. Sales of newly built homes perked up, too, though that could be a temporary flicker of life in a sagging market. Orders for cars, appliances and other durable goods gained 5.9% in July over June to a seasonally adjusted $230.7 billion, the Commerce Department said. Nondefense capital-goods orders excluding aircraft, a closely watched barometer of business investment, rose 2.2%. Sales of new homes, meanwhile, showed a surprising rebound of 2.8% in July from June as average prices fell. But declines are expected in coming months as the housing sector works through high inventories and weakening demand. July's strength in orders and new-home sales came ahead of a sharp stock-market downturn and turmoil in some credit markets. Concerns over rising defaults in the subprime-mortgage market -- that is, loans targeted at borrowers with less-than-stellar credit -- have stoked caution in the debt markets, leaving companies encountering difficulty in obtaining short-term financing such as commercial paper. Consumers are having more trouble getting mortgages, too, as lenders tighten standards.

o        NABE: Bad Credit Biggest Risk to Economy Borrowers' withering ability to pay their bills and the subsequent fallout in the credit markets this summer topped the list of short-term risks on peoples' minds, according to a survey of 258 members conducted by the National Association of Business Economics. NABE, a Washington-based association, said 32 percent of its surveyed members cited loan defaults and excessive debt as their biggest near-term concern.

  • Construction job losses could top 1 million Job losses in the construction sector could top 1 million if a housing downturn tips the economy into recession and tighter access to credit dampens business investment. Strength in nonresidential construction may continue to offset a downturn in housing for now, but recent turmoil in credit markets suggests job losses may accelerate in the sector in the next few months. Construction Employment
  • Will Europe Take Hit From U.S. Credit Woes? Credit-market turmoil and an anticipated slowdown in the U.S. could restrain Europe's economic rebound, but ECB policy makers believe their negative impact could be modest
  • Labor Picture Is Clouded Add another item to the economic worry list: Employers are shedding temporary workers. Temporary employment, long a buffer that gives companies flexibility, has fallen each of the past six months, and in July was down nearly 2% from the start of the year, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

o        New Home Sales= Zero Gains, +/- (BigPicture) plus July Existing Home Sales (CalculatedRisk) and Home Prices Post Steepest Drop in 20 Years

Goldman Sachs Housing Forecast

The following is excerpted with permission from a Goldman Sachs research note on housing: Home Price Declines: Accelerating and Around for a While Excerpts:

  • ... we expect housing activity to continue to decline as:

    Nonconforming mortgage rates are rising and credit is being rationed. Mortgage rates for subprime loans, indeed for all loans that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will not purchase, have risen sharply since the beginning of July. Along with this price increase, credit is being rationed as many loans that previously would have occurred are no longer being made. The reduction in credit availability will adversely affect the demand for housing.

    Substantial excess supply remains. Perhaps most tellingly, in the second quarter the homeowner vacancy rate was a high 2.6%, far above its long-term average and only slightly below the record level of the first quarter. Furthermore, measures of inventories of new and existing homes remain high, both with nearly 8 months of supply at current sales rates. This excess inventory will require time to be worked off, and while this is occurring will serve as a disincentive to new construction.

    Residential investment as a share of GDP is still high. A substantial fall has already occurred, with the share of output devoted to it falling from a peak of 6.3% to 4.9%. But that 4.9% is still above the 4.6% average of the last 30 years and well above lows reached during housing downturns in the early 1980s and 1990s when the share dipped below 3.5%.

    Foreclosure rates are increasing. Subprime and Alt-A loans originated over the last several years often called for unrealistic mortgage payments relative to the borrower’s income once mortgage rates reset to higher levels. As these resets have started occurring, delinquency and foreclosure rates on these loans have increased. If even more of these homes enter foreclosure, as appears likely, they will add to the inventory problem outlined above.
Africa's New Car Dealer: China In Africa's richer economies, such as South Africa, Chinese car makers already are going head-to-head with global brands for low volumes of new car sales. In South Africa, Great Wall has set up 20 dealerships since the beginning of 2007 and is planning to extend to 30 by 2008. But most Africans, especially in poorer economies such as Senegal in West Africa, don't have the means to buy a new Toyota, Ford or Volkswagen. Africans buy hundreds of thousands of used vehicles a year from developed nations. West Africa favors nearby Europe. Mr. Seck is on the buying end of a trend that is denting Europe's considerable used-car exports to the developing world and sending out early warning signals to established makers of new cars. Still unable to compete for the rich markets of the U.S. and Europe because of tough regulatory and marketing hurdles, China's young car companies are moving aggressively into Africa. Africa is too poor to be a big market for the world's major automobile brands, but the industry is watching closely. In addition to exporting, China's car companies are developing manufacturing hubs outside the country. Chery finished building a plant in Iran in 2003. Last year it started making cars in a former Daewoo factory in Egypt.Reacting to the price pressures, some European and American manufacturers are scrambling to develop bargain models of their own
    • In India, a Big Push Into Small Cars For the past four years, auto enthusiasts in India have been eagerly awaiting the launch of one of the industry's most ambitious projects, Tata Motors' ultra-low-cost car. Ratan Tata, chairman of India's largest private-sector conglomerate, announced in 2003 his intention to make a $2,200 car, which is now likely to debut at the Indian auto show next January in New Delhi. Others are not just waiting to see what Tata unveils. The group's innovative venture into the very-small-car space has sparked the imaginations of a host of Indian entrepreneurs, who are planning to compete with products of their own. In the last couple of months, many Indian manufacturers -- from scooter and motorcycle makers to automakers, auto component players, and various auto professionals -- have announced plans to roll out low-cost cars.

In Caspian, Big Oil Fights Ice, Lethal Fumes -- and Kazakhs Since an unlikely alliance of Western oil companies received rights to drill for oil here a decade ago, they've struggled to cope with a combination of rig-wrecking ice packs, bone-chilling winters and noxious, high-pressure gases. Yesterday, the consortium's bid to exploit one of the world's top oil deposits encountered its biggest challenge yet: Kazakhstan's government, stung by delays and rising costs, suspended the group's permit for the field, halting work there for the next three months. The day's wrangling added yet another layer of complexity to Kashagan, a field that shows the increasingly hostile environment encountered by Western energy companies in pursuit of crude. With the era of easy oil long gone and international demand climbing to new heights, the majors are focusing on increasingly remote and hazardous corners of the globe. The ultradeep waters of the Gulf of Mexico and offshore West Africa are Big Oil's new frontiers.

Putin Must Establish `Fair Rules,' Russian Business Leaders Say -- Viktor Gerashchenko, chairman of OAO Yukos Oil Co., sits in his almost-empty office on the 10th floor of the now-bankrupt oil giant's headquarters, its logo stripped from the roof, lobby and doors. The building in central Moscow is a stark symbol of Russia's triumphant return as an economic player under Vladimir Putin, 54, now in his eighth year as president. His administration's 2003 attack on Yukos was the first on a private company and ended with its founder in prison and key assets sold to a government entity. Since then, Russia has tightened its grip on energy resources, created ``national champions'' in aerospace and shipping, taken over automobile plants and unveiled a $5 billion nanotechnology initiative. As the country enters election season, industrialists and bankers are asking whether seizing the economy's ``commanding heights'' -- an echo of the Stalin-era motto for centralization -- is good for business. They say they worry about the ability of a powerful and unaccountable bureaucracy to regulate itself. Many bureaucrats confuse their public functions and private interests, fueling corruption, says Dmitri Zimin, the founder of Moscow-based OAO VimpelCom, Russia's second-largest mobile-phone operator. ``In Russia, bureaucrats are the state,'' he says. ``Their appetite for power and wealth can be limited only by outside forces. If they are not checked, their appetites will have to be fed all the time.''  The quickening pace of government acquisitions adds tension ahead of a political transition, with parliamentary elections in December and a presidential vote next spring. Putin, barred from a third term, has yet to announce the Kremlin's preferred candidate.

Weekly Reader 2Sep07 I: Introduction & Key Readings

Well, as Mr. Spock would have it, “FASCINATING”.  BtW – hope you had a great holiday weekend. Up here in the Northeast the weather was perfect – comfortable days, how humidity, cool (even chilly) nights and, for us sailors, perfect wind here and there. One gets the impression that the new new market consensus is that the same is going to be true for the markets.

Judging by the weekly numbers last week was a mild, almost non-existent, downturn in the market. Which belies the wild gyrations, to re-use my favorite, unavoidable word again, in the markets. After the President’s sub-prime salvation speech, Bernake’s  “we’ll do what we need to do” speech and the home that the next Fed meeting will see a “for-sure” 25 basis point decrease in the Fed funds rate obviously it’s all settled and we’re back to business as usual. And if we get the 50 basis point decrease that many are looking for then obviously we’ll be back off to the races though much of the advice is to start researching opportunities and wait a couple of months before picking your spots. Particularly if we get the normal Oct/Nov tax-adjustment based selling in the markets, which we didn’t get last year (surprising most of us, especially me).

There are so many inconsistencies, contradictions and non-fact-based assertions hiding in that that it’s hard to sort things out. For one thing we’re far from seeing the end of the real sub-prime/housing problems – in fact we’re barely into the sub-prime adjustments let alone the decrease in residential and commercial construction that’s likely. To be followed by a multi-year down pressure in housing prices. Most of the mainstream economic forecasters have rapidly and suddenly shifted their outlook for sub-2% growth which is otherwise known as a growth recession, partly as a reflection and partly in belated recognition that the general economy has been slowing (as we and others have been mentioning for quite some time) for months. The outlook for real consumer spending is at best for growth of 1.8% and, at 70% of the economy, that means that other segments such as investment and trade would have to make up a lot of ground. More than likely to much to make up.

While denial and avoidance seem to be setting in my natural optimism causes me to believe/hope/fantasize that behind the scenes all the powers and thrones are re-considering things. Which means that it’s worthwhile re-considering the prior three part series on market drivers where we showed how markets are almost entirely finance driven, and detached from fundamental performance concerns. While the momentum may not turn given where everyone’s self-interest lies the financial structures will, eventually, start running in reverse. Or, in other words, the financial supports will start evaporating:

·         Market Drivers: Liquidity, Liquidity(Buyouts) and Buyouts (Buybacks)

·         Markets Drivers 2 (Buyouts): the Carry to Cash Economy

·         Market Drivers 3 (Buybacks):Investment, Hiring, Nah...Bonus, Bonus, Bonus !

It would also be a worthwhile exercise to re-visit the prior work on the economic outlook which holds up quite well. In particularly two posts are worth re-visiting. The first is on the structural trends in the economy:  Reality Checks: the Latest GDP Report and Outlack ? and Foggy Market Breakdown: GDP Component Changes . Nothing in recent economic data causes me to re-think the analysis in those posts, which find the economy continues to slow, that risks from housing are rising and consumer spending, the engine, is beginning to sputter. Also important to note is the sector implications of the breakdown of GDP into components, e.g. will Technology continue be hot if corporate capex spending looks to be slowing ? Judging from the NDX you’d have to think the next great boom is at hand. Ironically the S&P closed last week at 1473 and 1479 the prior week for an effectively net null change.

There’s so much ground to cover, and so many interesting sources from this last week, that we’re going to split thing up in multiple posts and start with the “Special Section” and work thru the others separately. If you manage to read/skim only one section the one below covers the essentials. First up is Goldman-Sachs Housing outlook which is about as realistic and pessimistic, finally, as anything that’s come out. Let’s hear it for realism. Our friends at the Financial Times Alphaville blog cover  the interesting and iconoclastic Christopher Woods who presciently called the mortgage market and derivative risks a couple of years ago. His discussions of a broader unwinding of structured finance reinforces Bill Gross’ points about mortgages and housing are just the tip of the iceberg; or one of a flotilla. The re-pricing of risks and the resulting change in buyout and buyback valuations as well as both the hedge and LBO industries re-working of their strategies is covered in several different articles clustered together that result from this unwinding is introduced by the co-founder of Carlyle. The ecology surrounding all this is what are the world’s Central Banks going to do and how are they reacting, especially the Fed. And as a result how the banking industry will adapt to these new circumstances. And finally, with all the looking back to the crisis of ’87, ’92 and ‘97/’98 [all of which btw were driven by similar speculative and leverage mechanism] has us looking for prior business/credit cycle problems so we conclude the introduction/special section with a look back at the Crisis of  1907.

General & Special

A key component of misperception and denials on the state of the markets and economy are failures to take hard looks at the underlying structural characteristics and understand how they’re likely to move – even when those dynamics seem simple and straightforward when properly analyzed and presented. In particularly that’s true of housing, though also of the overall economy. As noted elsewhere the blog CalculatedRisk has been “calling” the housing downturn since early last year and backing it up with charts and analysis that anyone could validate for themselves. He recently posted, by permission, some Housing assessments and economic impacts from Goldman-Sachs which are well…well….well worth your time to read and think about. Goldman Sachs Housing Forecast + Comments on Goldman Sachs Housing Forecast

·         Housing Bottoms: Residential Investment vs. Existing Home Prices

The really interesting thing is now that the world’s premier investment bank has come around to an analysis and prognostication similar to what a single individual has done for over a year how did the rest of their company manage to get themselves into so much trouble but not doing this sort of thing earlier ? Think about – especially if “sub-prime” is so small  a part of the economy then how much else have they missed ? (Un)Fortunately Chris Woods has the answer in his Greed & Fear newsletter.

[Greed & Fear] The coming unwind of structured finance

Fresh from being singled out by the Wall Street Journal as “the man who saw it coming”, CLSA’s Christopher Wood in this week’s issue of his client newsletter Greed & Fear marvels at the wilful blindness of stock market investors and looks to the great unwind of structured finance. “It remains apparent,” he says, “that stock-market investors do not want to believe in bad stories. This is why stock markets keep falling when presented with such newsflow, even if the news should not surprise and, therefore, should be discounted.” The trend, he says, is clear from Wall Street’s reaction to the latest house-price data on Tuesday. Thus, the S&P/Case-Shiller US National Home Price index fell 3.2 per cent year-on-year in the third quarter, the biggest annual decline since the series began in January 1987. Moreover, 15 of the 20 metro-area sub-indices posted negative annual returns. Greed & Fear still believes that the newsflow on housing will continue to deteriorate for the rest of this calendar year, which means that house prices could be declining on an annualised basis by a high single-digit percentage by the end of 2007. This may still not be a disaster for the macro economy but it will be a disaster for the mortgage-backed-securities market because of the leverage embedded in it. But the real story, says Wood, remains “the exposure of the whole structured-finance industry as a collective endeavour to disguise risky credits as safe credits”. This revelation will expose the western financial-services industry to heavy regulation, he warns:

The upcoming unwinding of structured finance is also a big-picture deflationary deleveraging event, which is why the risks to the US economy remain all on the downside. More and more banks are being forced to admit to having set up special investment vehicles, or “conduits”, off-balance sheet, he notes. “A lot of dodgy securitised debt is now being put back to them,” he says, advising investors to “fundamentally underweight all the financial plays globally that have been making their money in this fashion”. The main risk in this stance is an escalating moral hazard generated by central-bank actions, he adds.

Carlyle Founder on Cheap Debt, Credit Crunch and the New Buyout Landscape. In the near future, we won't see buyout deals of the size we saw 60 days ago due to the debt-market uncertainty. And available debt will be more expensive. The sellers will have to adjust to lower prices. This is not a calamity. What we have now is just a temporary imbalance of credit. When the debt market returns to equilibrium, a lot of companies will be available and there will be clear bargains. Private-equity firms will continue to buy companies with a bit more expensive debt but also a bit more pricing discipline. For the last five years, there was almost no penalty for overpaying by 5-10%, for we were emboldened by these attractive loan features. Now these things are probably a relic of the past, or at least for the next few years.

  • Credit Crunch Lowers Boom On Deal Excess The receding tide of today's credit markets is already leaving some gnarly residue in its wake. One can only hope some of the worst practices of the credit boom will also be left behind -- the chief executives flirting with buyout barons, the dubious "staple financing" plans, the self-important private-equity rhetoric, and the over-the-top buyout bashes. All were practices that just a few months ago seemed commonplace. They now carry an air of the unreal. Such self-proclaimed pieties seem to be evaporating across the Street. That's especially true with private-equity firms, which regard their work as the vanguard of economic progress. The idea at the heart of their business -- that paying down debt instills managerial discipline -- became subverted over the past 18 months. As one leading private-equity player put it a few months ago, some buyout shops began "solving backwards." By that he means they first calculated how much money they could raise to finance a purchase, rather than first calculating a target's intrinsic worth. This meant debt markets were doing the exact opposite of disciplining -- they were enabling ever-steeper prices.
  • Morgan Stanley Vs. Carlyle: A Credit Market Dust-Up The credit-market meltdown is claiming victims worldwide. Next on the chopping block: The profitable harmony between buyout firms and the investment banks that serve them.

·         The Domino Effect: As LBOs Lose Luster, A Stock-Price Prop Falls and Stocks Decline on Concern
That Takeovers Will Fall Off & A $100 Billion Question: How Much LBO Debt Really Looms?

·         Buyout Funds Face Elusive Returns as Financing Costs Erode Takeover Gain

·         Lehman Sees Another Year of Fallout From Credit Collapse

·         A Cold Winter for M&A in August

The Fed’s Subprime Solution THE subprime mortgage crisis of 2007 is, in fact, a credit crisis — a worldwide disruption in lending and borrowing. It is only the latest in a long succession of such disturbances. Who’s to blame? The human race, first and foremost. Well-intended public policy, second. And Wall Street, third — if only for taking what generations of policy makers have so unwisely handed it. But masses of lenders and borrowers invariably seem to come to grief, as they have today — not only in mortgages but also in a variety of other debt instruments. First, they overdo it until the signs of excess become too obvious to ignore. Then, with contrite and fearful hearts, they proceed to underdo it. Such is the “credit cycle,” the eternal migration of lenders and borrowers between the extreme points of accommodation and stringency.  Significantly, such cycles have occurred in every institutional, monetary and regulatory setting.

Parallels to the Crisis of 1907

Since the current credit crisis began, economists have been looking for historical parallels. Steve Quinn, Associate Professor of Economics, Texas Christian University Fort Worth, TX, sees a connection to a situation in the early 20th century. Here are his thoughts:

The crisis of 1907 as an apt analogy to the current situation.

1. In 1907, trusts had developed to circumvent the regulatory restrictions on banks. In this, trusts paralleled hedge funds.

2. When panic hit, no one knew where the risk was, so a general credit crunch followed. As today, live by asymmetric information, die by asymmetric information.

3. The trusts outside the lender of last resort system of 1907 (clearinghouses) had a terrible time of it. Today hedge funds are outside the Federal Reserve System.

4. The crisis subsided after J.P. Morgan felt sure enough to step in with his own capital. Bank of America jumping into Countrywide is similar.

5. The 1907 crisis scared enough people to generate substantial new regulatory initiatives. At first, the old system of emergency lending was extended in the Aldrich-Vreeland Act. Later, the Federal Reserve was created to replace the clearinghouse system and separate the supply of ultimate reserves from banks. The parallel here is extending Fed discounting to instruments like CDOs and institutions like hedge funds.

6. Finally, how can one resist the 100 year gap?