« September 2007 | Main | November 2007 »

October 31, 2007

Performance Re-visited: Another Trip to HD's Woodshed

For some time now it's been the intention to revisit prior dissections of HD - where we ran a nice little series but also with the intent of using HD as an example of we outsiders taking a look at company performance. It seems like it might be time to re-visit that and for several very good reasons. As the set of postings on profits and earnings show company performance is a critical factor in many things. And, the point in yesterday's post on the Weekly Reader, there's a lot of examples of folks who deserve poking at.

Just to review the bidding the last HD posting id'd six major factors in digging into HD's performance and then worked thru them in some detail. The six are: 1) Economic environment and whether or not it was going to be worse, 2) Employee Morale and it's linkages to HD performance (an anlysis thread we dug into in several postings, and here), 3) Customer Service - a major area of old competitive advantage, current major breakage and bad image and one requiring major investments but not too major, 4) Operations - major changes in procurement, logistics and store operations to improve service and lower long-term operating costs, 5) Product Development - continue and expand the development of new products with higher value propositions and new services to support them ala Target and 6) revisions and extensions of the historical Business Model because the US market is pretty well saturated and new market niches will need to be developed to restore growth.

So the key questions are how're they doing, what's likely to happen and what can we do about it ? Below we present a summary table of the six factors along with some discussion and some implications. But before doing that let's review the last few months of headlines:

  • May/Jun - Q108 same store sales down approx. -8%, buying back $25B of stock (a 1/4 of capitalization at the time) using $10B in proceeds from the sale of Hughes Supply plus $12B of borrowings. [Earlier on MSN Money over 10K e-mails were recieved with detailed stories of customer woes and complaints]. BigPicture rants about poor service.
  • Jul/Aug - EPS for FY07 -15-18%, down from expectations of -9% with a 1-2% reduction in shares btw. Buyback set at $39-44/share. (7/26) Moody's downgrades all ratings, buyback reset (8/9) at $37-42/share, (8/26) Hughes prices drops to $8.5B with a guarntee of $1B in debt plus retaining equity.
  • Sep/Oct (9/5) Buyback 290Mil shares at $37/share for approx which would be 1/2 way uisng $8B in proceeds plus $2.7B in cash, about 12.5% of the stock. Seperately outlook was revised and pessimism increased for revenue, profits and earnings. (10/10) HD Design Center concept announced - warm & fuzzy hardware stores targeted at women (?). (10/16) Same store sales down -16% and (10/30) Buffett rumored to be interested.

While those are the sorts of headlines you'd expect in the financial press, especially in these times, notice that after a couple of quarters of "how-to-fixup-HD" articles the summer to date is primarily about buybacks, finacings and deteriorating sales with a little buyout thrown in to flavor the buyback. On the surface you'd have to ask yourself is this HD just being coy, preserving competitive information while it explores those options or is the lack of information a lack of action ?

Given a downtrending economy, increased financial pressures, and an imploding primary market then using scarce & expensive capital resources to buyback shares, especially when you're having to borrow and increase leverage to do it, doesn't make much sense. Even if you're a PE guy this outfit is going to spend the next couple of years fighting down pressures on EPS. Pressuring management to buyback shares makes sense if they're under-valued. Using scarce capital to hold back the tide and worsen performance is in nobody's interest. Or so it seems to me. 

And judging by the stock chart so it would seem to Mr. Market. Now if you're buying back stock at $37 that then is worth $32 you better hope Warren buys it for $35 or more and reduces your loss. It seems to me that now would be a good time to hunker down, explain what's going on, make some judicious investments and get set for an upturn that would/will hopefully follow what's likely to be another two tough years. And for gosh sakes - tell your people that too. Not use borrowed money to prop up your stock and paper over the deep challenges. 

Having set the table let's lay out the feast - which is captured in the accompanying table which lists  each of the major improvement factors, status and assessment/ comments plus grade where possible. The data's from late summer and/or early Sept.

1. Outlook - Blake admitted to a worsening outlook but it's been a bigger surprise. Outlooks will likely have to be revised down so a C/C+ may turn out to be optimistic. Watch out for excess cost cutting to maintain quarterly earnings. Bad..bad idea.

2. Morale - Blake's been more down to earth, eating in the cafeteria, etc. which helps but no programs of employee development and compensation have been announced - which also feeds forward to service. Again a B- may be optimistic.

3. Customer Service - the heart and soul of the HD that was, the quickest path back to protecting business and growing it anew (a saving grace - a recent retail study found that HD's locations bought in the good times so far outweigh Lowe's better layout, service, ambience and quality. Since my local stores are across the parking lot from each other, well....). On the other hand Blake apologized extensively and good some good feedback. C+, at least in contrast to Nardelli. IF there's no follow-up and bunches of PO'd customers continue to swirl around this will boomerang - risks of D/D- very high.

  • Putting serious efforts and funds into employee training, recruitment, compensation, store layout, cleanliness, purchasing and stocking as well as supporting marketing and sales efforts, e.g. more readily accessible experts which are still non-existent, are very high strategic priorities. Since everybody can see all this for themselves here's a major factor to judge how things are going.

4. Operations/Product Development - here we effect a timeframe shift. Whatever we're buying and putting into the stores in the next 18 months is most likely what we've agreed with the supplier base to sell us. Similarly how we run the warehouses, stores, transportation and buying operations is also pretty fixed. Yet these are major opportunities for huge performance improvements (the whys and wherefores are discussed in previous posts). Not being on the inside (fair disclosure) it's hard to tell what's in train. At the same time after all the supposed internal deep-dives on Six Sigma you'd think a) the analysts and the MSM types would have an interest and b) the analysts certainly would. Unfortuately it takes a certain level of understanding of how these operating functions actually work, and their critical role in the overall Retail enterprise, to know why you should be digging.

That said it's definitely in HD management and shareholder interest to at least let the world know these are serious issues for serious people - which are getting, or planned to get, serious resources. HD has NO better set of strategic opportunities once short-term fixes are funded, designed and underway. If I was one of the PE or Hedge folks poking at this company this is where I'd put some attention. Bottomline NG/NG since we have no observables. You have to wonder though if it shouldn't be an F.

These are the sorts of major strategic initiatives that when you start evaluating HD's recovery chances that you should be looking for, monitoring and, if possible, encouraging. 

5. Innovation -again a low to no-observable though the announcement in Oct. that there's trialing of some warm and fluffy versions of design centers is work a look. That's encouraging - so is it a NG, a D+/C- because it looks little and late and needs to be improved (what'd your teacher used to write - you've got talent but need to apply youself ?). Or an F because so far it's not much and way late ?

Certainly HD has the smarts, people and resources to be running some major innovation efforts. In fact when the old Business Model cratered at the end of the 90s and Nardelli was brought in this is the sort of combination, blended and balanced recovery agenda he should have applied. It's the sort of thing Kilts did at Gillette over 5-10 years, that Boeing has done over the last ten and Cisco as well. It is in fact what Nardelli needs to come up for Chrysler now that it's his watch again. 

But what we have here is an evaluation framework that looks at Business Model & Strategy, key operating functions, people and service issues and lays them out over immediate, tactical and strategic timeframes. And is a foundation for investing in HD should you care to apply it.

In that wise you've got a couple or three tacks to consider. As things begin to flatten and turn around with Housing HD is likely to improve. Spotting that a couple of quarters ahead of time makes you a worthy value investor. Of course without the other initiatives HD will crater again for the same reasons.

What makes us mini-Buffetts is if we spot the long-term turnaround taking hold, down the blueprint, and get in early enough. Or contrawise if we want to be speculative Buffetts (huh ?) it's realizing when the Street's recovery fantasies are going to be disappointed and getting out :) !

Good luck and let me know how it works. 

October 30, 2007

Weekly Reader 28Oct07: Business & Companies

Here's the second set of readings, this time focused on companies and business in general. While it's always valuable and interesting to dig into company performance and outlook our little multi-part series on earnings puts another perspective on it (The Heart of the Matter: Profits vs Earnings ?,Have You Seen the Elephant ?: More on Earnings, Review the Bidding, Count the Cards: EPS Growth Rates). Or so we hope - the general economic and business environment matters enormously. As does the state of markets and credit which help determine outlooks and valuations. But at the end of the day the sine qua non, a Latin tag, meaning "that without which there is no other", is earnings. And trickery aside - and don't we have a lot of that is company performance. The sine qua non. Or to quote Harold Geneern:

"In business, words are words, explanations are explanations, promises are promises, but only performance is reality."

 A bunch of last week's news certainly brings that home, the primary example being Merrill's giant writedowns. The questions you have to ask yourself boils down to what were they thinking ? Not just about the continued efforts by all parties to avoid marking to market but where were the banks fundamental skills in risk management ? Where was the CEO ? And the Board ? So as you skim over this week's readings think of it as due diligence on company's - what are they thinking and what does that mean for where they're going ?

The pointers start with three interesting more general articles. One on the rise in performance improvement consulting which is finally picking up and is yet another canary. The second on the level of effort most companies elicit from their employees - 1 in 5 will make an effort, the other 80% are just there to collect a paycheck for minimal effort (previous proposals are Aholes, Shirkers and Performance) where, to quote myself:

But, I'm more convinced than ever that good HR is a mandantory strategic performance requirement and excellent HR is a competitive differentiator.

The final general article is on the recovery of Scwab from it's post-bust near-death experience. Another case study in how deep revisions to the business model, innovation, customer value focus, painful cost controls and execution, along with good people policies, come together to re-vitalize a business.

All these themes, and questions, are illustrated in the sets of articles below. First is a set on the Finance and Banking Industry, starting with the admission that they knew the problems were coming but were too trapped in the "dance" to give up the greed. Which says a lot about strategic foresight and cojones doesn't it ?

Then there are some wonderful Greek Dramas, only in the real world, beginning to really play out:

  1. WMT (aging, mature business model and lack of innovation) vs Tesco in the US (adaptive, innovative, customer-focused)
  2. Detroit (ditto only compounded over decades of denial) vs emerging Asian markets and their need for small, affordable cars. Who'll figure out how to make those at a profit ? Whee !
  3. GE in China - if there's an old-line company which is re-factored itself into  new lines of business and  other geographies it's GE. A strategic opportunity for long-term investing though you may want to see what happens during the next few months.
  4. Apple vs MSFT - iPod, Leapord, etc. vs milking the mainstays. MSFT is still a big, decently run company. But stop to consider two things. First, none of it's new initiatives have taken off despite years of $B investments and in it's bread-n-butter operations it's still living off monopoly rents not excellent execution. Anybody who doubts that is invited to go back and compare Longhorn vs Vista. HINT: search on Microsoft and Code Red :) !
Stories on MOT, Verizon and Qualcom maintain the themes.

Business

Firms Seek Outside Guides For Help in Credit Crunch As credit markets tighten, U.S. companies are finding it increasingly difficult to ignore their operational weaknesses. And a growing number of them are turning to consultants that specialize in corporate restructuring. The Turnaround Management Association, which polled 190 turnaround, financial-advisory and consulting firms, says that six out of 10 respondents reported that inquiries, engagements and revenue have increased at least 10% in the past year. The surge marks the end of a years-long drought. The firms attribute the rise in inquiries to the difficulty companies have had obtaining money since the subprime-mortgage crisis hit. Most firms said clients were reporting increased difficulty getting refinancing or merger-and-acquisition financing. Turnaround firms say most of the inquiries they recently have received are from banks and lenders concerned about their borrowers. Bank-and-lender inquiries leapt to 70% this year from 57% in 2006, the TMA poll showed. The firms say they also are getting calls from attorneys, hedge funds and company managers. Lenders worried about their corporate borrowers turn to turnaround firms for a variety of services, such as developing strategies to improve operations of the distressed companies.

'Hey, boss, show me you care'
Only one in five workers worldwide is willing to expend extra effort on the job, according to a study that says the top reason for disengagement isn't money, but senior management's sincerity and caring. Only 21% of workers worldwide are "engaged" -- that's human-resource-speak for ready to expend some extra effort at work -- while 38% are either disenchanted or disengaged, according to a new survey. The survey found 21% of workers worldwide are engaged, and another 41% are "enrolled," which means they're on the road to engagement…More than 80% of the engaged employees say they contribute to the quality of company products, services and customer satisfaction, while only 40% of disengaged workers agree. Engagement helps retention too: About 50% of engaged employees say they have no plans to leave their company versus 15% of the disengaged. In a separate study, Towers Perrin assessed data on 40 global companies over a three-year period, measuring employee engagement at a certain point and then looking at the companies' financial results over the ensuing three years. Companies with highly motivated workers enjoyed a 3.7% increase in operating margins and a 2% rise in net profits, while companies with a lower level of worker commitment saw both measures decrease slightly.

Learning new tricks The old business model of attracting new customers through cheaper transactions over the Internet didn't completely disappear. But the firm's management did shift gears in a rather dramatic fashion. The result was a much leaner and diversified company. For example, at its peak in early 2003, Schwab had a payroll of around 27,000 employees and operated about 400 branch offices. Today, that's down to around 300 branches and a payroll of 13,000. Besides retail investors, the company's focuses on roughly three million 401(k) plan participants it serves in one way or another. At the same time, Schwab's management team has built what it believes is the largest network of independent advisers. The firm services accounts and refers more sophisticated planning work to its roster of 5,500-plus outside financial advisers. Schwab's revenue from investment management-related fees at third quarter's end was 47% of the total, almost double what they were just a few years ago. In the late '90s, about 60% of the firm's revenue came from transaction-based business. Through the third quarter, such trading-related revenue was down to some 17% of the total.

Companies

Bankers: We saw credit crisis coming The world's biggest bankers said Sunday their greed made them powerless to prevent the train wreck in credit markets, even though they recognized that markets weren't pricing the risk of subprime default appropriately. Despite their warnings, Deutsche Bank and Citibank have been forced to write off billions as the value of their portfolios of complex structured securities tied to subprime loans have plunged. The banks knew the dangers of buying and selling securities that were untethered to reality, but had to keep buying and selling them because of the pressure to keep profits growing, the bankers said.

Bankers' Ranks to Be Thinned By Bloodletting to Come Some day over the next few weeks, Wall Street executives are going to meet to make some bad decisions. They are going to decide to batten down the hatches, trim away the dead wood, button up for the battle ahead -- use whatever tired cliche you want. They sure will. Some people at these meetings are going to be asked to ``pursue other opportunities.'' The people who report to them are simply going to be fired. As you probably have heard, the financial industry has had a pretty nice few years. This isn't shaping up to be one of them. This is the year of subprime mortgages and structured investment vehicles and, at least for some firms, such as Bank of America, big losses on certain kinds of investments. Some firms have already made cutbacks, but so far, they have been pretty minor. What happens next is that the top brass meets and decides which businesses have been profitable and which businesses have not, and decide where they are going to spend their money. Then they cut jobs, and in some cases, entire departments. Entire departments? Whole lines of business? Those are the bad decisions.

Merrill Reports First Loss Since 2001 After $7.9 Billion Subprime Charge Merrill Lynch & Co. reported its first quarterly loss in six years after a larger-than-forecast $7.9 billion of writedowns for subprime mortgages and asset- backed bonds, the most by any Wall Street firm. Merrill's failure to meet its own projection shows how Chief Executive Officer Stanley O'Neal misjudged the severity of the decline in the credit markets since July, after late mortgage payments from borrowers with poor credit histories surged. The charge is the biggest in the firm's 93-year history and the first major setback in O'Neal's five-year tenure. Stan's still the man, but for how long? Merrill board will show chairman-CEO O'Neal the door, predicts David Weidner. Merrill's O'Neal losing appeal Hard-hitting management style made Merrill Lynch Chief Executive Stan O'Neal  a lot of enemies.

o        Merrill Lynch CEO Stan O'Neal Under Pressure to Resign After Record Loss Stan O'Neal is facing pressure to abandon his post as chairman and chief executive officer of Merrill Lynch & Co. after misjudging the contraction in credit markets and posting the firm's biggest-ever quarterly loss. Merrill's directors met yesterday to discuss his potential departure and may make a decision this weekend, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing people familiar with the matter. The New York Times said O'Neal discussed a possible merger with Wachovia Corp., angering his board. CNBC reported that he told friends he'll probably be out of a job this weekend. Merrill surged the most in five years in New York trading yesterday on speculation O'Neal, 56, will be ousted and the world's largest brokerage will become a takeover target.

AIG may take $9.8 billion subprime hit American International Group could take a $9.8 billion hit from its exposure to subprime mortgages, Friedman, Billings, Ramsey analyst Bijan Moazami estimated on Thursday. The write-downs will be big, but manageable for one of the world's largest insurers with $104 billion in shareholders equity and the ability to generate third-quarter earnings of $4.4 billion, the analyst wrote in a note to clients. Merrill Lynch's surprise $8 billion, subprime-related write-down this week has sparked fresh concerns about the impact of this summer's credit crisis on financial-services companies. AIG has the largest subprime exposure of any insurers he covers, Moazami noted. Shares of the company fell 3.2% to $61.79 on Thursday amid speculation it could be hit by big write-downs. Spokesman Chris Winans said the company doesn't comment on market rumors.

 

Buybacks, dividends in store for Wal-Mart Wal-Mart Stores Inc., facing slowing U.S. sales, may benefit from further trimming its U.S. store and square footage growth, and using the saved capital to buy back shares or pay dividends, analysts said. Ahead of its two-day analyst meeting that begins Tuesday, analysts and investors said the world's largest retailer, which already scaled back its supercenter store growth plan, can use some additional cutbacks. Wal-Mart in June said it will increase U.S. square footage growth by about 4% to 5% for fiscal years 2008 and 2009 and lowered its capital spending forecast to $15.5 billion from $17 billion. Same-store sales at U.S. Wal-Mart stores in the first 35 weeks of the year rose 0.8% this year, compared with 2.5% last year after the retailer failed to lure higher-income shoppers with more upscale apparel and home furnishing products, analysts said. The retailer last week cut prices on 15,000 additional items, 20% more than last year, as it said it plans to be more aggressive with price cuts heading into the holidays, many retailers' biggest sales and profit period.

·         Wal-Mart's woeful sales tale With its U.S. sales growth expected to slow further over the next three years, Wal-Mart executives told analysts Tuesday that the retailer will open fewer stores at home and instead boost its expansion overseas. Wal-Mart's chief financial officer Tom Schoewe said the world's largest retailer expects overall sales to grow about 9 percent this year, slower than last year's increase of 11.7 percent. More important, Schoewe said Wal-Mart's sales growth will further slow, to between 5 and 8 percent growth over the next two years.

Tesco Takes On U.S. Shoppers The British retail giant is bringing its concept of midsize, urban grocery stores to the Southwest. After all the research, can it succeed stateside? It's a big gamble, even for Tesco, which books $86 billion a year in revenue. The company, the largest retailer in Britain and among the largest supermarket chains in the world, already has announced 122 planned store locations in Phoenix, Las Vegas, and Southern California. It has committed to invest $2 billion over the next five years on the venture. Here's what Tesco has let out so far. Fresh & Easy stores will each be 10,000 square feet—roughly four times the size of a typical convenience store and one-third as large as a traditional supermarket. This mimics the format of the chain's highly successful Tesco Metro outlets in Britain, which dot the country in urban locations too small to support a full-size supermarket. Taking cues from consumers who said they were overwhelmed by choices, Fresh & Easy will offer an edited assortment of items—everything from freshly bottled fruit juices to detergent—at prices lower than convenience stores. At the center of each outlet will be a space called Kitchen Table, where customers can sample products. The company hopes to keep prices low by selling big volumes of those few chosen items and relying on trusted suppliers, some of which it brought from Britain to the U.S. To lower distribution costs, Tesco is clustering its stores in urban markets that it can supply quickly from a giant new distribution center it has built in Riverside, Calif., about an hour's drive east of Los Angeles.

Small Cars, Big Potential for Asian Makers Small, low-cost cars have abruptly become the next frontier for the global auto industry, after almost 20 years in which major car makers dismissed such vehicles as a low-profit afterthought. As gas prices keep rising, consumer tastes around the world are shifting toward smaller, more fuel-efficient cars. In the U.S., drivers are trading in gas-guzzling SUVs like the Nissan Armada for smaller models like the subcompact Honda Fit. In developing markets, where sales are exploding, first-time drivers are starting out with the smallest, cheapest cars. Global demand for small cars is expected to grow by 30% to 27 million vehicles by 2013, with the growth coming mostly from developing markets, according to auto research firm CSM Worldwide Inc. Demand for big SUVs during that time is expected to drop 4%, to 10 million vehicles.

General Motors Takes Sales Lead Over Toyota on Growth Outside of the U.S. General Motors Corp. outsold Toyota Motor Corp. in the first nine months of the year, buoyed by sales outside the U.S., in the battle to extend its 76-year reign as the world's largest carmaker. GM sold 7.06 million vehicles through September, taking a lead of 10,000 units over Toyota's 7.05 million, the two companies said in separate statements. At the end of the first half, Toyota led by 39,000 vehicles. Toyota's sales in the U.S., its largest overseas market, dropped each month of the third quarter, the longest stretch of declines since 1995. Detroit-based GM won customers in Brazil, Russia and China, boosting sales by 4 percent in the quarter.

Crash of Frontline, Overseas Shipholding, Teekay Nears on Freight-Oil Gap The record increase in oil prices and the unprecedented number of new tankers transporting crude is a stock market crash waiting to happen. That, at least, is the growing consensus among analysts who say the widening gap between West Texas Intermediate crude and the rate for supertankers shipping Middle East oil to Asia means industry titans Frontline Ltd., Overseas Shipholding Group Inc. and Teekay Corp. have unsustainable valuations. The Bloomberg Tanker Index has risen 19 percent in the past two years, even as freight rates sank 38 percent. The price of marine fuel, the biggest cost for shipowners, has advanced 73 percent to a peak of $446.50 a metric ton and the number of ships available is near a record.

China buys GE's 'green' push In China, GE (Charts, Fortune 500) appears to be making headway: The country is now one of the company's largest foreign markets, with $5.4 billion in revenues last year, a nearly fourfold increase since 2001. GE has 12,000 employees in China, including about 1,200 who work in a research and development center in Shanghai. It has 23 joint ventures with Chinese firms; last year, just to pick one example, the company opened its first wind turbine assembly plant, in the city of Shenyang. GE has been especially successful at selling Ecomagination jet engines, locomotives and wind turbines, said Bertamini.

Apple's wireless land grabThe iPhone maker's most audacious move is a possible end-run around wireless operators, including partner AT&T. The touch (yes, it is a lowercase "t") and other devices like it could spell trouble for big wireless operators, including Apple's exclusive iPhone partner in the U.S, AT&T (Charts, Fortune 500). In the short term, the touch provides consumers with what I would argue are the best parts of the iPhone (the touch screen, the music player and the Web browser) without requiring the consumer to sign up for a two-year service contract with AT&T. AT&T, of course, makes its money from such contracts. The iPod touch lacks the ability to make and receive phone calls, but plenty of people are content to carry a separate cell phone for voice calls. Indeed, the touch would certainly appeal to wireless customers who aren't inclined to get an iPhone because they have service contracts with AT&T competitors. The Wi-Fi capabilities built into the touch - and other devices such as Nokia's N95 and Samsung's T409 - in the long run could end up bypassing wireless phone networks altogether. How? If a user downloads ringtones or searches the web on a Wi-Fi network, he or she is not consuming minutes on the carriers' data networks, which phone companies are spending billions to build. Sure, the Wi-Fi connection usually is "fixed," which means the consumer isn't able to connect to the 'Net while walking around. But a lot of iPhone customers, for example, have expressed frustration with AT&T's data network, and prefer to surf their iPhones on Wi-Fi anyway.

·         Apple Shares Advance After Jobs Reports Record Mac Sales, Holiday Forecast Apple Inc. shares rose after Chief Executive Officer Steve Jobs delivered a 67 percent jump in fourth-quarter profit, topping analysts' estimates, on record Macintosh computer sales and growing iPod and iPhone demand.

 

 Leopard: Faster, Easier Than Vista The Mac is on a roll. Apple Inc.'s perennially praised but slow-selling Macintosh computers have surged in popularity in the past few years, with sales growing much faster than the overall PC market, especially in the U.S. By some measures, Mac laptops are now approaching a 20% share of U.S. noncorporate sales, up from the low single digits where they once seemed stuck. There are several reasons for this, including the security problems in the dominant Windows platform from Microsoft; spillover from Apple's blistering success with its iPod music players; the fact that Macs can now run Windows programs; and Apple's highly successful chain of company-owned retail stores. But another key factor has been the Mac operating system, called OS X, which came out in 2001. It has proved to be as powerful and versatile for mainstream consumers as Windows, yet easier to use and more secure. And Apple has upgraded OS X far more rapidly than Microsoft Inc. has upgraded Windows, bringing out major new releases roughly every 18 months, while Microsoft struggled for more than five years to produce the latest Windows iteration, Vista, which came out in January.

Microsoft's mainstays pay the bills Video games and Facebook aside, the real meat in higher earnings from the company are in the stalwart Windows and Office products. Microsoft on Thursday reported results that included a 24% increase in quarterly revenue to $4.1 billion for its client unit, which includes Vista, the latest iteration of its Widows operating system software. It also reported 21% growth to $4.1 billion in revenue for its business division, which includes its Office suite of software applications for things such as word processing and spreadsheets. Such impressive growth from relatively staid products came amid a flurry of headlines about the company's newer, edgier businesses. Microsoft's entertainment and devices unit, which includes its Xbox video games, did post a 91% increase in sales, though its total still came in at $1.9 billion. Microsoft also made big news by winning a partnership to sell advertising for Facebook Inc. earlier this week, though the company's online services unit continued to report a quarterly loss, with losses expected through the end of the fiscal year. And while games and online services certainly figure heavily in Microsoft's future, Windows and Office also seem poised to continue to post their own strong growth, analysts say.

· 

· 

· 

Motorola's Zander May Buy Time With Return to Profit Motorola Inc. Chief Executive Officer Ed Zander may have bought more time for a turnaround after firing 10 percent of his workforce and introducing a successor to the Razr handset. Motorola, the biggest mobile-phone maker in the U.S., probably will report its first profit in three quarters tomorrow after losing $209 million in the first half. The Schaumburg, Illinois-based company earned $49.9 million, or 3 cents a share, in the third quarter, down 95 percent from a year earlier, according to a Bloomberg survey of analysts. A return to profitability may give Zander another nine months to show he can produce a successful handset line to go with the cost cuts, said Tony Carbone, an analyst at RCM Capital Management in San Francisco. Investor Carl Icahn wants Zander's resignation if the phone unit doesn't recover by year's end. ``They're putting a tourniquet on the wound by cutting expenses,'' said Carbone, whose firm oversees $100 billion including Motorola shares. ``The longer-lasting solution of new products takes hold by the middle of next year.'' Motorola Reports First Profit in Three Quarters, Forecasts Higher Earnings

Verizon's FiOS Challenges Cable's Clout After years of promises, Verizon Communications Inc. is making significant headway with its $18 billion effort to roll out television and faster Internet service, posing a difficult new competitive threat for the cable industry. Two years after launching its FiOS service, Verizon has signed up half a million TV subscribers and, as of the second quarter, was adding 2,600 customers per business day, the company says. In the parts of the Dallas area where FiOS service is offered, a quarter of households are taking it, Verizon estimates. FiOS uses fiber optics to deliver television, faster Internet services and phone. Like similar cable packages it typically costs a little under $100 a month for all three services. Cable systems use fiber-optics in their networks as well but depend on coaxial cables to get the service into homes. The FiOS network has far more capacity for high definition TV channels, online games and downloading and uploading files. It also offers a few premium features that cable companies don't offer, like digital video recorders that can pipe recordings to different TVs in the house. On a national level, FiOS promises to change the balance of power among cable, telephone and satellite TV companies over which one can offer consumers the most attractive combinations of the latest TV, phone and high-speed Internet services. Until recently, cable companies were winning. They have about a 54% share of the high-speed Internet market and were much faster in breaking into phone service than phone companies were in offering TV. About 12 million of the roughly 90 million households that can get phone service from their cable operators subscribe to that service.

Qualcomm Has Plan to Widen Web Access Qualcomm Inc. today is announcing new chips to let laptop computers use multiple cellular data services, hoping to outflank a high-profile alternative called WiMAX. The cellular services are proving popular among laptop users who want to stay connected wherever they go. But there is a hitch. Many carriers built their networks on a technology called GSM, or global system for mobile communications. They typically use a technology for delivering data that is known by yet another acronym -- HSPA, for high-speed packet access. Another camp of carriers use code division multiple access, or CDMA, a technology pushed by Qualcomm, and favor an associated data network dubbed EV-DO, for evolution, data-only. The two kinds of networks aren't compatible. So laptop-computer makers hoping to offer long-range Internet access now have to buy two kinds of chips to support each service. Consumers typically choose one technology and one service provider and have to stick with them. Qualcomm, of San Diego, says its new Gobi chips can use either EV-DO or HSPA and their variants. That means PC makers can build laptops that can tap into the Internet virtually anywhere, says Sanjay Jha, Qualcomm's chief operating officer and president of its chip division.

Weekly Reader 28Oct07: Markets & Economy

Time to put up and review last week's interesting news and postings - split into two entries. First on Markets and the Economy and the second on Business and Companies. The news on all fronts continues to be interesting.

Basically the markets recovered last week what they lost the week before - which means of course that everything's going to be allright, right ? We put up what we'd like to think are a couple of major and interesting posts last week (Models, Metaphors, Musical Chairs and Market Outlook,Market, Market, Nice Market, Here Market.... ) that provide our views on market trends and ways/weighs to think about things. In the first pass a framework borrowed and adapted from BigPicture and Minynaville was presented that looks at four factors: Structure, Fundamentals, Technicals and Outlook (Psychology) and in the latter used it to examine current market trends. Despite the uptick last week we still argue that none of the first three factors is favorable but is being outweighed by the fourth.

One of the reasons is that none of last week's, or other recent, high-frequency economic data is particually positive. And the news on the Housing and Credit Markets can hardly be called favorable.  Which hopefully you can see in the accompanying chart which looks to harbbingers of future demand, from both Investment and Consumption. Investment is driven by (composed of) business capex spending plus housing investment. Last week's release of Durable Goods Orders, x-Aircraft, was down -3% YOY. A figure that's definitely one of the worst we've seen in a while, though not the worst this year. Meanwhile housing continues to deteriorate with New Home Sales down -30% YoY ! There's much more in the readings - most of it from our favorite source CalculatedRisk who continues to lead the analysis community.

On the consumption side real wages are "holding" up, though not improving, due to relatively benign inflation readings (more on those and interepretation thereof here: Inflation Re-visited: Uncle Alan & Prof. Jim Chime In). We'll see but the outlook there isn't particularly good either given rising oil prices and a falling dollar. Much more importantly employment continued to deteriorate with with YOY% gains falling from 1.19% from 1.27% the prior month. The average new jobs created in the first six months were 126K/month and fell significantly to 97K/month in the last three. Much more importantly, if you believe the working figure of merit is 150K/month to breakeven, then we're falling further behind and possibly at an accelerating pace. In the first six months the deficit was about -24K/month and has fallen recently to '53K/month. Really...really not good.

I'd say happy reading but it doesn't seem warranted. In any case you'll find all these themes dug into, reinforced and explored.

General & Special

Where was the Bubble: Houses, Rates or Credit? We can define a bubble as a “trade in high volumes at prices that are considerably at variance from intrinsic values." By that definition, I'm not so sure Housing was a true bubble -- the run up in prices, a doubling over the course of about 7 years, was actually a rational market response to interest rates being dropped to generational (46 year) lows. Trading volumes moved up, but proportionately so. Compare that with the Nasdaq, which doubled from October 1999 to March 2000 on a dynamic of a new paradigm. Trading volumes skyrocketed. When it was over, the Nazz had plummeted 78%. That example has the home price appreciating ~67%, but the monthly mortgage payments up only 14% But this only explains some of the pricing run up from 2001-04. It does not explain the next phase of price increases. To do that, we have to understand how everyone in the lending community got so drunk on securitization they simply abandoned their traditional risk metrics and repayment concerns. The assumption appeared to be that lenders could simply sell the mortgages to Wall Street to be securitized, without worries about delinquencies, defaults and foreclosures. You can see the decrease in lending standards over time: With each subsequent year of mortgage issuance, more and more homes began defaulting earlier in their ownership/repayment cycle. Have a look at the nearby chart -- it shows the delinquencies in the non-sub-prime loans. These were supposed to be higher quality loans. Apparently, these loans also succumbed to a lack of traditional lending metrics. The results speak volumes to where the bubble was.

Merrill's big mess up  What is the balance sheet of Merrill Lynch really worth? Depends to a large extent on who's in charge of valuing the company's large holdings of risky securities. Wednesday, Merrill (Charts, Fortune 500) reported third quarter earnings that contained $7.9 billion of losses on collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), which are complex debt securities, and junk mortgages. What shocked the market was that only three weeks ago Merrill estimated losses of $4.5 billion on these sorts of assets. What on earth happened that caused the brokerage to suddenly find another $3.4 billion of losses? One cause was that Merrill gave the job of valuing these securities to a group of people who turned out to have a much more conservative view on these assets' true worth. Compared with 10 years ago, Wall Street firms hold far more securities and financial instruments that don't trade regularly, which means they are valued according to in-house estimates and not so much by market prices. The extra $3.4 billion of losses at Merrill will only deepen fears that brokerages and banks have been overvaluing their assets to avoid taking the correct amount of losses at the appropriate time. This is big. It shows that executives had enough leeway under Merrill's approach to choose a very different end result. Different to the tune of $3.4 billion.

Markets & Investing

Mortgage Security Bondholders Facing a Cutoff of Interest Payments For all the pain in the mortgage market, investors who hold bonds backed by risky home loans have continued to receive their monthly interest payments — until now. Collateralized debt obligations — made up of bonds backed by thousands of subprime home loans — are starting to shut off cash payments to investors in lower-rated bonds as credit-rating agencies downgrade the securities they own, according to analysts and industry executives. Cutting off the cash flow, which is governed by rules and mathematical formulas that vary by security, is expected to accelerate in the months ahead. With such a re-evaluation, owners of collateralized debt obligations — investment banks, hedge funds, insurance companies and public pension funds — may be forced to write down mortgage investments beyond the billions they have already written off. Some bonds, for example, may go from being valued at, say, 70 cents on the dollar to becoming largely worthless overnight, bankers and analysts say. The adjustment could further erode the availability of credit to consumers and businesses. Though many people in the mortgage market expect a shut-off of payments, the broader financial market has not focused on it.

Fears of Falloff In Profits Send Dow Down 2.6% Weak earnings reports and dour projections are surprising investors who believed the global economy would bring a return to outsized profits. But that optimism may wane as the housing bust is showing signs of spreading to other industries. A slew of weak earnings reports stoked fears that profits in the next few quarters will fail to hit lofty expectations, sending the Dow Jones Industrial Average down 2.64% Friday. While investors have known for weeks that profits for the third quarter would suffer from turmoil in financial markets, many reassured themselves that a sharp turnaround would come in the current quarter, helped by a strong global economy. Instead, many third-quarter results have fallen below even the diminished expectations, and pessimistic news from companies such as industrial bellwether Caterpillar Inc. suggested more unpleasant surprises to come. A succession of earnings surprises at banks revived fears that the worst of the credit crisis, which hit two months ago and seemed to ease, has yet to pass.

Emerging markets next bubble Investors searching for big returns and no exposure to U.S. subprime mortgages are looking at emerging markets, raising the possibility that too much money could flow in, pumping up another bubble, top international bankers warned Sunday. Emerging markets have largely been spared any major impact from the subprime and structured finance crisis that has shaken markets in the United States and Europe, according to a report released Sunday by the Institute of International Finance. The group, consisting of hundreds of bank worldwide, said capital flows into emerging markets will reach a record $620 billion this year and should stay close to that level in 2008.

Economy

Why we need a recession -- soon America has a new mania this fall: recession-obsession disorder. If you just arrived from a visit to the International Space Station, you'd be excused for thinking that the U.S. economy is about to plunge off a cliff, with widespread unemployment, massive piles of unsold inventory, corporate profit growth in full-speed reverse and hundreds of bank closures. So is the inferno really upon us? Well, no. Not for a few months to a year, it seems, due to the Jedi mind tricks that bankers and government officials are able to play these days. And that's a pity because recessions serve a wonderful purpose in the economic ecosystem. Before this scenario can come to pass, it has one very high hurdle to overcome. Somehow, the big banks have to find a way to retain investors' confidence despite a January that is likely to feature many of the same problems we witnessed earlier this month. Once investors determine that the banks' bad loans are out of control and that the risk cannot be adequately measured, they will sell first and ask questions later. So, we are about to enter even more interesting times. A debt-led recession punctuated with joblessness and foreclosure is almost certainly en route. The only questions are whether it comes early next year or in 2009, and how deep a hole we'll need to dig for the burial. Whatever the timing or depth, continue to avoid the bank and brokerage stocks. A year from now, writes David Wessel, it will be clear what caused the recession of 2007-08: The triple whammy of falling housing prices, rising oil prices and the growing cautiousness of lenders and borrowers.

·         Americans Turn Negative on Economy, Expect Recession, Poll Says; 2/3rds Americans Say Recession is Likely

·         Northern Trust Week-In-Review. A must read – excellent charting and analysis of Housing and Durable Goods.

Home builders: Worst is yet to come The battered markets for real estate and home building still have farther to fall, according to a range of economists who spoke Wednesday at a forecast conference sponsored by the National Association of Home Builders. The economists agreed that the problems with home finance markets will continue to hit housing into next year, and that even when there is a recovery, it will be a slow process that will see weakness continue into 2009. While most said they believed the overall U.S. economy can weather the housing downturn, several saw significant risk of a recession. Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's Economy.com, said that large areas of the country will fall into recession, if they haven't done so already. The economists also admitted to being surprised by how bad the housing downturn has become, and all said that making forecasts of a recovery is difficult due to the problems in the credit markets. When will housing hit bottom? No one really knows. Optimists have been saying worst is behind us; pessimists say recovery is year, or years, away.

·         Housing Readings from CalculatedRisk (the goto for understanding what’s really going on): September Existing Home Sales Plummet, More on September Existing Home Sales, September New Home Sales, More on September New Home Sales, Up to $4 Trillion Decline in U.S. Household Real Estate Value Predicted

    • QUOTES: Sales of new one-family houses in September 2007 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 770,000 ... This is 4.8 percent above the revised August rate of 735,000, but is 23.3 percent below the September 2006 estimate of 1,004,000. The Not Seasonally Adjusted monthly rate was 60,000 New Homes sold. There were 80,000 New Homes sold in September 2006. September '07 sales were the lowest September since 1995 (54,000). This is another very weak report for New Home sales. The stunning - but not surprising - downward revision to the August sales numbers was extremely ugly. This is the second report after the start of the credit turmoil, and, as expected, the sales numbers are very poor. I expect these numbers to be revised down too.
    • Just to put these numbers into perspective, I've plotted the two declines - $2 Trillion and $4 Trillion - assuming the price declines happen between now and the beginning of 2010. Note that this doesn't add in any new homes or home improvement. A decline of this magnitude in U.S. household real estate value seems very possible.
  • Mortgage Industry Facing More Troubles- In all phases of the mortgage industry this week, from the people who make the loans to the people who insure them, the news was bad -- and most of them expect it to get worse.
  •  

Credit contagion infects your wallet The mortgage mess has already spread to car loans and credit cards. If consumers run scared and stop borrowing, the economy is in big trouble. My worst nightmare about the collapse of the subprime-mortgage market is coming true. The horrors let loose among mortgage borrowers and lenders by falling housing prices have begun to sink their fangs into the market for auto loans and credit cards, too. We're inching dangerously close to the point where consumers run for the hills -- taking their wallets and prospects for economic growth in the United States with them. In a wave of earnings reports that started with Citigroup (C, news, msgs) on Oct. 15, big banks reported a torrent of ink as red as blood from their mortgage operations. The damage came from two directions: mortgage delinquencies and assets backed by mortgages. At Citigroup, for example, delinquencies soared in September. Altogether, U.S. banks raised their reserves against loan losses by $6 billion in the third quarter from reserve levels at the end of the second quarter of 2007. That's bad news for bank stocks, certainly. Every dollar that goes into reserves is a dollar less that can be lent out to make money. And the levels of reserves don't look likely to fall in the near future. Washington Mutual, for example, told Wall Street analysts that it expects that charge-offs in its mortgage portfolio will increase by 20% to 40% in the fourth quarter. But the really scary news for the general economy is that the banks' problems aren't limited to mortgages and the housing market. They're starting to see rising delinquencies and charge-offs in their portfolios of auto loans and credit card debt. Wells Fargo, for example, said that charge-offs on its credit card portfolio rose to $176 million from $161 million in the second quarter. At Washington Mutual, managed credit card delinquencies climbed to 5.73% of the bank's portfolio from 5.11% in the second quarter. But the most stunning news -- and the most troubling indicator that credit problems aren't limited to the mortgage market anymore -- came from the credit card companies. Because these lenders have neither direct nor indirect exposure to the mortgage market, the trends here are an indicator of what's happening with consumer credit outside mortgages. And the news in the third quarter wasn't good.

Weak Mexican Peso Shows Oil Monopoly Undermining Growth, Reducing Surplus Mexican President Felipe Calderon is delivering a grim message: The largest oil producer in Latin America is running out of crude. The ban on private investment in its oil monopoly is depriving the nation of the benefits of record high prices and contributing to a slowdown in economic growth. Production of crude, Mexico's biggest export, has fallen 8 percent since 2004 to a seven-year low, data compiled by the government show. Mexico is being punished for its inefficiency in the foreign-exchange market. The peso fell 0.08 percent against the dollar this year, the worst performance among the 16 most-traded currencies. New York-based Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Credit Suisse Group in Zurich say the slump will deepen. The drop in production is hurting economic growth by reducing funds to improve highways, bridges and ports, Cervera said. Oil provides 40 percent of government revenue and the slowdown contributed to a 47 percent decline in the nation's surplus in August, according to the Finance Ministry. Mexico's economy has grown at an average annual pace of 2.8 percent since 2002, down from 4.4 percent during the previous five-year period. Output has dropped to a seven-year low of 3.12 million barrels a day as the state monopoly Petroleos Mexicanos fails to develop new reserves to offset dwindling production at Cantarell, the world's largest offshore field.

China Curbs Imports From Asia as Korea, Malaysia, Singapore Lead Job LossThe U.S. isn't the only country watching jobs and manufacturing migrate to China. Increasingly, so are China's closest neighbors. The nation is reducing its reliance on imports from the rest of Asia as it makes more of the higher-value-added intermediate and capital goods it previously bought from abroad. That is threatening growth in countries whose export sales are already in danger of erosion from the U.S. slowdown. More than 13,500 electronics-product workers in Singapore have lost their jobs since 2004, according to Ministry of Manpower statistics. The International Monetary Fund last week forecast Singapore's growth rate will fall to 5.8 percent in 2008 from an estimated 7.5 percent this year and sees weaker expansion in the Philippines, Malaysia, Taiwan and South Korea. ``China is moving up the supply chain,'' says T.J. Bond, chief Asia economist at Merrill Lynch & Co. in Hong Kong. ``The view that China produces labor-intensive goods but purchases high-value-added goods from abroad may be roughly correct today, but it need not last forever.''

October 26, 2007

Review the Bidding, Count the Cards: EPS Growth Rates

Well after puzzling some more on the outlook for the economy, profits, earnings and EPS I may have stumbled across an explanation for why the prognosticators have such a sanguine view of things. Just to review, the economy is slowing and faces more and more headwinds. In fact recent polls show a majority expect a recession in '08 and feel that we may be in one now.

In digging into earnings we found that EPS growth is not organic in the sense that it's based on growth in revenue, profits or earnings. And we found that to be consistent across three, no four, different and major data sources: GDP accounts, National Income accounts, WSJ reported earnings/profits by industry and S&P reported EPS by industry most recently. As they say - it's a puzzlement.

BUT...but...but if you look at the accompanying table it starts to become clearer. EPS growth rates by sector from the most recent S&P numbers. Take a look and see what you think. EPS growth as reported actuals and estimates from Q106-Q407, based on YOY% growth, lines up with the other data. When you add the '08 numbers the averages show some uplift but not big jumps. In other words it's the going forward expectations for Q108-Q408 that make you shake your head.

For the SP1500 overall EPS growth in '06 & '07 averaged 10.6% and is estimated to grow to 11.7%, which results in the 13.8% estimate for '08 as a whole. The sectors projected to perform exceptionally well are Technology, Telecom and Consumer Discretionary. Only Energy and Materials are estimated to have rates less than 10% and all the other sectors are projected to do well, with growth of EPS in the 10-14% range.

For another view consider the accompanying chart which shows YOY% EPS growth rates from Q106 to Q408, in two groupings. Notice that, roughly speaking, most of the sectors show declining growth to and thru '07 and a pickup on a quarterly basis into '08. More specifically the first sub-chart shows Consumer related sectors (blue-shades) and Energy/Materials (green). Overall four of the sectors are shown as declining and then return to a rather flat 10% outlook, which may have something to do with YoY comps. Con. Discreationary though is shown taking off !

In the second sub-chart Industrial (blue) and Tech (green) are shown doing well, with Telecom in particular projected to turn in a fabulous performance, rising to 50% EPS growth in early '08. Even Finance is shown returning to 20-30% growth rates in late '08.

And there you have IT - the nub of several matters. If any of these projections turn out to be in the ballpark any dips right now are buying opportunities. Of course that all hinges, in general, on a U-shaped path for the economy with the current low growth ( < 2%) being followed by more robust > 2% growth and eventually getting back over 3%. And of course with no further impacts from Housing or the Credit Market problems, especially in the Finance sector.

Fascinating isn't it ? The gap between current economic outlook and earnings projections I mean. Let alone all the major risk factors. It'll be interesting to see how S&P and other analysts change their forecasts over the next few months.

The question of course is how credible do you find them ? 

October 24, 2007

Have You Seen the Elephant ?: More on Earnings

Seeing the elephant is an old phrase borrowed, I think, from the British Army and used by many armies now and refers to one's first experience of something new and shocking. In their case combat - which is about as shocking as it gets. Fortunately our experiences aren't going to be on anything like that level. But still the Elephant here is learning that for the first time the old linkage between GDP, Profits and organic economic growth appears to be frayed to the breaking point (Dr. Pangloss Treating Goldie: Markets, Profits & Earnings, The Heart of the Matter: Profits vs Earnings ? ).

But first a small confession. My early religious training was in economics and after spending several years as a novice and then a few more in monastic retreat (otherwise known as grad skul) I went apostate and joined the real world. Now economics would tell us that any industry or product that gets a large return/profit must be serving someone somewhere. Yet as the share of Financial companies in profit has gone from 10% to 20% to, in just the last few years, 30% I begin to find myself turning into a modern Physiocrat. They were some of the earliest formal economists and started with the argument, in late 18th C France, that the only true source of wealth was Agriculture. Given the structure of the economy at the time they had a point if not a case. But other sectors like trade, manufacturing and finance were important contributors who's outputs made the functioning of the agricultural sector more efficient - thereby raising overall output and producitivity. Nonetheless I still find it difficult to believe that Finance contributes so much to the effective functioning of the economy that a 30% share of returns is warranted. Oh well...

Back to the Elephant and this time we'll go to the central cathedral of capitalism the Wall St. Journal - specifically it's recent reporting on quarterly profits and earnings. Which, BTW, they report as net operating income, NOT EPS ! 

If you take a look at the accompanying charts we have a third view, albeit on a shorter timeframe, of the shares of the various industries. Here we see quarterly profits from Q205 to Q207 in absolute and relative terms. Take a look for yourself and see what interpretations you come up with.

For the life of me there doesn't appear to be any major acceleration in profit growth that would cause me to be wildly excited about business performance. Earlier (Models, Metaphors, Musical Chairs and Market Outlook) we'd looked at  the markets and even quoted BigPicture from last Fall about the range-boundedness thereof. Based on these charts we'd have to argue that was a pretty sound judgement by Mr. Market.

On both absolute and relative basis we also don't see much to argue for a great outlook for any industry or sector. Energy and Materials looks pretty flat as do Consumer related industries (green-shaded) and Industrials/Utilities. Even Tech/Telecom, other than the spectacular performance of a few select (NDS, QQQQ) firms undergoing major innovation shifts (APPL, GOOG come to mind) indicate anything arguing for the runup over the other general or sector indices. Granted there was improvement in '06 and so far in '07 but an acceleration ? Nah.

Again we come, from yet a 3rd but consistent, data source that profit growth is a) NOT organic and b) neither acclerating nor indicating likely future growth.

Earnings, at least in headline reported EPS numbers, is another matter entirely. Or is it ? One "final" pass at a 3rd data source - S&P's quarterly earnings numbers.

Looking at the accompanying chart, low and behold, the S&P numbers surprisingly (at least to me) line up almost exactly with the National Income data and the WSJ quarterly numbers. In other words earnings have grown but not by that much, they appear to be flattening off recently and the DON'T appear to be growing at a rate that would indicate higher markets. BtW - these are EPS for the SP1500, not the SP500 !

So we come full circle on four different but complementary data sources: GDP accounts, National Income accounts, quarterly Operating Income and reported  earnings. With the economy slowing into a growth recession, with Housing much worse than anticipated and likely to still be worse yet over the next two years and with problems with asset pricing and valuations in the credit markets one would have to conclude that the outlook is not very sanguine :).

Too namby, pamby a conclusion ? Try this - there is NO indication that a better outlook for earnings is based in any reality I can investigate. Yet the Markets and Wall St. maintain a very upbeat outlook. Puzzling indeed, isn't it ? Feel free to chime in - variant opinions would be welcome. 

The Heart of the Matter: Profits vs Earnings ?

If you look back over the last two Weekly Readers they both might be said to converge on key question - where will earnings go ? Or broken down a little more will businesses continue to generate profits and will those turn into reasonable earnings ? And earnings growth in particular ? Earlier (Dr. Pangloss Treating Goldie: Markets, Profits & Earnings) we'd taken a pretty hard look at that question and found that Profits were strongly correlated with GDP growth and Earnings (ala S&P reported earnings/EPS) were strongly correlated with Profits. It might be worth your time to re-vist those charts and arguments because they lay a foundation for this discussion.

But we're presented with yet another conundrum - if the economy has been slowing why have earnings been growing ? As a partial answer let me quote from the earlier posting:

We can only conclude that with the lid screwed down on spending companies are making plenty of money, grabbing a growing share of the economy and, one guestimates, spending it on buybacks to keep the stock prices up and help out with EPS numbers. Which doesn't lead one to a great deal of confidence in organic growth of revenue, profits and earnings.

Stop and think about that for a minute - earnings may be going up but it's not because the economy or business is doing better. Somewhere under all the large pile of stock prices and reported earnings is a very large elephant. And he wouldn't appear to be a very well-groomed, well-behaved or benign one either.

We're definitely not in Kansas any more - so much for fundamentals. It's all about the finances and cash flow ?

 If you believe that argument, or at least think it raises some serious questions, then we thought it'd be worth looking into some more. Basically when we say growth is not organic what we're arguing is that EPS growth is NOT the result of growth in revenue or profits - rather it results more from throwing cash flow and borrowings at buybacks while screwing down the lid on expenses, hiring and capex spending.

Having set the table let's take a look at what some National Income accounts can tell us about the shares of profit from various sources. An idea we stole from Paul Kasriel and the Northern Trust economics team in their last US Economic Outlook (which we highly recommend reading for this and other reasons). 

So let's go elephant hunting. 

Let's take a look at total profits for Financial, Non-financial and Rest-of-World sources from the National Income accounts. From '79 to '93 there was a gradual increase from $200B to $400B and a faster rise $800B by '98. Interesting - oh, don't you just love hindsight so "next time" let's all remember to actually look at the data - profits flattened and then slowed from '98 to '01 before showing the sharpest upturn and continued rise since then.

If we look at the split between Finance, Non-Finance and ROW that also is interesting. While the shifting global economy is supposed to save us and make somebody else the engine you can't see any huge indication that that shift is in-place in terms of profits just yet.

The even more interesting shift though - we're looking at % shares of profit now - between Finance and Non-Finance. For ten, even twenty, years Non-finace companies had about 70% of the total profits while Finance companies split the rest with ROW until the '90s, depending on how you want to read the chart. Since then though there's been a profound structural shift.

If we take a closer look at the period from '95 to now we see roughly the same trends in more detail. During the 2nd half of the longest real boom in post war history profits were steady in the $600-800B  range but have grown rapidly in a few years until now they've nearly doubled at $1.6T/year.

Would anybody care to argue that a "recovery" with the lowest rate of job creation in the post-war era, low capital spending and the highest share of Profits in GDP represents sustainable, organic and self-reinforcing growth ? That's a rhetorical question in case anybody's wondering.

At the same time the share of Non-Financial companies has gone  from 70% to 50% of the National Income. At the same time Financial shares, which had earlier grown from 10% to 20% in the 80s have now gotten to be 30% of national income while ROW earnings have grown from 10% to 20%.

At a minimum the recent troubles in the Finance sector mean that the overall market, and the economy is no longer very insulated from those troubles. Though clearly ROW is increasingly important it won't be sufficient to offset already in place problems in the Finance industry. Nor are the other sectors likely to hold up well either, based on our earlier reads. In fact if you take the average share of the various sectors over the last several years (taken from WSJ quarterly profit/earnings reports) the energy & materials account for 20%, consumer related profits about 23%, industrials and utilities about 17% and tech/telecom 11% of profits. And Finance, as would be expected 30%.

So which of those industries do you expect to hold up or even do well ? Certainly a long-term argument for continued energy industry profitability is easy to make. But not so easy for either or both Consumer-related or Industrials, except as the latter is dependent on foreign earnings. Which is important but not yet as major as the talking heads would have us believe. Finance - well we seem to get a new rabbitt every six weeks based on the Mad Hatter's GPPDP - that's Genuinely Perturbed and Perverse Dissimulation Principles - of reporting.

Weekly Reader 21Oct07: Economy & Business

Here we pick up the other "1/2" of last week's Reader and shift the focus to the Economy, some more Markets - sans the financial engineering & SIVics, and look at Business pretty hard. As we've mentioned this has been finance driven market, and economy (the Liquidity, Buyout, Buyback mantras) which in the process of enchanting itself with the wonders of modern financial engineering forgot to look at fundamentals and sound operating practices. It's fascinating, and blackly amusing, that at the recent IMF conference major banking executives admitted they saw all this turmoil building up but were trapped into making bad decisions by the amount of short-term profitability being waved in their faces.

Excuse me, would you say that again ? Sheesh...something stronger seems inappropriate to the magnitude of the malfeasance. The selections for the General section, immediately below, pretty well set the table for thinking about all this with the Vice-Chair at Morgan-Stanley tellings us bank losses on LBO finances have destroyed any net profits. That's followed by an academic study pointer that finds that stock options cause CEOs to do unnatural and perverse things in pursuit of their own interest and at the expense of the company's strategic performance. Well smack me with a V8 and call me Nardelli, imagine that. Those two pretty well dispose of the Buyout and Buyback currents. The last pointer is to another Col. Rockies article talking about how to build a team and make it work with "no-name", low-cost but competent players. In other words how to make an organization perform well when it can't just buy sucess; and a return to fundamentals of building that over time.

The Economy section is brief but reinforces the themese we've struck here again and again - the core economy has been visibly slowing for some time if you know here and how to look, Housing is much worse than previously admitted but again if you know where to look the accelerating declines have been visible for some time. And, as the prior Reader post highlights, the ripples of the credit crunches are just beginning to show. So we have a growth recession with the possibilities of a Recession being triggerred by Housing running between 30-40%+. If you read no other document on the state of things read Paul Kasriel of Northern Trust Oct economic outlook.

All of these themes play themselves out in the Business section where Wilbur Ross is putting together a fund to go after mortgage companies in trouble to the impacts on Citigroup's failed business model. Speaking of that more information is coming out on GM's UAW deal where the agreement looks to set the stage of significant long-term reductions in labor costs, which'll be some help but not enough to revive the strategic outlook for Detroit. That will require wholesale transformations in operations, particularly manufacturing, product development, procurement and order cycle mananagement. Reflecting similar fundamental breakdowns in existing business models Delta's CEO is talking about industry consolidation.

Similar problems though are beginning to crop up in the technology & innovation-driven industries. The outlook for tech spending is beginning to deteriorate while earnings are going to face increasing challenges. Articles on IBM, Yahoo, Intel and others make the same points. Which we dove into earlier in the post Tech, tech, who's got the tech: Greenberg on Definitions.

And finaly there are a couple of pointers to Pfeizer news which point out their continued troubles with failed development processes and the resulting empty new drug pipelines. Talk about an industry with a broken business model and Big Pharma is it.

Happy Reading. So-to-speak... 

General & Special

The Private Equity Boom: A Net Loser for Wall Street?  “When you net out all the profit versus all the losses, Wall Street hasn’t made money, it’s lost money.” That was the ever-quotable Robert Kindler (left), vice chairman at Morgan Stanley, summing up the net effects of the private-equity boom and bust of the past few years. Kindler was speaking Monday at a New York M&A conference sponsored by Penn State’s Dickinson School of Law. He was addressing one of the primary questions of the past few weeks: How Wall Street’s eagerness to secure private-equity business — via profit-sapping bridge financing and other bad loans — is affecting the banks’ earnings. The banks “were getting paid nothing for the bridges,” Kindler said. “They were not pricing the risk they were taking.”

Large Stock-Options Grants May Hurt Investors A large stock option may motivate a chief executive officer to such great risks that he ends up making decisions that can backfire for shareholders.

Meet the World Series-Bound Rockies of Colorado The Colorado Rockies, make that the National League champion Colorado Rockies, are just like their manager. And they're nothing like him. Actually, scratch that. Don't focus on Hurdle. He wouldn't want it that way. Rather, take a gander at his players. See how a bunch of no-names are a reflection of their boss. And the teachings of the manager's father and grandfather, too. When you think about it, these Rockies are the anti-Clint Hurdle. They arrived with no hype. No expectations. And yet, here they are, four wins shy of achieving it all. The Rockies are in the World Series for the first time in their 15-year existence. Not the Mets or Cardinals or Dodgers or Braves or Cubs. Nope. None of them won the pennant. This isn't about big payrolls. Or big stars. Big effort and belief is more like it. It's about fundamentals. And, more than anything else, it's about a healthy dose of respect for the game, for teammates and opponents. The players run hard because their manager demands it. They set a record for team fielding percentage because the manager knows that phenoms don't always pan out. Fundamentals and effort don't slump. ``You build a good offensive team, you'll send a lot of players to the All-Star game,'' is Hurdle's philosophy. ``You want to win late and play late, you need to have a team that can pitch and play defense.''

Markets & Investing

5 bubble-proof foreign stocks  Developing-country stock markets are building a bubble that will burst -- eventually.

Is the outperformance by the developing-country stock markets of the world a wave you want to catch even now, because it's got months or years yet to run? Or is this just another bubble -- like that in technology stocks in 2000 or real estate in 2007 -- set to explode? It's a bubble, I'm afraid. But that doesn't mean it will burst tomorrow. In fact, it's almost certain to get larger before it bursts. The moment of reckoning, the explosive pinprick, could, in fact, be not just months but a year or even more away. Frankly, right now I'd tread very carefully, taking on only limited risk. That may leave some money on the table in the short term, but your portfolio is likely still to be standing when the run comes to a sudden, unexpected end. I'd much rather come back to these markets when valuations have pulled back from current peaks. And if you like the long-term fundamental story of the developing economies -- these are some of the fastest-growing economies in the world, after all -- there are still ways to invest that don't involve simply following the crowd and hoping that some greater fool will step in to buy from you.

Wall Street Remains Bullish Despite Data With all the predicaments facing the markets these days -- credit growing scarcer, oil near a record $90 a barrel, home prices in the dumps -- it would be logical if investors were shoving money under their mattresses, instead of into stocks. But logic doesn't always prevail on Wall Street. Why is Wall Street so optimistic, even though stocks took a hit Friday, with the Dow dropping 366.94, or 2.64 percent, to 13,522.02? While there are worries about the economy heading toward a mild recession, investors are still energized by the potential for U.S. companies to grow. Companies might have had their most challenging quarter in five years, but they are still sitting on large cash stockpiles -- and those with international units are able to take advantage of growth outside the United States. Furthermore, Wall Street doesn't expect the credit turmoil will send a shockwave through other parts of the economy.

Economy

Bernanke Says Housing to Remain `Drag' on US Growth Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said the housing slump will be a ``significant drag'' on U.S. growth into next year, though evidence of a broader impact on spending is limited. Credit markets have improved, he added, while a full recovery will take time ``and we may well see some setbacks.''  ``Risk management considerations also played a role in the decision, given the possibility that the housing correction and tighter credit could presage broader weakening in economic conditions that would be difficult to arrest,'' he said. In response to a question by Henry Kaufman, the former Salomon Brothers Inc. economist who now runs a New York firm bearing his name, Bernanke said investment firms ``need to be as transparent as possible'' about how they value their assets. ``This current financial stress is not likely to disappear overnight; partly it is an information problem,'' Bernanke said. ``It is going to take a while for investors to appropriately value these assets.'' Economists React: ‘Horrific’ Housing ,

IMF trims 2008 forecast Turbulence in financial markets will trim growth, but won't do much damage as China, India and Russia continue to power ahead and global growth comes in at 4.8%, agency predictsThe turbulence in financial markets will trim global growth but won't do too much damage as growth in Russia, India and China continue to power ahead, the International Monetary Fund said Thursday in its latest report on the global economy. The global debt crisis will trim growth in industrial countries to 2.2% next year, down from the previous forecast in July of 2.8% growth rate. Growth in 2007 should come in at a 5.2% pace, down only slightly from last year's 5.4% growth rate. But China should grow at a 10% pace next year, Russia at a 6.5% pace and India at an 8.4% rate, keeping the global economy afloat. These countries alone accounted for half global growth over the past year, the IMF said. For the first time ever, China and India will be the two largest contributors to global growth.

US Economic Outlook (Northern Trust) No Recession in Sight - If You Are Nearsighted plus Week In Review

 

Business

Wilbur Ross Sees Mortgage Market's Dead Men Rising in Subprime Debt's Wake Wilbur Ross, the billionaire who specializes in resurrecting failed companies, is betting the U.S. mortgage market will rise from the dead. He won an Oct. 5 auction for the home-loan servicing unit of Melville, New York-based American Home Mortgage Investment Corp. Ross agreed to pay between $435 million and $500 million for the right to collect payments and maintain escrow on about $45.3 billion of mortgages from the biggest residential lender to go bust this year. To succeed, Ross will have to coax delinquent borrowers to pay again, or, in industry jargon, get non-performing loans to perform, said Jeffrey Kirsch, chief executive officer of Miami- based American Residential Equities LLC, which specializes in getting people to pay overdue mortgage bills. Ross's pattern has been to acquire one bankrupt company in an industry and augment it by buying similarly distressed companies. In textiles, Ross began with Burlington Industries Inc. and Cone Mills Corp., both based in Greensboro, North Carolina, creating International Textile Group Inc. Then he expanded with joint ventures in places such as Turkey and India. Ross is investing in the mortgage industry at the same time as New York-based Goldman Sachs Group Inc., the biggest U.S. securities firm by market value, and Charlotte, North Carolina- based Bank of America Corp., the country's second-largest bank.

·         Readings on LBO/PEG Trends: Boston Scientific and the 3 Steps to Bad-Deal Recovery , The Tuck Rule: Only Government Can Kill Buyout Boom ,  Scenes From the Private Equity Picket Line

Credit Crunch Rattles Citigroup Model Touted as a diverse financial colossus that could profit in good times and bad, Citigroup Inc. is reeling after two weeks of dreary news -- including a 57% profit drop reported yesterday -- that show how unprepared the bank was for the recent bust in credit markets. With businesses struggling from Texas to Tokyo, the banking behemoth's capital ratio -- or cushion against losses -- has dwindled to its lowest level in years. Citigroup has halted a program to buy back its own shares. The stock fell 3.4% yesterday. Citigroup is at the center of an industry plan to rescue a series of bank-affiliated investment funds that invested in mortgage-backed securities and other risky assets. Citigroup once boasted about its big presence in such funds, but now is leading the charge to shore them up by creating a single big fund to buy up their assets. The dismal news adds to pressure on Chief Executive Charles Prince, who had declared 2007 "the year of no excuses." Yesterday, he said, "This quarter's performance was well below our expectations and, frankly, surprising." Unexplained Mysteries: Why Chuck Prince Still Has A Job, Citigroup turmoil turns spotlight on Rubin

GM job costs to plummet 75% of plant workers may retire by 2011; hires may get half as much pay. General Motors Corp. says its new labor pact with the UAW will slash labor costs by allowing the automaker to eventually replace up to three-quarters of veteran factory workers with lower-paid new hires who won't get costly retirement benefits promised to their predecessors. Speaking on Monday for the first time about the contract, GM said 56,000 of 74,500 blue-collar workers could retire by 2011. Many replacements will fall into a second-tier of lower-paid jobs created by the deal. They'll start at $14 an hour -- half the current average wage -- doing jobs outside of core assembly line work, from operating a fork-lift to maintenance to moving finished vehicles. About 16,000 jobs are considered noncore, but GM said the contract allows it to shift significantly more to the lower tier as workers retire. Even if new hires move into higher-paying jobs, GM won't pay medical bills in retirement, instead contributing to a 401(k) plan. The changes, which will likely be adopted in some form by Chrysler LLC and Ford Motor Co., will all but bring an end to lifelong health care and rich starting wages guaranteed for generations.

·         Stylish Sedans The everyday family sedan is undergoing a transformation from stodgy to stylish as drivers begin to demand more from their basic transportation than a nondescript appliance on wheels. Some call it the Target effect, after the budget retailer that has successfully applied costly looking design and style to inexpensive commonplace items from soap to sofas. Now, car makers are following suit with their mass-market midsize sedans, which have long sold in high volume despite their decidedly unstylish looks.

Delta CEO Says Consolidation Possible The chief executive of Delta Air Lines Inc. said Tuesday that the carrier wants to be the "undisputed leader" in the industry and that a deal with another airline may be in its best interest. Anderson noted the consolidation of the airline industry and said he expects that trend to continue. He said he believes Delta's financial improvements could make it a player. Atlanta-based Delta fought during bankruptcy to fend off a hostile takeover bid by Tempe, Ariz.-based US Airways Group Inc. But since exiting bankruptcy on April 30, the airline's executives have seemed open to the idea of consolidation with an airline in the future. Delta has indicated before that if it was involved in consolidation, it would want to be the acquirer. Anderson hinted at that again Tuesday when he said that consolidation would make sense to Delta if it was done from a position of strength and in the long-term best interest of shareholders.

Is This Big Tech’s Last Big Quarter?  Tech giants IBM and Intel posted strong quarters, but can they keep it up? Expect the shift toward services to continue, as it looks like companies are going to cut back on hardware and software. Over the last few days, this blog has started to see signs that businesses may slow their tech spending in 2008. A Goldman Sachs survey of 100 information-technology managers found that these people expect tech spending to drop 1% next year. And the research firm Gartner recently advised clients to prepare an alternative budget that anticipated spending cuts. The continued shift in IBM’s business away from hardware and software — the two areas that would be most affected by smaller IT budgets — and toward services — which companies sign up for in order to cut costs — bodes well for IBM’s ability to weather the storm, if it comes.

Why Google, Apple, Dell, others may not be what they appear. Herd mentality drives me nuts, especially when it involves "technology stocks" as if one size fits all. It often is a categorization that is as arbitrary and blurry as the line can be between value and growth stocks. That is simply the way Wall Street works, especially when any sector comes into favor, as tech has been in recent months. But that also raises the question: What really is a tech stock? Broadly defined, high-tech is anything having to do with telecommunications, semiconductors or personal computers. But that can be misleading, which is why former hedge-fund manager, tech analyst and all-around out-of-the-box thinker Andy Kessler likes to take it a step further to say that to be considered bona fide tech, a company must spend "some exorbitant amount on research and development" resulting in products that more than pay their own way. The easiest way to figure that out is to look at gross margins and the amount spent on research and development relative to sales. On both counts, the higher the better.

Yahoo's words more important than numbers Investors will pay more attention Tuesday to management update on restructuring than to expected earnings of 8 cents a share.Yahoo Inc. is poised to post its fiscal third-quarter results after the market's close Tuesday, less than two weeks shy of the unofficial close of a self-imposed, 100-day-long reorganization. Analysts on average expect Yahoo to post earnings of 8 cents a share for the period ended in September, on $1.24 billion in revenue, according to Thomson Financial. But the numbers Yahoo posts will be secondary to what management has to say about the company's ongoing transformation, and outlook for the future, analysts say.

Intel Share Rise May Slow Unless Otellini Widens Profit Margins on Chips Intel Corp. Chief Executive Officer Paul Otellini has delivered what he promised investors in 2006. The world's biggest semiconductor maker has regained market share lost to Advanced Micro Devices Inc., cut jobs to help shave $1 billion in costs, and introduced faster computer chips on time. Yet Intel's gross profit margin remains 10 percentage points below the average of the past 10 years. Unless Otellini can narrow that gap, he may not sustain a 26 percent rise in Intel shares this year, the seventh-best performance in the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Ericsson Falls to Three-Year Low as Profit, Sales Miss Company's Forecasts Ericsson AB, the world's biggest maker of wireless networks, dropped as much as 30 percent to a three-year low in Stockholm trading after saying third-quarter profit and sales trailed its forecasts. Ericsson didn't get expected orders to upgrade AT&T Inc.'s wireless network in the U.S., Svanberg said. The company has won contracts for new networks in China and India that carry lower profit margins than upgrading existing networks in Europe and North America. Svanberg became CEO in April 2003 and stepped up the pace of cost reductions, pulling the company back from near bankruptcy. Ericsson, founded in 1876 when Lars Magnus Ericsson opened a repair shop for telegraph equipment, slashed more than half its workforce