« October 2007 | Main | December 2007 »

November 26, 2007

WRFest 25Nov07(Business): ...and We

And while we're on the subject of tolling bells, Thanksgiving and all the little details that make life interesting this collection of business related readings has some real highlights. The prior WRFest posting sketched the general environment - not positive and lots of supposed "suprises" coming out of the woodwork. So the question remains who's going to do what ? In particular all those companies that though the good times would roll and bought back their shares are now experiencing a rapidly growing exposure to profit and cash flow problems. If you read nothing else read the excerpt from the WSJ on that (and also it's worth going back to review a prior post on the flood of liquidity and buybacks -Market Drivers 3 (Buybacks):Investment, Hiring, Nah...Bonus, Bonus, Bonus !.

Accompanying that is a little something pointing out that YoY earnings flipped negative for the first time in a long time. Several companies caught our eye for one reason or another from Cerberus to GM to Chipotle to Airbus, who continues to experience really rocky times. But the two links we'd really like to draw your attention to are the one on HP and the other on the application software market. In case you haven't noticed app software is a) where the value of computer systems resides - the rest if plumbing. And b) without ever having really delivered on it's hyped-up promises reached saturation and maturity so that c) there's been a lot of consolidation going on. Unfortunately that consolidation hasn't meant any benefits for customers....whoopsie ! If anybody thinks Tech has a rosy future they first need to work thru that little conundrum - how to get the APP S/W industry to actually deliver value. We're all open to suggestions.

On the other hand one of THE drums we beat around here is that a good strategy & business model are essential, a good management system vital but where the rubber meets the road is making it happen - execution, execution, execution. HP turned in a quarterly earnings report that was just sterling - firing acrosss the lines of business and geographies though interestingly it was servers that were beginning to take off while printers are experiencing continued profit pressures. And HP is certainly back in PC's as well.

At the end of the day this is about Hurd coming in and putting an operating plan in place, communicating, making sure it was executable and then establishing accountability for performance. Hopefully we'll get a chance to dig into this further and see what the details are but it's worth carefully reviewing the HP link and then ask yourself two key questions:

  1. How did they make it work and can they keep it up ?
  2. How does everybody else compare ?
The last question is the important one because if we're right about whom and what the bells are tolling for the requirements for performance and value are going to grow exponentially. If nothing else that's the take away here ! 

Business

Big Buybacks Begin to Haunt Firms High-profile companies are cutting back on share buybacks amid pressure from a slowing economy and deteriorating balance sheets. Driven by billions of dollars in share buybacks, record-setting buyouts and a wave of mergers, the amount of stock in the market shrank by hundreds of billions of dollars in the past four years. With the supply of stock down and demand strong, the market rallied. Now, as the economy slows and credit markets buckle, high-profile companies are cutting back on buybacks, and some wish they held on to the cash they gave back to shareholders. The reversal of the trend exposes a flaw in the buyback strategy -- many companies bought high and are selling low. From the third quarter of 2002 to the second quarter of this year, more than $1.5 trillion of shares in nonfinancial companies has disappeared from the stock market through buybacks, mergers or buyouts, according to the Federal Reserve. The number hit a peak during the second quarter of this year, when nonfinancial companies retired a seasonally adjusted net $192.5 billion of shares. Some of the money to buy the shares came from the credit markets, where companies raised $156.5 billion in the quarter. Now, some investors worry that dividends and buybacks will go from a positive for the market to a negative, as a slowing economy and deteriorating balance sheets put pressure on a host of companies.

  • Have Companies Feasted on Debt? It is clear many homeowners borrowed too much during the mortgage boom that unwinds daily before us. What's less clear is whether companies have done the same.

Greed Trumps Fear as Kravis, Schwarzman, Black Get Banks to Arrange CLOs After sticking banks with more than $300 billion of leveraged buyout debt, New York-based Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., Schwarzman's Blackstone Group LP and Black's Apollo Management LP are raising money for collateralized loan obligations that will buy the assets for as little as 95 cents on the dollar. Morgan Stanley, Citigroup Inc. and their Wall Street competitors, which reaped a record $8.4 billion in fees from the buyout firms in the first half of 2007, financed at least seven private-equity CLOs in the past two months, while cutting off other managers, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. KKR officials said they accounted for about 40 percent of the funds created since August. ``Private equity firms are such big repeat customers that they can demand investment banks'' serve them, said Martin Fridson, chief executive officer of high-yield research firm FridsonVision LLC in New York.

Indian automaker goes for Jaguar Indian automaker Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. is among the three final bidders for Ford Motor Co.'s Jaguar and Land Rover units, a person who has been briefed on the negotiations said Tuesday. Mahindra, which has joined private equity firm Apollo Management LP to bid for the British automakers, is competing against another Indian automaker, Tata Motors Ltd. (Charts), and U.S. private equity firm One Equity Partners LLC, said the person, who requested not to be named because the talks are private. Tata and the private equity firm have been previously identified as possible bidders for the luxury car operations. All three bidders were meeting Tuesday with the British government, labor unions and Ford about the sale, the person said.

As Software Firms Merge, Synergy Is Elusive  The voluminous deal activity in the software industry has meant a bonanza for shareholders. Customers, however, are left with unanswered questions about their future as the companies flesh out their integration plans. The issue of what customers experience after a big tech merger is once again coming to the fore as the software industry undergoes its latest wave of consolidation. As the big software companies flesh out their integration plans internally, customers on the outside are left with unanswered questions about their future. It often takes years for software makers to integrate all the products they have bought -- if they manage to at all -- making it hard for customers to decide what to buy in the meantime. Some customers worry about losing negotiating power in the long run as the number of product choices dwindles. And all the dealmaking can crimp a CIO's ability to plan, since it's unclear which software makers will survive.

Companies

Economy Conspires to Dog Cerberus United Rentals Sues Over Collapsed Deal; Chrysler Loans Stall Cerberus's termination of the deal, coupled with turmoil in some of its other investments, shows how even Wall Street's most-respected names are being battered by upheaval in the credit markets and economy at large. The ordeal is a turnabout for Cerberus, which had spent years distancing itself from its once bare-knuckle image. In the summer, it earned kudos for how it handled the tricky financing of its Chrysler buyout. Its earlier purchase of General Motors's financing' arm, GMAC, was a sign that it had truly arrived. Life in the big leagues has proved tough. Cerberus declines to explain why it backed away from United Rentals. A slate of investments related to the subprime-mortgage business have proved difficult. Compounding matters is the fate of a $4 billion sale of bank loans tied to the Chrysler deal, which was to take place this week. It will likely be postponed, a person familiar with the sale says.

GM's Wagoner Has Short Honeymoon The meltdown in the mortgage market and slumping car sales have combined to sour General Motors Corp. Chief Executive Rick Wagoner's brief honeymoon with Wall Street. The auto giant's stock has fallen 39% since it reached a three-year high of $43.20 a share a month ago on the strength of cost cuts tied to its new labor contract with the United Auto Workers. As auto sales have continued to falter, trouble has erupted on other fronts, including a big bet on subprime-mortgage lending made on Mr. Wagoner's watch

Coffee clash at McDonald's The fast-food chain wants to move full steam ahead into the growing market for specialty coffees with cappuccinos and other espresso drinks. But first it must bring reluctant franchisees on board. After the success of its upgraded drip coffee -- which even managed to snag a thumbs-up from testers at Consumer Reports earlier this year -- the fast-food chain known for supersize meals is gearing up for a massive expansion into the world of lattes. Restaurants will offer lattes, mochas, cappuccinos and espressos with a choice of different flavorings and milk. Industry watchers say the drinks will cost about 50 cents less than at Starbucks (SBUX, news, msgs) But as it tries to cash in on the fast-growing specialty coffee market, the world's largest restaurant chain is already finding itself at odds with the unlikeliest of groups: its own franchise owners. A full-court press by McDonald's couldn't come at a worse time for Starbucks, the world's largest chain of coffeehouses, which is struggling with rising dairy prices, growing competition and flattening store traffic in the United States.

Burrito Chain Assembles A Winning Combo Chipotle has built itself into one of the hottest fast-food chains in recent years by rejecting almost every technique on which the industry was built. The company doesn't advertise on TV or franchise, and executives aren't concerned about long lines. Chipotle Mexican Grill has arguably become the country's most successful fast-food chain in recent years by rejecting almost every major technique on which the industry was built. Not only does it not show the product, it doesn't advertise on television. It doesn't franchise. It has some of the highest ingredient costs in the industry. And its executives aren't especially concerned that customers wait as long as 10 minutes in lines that routinely stretch out the door. Of course, consumers are fickle when it comes to restaurants, making it difficult for chains to maintain success over time. Chipotle's narrow menu could make it hard for the chain to hold customers' interest. But Mr. Ells argues that the menu is more varied than it appears because of the many ways in which the ingredients can be combined. The chain's founder says he sees potential for Chipotle to do in fast food what Whole Foods Market Inc. has done in the grocery industry: popularize natural foods by selling them in an appealing environment. But Chipotle hasn't been able to secure as much naturally raised meat as it would like. Ann Daniels, the executive director of purchasing, says the company simply can't get suppliers to produce enough.

Investors May Want to Drop Whole Foods Whole Foods Market's investment story is a lot like the goods on its shelves: Pricey, but so compelling that people keep going back. Whole Foods shares are 17% above their 52-week low, currently trading at 30 times projected 2008 per-share earnings. This hefty valuation is despite a share price that has fallen some 22% from a high in October, as investors became jittery when a consumer slowdown hit other high-end food retailers such as coffee purveyor Starbucks Corp. They believed that sluggishness could slam growth at the rapidly expanding grocery chain. Bulls argue that its pricey valuation is less of a reflection of 2008 earnings -- which they agree will be lackluster because of the high costs of integrating Wild Oats -- than a big earnings revival expected in 2009. That is when some analysts expect the Wild Oats acquisition to bolster earnings in a big way. Still, paying 30 times forward earnings for the promise of rapid growth more than a year down the line can test even the most loyal Whole Foods patron, especially when that valuation is more than double that of traditional food retailers Kroger Co. and Safeway Inc. While the same-store sales growth of those bigger grocers lags behind that of Whole Foods -- Kroger's was about 5% in the latest quarter while Safeway's was 3% -- the difference in their gross margins is starting to narrow as Whole foods' costs increase and its rivals beef up their higher-margin, natural-food offerings. Kroger's gross margins are about 24% and Safeway's are about 28% in their most recent quarters; Whole Foods' are about 35%.

How Unilever Is Thinning the Ranks Consumer-products giant Unilever has cut thousands of jobs in the past two years and plans to cut 20,000 more by 2009. To carry out the sweeping reorganization that started with layoffs of half of Unilever's 1,200 senior executives in 2005, Chief Executive Patrick Cescau has turned to Head of Human Resources Sandy Ogg. The company's goal isn't just to cut fat but it is to change job descriptions in a company long known for being bloated and slow. Mr. Ogg has brought to Unilever a performance-ranking system for jobs and employees that he developed as a top human-resources executive at Motorola Inc., where the former U.S. Navy officer worked before joining Unilever in 2003. Mr. Ogg's system lists the company's top positions by criteria such as sales, profits, and operating costs. Mr. Ogg and Unilever's executive committee have rewritten job descriptions to create fewer, more powerful posts. To select employees for the new jobs, Mr. Ogg used a grid with financial performance of the employee's division on one axis and six leadership skills on the other. The leadership skills were selected to reflect Unilever's priorities, Mr. Ogg says. One ranks managers on "action not debate," because the company had often gotten bogged down in internal discussions about strategy.

H-P Issues an Upbeat Forecast Hewlett-Packard Co. posted a 28% rise in profit and a 15% jump in revenue for its fiscal fourth quarter and issued a stronger-than-expected forecast, highlighting how the technology giant has expanded despite its size and recent market turbulence. The Palo Alto, Calif., company's outlook contrasted with recent guidance from some other technology companies. This month, Cisco Systems Inc. Chief Executive Officer John Chambers said U.S. tech spending might be "lumpy." Wireless-tech maker Qualcomm Inc. gave a lower-than-expected outlook, helping to spark the stock market's recent tumble in technology shares. H-P, a tech bellwether because of its broad product portfolio that includes printers, personal computers and tech services, said its fiscal 2008 operating earnings would be $3.32 to $3.37 a share, above Wall Street estimates of $3.27 a share. It said its fiscal 2008 revenue would rise 7% to $111.5 billion, above Wall Street forecasts of $109.5 billion, according to Thomson Financial. H-P said its board authorized an additional $8 billion of share repurchases, a sign that the company thinks its stock is undervalued, and it declared a regular cash divided of eight cents a share on its common stock. The company has made similar moves in years past as a method for offsetting dilution from its employee-stock-benefits plan. H-P in the Stall Zone

Web War III Google is in over its head by taking on Ma Bell's descendants. Google is worried about what you'll see on your tiny cell phone screen someday -- it might not be Google! The much awaited Android software package was the search giant's way of trying to establish in the mobile wireless world the enviable position it enjoys in the fixed Internet world. Maybe instead of looking ahead to wireless, it should be looking over its shoulder and worrying more about what you'll see on your giant HDTV. Get ready for a free-for-all around the idea of convergence of, loosely, TV and the Internet. Players angling for advantage are too many to count, from Microsoft to Babelgum. But we wouldn't overlook the telephone companies, Verizon and AT&T, who just happen to be Google's nemeses in the wireless world war too. Verizon's Ivan Seidenberg is finally getting a few nods for his expensive approach, laying fiber right into millions of homes. This would enable -- if households need it -- 100 megabit speeds for dense, interactive media. AT&T has taken a cheaper approach, rolling fiber into neighborhoods but relying on the existing copper for "last mile." Your existing phone line is capable of carrying more and more data thanks to new compression technologies. When they're done, the telcos will have not just the preferred platform for delivering high-def, on-demand and interactive services. They'll have several advantages over their would-be rivals, whether Google or Microsoft or the cable companies. One is their history as phone companies, in the form of systems for billing and tracking individual customers in their usage. A second is their choice of technology: Unlike cable or satellite, true Internet TV means delivering individualized TV streams to each user on demand, rather than broadcasting the entire spectrum of channels to the user's set-top box.

Airbus May Cut Research Spending as Dollar's Decline Passes `Pain Barrier' Airbus SAS may cut its 2 billion- euro ($3 billion) research budget to trim costs as the dollar's decline becomes ``life threatening'' for the world's largest planemaker, Chief Executive Officer Tom Enders said. The dollar-euro rate has ``passed the pain barrier,'' Enders told Airbus works-council representatives in Hamburg, Germany, yesterday. Unions said today that with record orders secured this year the comments were ``absolute nonsense.'' Airbus is cutting 10,000 jobs after it lost 572 million euros last year before interest and tax, compared with Boeing's profit of $3.81 billion. Wiring problems put the A380 superjumbo two years behind schedule at a cost of $6.8 billion, the A400M military-transport is running a year late, prompting a 1.1 billion-euro charge, and the A350 widebody was redesigned five times to win airline approval, pushing deliveries five years behind Boeing's rival 787 Dreamliner. The job cuts Airbus is seeking through 2010 are part of a restructuring plan aimed at making the company profitable and competitive. The so-called Power8 program assumes an exchange rate of $1.35 to the euro, Ohler said today. Still, Airbus has already won record orders this year and EADS this month reported a smaller-than-expected loss after aircraft pricing was firmer than anticipated. Friedrich said Airbus needs to review its discounting policy if it can't make a profit given current demand and that Enders must be explicit about what measures are planned or risk destabilizing the workforce.

WRFest 25Nov07(Mkts/Econ): The Bell Tolls for Thee

Welcome back - hope you had an excellent Thanksgiving. Mine was and thanks for asking. Oh, yeah while last Fri. may have got our hopes up one would have to say today's markets take the edge off. As the quote goes, "Ask not for whom the Bell tolls, it tolls for thee". And there were quite a few tolling last week, some in such interesting keys that we may have crossed some thresholds. Below is our regular summary of the Markets and Economic news with several key themes serendipitously highlighted in the General section.

Before commenting on those we'd like to draw your attention to some markets and economic news which continues and expands several themes we've been playing (to wit an already slowing economy IN a growth recession with a long way to go in Housing and accelerating problems in the Credit Markets as the vast sets of structured instruments unravel).

The biggest shots across the bows were the announcements last week from Freddie and Fannie after they post multi-$B losses AND told us that they'd need to raise new capital. The first was very definitely not good but the latter is really scary. To which one needs to add in a couple of pieces of int'l news. For one thing the credit contagion appears to be spreading to some of the Asian countries, seperately from any economic linkages. And the spreads in the European commercial paper markets are widening back out, indicating rising risks and increased chances of yet another seizure in the worldwide credit markets. The central characteristic of all this that's still underplayed is that breakdowns in the credit markets are NOT limited to sub-prime and are more due to leverage and structure combined with bad under-writing diligence than the latter alone. Again we'd refer you to our post on the "rocks in the pool" model of spreading credit problems:Stages of Denial: Acceptence ? Not Yet .

The other big shot, in its' own way as significant, is the Fed's move to change its' reporting from 2 to 4X/year and also to include more information, including a 2-year economic outlook plus the ranges around that outllook. As we've discussed before the natural speed limit of the economy is 3% or north, and anything less is actually a growth recession. Well the Fed (!) is now telling us their outlook thru 2010 is for less than 3% growth.

Which brings us to the General section which nicely summarizes and re-presents/represents our themes. First is a great FT column explaining why a growth recession is a problem and then how it's spreading around the world. Followed by two interesting posts, one from the BigPicture and the other from the WSJ, commenting on the markets' YTD performance and how certain key bellweather companies are getting badly hurt (BP's example are Citi and HD - in the latter case we could say we told you so but our intent was to focus on performance improvement and understanding the problems, not critisizing where it wasn't merited. Citi though is another thing entirely). Which nicely sets up the Journal's point about needing to focus on company performance (also buttressed by the postings on buybacks to be covered in the next posting on Business). The final link is to a WSJ editorial on improving enterprise performance by using the PE mantra by Robert Pozen. While he makes some very good points our argument is that there's too much attention to financial engineering and not enough to improving the business. A point we made a couple of weeks ago and which is co-listed with the link.

In the midst of all these things to not be thankful for we'd still urge you to stop and consider what you have to be grateful for. If nothing else that you have the time, wherewithal and capabilities to worry about these sorts of things puts you in a better position than 90% of the human race in terms of well-being. As Warren Buffett put it's the birth lottery. 

General & Special

Who will pick up the thread after the great unwinding? Is the US going to experience a recession? Two answers must be given to this question: nobody can be sure; and it does not matter. A much more important question is whether the US economy continues to experience a “growth recession”, by which is meant a lengthy period of sub-trend growth. The answer is that it will. The standard US definition of a recession is two quarters of negative economic growth. This demands both too much and too little: too much because it requires an absolute fall in output, which is an infrequent event in a growing economy; too little, because it is consistent with rising unemployment and declining capacity utilisation. But a lengthy growth recession is likely to be far more disturbing even than a sharp recession, provided the latter ends swiftly. Most analysts believe that the trend rate of growth of the US economy is around 3 per cent a year. Growth at below that rate, then, is a growth recession. This year, the expectation is for growth of about 2 per cent. Next year, suggests the consensus, it will be a little above 2 per cent. That would mark a cumulative shortfall of about 2 per cent of gross domestic product over two years. So the US is already in a growth recession.

Midday Tidbits — Turkey Edition Special

·  The biggest gobbler this year in the Dow Jones Industrial Average is faced with the possibility of losing more than half its value in a year, which just doesn’t happen that frequently (General Motors managed it in 2005). It’s Citigroup, which, coming into today, was off 43.6% on a year in which the wheels basically came off the franchise. The next-closest competitor for this year’s dog is Home Depot, off 30% coming into today’s trading.

·  Taking apart the 10 sectors that comprise the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index, the worst is, predictably, the financial sector, which have shed 21% of their value, as the large banks, brokerages and mortgage lenders were beset with credit issues. Consumer discretionary stocks rank second-worst with a 13.6% decline headed into today’s trading.

·  If you’re still long this stock, well, good luck to you. ACA Capital Holdings may have its credit rating cut further, which would force banks to take on about $60 billion in collateralized debt obligations, according to a J.P. Morgan analyst. The shares were lately down 28 cents to 82 cents, after already losing 92% this year.

Four at Four: Finding Bulls, Avoiding Turkeys

·  In certain environments, distinguishing between one stock or another doesn’t seem all that important. The tech bubble of 1997-1999 was a heyday for many an undeserving company, and the recent run-up in financials (one that ended earlier this year) produced big rallies in a multitude of different shares. But in a more challenging environment, such as the one the market currently resides in, finding bull markets within choppy trading conditions becomes difficult. Even as industrial shares, in general, suffer, one such bull market can be found in Deere & Co., which reported a strong quarter and posted expectations for 2008 that looked good to investors, helping the shares to a 6% gain today. The stock is up 20% since the beginning of July, comparing favorably with Caterpillar’s 13% decline. Now, the two companies are different (Deere is more involved in agricultural businesses, which are doing better than construction at this point), but it does illustrate that the entire market isn’t poisonous. “What you try to do is find where the growth is in the economy,” says Scott Vergin — large-cap growth portfolio manager at Thrivent Investment Management in Minneapolis. “There are pockets of strength out there, and it’s not all this big disasters as the financials are.”

·  Looking at the Dow industrials today, there aren’t too many pockets of strength. All but one stock (GM) ended down in a sour session, one where investors leaned even harder on the likes of brokerages, oil and the industrial shares. But really, weakness abounded across the spectrum today as investors deal with the reality of the current and forthcoming earnings environment, which isn’t a strong one. Within the S&P 500, the average negative surprise in the third quarter was a 13.9% shortfall, the largest negative surprise for one quarter headed back to 1990, according to Merrill Lynch data. Still, Merrill notes that it remains difficult to shake analyst optimism. Fourth-quarter earnings estimates have fallen dramatically during the third quarter, to a growth estimate of 1.3% (from original estimates of 11.3% growth), but 2008 estimates still sit at a lofty 13.8%. Surveying the landscape, Wall Street researchers still come to the same conclusion: blue skies, smiling at me, nothing but blue skies.

Target-Proof Your Company  The increasing number of buyouts of public companies by private equity -- 202 this year (so far) from 35 in 1997 -- is putting more pressure on corporate boards to enhance shareholder value. Although private equity funds are currently on hold because of the credit crisis, they are very large and will return to action. During the hiatus, public companies should improve their performance and avoid being a future target by taking a few pages out of the private equity play book. Of course, some private equity deals have succeeded because of excess leverage, quick flips or onerous fees. However, several careful studies, including research published in the McKinsey Quarterly in 2005, have shown that the majority of companies acquired by private equity funds have outperformed thanks to substantially improved operations and better designed incentives. A broad analysis of this outperformance reveals five key factors. While some may be unique to the privately held company, public directors should ask the following five questions, and consider the extent to which they can apply the answers to their particular company:

Think Like a Private Equity Guy ? No, Think Like An Owner !

Markets & Investing

A whisper in your ear from City gurus Without further let ado, let me hand over to a couple of my favourites, starting with Teun Draaisma, Morgan Stanley's chief of European equities. "We do not wish to bet against the growth spillover effects of the financial crisis anymore. Will the credit crunch lead to a US recession? This is becoming increasingly likely. Can the rest of the world decouple? We would not count on it. "The risk-reward for equities has deteriorated. We are now overweight cash, neutral equities, and underweight bonds. "We have not seen the usual end of cycle excesses yet (meaning the rush by small investors to buy stocks, and mega mergers) but with the financial crisis not improving we are not so sure any more whether we will get to see those excesses. The end of this cycle may well be more like the last but one (late 1980s), just as a character trait often jumps one generation. That would mean that the equity fizzles out in the next few years. "What is new is the duration of the deepening financial crisis. It is still true that our recession-risk indicator suggests a mid-cycle slowdown, not a recession, while our earnings growth leading indicator suggests decent growth next year. These indicators do not capture the credit market situation fully, however, and many recessionary indictors are on red.

Freddie Mac Shares Plunge After Mortgage Company Posts $2.02 Billion Loss Freddie Mac fell 29 percent, the biggest decline since it went public in 1988, as the second- largest U.S. mortgage-finance company posted a record loss, warning of a possible dividend cut and the need to raise capital. The worst housing slump in 16 years caused ``significant deterioration'' in the third quarter that will continue through year-end, McLean, Virginia-based Freddie Mac said in a statement. The net loss was $2.02 billion, or $3.29 a share, three times what some analysts estimated. Freddie Mac and the larger Washington-based Fannie Mae, created by Congress to foster American home ownership, have lost $41 billion in market value this year as mortgage defaults and foreclosures rose to record levels. The companies, which own or guarantee 40 percent of the $11.5 trillion U.S. home loan market, will have less money available for new mortgages. The company ``almost in the immediate future'' will announce how it will increase capital, including the possibility of reducing its fourth-quarter dividend by 50 percent, Syron said in a conference call with investors. Freddie Mac also hired Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. as advisers. Should a dividend reduction fail to help meet capital reserve requirements, Freddie Mac may consider limiting growth, slowing purchases in its guarantee portfolio and selling preferred stock or convertible preferred stock, the company said. Freddie Mac cut its portfolio by $29 billion in September and October, Piszel noted in the interview.

·          Bank of America's Investment in Countrywide Now Shows Loss of $858 Million

·          Credit-Default Swaps on European Banks Rise to Record on Subprime Concern

·         U.S. 10-Year Bond Yield Below 4% for First Time Since 2005 as Stocks Drop

·         Japanese banks suffer 230 bln yen in subprime losses: report

At Subprime `Survivors Conference' It's Too Early to Tell Who'll Survive They dubbed it ``The Survivors' Conference.'' In early November, 2,000 people who handle asset- backed securities for a living crowded into a ballroom at the JW Marriott hotel in Orlando, Florida, just 3 miles from Disney World, to hear speaker after speaker explain why 2008 may be their worst year ever. The subprime crisis, which has claimed the jobs of three chief executive officers and prompted more than $45 billion in writedowns at the world's biggest banks, may end up spilling into 2009. ``These events tend to become deeper and play out longer than most people initially expect,'' says Michael Mayo, an analyst who covers securities firms at Deutsche Bank AG in New York. ``This is one of the slowest-moving train wrecks we've seen.'' The tumbling U.S. housing market will continue to inflict the damage. Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations containing those securities are falling in price and won't find their footing anytime soon. That's because most of the subprime mortgages, which provide collateral for $800 billion in securities, have yet to go bad, says Christopher Whalen of Hawthorne, California-based Institutional Risk Analytics.

Credit 'heart attack' engulfs China and Korea The global credit crisis has hit Asia with a vengeance for the first time, triggering a massive flight to safety as investors across the region pull out of risky assets. Yields on three-month deposits in China and Korea have plummeted to near 1pc in a spectacular fall over recent days, caused by panic withdrawls from money market funds and credit derivatives. "This is a severe warning sign," said Hans Redeker, currency chief at BNP Paribas. "Asia ignored the credit crunch in August but now we're seeing the poison beginning to paralyse the whole global economy," he said. Korean and Chinese three-month yields have fallen from 4pc to 1pc in a matter of days in a eerie replay of events on Wall Street in late August when flight from banks and the US commercial paper markets caused yields on three-month Treasuries to falls at the fastest rate ever recorded. Asian investors appear to be opting for deposit accounts with government guarantees. It is unclear what prompted this latest "heart attack" in the credit system, though rumours abound that Asian banks have yet to own up to their share of the expected $400bn to $500bn losses from the US mortgage debacle. Stock markets were battered across the region. The Hang Seng index in Hong Kong fell 4.15pc, while Tokyo's Nikkei slumped to the lowest level in a year and a half, dragged down by the shares of the 'Seven Samurai' exporters. Asian jitters set off fresh turmoil on Europe's credit markets. The iTraxx index measuring default insurance on bank and insurance bonds hit an all-time high of 63.5.

Europe Suspends Mortgage Bond Trading Between Banks  European banks agreed to suspend trading in the $2.8 trillion market for mortgage debt known as covered bonds to halt a slump that has closed the region's main source of financing for home lenders. The European Covered Bond Council, an industry group that represents securities firms and borrowers, recommended banks withdraw from trades for the first time in its three-year history until Nov. 26. Banks are still obliged to provide prices to investors, according to the statement today. Banks including Barclays Capital, HSBC Holdings Plc and UniCredit SpA took the step as investors shun bank debt on concern lenders face more mortgage-related losses than the $50 billion disclosed. Abbey National Plc, the U.K. lender owned by Banco Santander SA, became the third financial company to cancel a sale of covered bonds in a week as investors demanded banks pay the highest interest premiums on covered bonds in five years.

Wealthy Nations in Gulf Rethink Peg to Dollar For many years, oil-rich Persian Gulf states have pegged their currencies to the dollar. Now that link is stoking a bad bout of inflation in their red-hot economies and putting policy makers in a dilemma: Break the dollar peg and risk undermining the U.S. currency, or keep it and face growing local discontent. Because countries such as the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Qatar sit on large reserves of U.S. dollars, their decisions will have repercussions beyond their borders. If they move away from their strict dollar pegs -- perhaps following Kuwait, which earlier this year switched to a basket of currencies -- it could undermine demand for dollars and encourage others to diversify their holdings. Many nations have already created sovereign wealth funds to invest their holdings in a broader array of assets. The countries of the Persian Gulf are struggling with the impact of their own good fortune as rising oil prices bring a windfall. Normally, when the price of a country's major export rises, that pumps up the local currency, which helps restrain inflation. Instead, much the opposite has happened. As the price of oil has skyrocketed in recent years, Gulf currencies tied to the dollar have fallen relative to other currencies such as the euro and British pound, making many of their imports more expensive. The UAE and Qatar have suffered some of the worst inflation, as the oil gusher has triggered a building boom. In Qatar, inflation hit 11.8% last year, and the International Monetary Fund estimates it will average 12% this year. This week, officials in Doha, the capital, raised taxi fares by a third. Both countries depend on an army of guest workers from South Asia and elsewhere, who send much of their income to their families back home. As costs go up, these workers are spending more of their salary on basic goods and have less to send. What's more, the falling dollar erodes the value of the Gulf currencies against the workers' home currencies, meaning their remittances don't go as far.

No measure of risk A new U.S. accounting rule requiring banks to give detailed data on assets valued purely by mathematical models sheds light on the quality of their numbers, but has little value in assessing their risk exposure. Figures required by rule FASB 157 have generated keen interest among investors anxious to assess the reliability of bank reporting and ascertain exposure to losses on U.S. subprime mortgage-backed securities and other instruments shunned by the market since the credit crisis began. Journalists and analysts have begun citing banks' Level 3 assets and comparing them with total assets, but accountants caution against reading too much into the FASB 157 figures. "You can't draw a correlation between a high number for Level 3 and a bank's degree of risk," an accountant for a major European bank said. She said, for example, that credit derivatives may require little or no cash up front and so have a small carrying value in the figures, but might expose a bank to significantly more risk than a cash investment in the top tranche of a loan product, the full value of which would go into Level 3. The first bank auditor said a more informative number in the 157 table is a bank's net transfers in and out of Level 3 versus the other categories since the credit crisis kicked off.
 

Economy

Fed sees economy slowing in 2008 The Federal Reserve said that the decision to cut a key interest rate last month was a "close call," according to minutes from that meeting released Tuesday. But in a new economic outlook, the central bank also lowered its growth target for the economy in 2008, raising hopes that the Fed will cut rates again when it meets in December. The Fed indicated in an addendum to its minutes that it now expects the economy to grow at about a 1.8 percent to 2.5 percent rate next year, down from a forecast in June of 2.5 percent to 2.75 percent growth. The Fed also issued relatively sluggish growth targets for economic growth in the next two years. The Federal Reserve governors and Federal Reserve Bank presidents indicated that they anticipate the economy to grow at a 2.3 percent to 2.7 percent clip in 2009 and at a 2.5 percent to 2.6 percent rate in 2010.  Fed Lowers '08 Growth Outlook, Calls October Decision to Cut Rates `Close'

·          U.S. economy in meltdown MarketWatch economist Irwin Kellner says the U.S. economy is reeling from a one-two punch of plunging real estate values and a full-blown credit crunch that might not be alleviated with additional rate cuts. Home building remains weak October's activity skewed toward multifamily segment. Construction begun on single-family homes slips 7.3% in October, but a surge in apartment building pushed overall figure up 3%. But pact of building permits the slowest in 14 years. Why U.S. actually needs a recession Seventeen benefits from an economy going through "slow-motion train wreck."

  • Paulson on Housing My point isn't to embarrass Paulson, but to show how far behind the curve he has been on housing and the credit crunch. If modification standards are a good idea, he shouldn't be talking about standards, he should be proposing standards. At least he realizes that housing in 2008 is going to be much worse than 2007. Paulson Shifts on Mortgages U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, warning of a potentially significant increase in home-loan defaults in 2008, said in an interview that the mortgage-service industry should help large groups of borrowers qualify for better loans. The statement was a shift from his prior view against a group approach.
  • Commercial Property Now Under Pressure The value of commercial real estate is starting to decline because of the credit crunch, according to a Moody's report.

·         Pimco's McCulley Says Fed May Cut Rates to Below 3% on Recession Concerns

U.K. Economic Growth Unexpectedly Slows as Services, Manufacturing Falter U.K. economic growth unexpectedly slowed to the weakest pace in a year during the third quarter as service industries cooled and factory production stalled. Gross domestic product rose 0.7 percent in the three months through September, the Office for National Statistics said in London today. It previously estimated 0.8 percent, which was also the median of 31 predictions in a Bloomberg News survey. The annual growth rate was 3.2 percent, the most since 2004. European service industries from airlines to banks expanded the least in more than two years in November as a U.S. housing slump increased the cost of credit globally and oil prices approached $100 a barrel, a separate report today showed. Bank of England Governor Mervyn King said Nov. 14 that the U.K. economy may slow ``sharply'' as higher borrowing costs pinch spending. The central bank increased the benchmark interest rate five times in the year through July, while banks have hoarded cash and raised rates for lending to each other on concern about losses from mortgage-backed securities in the U.S.

Balancing market freedoms Today, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke admits that nobody, including him, is able to guess how near to bankruptcy the biggest banks in New York, London, Frankfort and Tokyo might be as a result of the real estate crisis. As one of the economists who helped create today's newfangled securities, I must plead guilty: These new mechanisms both mask transparency and tempt to rash over-leveraging. Why should non-economist readers care about these technicalities? Because the policy tools that served so well for Alan Greenspan's Federal Reserve and for the Bank of England now have to be changed. Today, central bankers and U.S. Treasury cabinet officers cannot know whether current interest rates are too high or too low. This is surprising, but true. The safest bond interest rates are indeed low. But financial panic engendered by the burst bubble of unsound U.S. and foreign mortgage lending means that even a mammoth corporation like General Electric would find it expensive now to finance a loan needed to build a new and efficient factory. The situation is not hopeless. New, rational regulations that discourage predatory lending and rash borrowing could help a lot. Also, as we learned during the Great Depression, the government's treasury and its central bank must be both the lenders of last resort and the spenders of last resort. Speculative markets will not stabilize themselves. The best policy is actually the middle way: not too much freedom for market forces, and definitely not too little freedom. Global markets have moved into a new epoch. China, India and even Russia and Ireland are currently growing at almost twice the pace of the United States and the core countries of the European Union. Gone are the days when an American president could command ocean tides to come in and go out.

November 20, 2007

WRFest 20Nov07(Business): Ch, ch, changes.....

Peter Drucker had a saying, "...change the people or change the people" and we've been seeing a lot of that and will be seeing more and more of it as the problems in the Finance industry are worked out. If you'll skim the readings below, as well as the prior post, one theme stands out to me - at the heart of all these problems was a major breakdown in the asset securitization "technology" cause by a combination of profound lack of understanding, a set of incentives that made pumping any business instead of good business the road to greedy gains (& everybody knew it and knows it who's involved) and the joint failures of competence, governance and execution on fundamentals, e.g. Risk Management, that were supposed to lie at the core of the executives capabilities. Change the people indeed. Like the prior post we'd have to say the extensive discussions and analysis from last week's WRfest still applies (WRFest 11Nov07(Business): ....performance is reality) and will be THE theme for a long time to come. 

The three listings in the General section bear this out and are specially recommended. One is a Bloomberg interview with John Thain where he reminds us of nothing so much as Mark Hurd as the latter was taking the reigns at HP. Let's hope he has similar success 'cause MER sure could use a dose of hardnosed execution these days. Along with the whole rest of the Finance industry.

They're not the only ones facing Ch...ch...changes though and below you'll find pointers to challenges in the Auto industry (including the big ones popping up at Chrysler so far), retailing facing the accelerating slowdown (there's a particular fun piece on HD in case you read our earlier post: Performance Re-visited: Another Trip to HD's Woodshed) and the continued emerging challenges in the Tech industry, in general and specifically. For example Starbucks is making some of the biggest changes in its' history by planning a major marketing campaign as it faces slowing growth, maturity of it's business model and increased competition, e.g. MickeyD's. Similarly Apple has gone gang-busters with the iPhone but ATT hasn't backed it up with a network that provides the proper level of support. The iPhone and Google's new open-source phone software platform are huge shots across the bow.

We recently heard Richard Armitrage, ex-Deput Secretary of State, outline what it takes to make something go: 1) a workable vision that you communicate to everyone, 2) execution and 3) accountability. He was, of course, speaking in a different context (US foreign policy) but put the essence of good management and govenence in one pithy sentence.

We went on a little longer but, again, we'll point to the introduction to our framework and suggest that the times are going to sort companies out into two buckets. Those that do and survive and those that don't.(Think Like a Private Equity Guy ? No, Think Like An Owner !)

Meanwhile have a great holiday ! 

General & Special

John Thain’s Strategic Agenda: Bloomberg TV interview

As Bank Profits Grew, Warning Signs Went Unheeded We should have known something was strange. The banks were doing a lot better than they should have been doing. When the history of the financial excesses of this decade is written, that will be a verdict of financial historians. There were signs that banks were either lying about their results or were taking large risks that were not fully disclosed, but investors were oblivious. What were the signs? Consider how banks make money. They pay low rates on short-term deposits and charge higher rates on long-term loans. So they love what are known as positively sloped yield curves. And they like to see big credit spreads, where risky borrowers are charged much more than safe ones. Put them together, and banks should clean up. By that light, nothing was going right in 2006 and early this year. The yield curve was inverted, or at best flat. And credit spreads were at historic lows. Risky loans, whether to subprime mortgage borrowers or junk-rated corporations, were readily available at rates that seemed to assume there was only the slightest risk of default. And yet the bank stocks were buoyant, and so were reported profits.

Why I'm Prepared to Become Citigroup's Next CEO I don't know about you, but I'm finding this latest upheaval in the financial markets a bit disheartening. The $45 billion is one thing; the losses we can all accept. (After all, it's mostly other people's money.) It's the lack of personal ambition that's hard to forgive. There was a time when bankers and traders at big Wall Street firms knew how to exploit a boss's weakness. The moment the head of a Wall Street chief executive officer rolled, a dozen subordinates lined up to kick it into the net. No longer. The CEO's of two giant Wall Street firms have been axed, a third is one big subprime writedown away from oblivion, and a fourth is apparently scouring his firm for his successor. And there's hardly anyone to replace them! As I say, disheartening. The size of the pathos on Wall Street, and the huevos, had me feeling low. That's when I realized: Anyone can be a critic. I can sit here at my computer and complain about all that's missing from the world, but my words won't fill the void. Only my actions might make a difference. But then something else came to me. Before I can responsibly accept the job as Citigroup CEO or even at Bear Stearns, I needed to ask myself: Am I really qualified?

Business

Subprime test Did the securitization industry fail its first major test? Some say the process helped fuel subprime lending excesses. Others argue that the long-term benefits are so important that they justify the risk.

VW Takes Lead in Resale-Value Rankings The Big Three auto makers still lag behind Japanese and European rivals when it comes to predicted resale value. Detroit's big three auto makers have gained ground in recent quality surveys, but a leading vehicle-price resource says American brands still lag behind Japanese and European competitors when it comes to predicted resale value -- a critical measure consumers use to decide whether a car is a smart buy. Boosting resale value is an urgent task for Detroit's auto makers. With data about used vehicle values and predicted resale values -- also known as residual values -- widely available on the Internet, consumers can fairly easily factor likely resale value into a buying or leasing decision. Detroit's auto makers have suffered in such comparisons because they have tended to push for share by overproducing, then slapping on big discounts or selling vehicles in bulk to rental-car companies. Those tactics undermined resale values for models on the road and the predicted resale values used by finance companies to set lease payments on new cars. Detroit's Big Three have recently slashed production of even hot-selling items in an effort to boost residual values.

Aggressive markdowns this holiday season aren't guaranteed, as retailers have taken steps to cut costs and inventories. The economy is weakening, crude oil is near all-time highs and subprime mortgage woes are snagging home-buyers and Wall Street traders alike. Time for aggressive Christmas markdowns? Not so fast. The annual stare down between consumers and retailers isn't a guaranteed win for consumers this year, industry watchers say. In the past, high costs and poor inventory planning gave retailers little choice but to quickly slash prices if the holiday shopping season started slow. Last December, caught off guard by a price war over flat-panel televisions, Circuit City Stores Inc. tumbled into the red after it was forced to refund part of the purchase price of HDTVs. During Christmas 2000, retailers loaded shelves in anticipation of a strong selling season only to dramatically cut prices when bad weather and economic worries kept shoppers away. At Gap Inc., fourth-quarter profit that year tumbled 34% while Nordstrom Inc.'s profit dropped 59% as a result of the early and deep markdowns. But after several years of retail mergers and low interest rates, most large chains have stronger balance sheets this year. Many retailers have taken steps to boost profit margins by cutting staff to reduce labor costs and adding pricing and planning software. Slowing sales growth since mid-2006 has curbed expectations -- and inventories.

American Airlines's `Hidden Asset' May Top Carrier's Market Value AMR Corp.'s American Airlines, the world's largest carrier, and its U.S. competitors are sitting on frequent-flier plans that may be worth as much as the airlines themselves. Demanding an upgrade on their investment, some shareholders want the programs sold. American's AAdvantage program, with more than 57 million members, may fetch as much as $5.7 billion, according to a Morgan Stanley estimate. That's almost the same as AMR's market value. Bear Stearns & Co. projects United Airlines' Mileage Plus may go for as much as $22.8 billion, more than four times the value of parent UAL Corp. Airlines could boost shares by 20 percent to 27 percent by unloading the units, Morgan Stanley says. Investors say selling the mileage plans would help reverse this year's 18 percent drop in airline stocks amid a 51 percent rise in jet-fuel prices. While airline executives have resisted giving up exclusive access to their best customers, they are now considering activist shareholders' demands to copy the 2005 spinoff of Air Canada's Aeroplan, which has passed its parent and grown to about the same market value as Northwest Airlines Corp.

Advertising: Web Videos Stealing TV Viewers, and Marketers WHY are fewer viewers watching the new fall television series? Perhaps because they are too busy watching video online. As broadband service becomes more available at home, the growing prevalence of video programming on the Internet is catching the attention of consumers — not to mention marketers and media companies.

Ethanol Bust Makes Losers of Bush, Gates, Archer Daniels Midland in 2007 Ethanol, the centerpiece of President George W. Bush's plan to wean the U.S. from oil, is 2007's worst energy investment. The corn-based fuel tumbled 57 percent from last year's record of $4.33 a gallon and drove crop prices to a 10-year high. Production in the U.S. tripled after Morgan Stanley, hedge fund firm D.E. Shaw & Co. and venture capitalist Vinod Khosla helped finance a building boom. Even worse for investors and the Bush administration, energy experts contend ethanol isn't reducing oil demand. Scientists at Cornell University say making the fuel uses more energy than it creates, while the National Research Council warns ethanol production threatens scarce water supplies. As oil nears $100 a barrel, ethanol markets are so depressed that distilleries are shutting from Iowa to Germany. An investor who put $10 million into ethanol on Dec. 31 now has $7.5 million, a loss of 25 percent. Florida and Georgia have banned sales during the summer, when the fuel may evaporate and create smog.

The end of the tech stock party  Despite the uncertainty, this much is clear: We won’t soon see a run in tech stocks like the one that just petered out. Break out the orange juice and aspirin: Wall Street’s tech party is officially in hangover mode. Investors don’t have to look far to see the signs. Apple (AAPL) shares are down 14 percent from their high of $192 earlier this month. Google (GOOG) shares are down 15 percent, and Research in Motion (RIMM) 22 percent.

Of course, it’s hard to feel too much pity for long-term holders of these feel-good stocks, since their recent tumbles have merely put them back at their September and October levels. But now is a good time to face a sobering truth: It will be many months before the markets throw another another tech party like the one that just ended — and holiday sales could be the best gauge of how bad things will get.

 

Companies

Chrysler mulls dealer cuts Chrysler is considering wide-ranging branding changes that would streamline its product offerings and eliminate as many as 1,000 dealers, The Wall Street Journal reported Friday. A plan currently under discussion calls for Chrysler dealers to sell all of the automaker's passenger cars under the Chrysler name. Dodge dealers would sell only pickup and commercial trucks, and Jeep dealers would sell only Jeep and sport-utility vehicles, three dealers familiar with the discussions told the Journal for its online edition. One of the dealers said the proposal was just one of several being considered, and that the company hoped to have a decision in place by the end of the year, the Journal reported. The dealers asked not to be identified because the plan has not been released publicly. The plan would allow Chrysler, which seeks to return to profitability by 2009, to drop some of its overlapping products. That in turn would eliminate underperforming dealerships carrying excess inventory and using incentives that cut into profitability. Messages were left after hours Friday with Chrysler spokesmen.

Home Depot Third-Quarter Net Falls as Drop in U.S. Home Sales Slows Demand Home Depot Inc., the largest home- improvement retailer, reported lower profit and cut its full- year earnings forecast after the U.S. housing slump reduced sales of kitchen cabinets and appliances. Home Depot said it will take a ``cautious stance'' on completing its $22.5 billion share buyback because of the volatility of credit markets and housing sales. Third-quarter revenue of $19 billion missed the $19.3 billion average estimate of analysts in a Bloomberg survey. Chief Executive Officer Frank Blake is spending more than $2 billion this year to improve customer service and the appearance of stores in a bid to reverse market-share losses to Lowe's Cos. Sales have declined for two straight quarters amid the worst housing slump in more than a decade. ``It'll take Blake about five or six quarters to turn the corner,'' said Burt Flickinger, managing director of Strategic Resource Group in New York. Net income fell to $1.1 billion, or 60 cents a share, in the quarter through Oct. 28, from $1.5 billion, or 73 cents a year ago, Atlanta-based Home Depot said today in a statement. Revenue a year earlier was $19.6 billion. Home Depot lowered its full-year earnings forecast from continuing operations to a decline of as much as 11 percent. Previously, it expected a drop of 7 percent to 9 percent.

Wal-Mart Net Beats Estimates as Retailer Offers Earlier Holiday Discounts Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the world's largest retailer, said quarterly profit rose more than analysts estimated and boosted its full-year earnings forecast after luring customers with holiday discounts. Wal-Mart shares rose 3.3 percent in early U.S. trading. Wal-Mart accelerated markdowns and promoted itself as a low-price destination as retailers braced for what may be the smallest holiday increase in five years while consumers face higher food, fuel and housing costs. To lure customers, the retailer cut prices on 15,000 items and started promoting toy discounts for the holidays in the beginning of October. ``Wal-Mart's having a tough time getting out of its own way,'' Burt Flickinger, an analyst at Strategic Resource Group, said today in an interview before the release of earnings. ``They're under pressure and it's no longer a growth company.''  Sales for the three months that ended Oct. 31 climbed 8.8 percent to $90.9 billion, Wal-Mart said. Revenue, which includes membership fees, rose to $91.9 billion. Sales at stores open at least a year rose 1.5 percent. Comparable-store sales declined 3.7 percent for home goods and 7.4 percent for apparel in the three months through August, dragging down overall results, the company said at its annual analyst meeting last month. Consumer electronics, where Wal- Mart has added Dell Inc. computers, rose 4.6 percent in the period. The same-store sales increase of 1.4 percent through October is trailing last year's gain of 2.1 percent, the smallest in at least 27 years.

At Starbucks, Too Many, Too Quick? For years, Starbucks Corp. has been able to throw up new stores, sometimes placing them across the street from each other, while sales at older stores still climbed at break-neck speed. But in the past year, the growth in Starbucks same-store sales revenue and number of transactions in the U.S. has slowed. When Starbucks reports earnings today, investors will be closely watching to see if growth in the average number of transactions per store, which essentially measures customer traffic, declines for the first time since Starbucks began disclosing the number three years ago. The concern is that the company has been adding locations so quickly that the new stores are cannibalizing the old ones to the point where the chain can't increase its same-store sales at the rapid pace to which investors have grown accustomed. In the past year, shares of Starbucks have fallen about 37%. More broadly, Starbucks's recent attempts at expanding its brand have had mixed results. While its strategy to sell music has been a hit with customers -- baristas recently gave customers free songs from iTunes with their coffee -- the films it has promoted in stores have had only minimal box-office success. Some analysts say the chain has fallen behind on creating enticing new beverages and its breakfast sandwiches have created little excitement. Investors knew that Starbucks's U.S. business would eventually mature. But they'd hoped that the chain's international business would be churning out strong profits that would pick up the slack. That hasn't happened yet, in part because Starbucks is still spending to build stores and other infrastructure in new overseas markets, which has slimmed international profit.

·         STARBUCKS'S PER-STORE TRAFFIC in the U.S. fell for the first time since the company began disclosing the figure. The company cut its earnings estimates for 2008 and said it is launching a national TV campaign. 

·         Starbucks' bitter brew

McDonald's Eyes Ballooning Coffee Market McDonald's Corp. executives came out swinging when they announced their assault on the comfy world of coffee shops. After the success of its upgraded drip coffee -- which even managed to snag a thumbs-up from testers at Consumer Reports earlier this year -- the fast food chain known for super-size meals is gearing up for a massive expansion into the world of lattes. "We want to move from beverages as an accompaniment to being a beverage destination," Don Thompson, president of McDonald's USA, said in a meeting with analysts Tuesday. "Our speed, our convenience, the value that we can afford to customers without quality comprise will make us a formidable player." Restaurants will offer lattes, mochas, cappuccinos and espressos with a choice of different flavorings and milk. Industry watchers say the drinks cost about 50 cents less than at Starbucks. But as it tries to cash in on the fast-growing specialty coffee market, the world's largest restaurant chain is already finding itself at odds with the unlikeliest of groups: Its own franchise owners.

 

Chrysler mulls dealer cuts Chrysler is considering wide-ranging branding changes that would streamline its product offerings and eliminate as many as 1,000 dealers, The Wall Street Journal reported Friday. A plan currently under discussion calls for Chrysler dealers to sell all of the automaker's passenger cars under the Chrysler name. Dodge dealers would sell only pickup and commercial trucks, and Jeep dealers would sell only Jeep and sport-utility vehicles, three dealers familiar with the discussions told the Journal for its online edition. One of the dealers said the proposal was just one of several being considered, and that the company hoped to have a decision in place by the end of the year, the Journal reported. The dealers asked not to be identified because the plan has not been released publicly. The plan would allow Chrysler, which seeks to return to profitability by 2009, to drop some of its overlapping products. That in turn would eliminate underperforming dealerships carrying excess inventory and using incentives that cut into profitability. Messages were left after hours Friday with Chrysler spokesmen.

 

McCaw Bets Again on Wireless Frontier Craig McCaw got rich betting on cellphones when they were still brick-size gadgets. These days, he's rolling the dice on another untested concept: a nationwide high-speed wireless network based on WiMax technology. His company, Clearwire Corp., is trying to cobble together a network to give customers fast, affordable Internet access for laptops and mobile devices in their homes, cars, commuter trains -- almost anywhere. Other wireless carriers in the U.S. and abroad are testing WiMax. But because the technology is unproven, and because it would require carriers to build expensive new transmission networks, many carriers have thus far opted to try to enhance their existing cellular networks to offer better Internet connections.

IBM's Blue Cloud: The Tipping Point for Enterprise IT as Service And so it is today, with IBM's announcement of Blue Cloud -- an approach that not only talks the services talk, but walks the services walk. We are all at the tipping point where IT will be delivered of, by and for services. If Google, Yahoo!, Amazon and eBay can do what they do with their applications and services, then why shouldn't General Motors? Or SMB XYZ? So the king of mainframes and distributed computing moves the value expectations yet again -- to the pre-configured cloud architecture. The standards meet the management that meets the utility that gets the job done faster, better, cheaper. Slap an IBM logo on it and take it to the bank. The future of IT is clearly about the efficiencies and agility of the grid/utility/Live/fabric/cloud/SOA/WOA thing. There can be no turning back. I believe Nick Carr is coming out with a book on this soon, The Big Switch: Rewiring the World, from Edison to Googleand IT, and IT is by no means irrelevant this time. IBM's Blue Cloud, arriving in the first half of 2008, will use IBM BladeCenter servers, a Linux operating system, Xen-based virtualization and the company's own Tivoli management software. Nothing about this is terribly new. Sun Microsystems has been talking about it for years. HP is well on the way to making it so, given its Mercury and Opsware acquisitions. Citrix has an eye on this all too. Red Hat has its approach. Amazon is game. Google is riding the wave. Even Microsoft has hedged its bets.

Memo to Michael: Dell's Report Card Since Your Return Congratulations. Your recent acquisitions -- including Wednesday's buyout of Everdream -- were all solid moves. You may recall that back in February, I wrote a memo highlighting 10 Ways to Fix Dell (DELL). Let's review each point of that memo to measure your progress so far.

My 10 key recommendations in February included:

The iPhone's broken connections Nearly five months have passed since Steve Jobs unleashed his flashy iPhone upon the world, and the sleek, do-everything gadget has met his ambitious initial sales targets and then some -- so far, more than 1.5 million have been sold. And despite all the prelaunch hype and fear mongering, you don't hear many gripes that the novel, finger-driven user interface doesn't work, or that videos look crummy, or that the battery doesn't last long enough. If anything, most of the iPhone's features have exceeded technological expectations, because in reality, it's a miniature Macintosh that happens to be a cellphone. Still, the iPhone frenzy seemed to evaporate more quickly than it built up, and these early days have turned out to be what euphemistically might be called a "learning experience" for everyone involved -- the customers, its wireless service provider, and especially Apple. What's so different about the iPhone? In an acronym: AT&T. Given the nature of the cellular phone industry today, Apple had no choice but to link up with a wireless network. AT&T (Charts, Fortune 500) was the most eager of the service providers and the easiest to persuade to concede -- in return for exclusivity -- the absolute design control that Jobs requires. While the terms aren't public, Apple also appears to be getting a sizable cut of the monthly service revenues. Nevertheless, it was a Faustian agreement, given the spottiness and sluggishness of AT&T's wireless coverage and the stubborn ingenuity of many of Apple's customers who want better performance. Apple recently estimated that a whopping 250,000 -- nearly 20% -- of the iPhones purchased so far haven't been activated for AT&T accounts. In other words, if they are in use, they've been hacked.

WRFest 20Nov07(Markets/Economy): Credit Breakage to Economic Slowdown

We've taken the weekend Readfest and pushed it out a couple of days because last week's listings and discussions were so extensive. And also because of the holiday - let me wish everyone a Happy Thanksgiving. While you may not think so if you're reading this you've probably got a lot to be thankful for compared to many in the world, or even this country.

The markets continue to gyrate, today in particular. But by and large we'll stand by our assessment and summary from the last go 'round: WRfest 11Nov07: SEE changes and Cusp Points(Markets) on the market situation. There's been a lite menu of economic news but wider spread recognition of the slowing economy and rising risks. Again we'll go with last week's summary of the situation on the economic front: WRFest 11Nov07: Paging Cinderella..Your Coach is Here(Economy) . The charts and discussions in both those posts are worth reviewing IMHO.

What added fuel to the fires last week and so far this is the growing recognition that the problems in the credit markets are not just sub-prime but do in fact represent a major breakdown in the new "technologies" of securitization. Which we are far from understanding. Jan Hartzius of Goldman traces thru some of the consequences when he points out that with potential losses of $200B in write-offs that the leverage built into the derivatives means something like $2 Trillion, yes that's Trillion with a T, will likely be pulled out of the credit markets. The one thing I think everybody's still missing is that more than one asset classs was bathed in the waters of securitization and baptized with multiple layers of leverage on it's way down the chain of players. NOBODY is talking about those risks as yet - at least in public. For a refresher try these: Stages of Denial: Acceptence ? Not Yet, The Sound of the Next Shoe: Corporate Debt.

As usual the MSM reported the monthly numbers and made headlines out of the core but in fact inflation is picking up rather rapidly and economic growth continues to slow, and the pace may be picking up judging by industrial production and retail sales. Given that there's a big meme running around about de-coupling saving us all the warnings signs of slowdown in Europe and Japan are important to pay attention to. Which is not to say that the developing countries aren't in fact beginning to lead independent existences.

The stand-alone development of the world's other economies will be the dominant feature of the world scene for the next few decades and has produced more real gains in the last two for the world's poor than at any time in history. A great deal of that is due to the growth of sound institutional foundations in various countries, for example Turkey. China and India are re-enterring the world economy at a level they haven't been at, relatively speaking, since the early 19th century when they were the two largest, most productive and most prosperous places in the world.

The other analogy to keep in mind, and this is important whether your an investor, employee, PE guy or what, is that the other closest analogy to what's going on is the rise of the US in the late 19th C. Eventually everyone was, and is, better off. But if you were in the "old world" the adjustment processes were pretty rocky.

Now, all that said, demand from the BRICs et.al. for our exports is still not sufficient to offset what's coming. Nobody bothers to look at the numbers. All decouplings really means is that they're getting more self-supporting. So for a review of what's coming you might want to go back to Slowmotion Slowdown: More On GDP .

Meanwhile have a great holiday. Bon Appetit' ! 

Markets & Investing

Enron all over again Everything was supposed to be different in the post-Enron era, wasn't it? Yet here we are just six years after that calamity, and it feels as though someone hit rewind. Start with the headlines about off-balance-sheet entities known as structured investment vehicles, or SIVs (or sieves, as some wags are calling them). As Gertrude Stein never said, an off-balance-sheet vehicle is an off-balance-sheet vehicle is an off-balance-sheet vehicle. Just as Enron's off-balance-sheet vehicles were propping up its stock price by camouflaging the company's real financial results, so SIVs were inflating the credit market by providing demand for the complex securities created out of mortgages and loans used to finance buyouts. Like Enron's off-balance-sheet vehicles, SIVs were invisible to those on the outside--and to many on the inside--until they weren't. When times were good, these creations made money for their sponsors, but when times changed, they became a problem for the rest of us. It's a little bit like "heads I win, tails you lose," which is pretty much how a former Enron executive described that company's off-balance-sheet vehicles.

  • Wall Street playing with more funny money The increase in 'Level 3' assets among big Wall Street banks is an ominous trend. Banks' exposure to illiquid, hard-to-value assets jumped sharply higher in the third quarter, a development that deepens concerns about the transparency and strength of bank balance sheets. Recently, banks have been required to show in financial statements which of their assets and liabilities rarely trade and are therefore valued according to in-house estimates. These so-called level three assets ballooned at banks in the third quarter as markets for many mortgage-related assets seized up, with Merrill Lynch posting the highest increase - a nearly 70% jump - in its level three assets from the second to the third quarter, according to a Fortune survey. It might sound like an increase in assets is a positive thing for a bank. But no financial institution wants to record a big increase in illiquid assets, because pricing and selling them is difficult and, if the credit crunch persists, many of them could be a source of large losses in coming quarters.
  • Wall Street's money machine breaks down The subprime mortgage crisis keeps getting worse-and claiming more victims. Two things stand out about the credit crisis cascading through Wall Street: It is both totally shocking and utterly predictable. Shocking, because a pack of the highest-paid executives on the planet, lauded as the best minds in business and backed by cadres of math whizzes and computer geeks, managed to lose tens of billions of dollars on exotic instruments built on the shaky foundation of subprime mortgages. Predictable because whether it's junk bonds or tech stocks or emerging-market debt, Wall Street always rides a wave until it crashes. As the fees roll in, one firm after another abandons itself to the lure of easy money, then hands back, in a sudden, unforeseen spasm, a big chunk of the profits it booked in good times. The crisis of confidence has exploded beyond Wall Street, driving the dollar to record lows - and helping send the prices of commodities, especially oil, soaring to historic highs. The results could be devastating for the U.S. economy. And it's far from over. As stunning as today's losses are, more carnage lies ahead. Wall Street banks are holding tens of billions in risky securities on their books, and no one seems to have any idea what they're worth. In conference calls and press releases, banks have been changing their estimates of the value of these assets.

Containment Has Failed Wrapping one’s arms around the depth and breadth of this credit crisis remains a difficult thing, if only because it seems to require bigger arms every week. Every other day or so, another analyst determines that such-and-such bank will lose exponentially larger sums of money than the last; another economist has a larger estimate of writedowns or losses and how much of a hit the economy will take as a result.

MBIA, Ambac Ratings Jeopardy May Cost AAA Investors, Issuers $200 Billion The crisis of confidence in bond insurers that bestow top credit ratings on debt sold by borrowers from the New York Yankees to Citigroup Inc. may cost investors as much as $200 billion. The AAA ratings of MBIA Inc., Ambac Financial Group Inc. and their five smaller competitors are being reviewed by Moody's Investors Service and Fitch Ratings. Without guarantees, $2.4 trillion of bonds may fall in value and some issuers would get shut out of the capital markets. ``We shudder to think of the ramifications,'' said Greg Peters, head of credit strategy at New York-based Morgan Stanley, the second-biggest U.S. securities firm by market value. ``You have politicians, taxpayers, municipalities, states. It just opens up a Pandora's box. That is a huge destabilizing force.'' The ratings companies said New York-based Ambac, FGIC Corp. in New York, and CIFG Guaranty of Hamilton, Bermuda, have a high or moderate chance of being told to add capital or forfeit their top status. Fitch and Moody's said MBIA has a low risk of a downgrade. Borrowers would see their costs increase if they lose top rankings.

Merrill, Citigroup Push Finance Borrowing Costs Above Industrial Companies For the first time in at least a decade, the world's biggest financial institutions are paying more to borrow in the corporate bond market than the average company. Bonds of banks, brokerages and insurance companies yield 1.49 percentage points more than U.S. Treasuries, matching a record high set in October 2002, according to indexes compiled by New York-based Merrill Lynch & Co. The average industrial company bond trades at a yield premium of 1.34 percentage points. Investors are demanding extra compensation for the risk of owning Citigroup Inc., Merrill Lynch and Barclays Plc on concern that the $50 billion in losses already reported from subprime mortgages will increase. The total damage may reach $400 billion worldwide, Deutsche Bank AG analysts said this week in a report, and Wells Fargo & Co. Chief Executive Officer John Stumpf said the housing market is the worst since the Great Depression.

GE Bond Fund Investors Cash Out After $200 Million of Losses on Subprime A short-term bond fund run by General Electric Co.'s GE Asset Management returned money to investors at 96 cents on the dollar after losing about $200 million, mostly on mortgage-backed securities.

 

 

 

Economy

 

Recession in the offing? MarketWatch economist Irwin Kellner says signs of recession are proliferating, especially on the consumer side. America's vulnerable economy Recession in America looks increasingly likely. Can booming emerging markets save the world economy?

  • Manufacturing Sector May Be Facing Recession A leading manufacturing think tank now sees at least a 50% chance of a general U.S. recession next year, with the factory sector itself almost certainly facing the r-word. The Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI’s new quarterly economic outlook points to a “confluence of challenges” that are bedeviling the economy, from the housing collapse and rising oil prices to slowing employment growth and slumping consumer confidence. “This is the grimmest outlook we’ve had for the economy since the last recession,” says Daniel Meckstroth, the group’s economist. The Manufacturers Alliance, based in Arlington, Va., is a public policy group whose members include many large multinational manufacturers.

·         Economists expect the credit crunch weighing on U.S. markets will take some time to play out. The credit crisis weighing on markets still has some time to play out and consumers may have a tough slog ahead, according to economists in the latest WSJ.com forecasting survey. But confidence in the Federal Reserve's ability to navigate the rough economic waters remains high. When asked about the credit crisis and related market turmoil, more than half of the economists said it was about half over, while 25% said it still is in its early stages. 

·         Industrial production nosedives Industrial production plunged in October by the largest amount in nine months, reflecting a big drop in utility output and continued troubles in auto and housing-related industries. The Federal Reserve said that output at the nation's factories, mines and utilities fell by 0.5 percent last month, a much worse outcome than had been expected. The October decline, the biggest since a similar drop in January, was led by a sharp plunge in output of electricity and natural gas due to warmer-than-normal weather during the month. Also contributing to the weakness was the third straight drop at auto factories and further weakness in industries producing lumber, appliances and other products tied to housing.

  • FedEx Cuts 2Q, Full-Year Outlook- FedEx Corp. cut its earnings expectations for the fiscal second quarter and full year, citing soaring fuel costs and a troubled U.S. freight market.

Economic Slowdown Shows Fitzgerald Got It Wrong as Rich Restrain Spending F. Scott Fitzgerald had it wrong: In a slowing economy, the rich aren't that different from everyone else. Affluent consumers, pinched by shrinking stock portfolios, falling property values and smaller bonuses, are behaving like their less-well-off peers: They're reining in spending. That portends a steeper slowdown than originally forecast for the U.S. economy, or even a recession, because the richest fifth of American households accounts for almost 40 percent of consumer spending, the main engine of economic growth. Now, the slumping stock and real-estate prices that followed have attracted the attention of the more-affluent -- which might have surprised Fitzgerald, who wrote in his 1926 short story ``The Rich Boy'' that the very rich ``are different from you and me.''

Credit-Market Losses May Cut Lending as Much as $2 Trillion, Goldman Says Goldman Sachs Group Inc., the largest U.S. securities firm by market value, said losses from slumping credit markets may reduce lending by $2 trillion. Losses related to record U.S. home foreclosures using a ``back-of-the-envelope'' calculation may be as high as $400 billion for financial companies, Jan Hatzius, chief economist at Goldman in New York, wrote in a report. The effects will be amplified as banks and hedge funds that borrowed to finance their investments scale back lending, according to the report. Goldman's Hatzius said his report is based on a ``conservative estimate'' of investors cutting lending by 10 times the loss to their capital. Investors realizing half of the potential losses, at $200 billion, would have to scale back lending by $2 trillion, he said. Goldman's U.S. economic forecasts already assume lending will fall by $1 trillion over the next two years, or half of the potential loss to the economy, the report said. The New York-based bank expects U.S. growth to slow to 1.9 percent in 2008, less then the 2.4 percent median forecast of 70 economists surveyed by Bloomberg News this month. Deutsche Bank AG, Germany's biggest bank, also said in a report this week that credit losses may be $400 billion. That's equivalent to ``one bad day in the stock market,'' or 2.5 percent of the value of U.S. equities, Hatzius wrote. ``No serious analyst would argue that a 2.5 percent equity market decline will make an important difference to the economic outlook,'' Hatzius wrote. ``So what's different about the mortgage credit losses? In a word, leverage.''

Consumer Price Index in U.S. Rises 0.3 Percent: Core Rate Up 0.2 Percent Consumer prices in the U.S. rose in October at the same pace as the prior month, led by increases in fuel costs that threaten to boost inflation and slow growth. The cost of living increased 0.3 percent in October, as forecast, the Labor Department said today in Washington. So- called core consumer prices, which exclude fuel and food costs, rose 0.2 percent for a fifth month. Gasoline and heating-oil prices started rising in late October and have continued higher this month, suggesting fuel costs will remain a concern. Still, the damage higher energy bills may inflict on spending and investment will keep the Federal Reserve focused on ensuring the expansion is sustained. So far this year, prices are rising at a 3.6 percent rate, compared with a 2.4 percent rate through the first 10 months of 2006. Core prices are rising at a 2.3 percent pace, compared with a 2.8 percent pace in the same period a year earlier. Today's report showed energy prices climbed 1.4 percent, the most since May. Gasoline prices also increased 1.4 percent and electricity costs increased 1.5 percent, the most since January.

S&P: Mortgage turmoil to worsen in 2008 The chaos in the mortgage markets is only going to get worse in 2008 and will put a dent in U.S. mortgage bank earnings, according to a report released Tuesday by Standard & Poor's. Next year will be the worst for mortgage bank earnings since the 1990s, the ratings agency said. Loose lending standards, especially to people with shaky credit, are at the heart of the problem. During the period from 2003 to 2006, nonprime mortgage originations increased 150 percent, Alt-A originations rose 550 percent and second-lien home equity loans went up 133 percent, while conforming loans saw a 47 percent decline in originations, S&P said. In 2007, mortgage correction has curtailed origination activity, with a 21.9 percent drop in originations in the third quarter. Through the first nine months of 2007, $1.980 trillion of mortgages were originated, down 12.4 percent from the first nine months of 2006. Some estimates show a 20 percent drop in originations in the fourth quarter, S&P said. Originations in 2008 will plummet further, possibly not exceeding $1.5 trillion, S&P said.

Trouble brews in China and world awaits tremors As worries mount about a downturn in the United States, there are increasing signs of trouble in China, too. Despite the Chinese government's efforts to dampen growth, the breakneck expansion has continued. If the Chinese economy overheats, what will it mean for the rest of the world? The official inflation rate in China has risen to 6.5 percent, and some economists think the real figure is much higher. If demand for labor, equipment, raw materials and energy outpaces China's ability to find supplies, prices could shoot up uncontrollably and shock the economy: a hard landing. How bad is the inflation problem? Part of what makes it a problem is that no one really knows.The vastness of the economy and the prevalence of black markets add to the difficulties. But Sung explained that China's exporting success was bound to have increased its money supply, so more cash is chasing the scarce resources in the economy and driving up prices. The problem may already have gotten out of hand. Even if the Chinese government keeps trying to slow the economy down - and there is some debate about how serious its efforts have been - there's no guarantee of a soft landing, said Nariman Behravesh, chief global economist of Global Insight, an economic forecasting company.

Money Is Key to Solving Many of China's Puzzles China is an oil importer and crude prices have quintupled since early 2002. Prices of other commodities imported by China -- such as copper -- have shot up, too, in the past few years. Why have they failed to make any dent into China's current- account surplus, which may widen to a staggering 12 percent of gross domestic product this year? In a recent study, Mussa looks at China's balance of payments as a monetary phenomenon, an approach ideally suited to countries with pegged currencies, and the Chinese yuan, for all practical purposes, is still tied to the U.S. dollar, having risen just 9 percent since a small revaluation in July 2005. The key idea is this: Assuming Chinese residents' demand for purchasing power -- the sum of currency and bank deposits -- is rising in tandem with economic expansion, there's growing pressure on the Chinese monetary authority to create more money. But base money -- the sum of currency and reserves that banks keep with the monetary authority -- is the central bank's liability and must be matched by its domestic and foreign assets. But in fast-growing developing countries, most notably China, the approach of the central bank is to buy foreign assets -- say, U.S. Treasuries -- to prevent appreciation in the currency. Since the resultant growth in base money may spark inflation, an attendant practice is ``sterilization'': The central bank sells local bonds to deny people the purchasing power they want. The net result is high investments, even higher savings, low consumption, more than $1.4 trillion in foreign-exchange reserves and a bloated current-account surplus despite a rise in the price of imported commodities. All of this is happening simultaneously because the central bank is repressing people's demand for money. With GDP growing at an annual pace of 11.5 percent in the third quarter and the inflation rate rising in October to 6.5 percent, the highest in a decade, the People's Bank of China is predictably stingy with base money.

·         Group of 20 Urges More Currency Flexibility From Emerging Asian Countries

·         Arabs' Dollar Losses Increase Pressure to Sever American Currency Linkage

The economic boom in emerging markets is changing the rules investors have used to guide decisions, complicating an already tricky environment and forcing many to rethink their worldview. It used to be that stocks in emerging markets were cheaper than U.S. stocks and vulnerable to a U.S. slowdown; that bonds in those places offered much juicier yields; and that a weak U.S. economy put downward pressure on prices for commodities like oil. Many of these rules are now being ditched by investors because places like China, India and Russia are growing rapidly despite troubles in the U.S. The emerging markets, it seems, have emerged and are forcing investors to rethink their worldview. In one reversal of a longstanding trend, shares of emerging markets have begun trading at a premium to those in developed markets. At the end of October, the stocks that make up the MSCI Emerging Markets index were trading at 18.5 times their earnings for the previous 12 months. In comparison, the stocks in an MSCI index that tracks developed markets around the world were trading at 16.5 times earnings. Three years ago, the stocks in the emerging-markets index traded at roughly 12 times their prior year's earnings, while developed-market counterparts traded at nearly 18 times earnings. "The whole set of rules that starts with the U.S. as the prime mover of all things economic is clearly under duress right now," says ING Investment Management economic adviser James Griffin. The International Monetary Fund estimates that while U.S. gross domestic product will have grown 1.9% this year, down from 2.9% last year, growth in the rest of the world will be on par with last year, with other advanced economies growing 3.7% and emerging-market and developing economies growing 8.1%.

The risk is that as investors throw out old assumptions about what drives the world economy and markets, they will overreach in formulating new ones. That is what happened during the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s, when notions of how technology would change the world ran away from reality. Analysts already worry about a bubble in Chinese stocks.

Turning point for Turkey For nearly a month, Turkey has been on the brink of launching a military offensive into northern Iraq. Such an incursion, if and when it happens, has the potential of damaging relations with the west and jeopardizing this country's hard-won role as an emerging economic power. With a booming economy, Turkey is attracting unprecedented levels of foreign direct investment. After years of dysfunctional coalition governments, it finally attained some political stability in 2002 when the Islamist-rooted AKP Party formed a single-party government committed to fiscal discipline. A predominantly Muslim country, Turkey has strong secularist traditions and maintains strict separation between church and state. The median age of Turkey's 72 million people is 28.

November 14, 2007

WRFest 11Nov07(Business): ....performance is reality

The title comes from a hard-nosed saying of Harold Geneen's, quoted in Jim Kilts new book "Doing What Matters", reviewed in the WSJ(The Man Who Sharpened Gillette) and pointed out by one of the few business-focused blogs(The importance of execution.) around and it's worth quoting from the review at greater length. Especially since it's a central, perhaps THE central thesis, of this blog.

When the hard-nosed Harold Geneen was driving the growth of ITT in its heyday in the 1960s and '70s from a $760 million company to a $17 billion conglomerate, his management philosophy was blunt: "In business, words are words, explanations are explanations, promises are promises, but only performance is reality."

When Jim Kilts showed up at Gillette in 2001, the first outsider to run the Boston-based company in more than 70 years, he found a business with great brands losing market share. Its acquisitions of Duracell and Braun were not delivering. Sales and earnings were flat, the company had missed its earnings estimates for 15 straight quarters, the stock had plummeted, and Wall Street had lost patience. Yet two-thirds of the top managers were getting top ratings. People were being rewarded for effort; performance, under Mr. Kilts's regime, became the new measure.

Floyd Norris reinforces the point in a rather telling NYT column focused specifically on the finance industry and the lack of reality in the last 18 months earnings report, which fall under the old rubric that if it's too good to be true it likely is:

 

As Bank Profits Grew, Warning Signs Went Unheeded We should have known something was strange. The banks were doing a lot better than they should have been doing. When the history of the financial excesses of this decade is written, that will be a verdict of financial historians. There were signs that banks were either lying about their results or were taking large risks that were not fully disclosed, but investors were oblivious. What were the signs? Consider how banks make money. They pay low rates on short-term deposits and charge higher rates on long-term loans. So they love what are known as positively sloped yield curves. And they like to see big credit spreads, where risky borrowers are charged much more than safe ones. Put them together, and banks should clean up. By that light, nothing was going right in 2006 and early this year. The yield curve was inverted, or at best flat. And credit spreads were at historic lows. Risky loans, whether to subprime mortgage borrowers or junk-rated corporations, were readily available at rates that seemed to assume there was only the slightest risk of default. And yet the bank stocks were buoyant, and so were reported profits.

 

There are a couple of CNBC clips worth watching(Financial Analysts Over-reacting ?,Bo's Rules)which also reinforce the argument.(). The key here is that however the economy and markets are running at the end of the day "performance is reality" and it's up to you whether as investor, employee or other stakeholder to dig into and understand the underlying characteristics of a particular business and the industry in which it operates. It's a point that we've hammered on a few times here as well. The way to do we've sketched in some of these prior posts.

At the end of the day our point is that performance matters, performance matters, performance matters !

AND as the artificial impacts of excess liqidities dry up we're going to be more and more in what we like to think of as Warren's economy where understanding the roots of enterprise performance, which has always been important no matter what the level of neglect, will be increasingly critical on many levels. As you sort thru and review the following links please look at them with this in mind. 

Business

And Then There Were Six… Standard & Poor’s, the credit rating outfit, says only six nonfinancial U.S. firms are still rated AAA, down from 25 in 1992 and 12 in 2002. And the gilt-edged ratings of two of the six are in doubt. “Part of the change is due to the shift in corporate financial strategy. Firms have become much more focused on shareholder return and have begun to manage their balance sheets accordingly. Firms that previously were ‘AAA,’ have applied more leverage and increased their risk profile

Small Firms Hire Guides as They Head Abroad A growing number of smaller U.S. companies are leaping overseas sometimes before they have the experience and personnel to handle it. International operations used to be the province of big corporations with the staff to handle cross-border complications. Now, a growing number of smaller U.S. companies like Boggs & Partners are leaping overseas -- sometimes before they have the experience and personnel to handle it. Some firms are drawn by low-cost labor in countries like China or India; others seek to sell into exploding foreign markets. Cheap phone and Internet connections encourage the trend. Small companies rushing to go abroad sometimes underestimate the difficulty, says Mr. Harding. Complicated cross-border taxes and duties can trip up companies not used to selling in different countries. Hiring employees abroad means tracking labor laws and benefits practices. Dealing with foreign languages and currencies makes everything harder, he says. Some little firms stumble.

How to avoid hiring a jerk Despite a labor shortage in many sectors, some employers are pickier than ever about whom they hire. Businesses in fields where jobs are highly coveted - or just sound like fun - are stepping up efforts to weed out people who might have the right credentials but the wrong personality. Call it the "plays well with others" factor.

Why workers stay with the company The critical factor is having a good, effective manager.. When they go wrong, where do managers do wrong? "A lot of it has to do with treating employees with dignity and respect. I don't know that that can be overestimated in terms of its impact and value," Wiley said. Over years of research and consulting work, he's found that often "employees were simply asking to be recognized, for the manager to say 'hi' to someone in the morning, to say 'thank you' for the work performed," Wiley said. "It doesn't really cost you anything in many respects to be considered a more effective manager." Also, it's important managers organize the workload fairly, provide feedback on workers' performance, and work to improve poor performers. "People want to work for a winning team," he said.

CEO job hunt Wall Street's annual conference, the Securities Industry Financial Markets Association's annual meeting in Boca Raton, Fla., begins in less than 48 hours. Hop a plane and bring your resume. The credit crunch has already claimed two chief executives, Merrill Lynch & Co.'s) Stanley O'Neal, who stepped down last week and Charles Prince, Citigroup Inc.'s CEO who left the company over the weekend. Another, Bear Stearns Cos.' Jimmy Cayne, may not survive fourth-quarter results if deeper write-downs or in Cayne's case more damaging personal information surfaces. Already more than $30 billion is being slashed in the wake of the credit crisis and there is no guarantee that amount will not rise significantly in the coming months. Below the executive suite, most bankers and traders are trying to prove their worth to avoid layoffs. It has been a rapid descent from the first half of the year when estimates suggested everyone's record 2006 bonus would rise as much as 20% in 2007. Singh and Donohue's appearances illustrate the growing role of hedge funds and derivatives in the marketplace. The Chicago Merc is trading 12 times the number of contracts it traded four years ago and retail brokers are offering derivative investing to clients. Hedge funds had only $625 billion under management at the end of 2002. They had $1.8 trillion at the end of the third quarter, according to Hedge Fund Research. Hedge funds, known for their heavy trading strategies, also provide huge fees to prime brokerage operations on Wall Street.

Calpers, and Where Private-Equity Funds Go to Die The California Public Employees’ Retirement System, the nation’s largest public pension plan, might think twice before it tries to sell any of its private-equity investments again. Calpers decided this year to sell the stakes it holds in about 60 private-equity funds — many of which were older and had ceased to generate significant returns. For an illiquid market such as the private-equity sphere, that means the pension system had to offer up the portfolio on what is known as the secondary market, where a handful of firms specialize in buying second-hand fund shares. Calpers’ decision to dip its toe in the secondary waters was widely noted in the industry and is considered a test of whether the secondary market is efficient enough for big investors conducting such sales. The funds Calpers put up for sale had assets valued at about $1 billion, making it one of the largest portfolios ever offered on the secondary market. Ever since Calpers started marketing the portfolio around Labor Day, hiring UBS to oversee the process, the sale process has been characterized by confusion and delay, people tell Deal Journal

·         Lombard: Private equity investors should prepare for trouble Gloom-mongers within the industry have been talking about the looming wave of distress for some months. Poorly thought-out deals are now getting squeezed from both ends. In the glory days of the first half of this year, such buy-outs were done on the basis of leverage at eight or nine times earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation, against the previous industry norm of four times. But those ratios are not comparable: in normal times, the ratio was based on debt to historic ebitda, but at the peak of the sellers’ market, debt was being raised at higher multiples against prospective, pro forma earnings and credulous buyers were also prepared to accept such innovations as “vendor due diligence” – the M&A equivalent of self-certified sub-prime mortgages. When flimsily structured, highly leveraged deals, based on optimistic forecasts and self-interested risk assessments, collide with a downturn in the real economy, the risk of default – or at least disappointment – is bound to increase.

Brokerages set sail with boomer dollars Once considered the safe havens for conservative investment dollars, such as retirement assets, banks face new competition from the brokerage industry. The race for all that money is pitting the perceived safety and security banks afford against the broad menu of financial services the brokerage industry offers. In new study, the Bank Administration Institute says banks have steep competition from brokerages and need to step up to win the retirement money competition. Moreover, a majority of affluent consumers (59%) cite saving for retirement as their top financial priority. This, of course, puts savings together with retirement, something banks could and should easily be able to integrate into their service offerings. Of course, they haven't. Instead, banks have strong credit-card offerings and have incorporated mutual funds and other current investment programs into their offerings nicely. They've just never taken it to the next step. Indeed, as the BAI numbers show, banks have hemorrhaged retirement assets. With so much money on the line, however, banks are bound to change. And BAI sees three areas that banks could and likely will be seizing on in the future:

Cisco’s Chambers: IT Spending Could Get Lumpy Look out: Cisco CEO John Chambers says tech spending in the U.S. might get a little “lumpy.” Cisco is often viewed as a barometer for the business-tech industry. The company makes equipment that businesses use on their computer networks. Most businesses buy at least something from Cisco, and consequently Cisco’s revenue tends to rise and fall with information-technology budgets. By that measure, the first quarter was obviously good for IT departments: Cisco’s revenue increased 17% from the year-ago quarter to $9.6 billion.

But lately there’s been speculation that corporate tech budgets may start to shrink. Companies worried about an economic downturn as a result of the housing slowdown are likely to cut IT spending. A recent Goldman Sachs study predicted IT budgets will drop in 2008, and the tech-research firm Gartner Group has started warning its clients that they need to prepare two budgets: one in which they spend more and one in which they don’t. What does Cisco think? On a call with analysts, Chambers said to expect revenue growth of about 16% at the company next quarter, about the same as this quarter. But when asked, Chambers said a lot of that growth would come from international markets and that U.S. revenue might suffer. That’s when he used the L word. These calls are usually a lesson in equivocation, so Chambers’ statement is pretty strong. To all those Gartner clients trying to decide which budget to go with, the hits from Cisco suggest it will end up being the smaller one.

Who Buys Technology? Not Just IT, Anymore This used to be true by definition: Information-technology departments provide companies with their technology. But increasingly, it isn’t IT that’s buying tech. No, this isn’t another post about employees using iPhones and Gmail to get their work done. It’s about finance and marketing execs, who say it’s often them – not IT – who are making tech-buying decisions these days. A new survey by Forrester Research found that 25% of business execs said that they were either completely responsible, or more responsible than IT, for managing tech vendors. Another 23% said that they were completely responsible, or more responsible than IT, for selecting technology.

This change has been a long time coming. Tech vendors used to target their pitches to the IT department. But a few years ago, we started noticing pitches that clearly weren’t meant for techies: Vendors started talking about the business problem their product solves, not how it solved it. Eventually, we started asking whom these companies were selling their products to. They said finance, marketing or HR execs and rarely IT. Business units were the ones with the budgets.

Vendors used to add that they always worked with the IT department. Now, they may not even need to do that. A lot of the software being sold these days doesn’t have to be installed on company servers, the back-office computers IT uses to process data and run applications. Instead, it can be accessed over the Internet through a Web browser. IT never has to get involved. We talk to a lot of techies who say that it creates problems when non-technical folks make technical decisions, because they invariably overlook something important. But the way around that is for tech departments to let business leaders know that they’re willing to work as consultants. It isn’t to try to wrestle back tech decision making. Forrester’s numbers show that th

Companies

Citigroup's Profit Engine Breaks Down as Prince Exits, Writedowns Increase Citigroup Inc., the profit engine built by Sanford ``Sandy'' Weill, has seized up. The biggest U.S. bank by assets said yesterday that subprime mortgages and related securities lost as much as $11 billion of their value in the past month, a decline that may wipe out half of the company's profit so far this year. The New York-based company also said in a statement that Charles O. ``Chuck'' Prince III, Weill's hand-picked successor, stepped down. Former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin will become chairman, and Citigroup's most senior executive in Europe, Win Bischoff, will be interim CEO. Analysts at CIBC World Markets and Morgan Stanley told clients last week to get rid of Citigroup shares. CIBC's Meredith Whitney said Citigroup may have to sell assets because it needs to raise $30 billion of capital. The combination of $25 billion of acquisitions in the past 19 months and the lowest cushion for losses ``in decades'' increases the risk of owning the stock, she said. Citigroup reported lower third-quarter earnings from consumer banking, corporate banking, investment banking and credit cards, and the company's stock market value has fallen below that of Bank of America. Net income slumped 57 percent to $2.38 billion in the three months ended Sept. 30.

  • Amid Turmoil, a Shake-Up at Citi Citigroup named Robert Rubin chairman and Sir Win Bischoff interim CEO after Charles Prince resigned amid billions of dollars in losses on mortgage-related securities. A special committee, including Mr. Rubin and board member Richard Parsons, chief executive of Time Warner, will conduct a search for a permanent CEO. That could be a tall order: A decade after Mr. Weill built the insurance-to-banking-to-stockbroking behemoth through a run of acquisitions, his creation remains an often-dysfunctional collection of businesses whose employees sometimes ignore or even compete against each other. The bank's retail network isn't hooked into other parts of the company -- meaning branch tellers can't see whether a customer in front of them has been preapproved for a credit card so they can offer it. Until recently, capital markets and consumer businesses within the bank's European operations duplicated basic office functions because each had its own legal and human-resources staffs. Citi's core problem -- and Mr. Prince's core failure -- isn't just the recent market losses. It's also the conspicuous lack of successes elsewhere to compensate for them. That potential was the big strategic idea behind the "universal bank model" created by Mr. Weill a decade ago. The universal bank could generate more revenue from clients by offering a slew of related financial services. Meanwhile, the collection of varied businesses is supposed to provide a cushion, with downturns in some areas balanced by upturns in others. It's a model that banks in Europe have relied on for years.
  • Now Citi Needs a Plumber Prince's lawyerly response to Citi's regulatory problems -- mostly over its stock research and initial-public-offering practices -- may have stifled innovation, dimming its earnings potential and hurting its ability to recruit and retain talent.
  • Citigroup's Subprime Explanation Defies Belief Citigroup Inc. says it isn't sure how much its subprime-related assets have fallen in value this quarter. Maybe it's $8 billion. Maybe it's $11 billion. On one point, though, Citigroup isn't budging: It says none of these declines began until after last quarter ended.
  • Prince Alwaleed: Chuck had to go  In a Fortune exclusive, Citigroup's biggest single investor talks about his disappointment in Chuck Prince, the bank's colossal losses, and his views on a successor CEO.

Breaking Citi News: Pandit’s Planned Reorg Pandit, the newly minted CEO of Citigroup’s Institutional Clients group, is likely to begin his makeover of the embattled firm’s investment bank in the coming days, people familiar with the matter say. The initiative, which could be unveiled at a town-hall meeting Nov. 14, would be Pandit’s first big move since he joined Citi in April and was promoted last month to his current position. One option for the makeover could be referred to as the Morgan Stanley-ization of Citi. A few years ago, Morgan combined separate debt and equity capital markets groups. A person familiar with the matter cautioned that no final decision has been made, and that other executives who prefer the status quo could still win out. (Read more about importing Morgan Stanley’s model at Citigroup in this post we did earlier.) It is unclear which executive would spearhead the project or who they would report to. Should Pandit prevail, he would collapse the walls between bankers selling various products, be it high-yield bonds, equities, or derivatives. The point would be to make bankers agnostic to what they are selling and focused only on what the client needs. Citi is notorious for having an army of bankers that often work at cross purposes and have been derisively referred to as the “Citi swarm.” Tales are told of one group of Citi bankers unexpectedly running into another at a client’s headquarters. True or not, they are symbolic of just one of a slew of woes facing the nation’s largest bank, which is still struggling to make the 1998 megamerger of Travelers and Citicorp work. Of course, with Citigroup in disarray after massive fixed-income write-downs and the recent departure of its CEO, there are no guarantees at the bank right now. Who knows if, for example, Pandit will even be around after the bank chooses a successor to Chuck Prince.

Countrywide, Washington Mutual Play Shell Games: Jonathan Weil The balance-sheet maneuvers are a classic case of earnings management. Last quarter, both companies changed the asset- classifications for billions of dollars of mortgages to ``held for investment'' from ``held for sale.'' While the distinction may look arbitrary, the effect on short-term earnings under the accounting rules can be huge when loan values are falling, as they are now. That's because mortgages classified as held for sale must be carried on the balance sheet at cost or market value, whichever is lower, with any declines hitting quarterly earnings. Mortgages held for investment, by contrast, need be written down only if they have suffered an ``impairment'' that is ``other than temporary,'' which can mean different things to different people. A loan's real-life value, of course, won't stop falling just because the accounting treatment changes. Yet by reclassifying loans as investments, banks can postpone big losses, hoping the values rebound later. The problem is they might not, in which case investors could get blindsided. Countrywide, which reported a $1.2 billion net loss for the third quarter, transferred $12.32 billion of prime mortgages to held-for-investment, after first marking them down by $418 million. The loans all were of the ``non-conforming'' variety that don't qualify for sale to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- which in this market means there are few, if any, buyers. The biggest U.S. mortgage lender finished the quarter with $30.86 billion of loans held for sale and $83.56 billion in the investment category. Other problems lurk. Because the transparency is so poor, investors can't see if the companies might have sold their best loans and stashed the bad ones in their investment portfolios. Such ``gains trading'' was a big problem during the 1980s savings-and-loan crisis, notes Donn Vickrey, editor in chief at Gradient Analytics Inc. an investment-research firm in Scottsdale, Arizona. ``From the disclosures they provide, you really can't tell the extent to which gains trading may have occurred,'' he says. The markdowns the companies took before reclassifying their loans also are open to question. The rules known as Financial Accounting Standard No. 65 let lenders review their mortgages in pools, which are easy to gerrymander, rather than individually. They also can offset loans with embedded gains against those with embedded losses.

Moving at the Speed of Sound at Chrysler It is the management equivalent of zero to sixty in one second. According the chairman of Chrysler owner Cerberus Capital Management, the decision to cut production levels at the auto maker in response to slowing demand this year was made in “seven minutes.” That is what John Snow, the former Treasury secretary, said in an interview Monday with Dow Jones Newswires. (Read more about it here.) In the old days, the same decision would have taken weeks, according to Snow. That, of course, was before the keys of the company were turned over to the private-equity firm in August by the German auto maker then known as DaimlerChrylser.

General Motors Has $39 Billion Loss, Biggest Ever, on Deferred Tax Charge General Motors Corp., the world's biggest automaker, reported a $39 billion third-quarter loss, its largest ever, after writing down $39 billion of future tax benefits. The loss of $68.85 per-share widened from a deficit of $147 million, or 26 cents, a year earlier. The non-cash charge is related to deferred tax assets in the U.S., Canada and Germany, the Detroit-based company said in a statement today. GM is writing down the tax assets because it may not be able to generate enough earnings to use the benefits. The move is another sign of a worsening outlook for the U.S. economy and auto sales, as GM cited mortgage-related losses at its partly owned GMAC LLC finance unit and ``more challenging'' auto-market conditions in the U.S. and Germany.

British food takes U.S. by storm After nosing around U.S. kitchens and refrigerators for nearly three years, Britain's biggest food retailer is putting its conclusions -- along with American shopping habits and meal preferences -- to the test in bringing a new grocery-store format to the western U.S. this month. Tesco is opening 11 Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market stores, with six Los Angeles-area stores debuting Thursday, followed by five Las Vegas stores Nov. 14. Other openings are slated for San Diego and Phoenix by year-end. Industry observers are labeling the Fresh & Easy launch the most closely watched grocery opening in years, with the arrival of the new concept potentially impacting a wide range of food retailers.

Home Depot May Pare Lowe's Market Share as Blake Repairs Nardelli Blunders Now, Frank Blake, who took over as Atlanta-based Home Depot's chief executive officer in January after Robert Nardelli was ousted, is staking his success -- and that of the retailer's languishing shares -- on winning back contractors like Masters, who provide as much as 40 percent of the $79 billion in annual sales. Taking Lowe's and other hardware stores head-on, Blake increased bulk discounts, added account managers to serve big- spending shoppers and put more workers in areas contractors frequent, hoping to take back market share Home Depot surrendered. Home Depot is focusing on home-improvement contractors because they provide an immediate opportunity for growth during a slumping market for home sales. While nine of 10 contractors shop at its 2,200 stores, they make 10 percent of their purchases there, the company said. The plan is to capture 50 percent more sales from contractors, said Ron Jarvis, the Home Depot executive heading the effort. This may boost annual revenue by $12 billion ``long term,'' he said. Home Depot added account managers to form an outside sales force of 240, each handling about 30 accounts. Salespeople have wireless phones so contractors can reach them directly, and expense accounts, Jarvis, 48, said. Responding to complaints that Home Depot failed to place enough knowledgeable sales help on the floor, Home Depot hired tradespeople to work departments professionals frequent, including lumber, concrete, drywall and doors. Once purchases are made, the company is testing whether to add an extra employee from 6 a.m. to 3 p.m. to load goods into contractors' vehicles.

Time For Change …Parsons is getting ready to wrap up an eventful, nearly six-year stint running the planet's biggest media company, and that Bewkes's era is near. Parsons' contract will expire in May, but several senior people within the company expect him to hand over the CEO reins to Bewkes sooner, perhaps by the time the company's annual top management retreat begins in November in Miami. The betting is that Parsons will stay on as chairman for at least a year. What is making the transition less smooth than either man hoped, however, is the anvil weighing down Time Warner's stock price. Instead of celebrating Parsons' corporate stewardship, frustrated investors are grumbling that Time Warner is today trading slightly below where it was when he took over in May 2002. Now, even before Bewkes has the top job, the stock's malaise has some wondering whether the 28-year company veteran, who was anointed as Parsons' likely successor two years ago, can really lead Time Warner's beleaguered shareholders to the promised land. Through the ups and downs of his tenure, Parsons has consistently argued that Time Warner, which has a market capitalization of $70 billion, is more valuable together than in pieces - particularly since the company has trimmed the portfolio by selling its books and music businesses and the Atlanta Braves, among other things. And he has made the argument, quite rightly, that media stocks are out of favor with a Wall Street that frets about what the digital world is going to do to these companies' cash flows. In fact, Time Warner produces more cash flow than any of its rivals. Yet the two standout stocks in the media sector over the past couple of years - News Corp. and Walt Disney Co. - have also shown that it is possible to break away from the herd. Their share prices have significantly outgunned Time Warner's during Parsons' tenure (see chart). Time Warner had revenues of $44 billion last year, while Disney generated $34 billion and News Corp. reported $25 billion.

Dell to buy EqualLogic for $1.4 billion Dell Inc. continued to break with past tradtions Monday when the world's No. 2 personal-computer company said it would acquire privately held network-storage provider EqualLogic for $1.4 billion in cash as part of an effort to sell more products to small and midsized business customers. For Dell, the four deals represent an acquisition binge, as prior to this year the company had only made three corporate acquisitions since its founding in 1984. Its March 2006 purchase of high-end gaming computer company Alienware was arguably Dell's best-known deal up to that time. The deal also falls in line with Dell's strategy of has been seeking to bolstering its storage business and generating more sales among small-and-medium-sized businesses. In September, for instance, Dell unveiled its new MD3000i storage-area-networking product. It's easier to use and less expensive than similar offerings from rivals such as International Business Machines Corp. and Hewlett-Packard Co., according to Dell. The new push into the storage market represents the latest in a long line of attempts by Dell to reach out to small- and medium-sized businesses with products specifically designed for that market instead of with devices merely reconfigured from larger-market products.

  • Dell spends big in virtualization play Dell Inc.'s costly deal to purchase EqualLogic, a storage and virtualization company that was ready to go public, is a sign that the sleeping giant has awakened after losing market share and being beset with accounting issues for months. In this case, Dell is making a play in the red-hot area of virtualization, made popular of late by the latest high-profile newcomer of the moment - VMware Inc. VMware's software makes it easier for system managers to run a network, making multiple servers appear as one, EqualLogic does something similar in hardware. Dell already resells VMware with some systems and this deal gives it more storage hardware that runs the popular virtualization software. What Dell lacks in the invention department, it used to make up for in manufacturing prowess. But now, with more intense competition from H-P, Sun Microsystems Inc. and International Business Machines Corp. in the server business, it has to buy ways to leapfrog rivals.
  • Dell Is Getting Serious About the Customer Experience. Dell is getting very serious about transitioning from the PC cube to the consumer experience. I heard in San Francisco recently at the World Design Conference that Dell has hired Ed Boyd from Nike to head up their consumer product design operation. Boyd is part of a new Dell's Design Dozen, 12 people recently hired to build out its brand and experience design operation. This is a very big deal. Nike has been right on top of the move to use social networking to link directly to potential and real customers, through the Nike Plus site. And Boyd has been essential to that. Right now, 85% of Dell's products are in the b-to-b space and it wants to transition to the b-to-c market and for that, you need great expertise in user experience and co-creation. This is a big culture change, that Michael Dell is behind.

Google Crafts Big Plans for Android There is no Google phone, but what Google revealed Nov. 5 could be even bigger. Google unveiled a complete mobile phone stack under an open-source license as an alternative to proprietary platforms from Microsoft and Symbian. Aimed at the roughly 3 billion mobile phone users around the world, Android, as it is called, is a Linux-based mobile software stack, including an operating system, HTML Web browser, middleware and applications. Google will make a software developer kit for Android available within a week to allow programmers to begin testing it. The stack was created under the aegis of the Open Handset Alliance, an alliance of technology and wireless carriers that includes Google, T-Mobile, eBay, Qualcomm and Motorola as just a handful of the 34 founding members. Schmidt noted that the lack of a collaborative effort has made it a challenge for developers, wireless operators and handset manufacturers to work together and build better mobile products. This has resulted in poor, often unwieldy user interfaces that make accessing the Web via mobile phones a chore; a mobile software stack that assuages the usability problem, combined with Google's search capabilities and applications, has the potential to be extremely successful.

  • Can Android conquer the mobile world? The search king became popular more than a decade after PCs went mainstream and several years after the Web became a staple. Has Google done exceptionally well? Of course. But it's one of many companies vying for eyeballs on the PC browser. Enter Android. Unlike the PC market, Google joins the contest for mobile access to the Internet with its Android software while there is still much work to be done. Many would argue Apple's iPhone was the first mobile computing device to allow a Web page to look exactly as it does on a PC's browser. The search giant announced the Android platform for mobile devices and the Open Handset Alliance on Monday in a move to break the lock existing carriers and phone makers have on the industry and make it as easy to use the Web on mobile devices as it is on desktop computers. With Android, Google can ensure current and future mobile phone subscribers can see Google services, applications, and ads. Also, the announcement could pave the way for a Google branded phone that would give the company a direct connection to consumers, even more than the ubiquitous search bar. And don't count out a Google phone just yet.

Cisco Shares Fall on Failure to Top Growth Estimates  U.S. companies have ``squeezed'' information-technology spending, Chambers, 58, said on a conference call yesterday. Orders fell from Cisco's top 25 U.S. customers, which include eight financial services companies and two automakers, he said. Corporate customers may slash networking budgets as they deal with a collapse in subprime lending and a slowdown in new construction. Cutbacks at U.S. automakers also are threatening Cisco orders. General Motors Corp., the world's largest automaker, reported a quarterly loss yesterday of $39 billion, about twice its market value. Chrysler LLC, the carmaker owned by buyout firm Cerberus Capital Management LP, said last week that it plans to cut as many as 25,100 jobs after losing $680 million last year. To weather the slump, Chambers is investing in emerging markets, making acquisitions and pushing into new products such as television set-top boxes. Sales in developing countries such as Serbia and Turkey grew 35 percent, helping make up for the U.S. slowdown. North America contributes about 55 percent of total revenue. Cisco also is winning sales from phone and cable services, which use its routers and ethernet products to spruce up their systems. The company bought Scientific-Atlanta last year to expand into cable set-top boxes. Telecommunications customers are switching to Cisco from suppliers such as Tellabs Inc. and Ericsson AB

Cisco’s Chambers: IT Spending Could Get Lumpy Look out: Cisco CEO John Chambers says tech spending in the U.S. might get a little “lumpy.” Cisco is often viewed as a barometer for the business-tech industry. The company makes equipment that businesses use on their computer networks. Most businesses buy at least something from Cisco, and consequently Cisco’s revenue tends to rise and fall with information-technology budgets. By that measure, the first quarter was obviously good for IT departments: Cisco’s revenue increased 17% from the year-ago quarter to $9.6 billion.

But lately there’s been speculation that corporate tech budgets may start to shrink. Companies worried about an economic downturn as a result of the housing slowdown are likely to cut IT spending. A recent Goldman Sachs study predicted IT budgets will drop in 2008, and the tech-research firm Gartner Group has started warning its clients that they need to prepare two budgets: one in which they spend more and one in which they don’t. What does Cisco think? On a call with analysts, Chambers said to expect revenue growth of about 16% at the company next quarter, about the same as this quarter. But when asked, Chambers said a lot of that growth would come from international markets and that U.S. revenue might suffer. That’s when he used the L word. These calls are usually a lesson in equivocation, so Chambers’ statement is pretty strong. To all those Gartner clients trying to decide which budget to go with, the hits from Cisco suggest it will end up being the smaller one.

Apple's IPhone Service Fees Prompt Analysts to Revalue Earnings Multiples Chief Executive Officer Steve Jobs jumpstarted optimism about the power of the iPhone, the $399 Web-surfing mobile device he introduced in June, to generate a steady flow of cash. Analysts are revaluing the stock because each sale brings Apple a cut of monthly wireless service fees from AT&T Inc., and sales of the phone are recognized over 24 months. This has led analysts including Credit Suisse's Robert Semple and Deutsche Bank's Chris Whitmore to use multiples of cash flow rather than earnings to estimate Apple's stock price, reflecting an anticipated pileup of deferred revenue. Twelve analysts raised

WiMax on the ropes with Sprint, Clearwire out The setback cannot be good news for proponents Intel and Motorola. News that Sprint Nextel Corp. and Clearwire Corp. have halted plans to build a wireless network around the wider-reaching WiMax technology cannot be good news for some of its major proponents, namely Intel Corp. and Motorola Inc. Sprint could still decide to go ahead with a WiMax network, but it may be months before the rudderless company makes a decision. The carrier, which has not yet hired a new CEO, is reviewing its WiMax plans and could decide early next year. The Sprint and Clearwire projects was estimated to cost $5 billion. Chipmakers Intel and Motorola have made major investments to develop semiconductors to deliver WiMax technology in the next few years, offering faster and broader Internet connections than current WiFi networks. A fact sheet posted on the WiMax Forum's Web site, dated October 25, cites the Sprint and Clearwire services as the key U.S. example of proposed mobile WiMax services, targeted to reach more than 150 million consumers in 2008. Sprint, Clearwire Scrap WiMax Pact

November 12, 2007

WRFest 11Nov07: Paging Cinderella..Your Coach is Here(Economy)

Speaking of fundamentals it doesn't get more so than economic trends. For the last several months it's been Goldilocks 2.0, as treated by Dr. Ben Pangloss, but it's beginning to look as if it was still Cinderella's economy, the clock is closer to midnight and the pages have announced her carriage. Some of the evolving trends have been visible for some time now, despite the recent quarterly numbers - which were not anywhere near as good as the headlines would have had, as usual.(So, Dearie, What Time IS It, Anyway ?,Reality Checks: the Latest GDP Report and Outlack ?,QR Mary: a Little High-Frequency Data and the Outlook).

Our major look at the recent GDP numbers(Slowmotion Slowdown: More On GDP) found real GDP growth was closer to 2.6% instead of the 3.9% reported headline number. The number is the difference between YoY comparisons and annualizing one quarter's data. We also found that consumption was running about 2.9%, not bad, and the outlook based on employment and real wage growth was holding up reasonably well. That's the good news and you can see some of it is reflected in the accompanying chart. For more discussion and analysis please see the earlier post on the Slowmotion Slowdown. The bad news is:

  1. Housing is turning out to be much worse than anticipted or is still being anticipated.
  2. The employment impacts of Housing and the slowdown in general are still muted because of the lags between when things slow and when the in-direct impacts turn up.
  3. Consumption is still getting support from MEW and that should be turning down.
  4. Capex spending is slowing as well but again the lag structure has a ways to go to impact things.
  5. Inflation is begninning to rear its ugly head and the huge gap in PPI over CPI is beginning to go away as companies are seeing much worse input pressures which they are increasingly passing on. And this time around Food & Energy increases look increasingly as if they're due to structural shifts in long-term energy supply/demand imbalances.
  6. The infamous de-coupling argument where foreign economies will make up for the slowing of the US economy may be right in the very long-run but, something that's widely ignored, those economies are not big enough to make up for the slowing of the developed economies. Nor do they buy enough of our imports.
  7. Japan and Europe are beginning to show signs of the typical 1-2 quarter lag slowdown, and they do buy most of our exports.

So the bottomline the US is teetering on, or is in, a growth recession with an outlook for less than 2% growth, perhaps thru '08. It is also increasingly sensitive to the accumulation of shocks (Oil prices, credit market, housing) and the risks to the downside are increasing as a result. While the odds of a recession are still in the neighborhood of 40% the chances of totterring over the edge are going up. In any case the difference between a growth recession and a real R-word one are pretty small in terms of job creation, increased demand or investment spending.

Interestingly, and finally - read at last, at long last - the general MSM reporting is beginning to recognize all this as reflected in the articles listed in the General section below. Other articles trace out the other various factors we've just summarized.

I'd wish you Bon Appetit' but that hardly seems appropriate. Nonetheless my hope is that forwarned is forearmed at least. 

Oh, btw, the dollar is in freefall, the world oil industry is undergoing a vast re-structuring where most reserves are in unstable areas and foreign governments are taking control of those reserves. And to add icing to the cake China is beginning to export inflation instead of deflation. OOPs. 

UPDATE: Calculated Risk draws our attention to Recession estimates from Roubini and Hussman as well as more on MEW and Consumption from Roubini and himself:Hussman, Roubini: Recession Coming,Roubini on Home Equity Extraction.

Both very well worth reading as well as extending our comments and analysis. 

General & Special

$100 Oil May Mean Recession as Weakened U.S. Economy Enters `Danger Zone' Rising fuel prices that businesses and consumers took in stride earlier this year may now be near the point of pushing the weakened U.S. economy into recession. Crude-oil prices are poised to cross the $100-a-barrel mark while the U.S. economy is still reeling from a surge in corporate borrowing costs. Europe and Japan are vulnerable as well, after the U.S. subprime-mortgage collapse contaminated their credit markets. Even before the latest jump in energy costs, economists expected U.S. growth to slow to less than 2 percent in the fourth quarter -- half the third quarter's pace. Andrew Cates, an economist at UBS AG in London, said his models suggest a 45 percent chance of a U.S. recession next year, up from 33 percent last month, as oil prices prove a ``growing concern.'' Japan risks its fourth recession since the early 1990s, with its index of leading economic indicators falling to zero for the first time in a decade. The European Commission last week cut its 2008 growth forecast for the 13 nations that share the euro to 2.2 percent from 2.5 percent, partly because of costlier crude. The economy grew 2.8 percent last year.

Fears about overseas growth have fueled the U.S. market retreat, as credit turmoil continues to hurt financial firms, the Fed warns of slower U.S. growth and oil prices climb.A new fear is helping fuel the latest stock-market rout: that booming global growth -- for years the engine of the world's financial markets -- may have trouble pulling U.S. markets out of their swoon this time around. Over the summer, when shaky credit markets first sent U.S. stocks lower, strong economic growth in China, India and Europe, together with intervention by the Federal Reserve, reassured investors and sent them back into stocks, pushing U.S. market indexes to new highs. Now, big financial companies like Citigroup Inc., Merrill Lynch & Co., Morgan Stanley and Wachovia Corp. are taking multibillion-dollar write-offs linked to the credit-market turmoil. The Fed, meanwhile, is warning that the nation's economic growth is likely to slow. Europe's growth prospects have weakened, and oil has continued to climb toward $100 a barrel. Those factors have left investors to wonder whether the Fed's skill in adjusting interest rates and China's economic power will be enough to save U.S. stocks from a steeper selloff. Money managers overseeing billions of dollars at hedge funds, pension funds and mutual funds have been hunkering down. Their pullback helped send the Dow Jones Industrial Average down 4.5% in the final three days of last week, to 13042.74 -- the sharpest three-day plunge since 2002.

Economy

Dollar Drops to Record Low Against Euro on China's Plan to Adjust Reserves The dollar fell the most since September against the currencies of its six biggest trading partners after Chinese officials signaled plans to diversify the nation's $1.43 trillion of foreign exchange reserves. The dollar fell against all 16 of the most-active currencies, declining to the weakest versus the Canadian dollar since the end of a fixed exchange rate in 1950, a 26-year low against the pound and a 23-year low versus the Australian dollar. The New York Board of Trade's dollar index dropped to 75.21 today, the lowest since the gauge started in March 1973. ``We will favor stronger currencies over weaker ones, and will readjust accordingly,'' Cheng Siwei, vice chairman of China's National People's Congress, told a conference in Beijing. The dollar is ``losing its status as the world currency,'' Xu Jian, a central bank vice director, said at the same meeting.

Bernanke Says Federal Reserve Sees Slowing Growth, Rising Inflation Risks Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said the U.S. economy is likely to ``slow noticeably'' this quarter while high commodity prices and a weaker dollar may stoke inflation ``for a time.'' Bernanke said the Federal Open Market Committee, which sets the benchmark U.S. interest rate, saw risks to both growth and prices at its Oct. 31 meeting, when officials reduced the rate by a quarter-point to 4.5 percent. He added the Fed ``will be very dependent on the data'' and ``will respond as needed'' to keep growth and inflation stable.

Costly crude fuels price hikes on goods you use every day Let the consumer beware: Costs are going up on almost everything the average American family consumes. Blame it on crude oil. The rocketing price of crude oil is not only sharply hiking the costs of fueling the car and heating the home, but is bidding up prices on the raw materials that go into goods from produce to perfume. At the same time, the push to develop ethanol as an alternative fuel through corn and similar products is inflating the cost of feed for cows, pigs and other farm animals - and that also increases the prices consumers pay. Inflation Re-visited: Uncle Alan & Prof. Jim Chime In , Fighting the Wrong Fight: Inflation Real & Imagined

Japan's growth is increasingly dependent on exports, and that could be a problem as the possibility looms of an economic slowdown in the U.S.-- and the corporate investment needed to manufacture those exports. That could be a problem now, as the possibility looms of an economic slowdown in the U.S., for decades Japan's biggest export market. Japan could be partially insulated by a long-term shift in its trade relations. Though still export-dependent, Japan's economy is less U.S.-dependent than before. In 2000, 30% of Japan's exports went to the U.S. This year only 20% will -- probably less than its exports to China, including Hong Kong, for the first time. The effects are likely to be seen Nov. 13, when the government announces gross domestic product, the widest measure of economic activity, for the July-September quarter. Flat consumer spending plus a sharp fall in housing investment probably caused domestic demand to shrink, economists say. But exports -- led by those to the rest of Asia -- likely more than made up for this, to produce some 1% to 1.5% of annualized growth. How Japan makes it through a possible U.S. downturn and its global knock-on effects is crucial for the long-term economic health of the world's second-largest economy. A fallback into the recessions that dogged Japan until 2001 would mean it imported less, diminishing an important contribution to global growth.

·         Japan Machine Orders Fall More Than Expected; Companies May Pare Spending Japan's September machinery orders fell more than economists expected, a sign that companies may pare spending in the coming months as demand wanes. Orders declined a seasonally adjusted 7.6 percent to 958.7 billion yen ($8.5 billion) from August, the Cabinet Office said in Tokyo today. The median estimate of 41 economists surveyed by Bloomberg News was for a 1.5 percent drop. Slowing overseas demand and a consumer spending slowdown at home may prompt businesses to reduce investment in factories and equipment, cooling growth in the world's second-largest economy. The yen traded at 112.63 per dollar at 9:05 a.m. in Tokyo compared with 112.48 before the report was published. Orders, which tend to indicate corporate investment in about three to six months, have declined since surging at the fastest pace in almost four years in July. The report adds to signs that the economy is losing steam. The Cabinet Office said this week that the leading index, a key gauge of the direction of the economy, fell to the lowest level in a decade, and the central bank cut its growth estimate for the year ending March to 1.8 percent from 2.1 percent on Oct. 31.

The recent turmoil in global credit markets and the strong pound are taking their toll on British economic growth, increasing the likelihood of a cut in the country's interest rates. Data released yesterday showed factory output fell in September and service-sector activity slowed sharply last month. While the Bank of England has said some slowing is necessary if inflation is to remain at its 2% target, the data may indicate the deterioration is occurring faster than the bank had expected. Many economists now believe a rate cut is no more than months away, and the increased likelihood that U.K. interest rates will fall led to a drop in sterling against both the dollar and the euro.

EU cuts economic outlook, cites U.S. mortgage mess The European Union cut its economic forecasts Friday, saying rising oil prices and turmoil in financial markets, stemming from the subprime mortgage debacle in the United States, will significantly cut growth over the next two years. The European Commission forecast that growth in the 27-nation bloc will slow to 2.4 percent in both 2008 and 2009, from 2.9 percent in 2007. In the euro zone - the area of 13 nations using the euro as a common currency - growth will slow to 2.2 percent in 2008 and even further to 2.1 percent in 2009, down from 2.6 percent in 2007, according to the forecast.

$100 Oil May Mean Recession as Weakened U.S. Economy Enters `Danger Zone' Rising fuel prices that businesses and consumers took in stride earlier this year may now be near the point of pushing the weakened U.S. economy into recession. Crude-oil prices are poised to cross the $100-a-barrel mark while the U.S. economy is still reeling from a surge in corporate borrowing costs. Europe and Japan are vulnerable as well, after the U.S. subprime-mortgage collapse contaminated their credit markets. Even before the latest jump in energy costs, economists expected U.S. growth to slow to less than 2 percent in the fourth quarter -- half the third quarter's pace. Andrew Cates, an economist at UBS AG in London, said his models suggest a 45 percent chance of a U.S. recession next year, up from 33 percent last month, as oil prices prove a ``growing concern.'' Japan risks its fourth recession since the early 1990s, with its index of leading economic indicators falling to zero for the first time in a decade. The European Commission last week cut its 2008 growth forecast for the 13 nations that share the euro to 2.2 percent from 2.5 percent, partly because of costlier crude. The economy grew 2.8 percent last year.

The Perils of Petrocracy Can Hugo Chávez’s ‘‘oil socialism’’ show resource-rich countries the way to stability and prosperity? Or is it just the old oil curse in a new guise? Who holds the world’s oil? You might assume it’s in the hands of big private oil companies like ExxonMobil. But in fact, 77 percent of the world’s oil reserves are held by national oil companies with no private equity, and there are 13 state-owned oil companies with more reserves than ExxonMobil, the largest multinational oil company. The popular perception in the United States is that if leaders of oil countries nationalize their oil, they are bucking a global trend toward privatization. In reality, nationalized oil is the trend. And the percentage of oil controlled by state-owned companies is likely to continue rising, mainly because of the demographics of oil. Deposits are being exhausted in wealthy countries — the ones that exploited their oil first and generally have the most private oil — and are being found largely in developing countries, where oil tends to belong to the state. Now as the record high price of oil has made exploitation worthwhile even in places that are remote or geologically complicated (Chad comes to mind), more underdeveloped countries have to choose what to do with their oil. Those that have long held oil must decide how to spend the incomprehensible amounts of money oil is now bringing them. Historically, almost every country dependent on the export of oil has answered this question in the same way: badly. It may seem paradoxical, but finding a hole in the ground that spouts money can be one of the worst things to happen to a nation. With one or two exceptions, oil-dependent countries are poorer, more conflict-ridden and despotic.

Chinese headwinds for clothing, footwear Rising labor and raw-material costs in China as well as lower tax incentives for Chinese exporters make one analyst warn investors. The footwear and apparel industries face a challenging outlook amid rising labor costs in China and the end of a multi-year decline in apparel import prices, Morgan Stanley analyst Brian McGough said in a report Tuesday.  U.S. footwear industry, which sources 85% of its merchandise from China, faces "significantly higher labor costs" in that country, where the costs are rising at a rate far above China's economic growth and in some cases more than 20%, McGough said. China this year also lowered tax incentives for exporters, further driving up costs for U.S. footwear companies at a time of rising raw material costs, the analyst said. That doesn't mean the industry will be free from its own share of hurdles. Apparel industry is seeing an end of a multi-year cost benefit from moving its production offshore. The percentage of apparel consumption that is imported into the U.S. rose to 99% in late 1996 from 45% 10 years earlier, McGough said. That allowed the industry to lower costs from a 20-to-1 cost differential between U.S. and Asian labor, he said.

 

 

November 11, 2007

WRfest 11Nov07: SEE changes and Cusp Points(Markets)

There was a tsunami of bad news, in fact several in the last 2-3 weeks from MER and C's write-off and CEO changes to the growing awareness of credit market problems to Cisco's unanticipated re-introduction of the linkages between slowing economies, capital spending and tech earnings & outlooks. Look for all that bad news to continue for a while. Our views on the various factors are and might play out is summarized in the table below. Earlier we organized a review of all these major pressures and pointed to the tools and analysis that backs up our summary (Sailing in Harm's Weigh: the Perilous Voyages of the Vindicator).

FACTOR

SITUATION

EVALUATION

Surprises to Watch For

Structure

Asset deflation pressures

Dollar pressures, Rising inflation

Supply/Demand imbalances for oil

Spreading Credit market problems

C/C- and dropping

Widening of credit market problems to other asset classes

Short-term credit squeezes

Fundamentals

Slowing Economy

Housing worsening w/full impacts not yet visible

Earnings growth under pressure

Earnings resulting from financial engineering – not organic growth

C/C- and dropping

Bad news on Housing still significantly under-estimated

·          Lag structure not grasped

 

Technicals

Short-term downtrend for SP500

Sudden break in Nasdaq/NDX

Emerging markets increasingly bubblicious

B-/C+ and eroding

Sudden revisions in Outlook accelerating technical downpressures

Outlook

Acceptance and awareness of structural and fundamental problems growing

Tech outlooks being reviewed/revised ????

B/B-

Watch for bounce unless S+F+T results in reality realizations deepening

 

In our humble opinion the biggest changes underway are the growing realization that the problems in the credit markets with badly evaluated and analyzed structured debt assets and products are more widespread than anybody knows, or is willing to admit. And the accompanying realization that it's likely to extend far beyond mortage related derivatives into other assets classes (Stages of Denial: Acceptence ? Not Yet, The Sound of the Next Shoe: Corporate Debt). A realization that's far from being realized, so-to-speak. Borrowing from an earlier posting the accompanying chart is a conceptual illustration of how problems in mortgage-based instruments ripple across other markets on the one hand. And on the other how those other asset classes likely will also face similar problem. If that sets in, as it should, major down pressures will develop.

The other major change in Outlook is due to the Market's reactions to Cisco's earnings - which was a sterling performance. The suprise was Chambers admission that sales to US corporate customers are coming under increasing pressure. Now why folks think a slowing economy would see continued capex spending, under which technology investment falls, is beyond us. But there it is. Given how much the NDX has bubbled over the general market trends since March there's a lot of fluff to be brushed off. Just to put it in a nutshell though let's point to one among many headlines and excerpts:

Bear season not over yet U.S. stocks are poised for more weakness next week, after a slide in the Nasdaq wiped out hopes that technology shares could pull the market out of the subprime pain felt by financial institutions on Wall Street.After dashed hopes of tech-led upturn, market turns focus to retailers. Analysts see little good news on horizon as fallout from high oil, weak dollar, subprime write-downs still spreading. The selling that plagued the financial sector of the market for the last two months formally spread to the rest of the market on this past Thursday. That's when tech shares began selling off in earnest upon a lower-than-expected revenue forecast from industry giant Cisco Systems, which fueled worries that corporate spending on technology products going into next year.

Our more detailed analysis of the characeristics of the major markets was posted earlier: Tremors: Assessing the Markets

 Below you'll find this week's collection of readings and links. It's worth a bit of time to at least skim the summaries and see if there's sufficient evidence to either backup our assertions or disagree with them. We've tried to provide enough detail to let you at least browse the highlights, or should we say the lowlights.

The links brought up to the Special section highlight what we think are the really critical trends that popped into major visiblity this last week. 

General & Special

 

O'Neal's Agony, or, in the Bunker With Stan When a big Wall Street firm loses a huge pile of money, it's often hard to figure out exactly what happened.

 

S&P500 ex-Risk ? Here's an issue I have been mulling over, without a satisfactory answer:  There have been many investment thesis (thesii?) over the past few years about the market which supported the bullish side of the ledger: Earnings were high, stocks were cheap, risk was moderate, the Fed model favored stocks over bonds. Regardless of whether you found these arguments persuasive or not, global markets have gone higher. While the U.S. indices may have lagged the rest of the world's bourses, they too, have powered higher.  Here's the odd factor: It turns out that many of the arguments made in favor of U.S. domestic growth have been based on an assumption that turned out to be false. To wit: The Financials, the largest sector in the S&P500, had legitimate, sustainable, normalized risk-based earnings. That basic premise turned out to be wrong. What's truly astounding is that we may only be seeing the tip of the iceberg. Its possible that the big brokers and banks have $1 trillion in toxic debt on their books to be written down. That would equal decades -- not years -- of profits to be wiped out. To paraphrase the WSJ, "the financial crisis is becoming Shakespearean comedy."

 

Global credit squeeze Global investors succumbed to a new bout of jitters amid concerns that a host of big western financial institutions are nursing additional, serious problems related to America’s troubled mortgage markets. [a Special Section from the Financial Times that is extensive, insightful and well-written].

  • "Worst banks crisis" says Deutsche CEO Global credit markets are deep in the worst crisis of Deutsche Bank chief Josef Ackermann's 30-year career, but he does not see any further writedowns for Germany's flagship bank. "If you go back to the Asian crisis, the Latin American crisis, the Russian crisis, these were pretty regional," said Ackermann, who also heads global banking organization the Institute of International Finance. "(This) is psychologically the worst crisis that I have seen in my 30 years," he told journalists at the Reuters Finance Summit. "What is really new and unexpected is that we had a phase of excessive liquidity. It is not a shortage of liquidity. It is a shortage of demand. The liquidity was hoarded under the pillow."

Markets & Investing

 

 

 

Bear season not over yet U.S. stocks are poised for more weakness next week, after a slide in the Nasdaq wiped out hopes that technology shares could pull the market out of the subprime pain felt by financial institutions on Wall Street.

After dashed hopes of tech-led upturn, market turns focus to retailers. Analysts see little good news on horizon as fallout from high oil, weak dollar, subprime write-downs still spreading. The selling that plagued the financial sector of the market for the last two months formally spread to the rest of the market on this past Thursday. That's when tech shares began selling off in earnest upon a lower-than-expected revenue forecast from industry giant Cisco Systems, which fueled worries that corporate spending on technology products going into next year.

 

The Fed's newest chief is a wuss Ben Bernanke's Fed, like that of his predecessor, can't abandon reason fast enough. It caves in to Wall Street's demands regardless of long-term consequences. So why did the Federal Reserve instead cut interest rates, further damaging the inflation-fighting credentials of the Bernanke Fed? As best as I can figure out, the Fed didn't stand pat on interest rates because Wall Street -- by odds of 4-to-1 -- had decided that the Fed would cut rates. And the Fed decided that the financial markets were so fragile that dashing those expectations would make a bad situation worse. If that's what the Federal Reserve was thinking, it's rubbish. It's not that the debt markets are back to normal, because they aren't. And it's not that there aren't more hedge funds and structured investment vehicles on the edge of imploding, because there are. And it's not that Wall Street -- from mortgage bank to investment bank -- isn't hoping to avoid writing off billions in illiquid debt, because it is. Given the problems in the debt market, the prices of stocks are too high and the risk premium on bonds still too low. If the debt market is on the edge of melting down, if Citigroup (C, news, msgs) is tottering, if the economy is about to slip into recession, nobody seems terribly worried, judging from stock prices here and overseas. But, gol' dang it (fill in your expletive of choice), investors ought to be scared. There's at least one more debt-market shoe to drop when the current wave of credit-rating downgrades turns into selling, which will force institutions with portfolios stuffed with questionable paper to mark their assets to market prices. Moody's (MCO, news, msgs), Fitch Ratings and Standard & Poor's all downgraded billions of dollars in mortgage-backed assets in October. Credit downgrades last month from the three rating companies hit $100 billion of asset-backed paper. More shocking than the total, however, was the distribution: Many of these downgrades hit AAA-rated mortgage securities. These securities were supposed to be the safest part of the mortgage-backed debt market. Turns out they're not.

 

Fire on the mountain There were plenty of warning signs along the path that led to the current conflagration in credit markets. Similar to what we've seen in California, the possibility exists that this past period will move from the front pages to a rebuilding process. After billions of dollars of damage sunk costs associated with any tragedy a recovery phase will eventually emerge with lessons in tow. Before we issue the all clear, however, it is necessary to understand the root cause of the financial fires. While it doesn't change the fact that homes and livelihoods were lost, it may help us understand how and why this seemingly unnatural disaster began in the first place. Wall Street has long profited from repackaging risk. At the core of brokerage business models, they benefit from the chasm between what people know and what they can charge for advice. Many of the positions on trading desks around the street have no listed proxy with which to guide or gauge their valuation. Many Wall Street firms are assigning estimations of where they believe these securities should be trading but as we know, something is only worth as much as what someone else is willing to pay for it.

In a derivative laden finance-based economy, the banks, brokers and other financial service companies simply serve as wicks to the much broader brush. Stocks across a wide swath of sectors derive earnings from financial-based operations and that is reason for economic concern regardless of whether the fans are flamed.

·         Markets fear banks have $1 trillion in toxic debt, Why Street Bankers Get Away With Repeating Old Mistakes, Fears intensify for prolonged turmoil, Bloodbath expected to claim more victims , Auditors set for tough talks with clients

·         Money Quotes

    • A new phase in the credit crunch, one of “$1 trillion losses” seems to be dawning. The crisis at Citigroup and renewed doubts about some of the world’s leading banks disquieted stock markets on both sides of the Atlantic yesterday, with the fractious mood set to continue.

o        Fears are growing that the turbulence in the financial sector will be more protracted than expected as big US and European banks come under intensifying pressure due to losses on US subprime mortgage securities.

    • Shares in banks and insurers continued to tumble on Monday as analysts warned that losses from mortgage securities could leave some institutions short of capital.
    • Most of all, however, the disclosures from Citi and Merrill – which last month reported much heavier losses than it had warned of a few weeks before – have left investors with the impression that the valuations banks are putting on their subprime exposures cannot be trusted.

o        Don't let those on Wall Street fool you by saying "this is the natural cycle of things." Does it really have to be? Unlike virtually any other industry, Wall Street shakes, twists, and hammers on its innovations until they break. What would happen if Boeing Co. or Johnson & Johnson rolled out products with similar defect rates? Ratings downgrades -- defects, really -- have hit about 10% of the subprime related derivatives, known as collateralized debt obligations. The number is expected to rise in the weeks ahead

  • Fundamentals, not liquidity conditions, are behind MBS crash Many banks, if not financial institutions in general, would have you believe that the current rout in mortgage-backed debt is largely being driven by irrational fear. A few bad subprime debts buried around the structured universe are scaring buyers out of markets. But, said CreditSights, in a note to clients on Wednesday, current pricing levels reflect fundamentals, even for the most highly-rated debt. Mortgage securities across the board are overrated and overvalued:

·         Morgan Stanley Says Value of Subprime Mortgage Assets Fell by $3.7 Billion Morgan Stanley, the second-biggest U.S. securities firm, said its subprime mortgages and related securities lost $3.7 billion in the past two months, after prices sank further than the firm's traders expected. The decline may cut fourth-quarter earnings by $2.5 billion, the New York-based company said in a statement today. The figure is subject to change until the end of this month, Morgan Stanley said. The average estimate of analysts surveyed by Bloomberg is for a $1.93 billion profit in the quarter. AIG Net Falls 27 Percent on Losses From Mortgage Securities; Shares Slide

·         Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Market in U.S. Shrinks by Most in Two Months

$500 Billion: The Mother of All Write-Down Estimates Write this down: five hundred billion dollars. That is how much one analyst thinks the tally of the carnage in the fixed-income markets ultimately could be. Royal Bank of Scotland Group chief credit strategist Bob Janjuah put out a report today estimating that the credit crunch will cause $250 billion to $500 billion of losses at banks and brokers around the world. As Bloomberg points out in this story on the report, the estimate includes not just losses on subprime mortgage-related bonds but also the effect of a new accounting standard that goes into effect Nov. 15 known as Financial Accounting Standards Board’s rule 157. It will force companies to put values on opaque securities and could lead to write downs of as much as $100 billion at firms including Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs Group, according to Janjuah. Should the estimate prove accurate, it would mean the credit-market storm that began this summer is just beginning. The total of write-downs already announced by Citigroup, Merrill Lynch and the other Wall Street firms is only about $30 billion to $40 billion. Big as those numbers are, they still don’t come close to the last major crop of write-downs, when another accounting change prompted eye-popping losses at companies including AT&T and AOL Time Warner in 2002. The media-and-Internet conglomerate had write-downs that year for goodwill and soured Internet assets of roughly $100 billion. Still, Janjuah’s number is in a league by itself. Not only is the upper end of his range roughly what the U.S. has spent on the Iraq War, it is about equal to the market caps of the three largest U.S. banks, Citigroup, J.P. Morgan Chase and Bank of America, combined.

 

Fitch May Downgrade Bond Insurers After New Test Fitch Ratings may lower the AAA credit ratings on one or more bond insurers after a new review of the companies' capital takes into account downgrades of collateralized debt obligations that they guarantee. Fitch said it will spend the next six weeks reviewing the capital of insurers including MBIA Inc., Ambac Financial Group Inc., CIFG Guaranty and Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. to ensure they have enough capital to warrant an AAA rating. Any guarantor that fails the new test may be downgraded within a month unless the company is able to raise more capital, New York- based Fitch said today in a statement. In September, Fitch announced the results of a stress test of the bond insurers' capital to demonstrate how much capital insurers would need if conditions in the market were to significantly worsen. The test indicated that FGIC and CIFG would need to raise additional capital under the hypothetical scenario. Fitch said it decided to review the bond insurers after ``broader and deeper'' downgrades of CDOs, which package debt such as subprime mortgage securities and loans. The bond insurance industry has guaranteed more than $1 trillion of bonds issued by U.S. cities and states as well as bonds backed by mortgages, credit cards and other assets, and the guarantee allows borrowers to use the insurers' AAA rating. Shares and debt of the insurers has tumbled on concern the sliding value of subprime mortgages may erode their credit ratings.

Next Fear: Corporate Debt Fitch Ratings says downgrades of corporate bonds rose in the third quarter to $92.1 billion, their highest level in two years, a potential sign of rising distress. Financial markets have been hit by a wave of defaults on mortgage loans. Now it might be time to start worrying about a more-remote threat: shaky corporate debt. Amid booming profits and extremely low default rates in recent years, many companies borrowed heavily to make acquisitions, go private, buy back stock or pay special dividends in activities designed to boost shareholder returns. Not long after that binge of borrowing, some cracks are showing in parts of the economy, and the prognosis for corporate balance sheets is looking less rosy. Fitch Ratings says downgrades of corporate bonds rose in the third quarter to $92.1 billion, their highest level in two years. Meantime, interest rates on junk bonds have risen, potentially straining the ability of low-grade issuers to tap the credit markets for fresh loans or to refinance existing debt. Fitch predicts a jump in corporate defaults, from less than 1% of all debt outstanding in 2007 to more than 4% in 2008. If this happens, it will become harder still for companies to borrow. Sensing a turn, "distressed investors" -- who seek to gobble up debt when it has hit rock bottom -- have raised more than $300 billion by some estimates to put to work in the years ahead.

JPMorgan, Citigroup, Goldman to Revive $10 Billion Sale of Chrysler Loans Chrysler LLC's bankers plan to sell $10 billion of loans to investors this week after an attempt in July was shelved when demand for high-yield, high-risk debt dried up, according to people with knowledge of the plan. JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc., Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Morgan Stanley and Bear Stearns Cos. will begin selling the loans tomorrow, said the people, who declined to be identified because the terms haven't been set. The banks provided the loans to help Cerberus Capital Management LP complete its acquisition of Auburn Hills, Michigan-based Chrysler Daimler AG in August. Banks are trying to reduce a backlog of more than $200 billion of loans they weren't able to sell as losses on securities tied to subprime mortgages contaminated credit markets in July and August. The New York-based banks haven't decided whether they need to offer discounts to sell the loans, the people said. The decision to proceed with the offering was made last week, before concerns over bank losses on subprime securities sparked a slump in loan prices, one person said. Citigroup, the largest U.S. bank by assets, said Nov. 4 it may write down the value of its subprime assets by $11 billion and Chief Executive Officer Charles O. ``Chuck'' Prince III resigned.

Private Equity’s Fund-Raising Gusher  U.S. private-equity firms may not be doing a whole lot of deals these days, but that isn’t stopping them from raising more money. PE firms have set a fund-raising record this year, pulling in a total of $263 billion, according to sister publication Private Equity Analyst, up from $258 billion raised last year. With nearly two months left in the year, there is a chance they could surpass $300 billion. It might seem an odd time for private-equitiy firms to set a fund-raising record. After all, the debt markets have curbed new buyout activity. Buyout shops announced just $8.5 billion of new deals in October, roughly a fifth of the $42.2 billion a year earlier, according to Dealogic. Then, there are those pesky economists who lately have been warning of the possibility of recession, which would threaten the health of existing PE-backed companies. Amid such a cloudy environment, Deal Journal can’t help but wonder: Just what would it take to shut off the fund-raising spigot? U.S. institutional investors are smitten with private-equity funds, while Chinese and Middle Eastern sovereign funds have started to pile on as well. They show no signs of stopping. Is its possible that private-equity fund managers themselves might one day need to exercise some restraint and raise smaller funds? Perhaps, but we aren’t holding our breath.

BRICs Prove Cheap to GDP as Greenspan Leads Warning of Speculative Bubble For all the concern about stock- market bubbles in Brazil, Russia, India, China, the biggest emerging markets still may have more promise than anything in the developed world. The simple math of comparing the value of companies with their countries' combined gross domestic product shows the so- called BRIC markets total $1.71 trillion, or 25 percent of their GDP. U.S. equities available for trading, by contrast, are worth $13.98 trillion, or about the same as comparable GDP, according to data compiled by Morgan Stanley and Bloomberg. Stocks in all industrialized nations account for 81 percent of GDP. While history shows emerging markets have the greatest potential for growth, they are also susceptible to some of the biggest declines. The Mexican peso devaluation in December 1994 led to a 24 percent drop in developing nations' stocks, while Thailand's decision to let the value of its currency fall on July 2, 1997 spurred a 37 percent loss in six months. Emerging- market shares fell another 19 percent after Russia defaulted on $40 billion of debt on Aug. 17, 1998. Even with the gains, the BRIC markets are small compared with the size of their economies. The four countries account for 14 percent of global GDP, while their stocks make up 5.1 percent of the world's market value, based on shares available for trading, data compiled by Morgan Stanley show. Japan's stock market expansion from 1977 to 1987 shows the potential for BRIC countries. The nation's market capitalization was 53.6 trillion yen ($467 billion) in 1977, representing 29 percent of the economy, in line with the average since 1955, according to data compiled by Japan's Cabinet Office and the Tokyo Stock Exchange. During the next 10 years, that percentage jumped to 99 percent as the Nikkei 225 Stock Average increased more than fourfold. The stock market peaked at the end of 1989 and then lost half its value during the next decade as its asset bubble burst.

November 10, 2007

Tremors: Assessing the Markets

Now this was a fun week, wasn't it ? Lots and lots of news and events. Before doing our weekly review it seemed like a good idea to step back and take a careful appreciation of the markets; plus there's so much news to note that splitting some pieces up into seperate posts also seems like a great idea.

When a major earthquake is building up it's often preceeded by earlier tremors. If we take that step back it seems that March's Shanghai Surprise was one such early and mild tremor. And the worldwide seizing of the credit markets that drove all other markets down in Aug the next and bigger one. But despite significant building up of problems in Structure, Fundamentals and Technicals the outlook of investors remained pretty sanguine and the markets not only recovered but rose higher despite accelerating bad news in each of the deeper factors. So the key question is will it be the same again or are we getting smarter.

Below we walk thru some of the major markets and appraise each of them to the best of our ability but to start with we'll point you to an interesting Marketwatch look ahead:

Bear season not over yet U.S. stocks are poised for more weakness next week, after a slide in the Nasdaq wiped out hopes that technology shares could pull the market out of the subprime pain felt by financial institutions on Wall Street.

After dashed hopes of tech-led upturn, market turns focus to retailers. Analysts see little good news on horizon as fallout from high oil, weak dollar, subprime write-downs still spreading. The selling that plagued the financial sector of the market for the last two months formally spread to the rest of the market on this past Thursday. That's when tech shares began selling off in earnest upon a lower-than-expected revenue forecast from industry giant Cisco Systems, which fueled worries that corporate spending on technology products going into next year.

Barry Ritholz at BigPicture has two interesting posts up today that are worth taking a look at as wel. One is an interesting deep dive that riffs off a Barron's column and the other his regular weekly Linkfest, the introduction of which is well worth reading. Are Retail Stocks Bargains? and  November Linkfest: Week in Review

 

Let's start with the SP500 and the move onto a seperate look at the NDX. If you look at a daily six-month chart the SP500 blew right thru resistance around 1490 and has established a new downtrend. The question is where will it end up ? In other words how will the four factors play themselves out ? Reviewed in a bit more detail in the prior post,Sailing in Harm's Weigh: the Perilous Voyages of the Vindicator , so we won't go into detail here.

If you look at the longer-term sub-chart the uptrend is still very much intact. So the key questions then become will the downturn approach the longer term upper boundry at 1340 or keep on going ? If it bounces then we'll argue that the Outlook is still very much to the positive side and there will be short-term opportunities to buy for a bounce. On the other hand this tremor appears to be different in tone with the realiteis of the more basic factors finally starting to appear to sink in, from the economic slowdown, housing problems or the spreading credit market problems. In any case now is not a good time to put cash to work and you ought to consider selling into any rallies while beginning to research good companies and sectors for a serious correction and the resulting buying opportunities.

A key to all this is that Cisco woke people up more than a bit by admitting that companies don't keep investing in technology with a downturn emerging. Something that's been ignored for quite a while and is reflected in the shorter-term NDX chart, which has shown a disconerting tendency to bubble up even more after the prior tremors than rationality would argue. On the other hand for the last two times buying into tech has been a great move but we have to doubt that that's going to be as true in the future. The drop in the NDX was abrupt and unexpected and it blew right thru resistance at around 2040, but no clear downtrend has been established.

And if you look at the longer-term chart you can two things. First there's was a lot of froth bubbled into the NDX as the result of the sterling performance of key companies,e.g. APPL, GOOG, et.al. But these are company specific stories. It's not until we get back to 1750 or so that that we're back in grounded territory but even there the uptrend would still be alive and well. If it bounces off the 1900-1950 range delusion is still in charge and a short-term speculative opportunity exists. This is a major attitudinal adjustment process and how it plays out will tell us a lot of things.

In the prior upturns in March and August certain markets and sectors clearly established themselves as gaining distance on the pack. Specifically Technology, Energy and Emerging Markets. If you look at the multi-sector, multi-market chart you can see how the various S&P sectors have performed. YTD Finance (XLF) and Con. Discretionary (XLY) have taken the most damage as you'd expect while Con Staples (XLP) and Healthcare (XLV) have held up as "well" as the SP500. Contrasting that with the sectors that have been doing better that Tech (XLK), Industrials (XLI) and Utilities (XLU) continue to maintain an advantage, Utilities appearing to reflect a defensive move perhaps ? And Energy (XLE) continues to outpace everybody. A key thing to note with Energy is that it hasn't moved down - which means that some of the air is still in it and this will NOT be a short-term buying opportunity though it ought to remain a strategic long-term investment for years. In other words if and when it heads down would be a good time to add energy investments to your portfolio. Depending on how things work out in general though now would be a good time to take profits off the table in all the other sectors or plan on holding them thru what we see coming and for several years. The really interesting markets are the Emerging Markets (EEM, EPP) which have NOT followed the downturns in all the other markets and sectors. Whoops - now that's a bubble. Before the two best places to put hot money as the upturns took off were Energy and EM. NOT this time. In fact now would be a very good time to start watching closely for a sudden sharp downturn and be ready to pull out.

We could stop there, and probably should, but let's throw up a few more words and a chart on some other markets that might interest you. If for no other reasons that it makes such a perfect story to  tell that defines the wrap-around context influencing the equity markets. In the chart at the left we stack 10-Yr Treasures (TNX), the Oil Index (long #), Gold (XAU.X) and the Euro. Notice how perfectly they mirror one another and define most of the characteristics of the Structural enviroment.

Interest rates have dropped somewhat sharply YTD as a combination of Fed policy and a flight to quality has bid them down. Meanwhile Oil has accelerated sharply and abruptly from the mid-$70 range to almost $100. Now some of that's imbalances (let's say $60 or so), some of it's geo-political risk factors (let's guestimate $20) and the rest is short-term speculation.

As a result of declining rates and increased inflationary pressures Gold has also taken off and might well continue on for a while, though exposed to some pullbacks. Similarly the Euro has climbed rapidly agains the dollar.

All of these forces will continue to play out for several more months though some expect the dollar to bottom out around $1.50/Euro and Gold to taper off around $800, though with a chance of reaching $1000 first.

A choppy and chaotic environment which shows some signs of a major shift in the psychology and sentiment of Outlook. Though judding from many of the CNBC commentators we've got a long way to go before underlying realities take hold. The impact of Housing is still being significantly under-estimated. Morgan-Stanley for example views Housing as bottoming in Q108 which is literally years off from CalculatedRisk's analysis.(Q3 Adjusted New Home Inventory based on Cancellations)
And everybody expects the economy to do better in the second half of '08, where "better" is defined as greater than 2% growth. Possible, as long as there are no more suprises and sudden shocks, right ? :). 

Just for fun let's wrap some numbers around all this. While I'm not a technical analyst nor necessarily a strong proponent it has a definite place. Both because a lot of folks do follow it and, perhaps most importantly, it helps put some structure and thinking around one's analysis. So that said let's borrow another technial tool - Fibonacci numbers. Which map certain naturally ocurring patterns in terms of adjustments. The accompany table takes the preceeding discussions on various trend boundaries and uses them as the Low/High limits and applies the standard Fibonacci adjustment factors to help define the possible levels of adjustment. If you find any of the preceeding discussion convincing it boils down to the argument that both the SP500 and the NDX should find safe havens at the lower range of the longer-term trends. That would be, as shown in red, about 1368 on the SP500 and 1752 for the NDX. Certainly if we got down that far my comfort level that we'd returned to more reasonable level would be raised. Of course that'd be a 12% correction for the S&P. Well within the bounds of other estimates and a comfortable correction. On the other hand with all the fluff and bluff built into the big techs reaching 1752 would mean a 22% correction in the NDX.

A number that strikes me as grounded but pscyhologically unreasonable. If we approach that I'd argue we'd see a real downturn below the longer-term uptrend. Which in fact, as we've argued repeatedly, is in fact a reasonable reflection of the deeper realities. 

November 09, 2007

Sailing in Harm's Weigh: the Perilous Voyages of the Vindicator

Well good morning, in case you don't know future are down rather sharply after a Wachovia announcment after spending most of the time since yesterday's close in pretty positive territory. What's surprising is not that they're down now but that they were up. One must, of course, expect some bouncing around but a comeback envisions that all the tsuamis of the last couple of weeks were going to peter out and no more surprises would pop up.

We take two contrary views. First these aren't Black Swan events in the sense of being un-looked for but rather natural outcomes of the structural forces at play in the economy and markets. And second, the most important, you can navigate them better if you understand them.

So what we'd like to do is review some of the key headlines from the last week - jumping the gun a bit on the normal weekly review - and compare them to some prior postings which try to take just such a deeper dive. We're headed into stormy waters and perilous voyages and to avoid being swamped it'll help to get some more tools in the toolkit as well as maps and charts plus a weather report (there, enough mixed metaphors to qualify for the Great Tanta of CalculatedRisk fame contest). In some ways a review might be seen as an "I told you so" vindication effort and there's an element of truth.

But more importantly the Vindicator is aiming to test the tools and implications against the empiricals. So perhaps better labels would be Verify, Validate and Vorecast :).

We'll perform those test of the headlines and tools for the Economy, Markets, Credit crisis, the Tech Outlook and enterprise performance. Below what'll we'll show will be a recent headline paired with some of the relevent postings. Hopefully what you get out of this is a set of ways to think about and analyze what's going on around us.

Economy

Let's start with the bid daddy that drives everything else.

Bernanke Says Federal Reserve Sees Slowing Growth, Rising Inflation Risks

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said the U.S. economy is likely to ``slow noticeably'' this quarter while high commodity prices and a weaker dollar may stoke inflation ``for a time.'' Bernanke said the Federal Open Market Committee, which sets the benchmark U.S. interest rate, saw risks to both growth and prices at its Oct. 31 meeting, when officials reduced the rate by a quarter-point to 4.5 percent. He added the Fed ``will be very dependent on the data'' and ``will respond as needed'' to keep growth and inflation stable. 

Markets

At this point we're all probably aware of what's going on so perhaps a single headline isn't the best place to go to review what's widely known. However the most interesting thing we saw was the appearance of S&P's lead technical analyst on CNBC yesterday where he says he's looking for an 8-12% correction.

Technical Outlook:Whether now is the time to head for the hills, with Mark Arbeter, SandP chief technical strategist and CNBCs Brian Shactman. To which we should add this just hot off the press.
Beware Earnings Recession Analysts are cutting earnings estimates for Q4, with Charles Rotblut, Zacks.com senior market analyst and CNBCs Becky Quick

Credit Markets

 
"Worst banks crisis" says Deutsche CEO Global credit markets are deep in the worst crisis of Deutsche Bank chief Josef Ackermann's 30-year career, but he does not see any further writedowns for Germany's flagship bank. "If you go back to the Asian crisis, the Latin American crisis, the Russian crisis, these were pretty regional," said Ackermann, who also heads global banking organization the Institute of International Finance. "(This) is psychologically the worst crisis that I have seen in my 30 years," he told journalists at the Reuters Finance Summit. "What is really new and unexpected is that we had a phase of excessive liquidity. It is not a shortage of liquidity. It is a shortage of demand. The liquidity was hoarded under the pillow."

 Tech Industry Outlook

Cisco’s Chambers: IT Spending Could Get Lumpy Look out: Cisco CEO John Chambers says tech spending in the U.S. might get a little “lumpy.” moneyCisco is often viewed as a barometer for the business-tech industry. The company makes equipment that businesses use on their computer networks. Most businesses buy at least something from Cisco, and consequently Cisco’s revenue tends to rise and fall with information-technology budgets. By that measure, the first quarter was obviously good for IT departments: Cisco’s revenue increased 17% from the year-ago quarter to $9.6 billion.

Tech, tech, who's got the tech: Greenberg on Definitions

Enterprise Performance

While we didn't specifically analyze Citi it could serve as a poster child for the challenges in establishing an organizing principle, executing against that vision and business model and for a failure to establish controls and accountability for performance, otherwise known as a managemenet system. And of course the way they treat their people. With that in mind the necessary deep changes required for Citi to recover don't appear to be on the horizon or under discussion but they should be. So below is a sampling of three articles pointing to that dilemma and some relevent prior postings.

  • Now Citi Needs a Plumber Prince's lawyerly response to Citi's regulatory problems -- mostly over its stock research and initial-public-offering practices -- may have stifled innovation, dimming its earnings potential and hurting its ability to recruit and retain talent.
  • Citigroup's Subprime Explanation Defies Belief Citigroup Inc. says it isn't sure how much its subprime-related assets have fallen in value this quarter. Maybe it's $8 billion. Maybe it's $11 billion. On one point, though, Citigroup isn't budging: It says none of these declines began until after last quarter ended.
  • Prince Alwaleed: Chuck had to go  In a Fortune exclusive, Citigroup's biggest single investor talks about his disappointment in Chuck Prince, the bank's colossal losses, and his views on a successor CEO.

And our review of enterprise performance analysis along with the detailed investigation of Home Depot that illustrates the application to a real company.

 

November 07, 2007

Slowmotion Slowdown: More On GDP

Speaking of other shoes dropping one that hasn't yet are any of the major economic indicators. In fact last week's GDP preliminary numbers and payroll jobs reports were so good as to be described as stunning. At least on the surface. As we mentioned one little trouble, among several, was the question of how good the 3.9% annualized growth in GDP was given the extremely low price deflator. We walked thru that and put it to bed in the Weekly Reader 5Nov07: Economy, including comparing real to nominal GDP and YoY to QtQ changes. The bottomline is, as we've argued, that real & nominal track each other closely and quarterly numbers do as well, they're just noisy and hard to judge. So now we'll concentrate on YOY% changes in real GDP.

If you'll look at the accompanying chart it has two sub-sections. The first shows GDP, PCE, Industrial Production and Investment. A couple of things to notice - GDP upticked a tad but not so much as to do more than return to the longer-term downtrend (the Slowmotion Slowdown) while PCE remains low and flat. BtW - actual GDP growth was 2.6% when you look at this way instead of extrapolating a single quarter to full year and end up with 3.9%. PCE is running at 2.9%, that is 3% YoY.

Industrial Production(r.h. scale) is about 1.8% for the 2nd quarter in a row after slowing fairly sharply in earlier quarters. Investment upticked as a combination of an improvement in capex plus a decrease in the rate of drop in residential investment. 2.6% moves us up out of the growth recession range of < 2% but the real question is not how we did. It's how we'll be doing. One of the things the punditocracy forgets is that these aren't financial markets - there's a clear set of inter-connections, adjustments take time and there's a pronounced lag structure. In other words the Housing downturn hasn't spread to PCE or GDP, yet ! But it will

The key is Consumption (PCE) which drives the rest of the economy. And what it looks like in the future. Consumption in turn is driven by the combined impact of job growth, real wages and opportunities to borrow. Mortage-equity Withdrawl (MEW) has been a major supporter of Consumption - which is good because neither job growth nor real wage growth have been strongly positive.

In the 2nd sub-chart you can see the YoY% change in Employment as well as compare it to GDP. Notice, again, that the turning points and timetrends follow predictable patterns. With the caveat that employment is a lagging variable and depends on how the economy overall is doing. So that while GDP has been slowing since '04 its' downpath steepened in Q106 and employment growth, which has NEVER been strong having peaked around 2.0% briefly and headed back down, and has also been trending down since then. In fact YoY growth was only 1.3%, down from the prior 1.4%.

Bottomlines here is that the economy continues to slow no matter what the headlines said, is not exposed to the most damaging impacts of Housing and Credit market problems yet but will be as the time lags work into the system. 

So what drives Consumption ? Jobs, pay and loans, right ? Following Joseph Ellis (Ahead-of-the Curve a very worthwhile book, quick to read, fairly easy to understand and worth studying) who found that a very good indicator of future consumption demand is the YoY% changes in Employment plus Real Wages we take a look at how that's behaving.

The accompanying chart shows the changes in PCE verses the sum of the changes in Real Wages + Employment. The first sub-chart shows the curves back to Q194 and you can how relatively closely they track. Also notice that the combo turned down quite a ways before PCE did during the last downturn. A 2nd thing to notice is the gap between them for the better part of the last ten years. That's due to MEW plus the '03 tax cuts which resulted in Consumption not falling as far as it normally does in a downturn. Given we had a major investment-boom bust that's a very good thing as the Japanese will tell you. Unless of course spending almost 20 years in the economic doldrums is a good thing. In fact given what could have happened the other D-word should come to mind.

Since the nadir in '02/'03 the combo has gradually picked up, which has lent what element of organic growth we do have to our "recovery". It spiked last Fall as Oil prices dropped sharply and took Inflation down with them as well as freeing up spending capacity for consumption instead of energy spending. But the current trend is a flattening, or perhaps even a downturn.

Based on what we see here the general view that we're in for a year or more of slow growth (the infamouse "growth recession") is well-grounded in the data. But remember the lag structures of employment demand and job growth. As well as the lags in MEW and other asset-based debt. We'll have to see if Wages + Employment (W+E ?) starts slowing itself. But that has to be considered a strong possibility, even likely.

The difference between a slowdown or soft landing and a Recession lies right there. If W+E slows abruptly or turns down then look out below. 

The Sound of the Next Shoe: Corporate Debt

Well timing may not be everything but it's close. The WSJ has a very interesting post on Fitch's recent announcement that corporate debt, another asset class, is under a higher liklihood of increased pressure. Or, put another way, oops, here they go again (if that calls up some subliminal associations good - remember whose song that is and what's happened to her :) ).

 Next Fear: Corporate Debt

Fitch Ratings says downgrades of corporate bonds rose in the third quarter to $92.1 billion, their highest level in two years, a potential sign of rising distress.

Financial markets have been hit by a wave of defaults on mortgage loans. Now it might be time to start worrying about a more-remote threat: shaky corporate debt. Amid booming profits and extremely low default rates in recent years, many companies borrowed heavily to make acquisitions, go private, buy back stock or pay special dividends in activities designed to boost shareholder returns. Not long after that binge of borrowing, some cracks are showing in parts of the economy, and the prognosis for corporate balance sheets is looking less rosy. Fitch Ratings says downgrades of corporate bonds rose in the third quarter to $92.1 billion, their highest level in two years. Meantime, interest rates on junk bonds have risen, potentially straining the ability of low-grade issuers to tap the credit markets for fresh loans or to refinance existing debt. Fitch predicts a jump in corporate defaults, from less than 1% of all debt outstanding in 2007 to more than 4% in 2008. If this happens, it will become harder still for companies to borrow. Sensing a turn, "distressed investors" -- who seek to gobble up debt when it has hit rock bottom -- have raised more than $300 billion by some estimates to put to work in the years ahead.

I almost rest my case but would point you back to the broad overview of the spread of contagion not just to other instruments but the liklihood that other asset classes stand a good chance of toppling into the pool: Stages of Denial: Acceptence ? Not Yet.

And also the earlier discussions about buybacks, leverage and consequences:

Market Drivers 3 (Buybacks):Investment, Hiring, Nah...Bonus, Bonus, Bonus !

 Which, as the title implies, will take you to a 3-part look at the liquidty, leverage and risk picture for buyouts and carry trade funding as well. The other little thing to think about is corporate perofrmance - with this morning's GM Headline it's probably also time to put that issue in the center of the table. Which we did earlier Think Like a Private Equity Guy ? No, Think Like An Owner ! FWIW.

And it looks more and more as an employee, stakeholder, investor or buyout person it's going to be worth a lot. Too bad we didn't all ask these questions when it was a matter of doing it right rather than mopping up the spillage.

UPDATE: the Deal Journal has two great interviews with Jim Keegan, one from April when he called it exactly and the other from today. Read it and weep, as they say. Or start looking for a boat, some food and flood insurance.

UPDATE2: The FT Alphaville chimes in with a London firm's take on the realities of things. Pile on, pile on:

  •  Fundamentals, not liquidity conditions, are behind MBS crash Many banks, if not financial institutions in general, would have you believe that the current rout in mortgage-backed debt is largely being driven by irrational fear. A few bad subprime debts buried around the structured universe are scaring buyers out of markets. But, said CreditSights, in a note to clients on Wednesday, current pricing levels reflect fundamentals, even for the most highly-rated debt. Mortgage securities across the board are overrated and overvalued:
UPDATE3 (wow, new is just roiling, I mean rolling in): from CalculatedRisk - his comments plus the cite: RBS: $250 billion to $500 billion in Credit Crisis Losses

November 06, 2007

Stages of Denial: Acceptence ? Not Yet

Barry Ritholz of BigPicture put up an interesting post today on the continued unfolding of the credit markets and the status of the banks and investment houses. In it he asks several questions of which two are critical, perhaps life-threatening. How much more will show up as this unravels ? And what would the finance industry's earnings and performance look like if it were recast with proper accounting instead of mark to fantasy ? As the House of Cards continues to wobble these are really important.

S&P500 ex-Risk ? Here's an issue I have been mulling over, without a satisfactory answer:  There have been many investment thesis (thesii?) over the past few years about the market which supported the bullish side of the ledger: Earnings were high, stocks were cheap, risk was moderate, the Fed model favored stocks over bonds. Regardless of whether you found these arguments persuasive or not, global markets have gone higher. While the U.S. indices may have lagged the rest of the world's bourses, they too, have powered higher.  Here's the odd factor: It turns out that many of the arguments made in favor of U.S. domestic growth have been based on an assumption that turned out to be false. To wit: The Financials, the largest sector in the S&P500, had legitimate, sustainable, normalized risk-based earnings. That basic premise turned out to be wrong. What's truly astounding is that we may only be seeing the tip of the iceberg. Its possible that the big brokers and banks have $1 trillion in toxic debt on their books to be written down. That would equal decades -- not years -- of profits to be wiped out. To paraphrase the WSJ, "the financial crisis is becoming Shakespearean comedy."

Barry's questions though are just the beginning. Aside from a slowing economy there are two other factors working their ways thru the economy and markets. One is the Housing collapse which is still just at the beginnings of the bad news and for which the only comprehensive, reliable and analytical source of analysis I've found is CalculatedRisk. The other is the contagions in the Credit Markets - which just in the last two weeks has shown a) to be a lot more widespread, difficult and dangerous than talked about and b) whose scope is still, IMHO, almost entirely under-estimated.

And here's the keys:

  1. Rocks thrown in the credit market pool ripple to all the other markets
  2. There are a lot of other asset classes with a lot more rocks lined up teetering on the edge of toppling in.

We've tried to capture those (think of it as representational art) in the accompanying picture. Think of the credit markets as a pool in the wild, wild woods. As sub-prime deteroriated the magic of highly leveraged derivatives that were designed, built and marketed on mathematical models and not on underlying exchanges led to a re-evaluation and re-valuations of the real value of those assets (both the originals and the artifical ones).

 

For example people who shouldn't have bought houses they couldn't afford with income they pretended to have. Those mortgages were passed on to banks who securitized them by pooling them into structured securities. Those were in turn sold to Invesment Banks who sliced them up and built new derivate products where the underlying asset, real mortages on real houses, became semi-invisible. Then those instruments (CDOs, et. al.) were turned into more CDOs and sold to Hedge funds who bought them with, thru the chain, what turns out to be huge leverage (not 10X, maybe 50 or 70X) and then sold to Investors.

When the first sub-primes started failing the resulting ripples spread thru the whole system and almost froze up the entire worldwide credit markets. Short-term paper and commercial paper still hasn't recovered. The write-downs this week at Merrill and Citi show how utterly false-to-real-markets the valuations are, and as the values got driven down, what some of the explosures were.

The problem(s) are that more rocks are going to topple in the pool in the sub-prime arena and will keep doing so. And are likely to effect other mortgages.

That's not the scariest thing - the whole House of Cards that was built on mortgages was duplicated in other assets classes. Which ones and how they worked we don't know. Even the rocket scientists who built them don't because they only know a small part of their own pool and instruments & markets.

Yet how long will CLOs built the same way for the buyout guys to buff and fluff companies taken private take to go the same way. As we try to show in the picture there's a lot more rocks trundling up to the pool.

Whether they topple - who knows ? How big they are - who knows ? How widespread the ripples are - who knows ?

But we better figure it out pretty quickly or the word Tsunami comes to mind. 

 If you'd like to take a slightly deeper dive in the pool some readings and pithy quotes follow-on.

Bon Appetit'. No, that's not right, Bonne Chance' !! Where's Tiny Tim when you need him (the orignal I mean).

Readings

·         Markets fear banks have $1 trillion in toxic debt, Why Street Bankers Get Away With Repeating Old Mistakes, Fears intensify for prolonged turmoil, Bloodbath expected to claim more victims , Auditors set for tough talks with clients

Money Quotes

  • ·         A new phase in the credit crunch, one of “$1 trillion losses” seems to be dawning. The crisis at Citigroup and renewed doubts about some of the world’s leading banks disquieted stock markets on both sides of the Atlantic yesterday, with the fractious mood set to continue.
  • ·         Fears are growing that the turbulence in the financial sector will be more protracted than expected as big US and European banks come under intensifying pressure due to losses on US subprime mortgage securities.
  • ·         Shares in banks and insurers continued to tumble on Monday as analysts warned that losses from mortgage securities could leave some institutions short of capital.
  • ·         Most of all, however, the disclosures from Citi and Merrill – which last month reported much heavier losses than it had warned of a few weeks before – have left investors with the impression that the valuations banks are putting on their subprime exposures cannot be trusted.
  • Don't let those on Wall Street fool you by saying "this is the natural cycle of things." Does it really have to be? Unlike virtually any other industry, Wall Street shakes, twists, and hammers on its innovations until they break. What would happen if Boeing Co. or Johnson & Johnson rolled out products with similar defect rates? Ratings downgrades -- defects, really -- have hit about 10% of the subprime related derivatives, known as collateralized debt obligations. The number is expected to rise in the weeks ahead

November 05, 2007

Weekly Reader 4Nov07: Business & Companies

Now we get down to putting some rubber on the road - what have the businesses who generate a lot of this news actually been doing. And again it's been an interesting week. Before reviewing the news let me point to some prior postings that should be interesting and define the filter we use to select and analyze these folks.

  1. First, as a reminder of why business performance is critically important we'll point to the multi-part set of postings on Earnings and outlooks, which starts with Review the Bidding, Count the Cards: EPS Growth Rates
  2.  Then we'll point to what we think is an interesting and valuable little piece of work on how one might go about analyzing a company, or an industry for that matter. A general set of questions to investigate if you like:Think Like a Private Equity Guy ? No, Think Like An Owner !
  3. And also point to the last entry in a longer-running set of posts on Home Depot that builds up a picture and ends up being a pretty good test case for the approach: Performance Re-visited: Another Trip to HD's Woodshed

With those tools in mind let's talk about the listings in our ReadFest below. First we've brought up to the front two very interesting articles that nicely complement our approach. One is TheStreet's look at the correlation between payroll and performance in MLB - which by and large turns out to be none. It turns out that working harder and harder but not very smart doesn't yield a very good payoff. On the other hand if you're a big team in a wealthy market who runs both a smart team AND a smart business then things can get pretty rosey indeed (if you think I'm thinking of the SOX you'd be right). Another view that kinda converges on a similar conclusion is an interesting column from Jim Jubak pointing that there's no corner of the market that's currently under-valued and many that are very much over-valued, e.g. emerging markets which are definitely bubblicious. He suggests that the only pockets of mis-priced opportunity are companies with good growth prospects beyond the next 12-18 months, i.e. over the event-horizon of the market. Sounds Buffet-like to me and leads to the question of how to analyze those opportunities. To which we point to the toolkit we're building in the above links.

Next in the Business section are a few general articles that may talk about specific companies but also say something about bigger issues. At the end of the 90s four representative name companies were Cisco, Schwab, Wal-Mart and Dell who were taken to represent the mark by which everyone else should be measured. Well all four hit more than major turbulence after the bust as their core business models, strategies and operational execution came under major pressures to adapt. WMT has only recently admitted that it needs to start doing some new thinking but continues to run itself, as the company it was, reasonably well. Dell's admitted - involuntarily to be sure - that there were major problems but is still thrashing around violently looking for new directions. BtW - if you think selling brightly colored boxes into WMT is the answer let me ask you how well will their supposedly unbeatable new age processes adapt to the Retail channel ?

On the other hand both Schwab and Cisco went thru deep, soul-wrenching adjustments and innovations. Last week we pointed to an excellent article on Schwab and this week there's an even better one on Cisco. That one is really worth wading thru if your interested in telecom, tech or businesses that are smart and hard-nosed enough to really change things over. Even in the face of their own culture.

Two other general articles point to the Pharma and Oil industries. The latter is seeing a major structural shift to what looks like a permanent supply/demand imbalance as long as the BRICs keep booming. But they have serious problems nonetheless. The Pharma industry on the other hand is between a rock and a hard place because their basic business model is built around a drug development process that isn't working well, is increasingly expensive and non-productive and the need to change both their R&D and their go-to-market operations. The word is OUCH.

No suprise that Merrill makes the reading list and for similar reasons. It turns out it wasn't all about hubris and unmanaged risk chasing for return. It had and has something to do with not building up your basic capabilities. Other news covers Chrysler, Lenovo (who's another good example of adaptation and innovation) and Alcatel-Lucent (who's very definitely NOT).

Happy reading. 


General & Special

Money Doesn't Count for Much in Baseball But here's the great thing about baseball, at least recently. Funny things seem to happen when people get to the playoffs. Money doesn't count for as much as you think. Call it Steinbrenner's Law. Since 2001, Yankees boss George Steinbrenner has spent a staggering $1.2 billion on his team's payroll in a desperate, and so far unsuccessful, bid to win yet another championship. Here at TheStreet.com, we're always looking at returns on investment. So we've run the numbers for all postseason series -- including division, league and championship -- since 2001, and compared them to team salary data. The bottom line? There is little correlation, if any, between payroll and playoff success. The team with the higher payroll beat the team with the lower payroll in 113 games. But the team with the lower payroll won ... 112. And more than half of all series, 53%, were won by the teams with the lower payrolls. More than half. Maybe this has been an atypical period. After all, in the 90s the big-spending Yankees dominated the titles. But you'd think things would be getting more professional as time went on, and spending on players would become more efficient. It is, after all, four years since the publication of Michael Lewis' seminal Moneyball, which touched on this very subject. The reality is that a small number of franchises typically dominate the money in baseball. And over the past seven years, only once -- in 2004 -- has a member of that plutocracy happened to carry home the prize. Usually it has been a team in the financial second tier.

3 cheap stocks for a pricey market Everything -- the global big caps of the Dow Jones Industrial Average ($INDU), oil and gold stocks, Chinese and Indian stocks -- seems expensive right now. There aren't any obvious bargains in a world where stock markets from Mumbai, India, to New York are trading at historic highs. Forget about a sectorwide approach, either, because the few sectors that are trading at depressed prices -- home builders and financials -- are too toxic to touch. And adding to the problem is that the screening tools bargain hunters usually use -- price-to-book value, for example -- are wildly misleading right now. What's a bargain hunter to do, especially now that the Federal Reserve is heavily hinting that Halloween's cut in interest rates might be the last for 2007? Dig deeper, I say. The stock market is always misvaluing something. Right now that something is growth that's more than six to 12 months away. Current sky-high valuations make the majority of investors with money in the market nervous. Not nervous enough to sell but nervous enough to have an exit strategy and timetable in mind. Almost nobody wants to bet on earnings growth much further out than the November 2008 elections, just before the Federal Reserve starts to raise interest rates again to support the dollar and quash resurgent inflation. That creates some intriguing bargains for investors willing to look that far ahead and with the patience and fortitude to ride out any rough patches between now and then.

Business

Cisco's display of strength Cisco fell hard, went through a wrenching period of reinvention, and is now stronger than it has ever been. But it's just one part of Chambers' strategy to ensure that as video, voice, and data converge on the Internet and at the same time go mobile, Cisco is selling one-click solutions that tie it all together. "Unified communications" is the buzzword for the fast-growing corporate piece of this puzzle - a piece that Microsoft also wants. But Cisco's ambitions don't stop there. In "the next big market transition," which Chambers believes is fast unfolding, the Internet will become the delivery medium of all communications - and eventually everything from security systems and entertainment to health care and education. Think of the company from its IPO in 1990 to 2000 as Cisco 1.0, and the company from 2001 to 2006 as Cisco 2.0. Cisco 1.0 was a two-hit wonder: It sold routers and switches to FORTUNE 500 companies and made rapid-fire acquisitions to scoop up technology it needed. Cisco 2.0 built a more diversified customer base (cable companies, telcos, smaller businesses along with the big boys) and a much broader range of products, many of which it developed internally - IP telephones, data storage, digital media, and, to use a favored Chambers-ism, "end-to-end-architected solutions" (which sounds like "Indian-architected solutions" when he says it). Version 1.0 was a "plumbing" company called Cisco Systems and invisible to the public beyond its high-wattage stock; in the 2.0 phase it dropped the "Systems" and became just Cisco…

Microsoft and GE: not old & in the way Big blue-chip companies like General Electric and Microsoft do many things well, but showing up on lists of the hottest brands is typically not one of them. Yet these two lumbering giants both made their way onto brand consultancy Landor Associates' annual Breakaway Brands ranking - a comprehensive survey that measures consumer sizzle over a three-year period. Microsoft's rise in brand stature is due to several factors, experts say. Releasing more consumer-friendly products like its game console Xbox give it cachet that office-related brands like PowerPoint and Word, however dominant, just don't deliver. General Electric's improvement is attributable almost entirely to its environmental efforts. The company's highly visible "ecomagination" campaign aims to more than double its annual research budget for cleaner technologies - like energy-efficient refrigerators and wind turbines from $700 million in 2005 to $1.5 billion in 2010. Last year those research efforts generated $12 billion in revenues from 45 products and services.

Drug giants face worst growth in 4 decades A closely-watched forecast of drug industry revenue growth released today projects that sales in 2008 will expand at their slowest pace in more than four decades. The reason: A combination of virtually empty Big Pharma product pipelines and increasing price competition from inexpensive generic drugs. The drug business has been in the doldrums for a few years now. But the outlook for 2008 is particularly worrisome. The biggest problem is that many of the largest drugmakers … are seeing their largest-selling medicines lose patent protection between 2006 and 2012. At the same time, those companies possess pipelines of future products that are either nearly empty or filled with drugs whose potential sales won't fill the hole left by those going off patent. To prepare for the hard times, a number of the largest drugmakers have recently announced staff reductions and other austerity measures. Many companies are rethinking their approach to sales and marketing - which is where the bulk of the layoffs are taking place. Companies are convinced that their armies of door-to-door sales representatives are becoming a less effective way to communicate with doctors.

Wanted: Oil workers Retiring baby boomers, roaring global economy and focus on information technology are leading to a labor shortage that could squeeze supply. In the next three or four years, there's expected to be a 30 to 40 percent shortage of technical and professional oil workers in the Untied States. Over a quarter of the industry's highly skilled employees - petroleum engineers, process engineers, geologists, geophysicists and the like - are eligible for retirement in two years. Worldwide, the industry's "people deficit" is expected to reach up to 15 percent by 2010. But oil has its own problems. During the 1980s, low crude prices forced layoffs throughout the industry. Around the same time, students formerly drawn to basic sciences such as mathematics, chemistry and engineering were enticed into a new, sexier field: Information technology. So now, projects to find and bring new oil to market are delayed as oil firms compete with one another for workers with the competence to bring new, often challenging fields into production. It also means new, less experienced people are designing projects, and errors can be made in the design process that take time to correct before the facility can become operational.

Companies

Merrill Lynch Needs A Plan (And A New Leader) Merrill Lynch is a company in search of a strategy as much as it is a leader. For the last decade, the big brokerage firm has thrown its full weight into a number of big ideas only to pull back its horns significantly when things didn't work out. Five years ago, Stanley O'Neal, ousted as chief executive this morning, led the company through a massive retrenchment of 20% of the firm's worldwide employees and a wholesale retreat from the brokerage business outside the U.S. O'Neal, then president, said the changes, which included billions of dollars in charges, recognized that Merrill's efforts to dominate retail brokerage on a global scale had been pulled off too quickly and went too far. Since then, Merrill has vacillated between wanting a big presence in fixed income and commodities to pulling back, and then flooding back into the space. It piled into derivatives in the last couple of years, seeing an opportunity to stake a big claim. It piled into subprime mortgages last year at the peak of the housing market, buying lender First Franklin in December from National City for $1.3 billion.

·         Help wanted: Merrill Lynch CEO Only one or two people in the financial world are qualified to run the banking giant, but really - who would want it?Taking on the top job at Merrill Lynch could turn an executive into a Wall Street legend, but it also has the potential to ruin anyone who takes the CEO post from the just-departed Stanley O'Neal. That stark choice may be one of the reasons Merrill hasn't lined up anyone just yet to lead the firm out of the crisis sparked by large losses from junk mortgages. In essence, then, Merrill needs someone who can do three things with the CDO mess: Take the right amount of losses, no matter how large that number is; set up strong risk controls across the company, and; be able to communicate quickly and convincingly what is happening when fresh upsets occur, as they almost always do when a company is working its way through a crisis.

·         Merrill board: Too late to the game Merrill Lynch's board of directors was instrumental in removing Stanley O'Neal from the CEO and chairman posts after the brokerage reported $7.9 billion of bond losses in its third quarter. But the board may have missed earlier opportunities to keep O'Neal in check. Several board members, including Alberto Cribiore, now the company's interim chairman, sat on committees that were supposed to help prevent Merrill from taking the sort of outsized risks that led to the losses. While board members from outside Merrill probably won't end up taking as much blame as O'Neal and other senior Merrill executives for the losses, the board's role is coming under scrutiny. That's because two board committees had the power to step in and object as Merrill became dangerously overexposed to collateralized debt obligations - the complex debt securities that were the source for most of the third quarter losses and which, according to analysts, could produce another $4 billion of losses in the fourth quarter.

Chrysler restructures, thousands of jobs cut Chrysler LLC began laying off thousands of salaried workers Wednesday as part of an effort to slash costs in the company's new era of private ownership, a spokesman said. The cuts won't end there. On Thursday, Chrysler planned to announce the elimination of third shifts at the Toledo North plant in Ohio and the Belvidere plant in Illinois in the first quarter of 2008, according to two congressional aides with knowledge of the announcement. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. A compact Chrysler Now private auto manufacturer to slash as many as 10,000 further hourly jobs as well as 1,000 salaried positions and four models. Deal Journal: Cerberus's Striptease

·         Chrysler reshuffling begins: 4 models scrapped It wasn't just jobs that Chrysler LLC cut on Thursday. The automaker knocked out some cars as well. Chrysler announced that it will stop production of four Dodge and Chrysler models: the Dodge Magnum, Chrysler Pacifica, the Chrysler Crossfire and the PT Cruiser Convertible. The moves come as the troubled automaker, recently acquired by a private equity firm, is embarking on a major reorganization. Chrysler also said Thursday that it would eliminate some shifts from five of its North American assembly plants and cut 8,500 to 10,000 hourly jobs by 2009. The cancellation of the four models is the first major product move by Chrysler since James Press, formerly Toyota's top American executive, joined the company in September. Press is now in charge of Chrysler's North American product strategy.

Lenovo celebrates 177% profit spike Lenovo Group, the world's No. 3 personal computer maker, said Thursday its profits in the latest quarter jumped 177 percent as it captured a bigger share of the global market following a restructuring. Earnings for the fiscal second quarter were $105.3 million, the Beijing-based company said. That was up from $37.9 million for the same period a year earlier. Revenues rose almost 20 percent to $4.4 billion. Lenovo is no longer just a company within the Chinese market, it is a worldwide company," Chairman Yang Yuanqing told reporters at a press conference in Hong Kong to announce the results. The company said it believed it had been successful in building the Lenovo brand and would stop using the IBM logo, two years ahead of schedule.

Alcatel-Lucent Will Deepen Job Cuts After Third Straight Quarterly Loss Alcatel-Lucent SA, the world's biggest maker of telecommunications equipment, will cut a further 4,000 jobs and Chief Financial Officer Jean-Pascal Beaufret will resign after the company reported a third straight quarterly loss and reduced its sales forecast. The elimination of another 5 percent of the workforce will help save 400 million euros ($577 million) by the end of 2009, Paris-based Alcatel-Lucent said in an e-mailed statement today. The company in February had said it would cut 12,500 workers, with planned savings of 1.7 billion euros. Alcatel-Lucent shares have lost 39 percent this year, the worst performance in France's CAC 40 Index, as the combination of Alcatel SA and Lucent Technologies Inc. failed to create a more formidable competitor to Ericsson AB. Before February, Chief Executive Officer Patricia Russo targeted job cuts of 9,000. Can Pat Russo save Alcatel-Lucent?

Weekly Reader 5Nov07: Economy

Like we mentioned in the previous post the economic news was exceptional with a 3.9% GDP and 166K new jobs. Both of those numbers were unexpected enough it makes some sense to dig into them, and we shall, but several others have already, not suprisingly. The biggest two questions on Employment are how valid is the number per se ? And what does it have to say about the trend in employment growth. The Readings below go into this quite nicely with Barry Ritholz providing an excellent summary of the key issues, particularly the Birth/Death model which uses models to estimate jobs created or lost by small businesses that are invisible in the surveys. This is a potentially important issue as something like 80% of the new jobs were B/D adjustments. On the other hand Jim Hamilton at Econbrowser compares the surveys and finds them all having the same trends and structures; and all are weakening. None of this changes our earlier conclusion (What are They Smoking ?) on the nature of employment trends and it'd be worth your while to review the earlier dissections to see why.

The other controversy that erupted was the extremely low inflation measures in the GDP report which allegedly pushed up the "real" growth rate to 3.9%. Perhaps and likely. The sequence from Ritholz to Rex Nutting to Mankiw's clarification of national income accounting, where he points out the interesting question is what domestic inflation measure is the right one is the key question, to Menzies Chin on Econbrowser who walks thru the issues in more detail. The bottomline is that a low GDP Deflator was used, correctly and reflects the low core inflation (more on that here) which should "self-correct" as inflations shows up in domestic goods and services, as Chin implicitly points out.

As you may recall we prefer to look at YoY% changes in real GDP which sidesteps some of these issues but the questions are to what extent ? And how much does the deflator issue matter ? And of course what's the trend in GDP and associated risks in the outlook. We can answer some of those questions by comparing QtQ changes to YoY and also real vs nominal GDP changes, which the accompanying chart does. Looking at the first sub-chart you'd almost swear the YtY changes are a pretty decent MA of the QtQ changes, that they're easier to see trends, structure and turning points and are far less noisy. Think we can not only rest the case but argue that nothing's lost ?

The real vs nominal is more interesting but similar in the 2nd sub-chart which shows YoY% changes for both, as well as the difference between them. They have the same timings, structure & patterns and turning points as one would hope and expect. So when some data controversy errupts checking out the nominal number is helpful. The difference doesn't appear to have a constant relationship but does seem to move in predictable patterns. We appear to be in a period when the differences are shrinking, for example. Both real and nominal show a sharp uptick in the last two quarters but in neither case is an overall downtrend affected. GDP growth is still headed lower. Oh btw real GDP growth YOY was 2.9%, which is still healthy and a vast improvement over earlier this year, but not the 3.9% of the headlines.

As some of the readings below point out it's the next two quarters that will tell the real story - especially since we haven't seen much of the brunt of the downturn in Housing nor an apparant slowdown in consumer spending. At least so far. But credit risks are rising and spreading, consumer spending continues to slow and, as we said, employment growth is below neutral.

Two other areas of concern are rapidly rising oil prices and foreign economies. Well there's a nice set of readings on the former and some pointers on the latter. In particular both Japan and the UK are showing signs of either weakening or increasing troubles from the same issues we face.

Finally, on a bigger picture, there's a fascinating article on China's growing presence in Africa. 

Economy

Looming danger of recession Ignore Wednesday GDP report: Economists say next two quarters crucial, January-March 2008 most dangerous for sharp slowdown.If you've listened recently to some prominent Wall Street economists, the U.S. economy in the next two quarters is going to slip from the jaws of the credit crunch, hurdle the tiger-trap of the housing slowdown, swing across boiling oil prices, and land on its feet having narrowly escaped a recession. But many economists are skeptical. They say that this scenario of the economy as swashbuckling hero from a classic B movie isn't very realistic. Instead, they are seriously concerned that the economy soon could slip into a recession. Economists are advising investors to ignore all festivities planned after the third-quarter gross domestic product report is released on Wednesday morning. That report is expected to show growth over 3% in the July-September quarter. But the third-quarter report is like looking at movie flashbacks. It is the growth in the next two quarters where the rubber meets the road. Analysts expect growth in the fourth quarter to slow to around a 1.5% rate, less than half of the third quarter. They call the January-March quarter of 2008 "the dangerous quarter" for a sharp slowdown.

·         $915B bomb in consumers' wallets This past summer's subprime meltdown involved about $900 billion in now-suspect securitized debt, reckless lending, and consumers who buckled under the weight of loans they couldn't afford. Now another link in the consumer debt chain - credit cards - is starting to show signs of strain. And the fear that the $915 billion in U.S. credit card debt (an uncannily similar figure) may blow up has major financial institutions like Citigroup, American Express, and Bank of America strapping on their Kevlar vests. Last month, as banks reported their worst quarterly results since 2001, concerns about rising credit card delinquencies began to make their way onto earnings announcements alongside mentions of subprime woes. Credit contagion infects your wallet 

·         Spending Growth Slowed in September Consumers, battered by a steep downturn in housing and a severe credit crunch, slowed their spending growth in September while a key gauge of factory activity flashed its weakest reading in seven months in October. U.S. Economy Is Cooling After Third-Quarter Growth Surge, Reports Suggest

·         Caution: Sluggish job growth ahead Economists aren't worried about job losses any longer, but sluggish growth looks like it's here to stay. But when the Labor Department is due to report on October job growth at 8:30 a.m. ET Friday, economists are looking for another month of sluggish job growth. Those surveyed by Briefing.com forecast employers added only 80,000 jobs in October, and they are looking for the unemployment rate to stay at the 4.7 percent level hit in September. And many economists say they're not expecting particularly strong job readings the rest of this year and going forward into early next year. Economists generally believe that employers need to add between 125,000 and 150,000 jobs a month just to keep up with the growth in the labor force, so prolonged job growth at the levels forecast for October are seen as leading to higher unemployment in the coming months.

o        Develving Deeply Into the Data of NFP Day (backstory analysis of payroll data and interpretation – excellent work from Ritholz at BigPicture; explains why various model adjustments make the data unreliable, especially in these circumstances)

o        Are the employment numbers as good as they sound?

I Call "Shenanigans" on GDP! Shenanigans! At the risk of sounding shrill, I am compelled to point out the quantum bogosity of this 3.9% GDP number: It is highly dependent upon a rather suspect reading of Price Increases/Indexes for Gross Domestic Product: The Price Deflator rose a much less than expected .8% vs expectations of 2%. Inflation was low because oil prices surged  (Nutting on MarketWatch), A National Income Accounting Puzzle (Mankiw’s comment and dissection) and putting the whole thing to rest Some Observations on the GDP Release (Menzies Chin on Econbrowser).

The new math of oil  We're hard-wired to tremble when oil prices rocket, and the past few weeks have looked like another example of why. Whenever stocks fell sharply, as they did several times, traders blamed the fast-rising price of oil. But that chain of logic is misleading. The bigger picture shows that the relation between oil and the economy is changing, and we'll have to rewire our brains to understand what's happening. Watching oil prices rise and fall is no longer enough; the key now is understanding why they're moving. The critical insight into what's happening comes from Daniel Yergin, chairman of Cambridge Energy Research Associates and a longtime authority on world energy. "This is a demand shock, not a supply shock," he says. "What's causing it is the extraordinary economic growth of the past few years." Previous oil spikes happened when OPEC closed the spigots; the resulting high prices were a tax on the world economy and slowed everything down. But today's situation is the opposite: Strong global economic growth is pushing oil prices up.

·         Posts from Econbrowser (deeper, better, more charts): Why is oil above $90? , $90 a barrel: Is it time to start worrying about the oil price shock of 2007?

Bank of Japan Cuts Growth, Inflation Outlook, Says Rates Must Still Climb The Bank of Japan forecast slower economic growth and abandoned a prediction that consumer prices will increase this year, making it harder to raise the world's lowest borrowing costs. Prices excluding fresh food will be unchanged in the year ending March 31, the central bank said in its semiannual outlook today in Tokyo. In April it forecast a 0.1 percent gain. The economy will expand 1.8 percent this year, it said, slower than the 2.1 percent predicted six months ago, in part because of a slump in housing starts following a change in regulations. Japan's longest expansion in more than 60 years is losing steam as a U.S. housing slump threatens global growth, higher oil prices squeeze profits and stagnant wages fail to spur consumer spending at home. The bank repeated its commitment to increase interest rates as long as the economy keeps expanding and prices resume rising.

China's Africa Dream Is Looking Less Nightmarish It's rare that a business deal intrigues investors and political scientists alike. Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.'s move to buy 20 percent of Africa's largest bank is such a transaction. It's the biggest overseas investment by a Chinese company, in this case the world's No. 1 bank by market value. ICBC's $5.6 billion purchase of the Standard Bank Group Ltd. stake is the largest in South Africa since apartheid ended in 1994. Yet there's something even bigger at play here. This is arguably the first Chinese investment in Africa that doesn't carry a whiff of political strategy. Nor is it directly related to China's desire for resources, which can often help despots more than African households. ICBC's Standard Bank deal may be the watershed that begins propelling China's designs on Africa from talk to just plain business, and smart business at that.

U.K. Housing Market Teeters on Edge of Northern Rock in Capital Gone Awry The U.K. economy had been the envy of Europe, outpacing Germany and France almost every quarter from 2001 through 2005. Germany surged past the U.K. last year, and for 2008, Europe's largest economies are forecast to run in a pack. The U.K. will probably grow 2.3 percent next year, while Germany and France will each expand 2.0 percent, the International Monetary Fund said on Oct. 17. Britain's expansion has been spurred by a borrowing spree, thanks to interest rates at 40-year lows from 2001 to 2006. By the end of 2006, the British owed 1.37 trillion pounds, or 1.61 times their income -- the highest rate in the Group of Seven nations, according to the London-based National Institute of Economic and Social Research. By June 30, the ratio had grown to 1.66. The U.S. rate remained at 1.42 during that period. Britons poured the borrowed money into housing -- and then used their new homes as collateral to take on even more debt. Residential property prices soared 189 percent in the past 10 years, almost twice the increase for single-family homes in the U.S., according to HBOS Plc, the U.K.'s biggest mortgage lender, and U.S. government figures.

Weekly Reader 5Nov07: Markets & Investing

What an interesting week that was. What an interesting week this looks to be. We started off with Stan O'Neal's departure from Merrill last week and this with Chuck Prince's, both brought low by nearly indentical problems with hubris, risk management, chasing risky business and bad execution on the operating side. On the other hand we saw the much-anticipated Fed rate cut, an usually strong and unexpected GDP report of 3.9% growth and a completely suprising 166K reported new jobs. Yet the markets didn't react very positively to all that "good news" - which one would have to guess means that some serious re-thinking is going on.

Looking at the charts we can see the "flattening", or topping, pattern we discussed a while back (Market, Market, Nice Market, Here Market....) beginning to emerge. In fact the analysis in that post would still seem to be the way to read things. Looking at the chart the old economy major indices are basically flat for two weeks while Technology continues to roar ahead. The problem with that of course is that the rise in the NDX is being driven by a very few outstanding performers (GOOG, APPL) who account for something like 1/2 of its' rise. Otherwise it too is a thin, low-volume market. The DJIA, SP500, NYSE and R2K are basically flat for the two weeks since our last update. And the Nasdaq and NDX are up 3% and 4% respectively.

The other major interesting news for the week was that huge writeoffs were necessary at Merrill and Citi and a downgrading of their stocks. Which Mr. Market may finally be reading, correctly, as indicating that the consequences of speculative investment in structured debt instruments has a long way to go. One would hope so. So where does that leave us against the 4-Factor Model (Models, Metaphors, Musical Chairs and Market Outlook). Structure, the nature of the market environment, continues to deteriorate with a failing dollar and increasing expansion of credit market problems. Several of the key readings point to needing to really understand the underlying value of these instruments but we don't seem to be making much progress.

Fundamentals would appear exceptionally strong with the GDP and Payroll reports though. Why didn't the market react ? We'll dig into just how real those gains are in some subsequent reports but several issues with the "quality" of each have been raised. For example some 80% of the rise in jobs is due to Birth-Death model adjustments in the Payroll report, not measured organic job growth. A necessary tool that misses badly at turning points.

Technicals - well you can begin to judge for yourself with the accompanying chart though a longer-term composite is in the continuation. Again we'd refer you to the prior post for an assessment that we see no clear reason for changing right now.

Outlook - so, as usual, the bottomline in the short-run is how Mr. Market is viewing the situation. What's the psychology and sentiment. We'll find out more this week but optimism and denial seem to be evaporating away a little bit. The jury's still out on Earnings with different headlines claiming o.k. and others weak but on our analysis they don't seem to be particularly encouraging ( Review the Bidding, Count the Cards: EPS Growth Rates). 

Our take - given the runup in the markets after the Shanghai Suprise in March and the rapid return and runup after the Great Credit Implosion in Aug. you'd expect another fantasy-driven runup. One other thing that's changed - up until at least June and perhaps even thru Aug. the breadth and depth of the Housing market problems weren't visible. Since then we've been hearing that adjustments are likely to continue into at least '09 and prices might still be falling in '10. We've also been hearing more use of the R-Word in the last two weeks in punditland, otherwise CNBC.

It looks like the Outlook is beginning to shift. How, if and when it does will be the factor to watch this week and for a while. 

Markets & Investing 

 As for the longer-term chart we'll mostly content ourselves with the pointer above to the earlier post with a couple of observations. First, over three months, flattening/topping would appear to continue to the word of the week. Second, on the 1-year chart this would still hold though there's no clear down move indicated. Optimistically could one anticipate the emergence of a trading-range market ? Perhaps. We'll have to see.

Meanwhile enjoy the readings - they're definitely worth skimming as all the factors discussed above are gone into. 

Loss leaders The mortgage crisis has done more than $27 billion-worth of damage to capital-markets businesses so far. With the value of subprime securities still falling, that number could rise dramatically when fourth-quarter results are unveiled. Hopes that banks would be able to put the worst behind them in a single bad quarter have been dashed. Several bosses, including Citigroup's Chuck Prince, are under enormous pressure to steady the ship.Big differences in the quality of risk management have become apparent. Merrill's controls were left in the dust as it ramped up its trading bets. Mr O'Neal sacked a senior fixed-income executive who had rung alarm bells last year. The board ignored a warning in April. By contrast, Goldman Sachs and (to a lesser extent) Lehman Brothers appear to have minimised damage through tight oversight and shrewd hedging. But analysts think Goldman must also have taken some huge gambles to raise third-quarter profits in a difficult market (and despite a $1.5 billion write-down). The more troubling question is how much more pain still lies ahead. Banks say they are following guidelines put out by the big accounting firms when valuing lumpier assets, but there is still plenty of room for subjectivity. It is possible that some banks will mark their assets down too far, and will be able to mark them back up at a later date. But all the signs are that prices have further to fall before buyers are tempted to step in. Dilatory rating agencies are only now getting round to downgrading the most senior CDO tranches. In America, credit-card defaults are ticking up, which will further hurt asset-backed securities. Many subprime-linked instruments have become prohibitively expensive to hedge. Mr O'Neal fell in a falling market, but perhaps nearer the top than the bottom.

Guesstimates Won’t Cut It Anymore THE props holding up the values of risky mortgage securities finally started to give way last week. And that means the $30 billion in losses and write-downs taken by big brokerage firms in the third quarter are not likely to be the last. Even as developments in the credit markets went from bad to worse this year, investors for the most part have remained upbeat about the values of the mortgage securities they held. One reason that they could keep their heads in the sand was that these complex securities are hard to value in good times, impossible during periods of stress. After last week, however, it was no longer plausible to deny that mortgage loans, and the complex securities derived from them, had crashed — and caused a lot of damage in the process. Until that moment, investors had been willing to trust companies claiming to have limited exposure to the credit mess. But Merrill’s third-quarter results made clear that such confidence must now be earned, not presumed. The executives on Merrill’s dismal conference call conceded that even after they decided to value their C.D.O. holdings more conservatively — resulting in losses — much of their methodology was based on “quantitative evaluation.” ANALYSTS quickly responded by forecasting an additional $4 billion in write-downs on Merrill’s portfolio. Marking positions to model — a favorite reality dodge on Wall Street — just doesn’t cut it anymore.

More trouble ahead for credit markets The prospect of rating downgrades on complex debt instruments, along with massive writedowns at big banks, are raising fears that the credit crisis may deepen. Collateralized debt obligations backed by mortgage securities are triggering another wave of worry on Wall Street. Banks have been hard-hit by a decline in the value of these securities, and investors and traders worry that more losses could result if prices fall further. CDOs are pools of bonds that are sliced into so-called tranches with different levels of credit risk. As delinquencies on home loans given to borrowers with weak credit has risen, rating agencies have started to warn that these securities may not be as creditworthy as they previously thought. The three major rating companies - Moody's, Standard & Poor's and Fitch - have put an estimated $70 billion worth of collateralized debt obligations, including those with the highest ratings, on review for downgrading. Fitch said Tuesday that structured finance CDOs it had rated are "clearly underperforming." The agency placed 150 transactions representing about $37 billion on negative rating watch.

·         Fed Pumps $41B Into U.S. Financial System- The Federal Reserve pumped $41 billion into the U.S. financial system Thursday, the largest cash infusion since September 2001, to help companies get through a credit crunch.

Signs Point to Pressure on Stocks Multinationals are boosting major stock indexes while companies reliant on the U.S. consumer have been hit, suggesting support for prices may be thin. But rising oil prices, mixed corporate profit reports and the spreading effects of a housing slump continue to fuel tumult in the economy -- and some underlying patterns suggest that stocks may have trouble maintaining their high-wire act. Major stock indexes are being supported by multinationals such as Microsoft Corp., Coca-Cola Co. and Procter & Gamble Co., which benefit from the strong global economy. Many other stocks, notably financial institutions and smaller companies dependent on the flagging U.S. consumer, have taken hits. Other indicators also suggest thin support for the market. The ratio of the number of stocks rising versus the number that are falling has been getting worse since the spring, and the number of stocks at 52-week highs has been on the wane since last year. Also, the percentage of advancing stocks on the New York Stock Exchange has been in a gradual decline since spring. The number of stocks hitting new highs peaked last year. The market has become very sensitive to rumors, another sign of investor nervousness. These trends could reverse if the economy shakes off its woes. But unless that happens, they are signs of trouble ahead. U.S. economic growth has slowed markedly in recent months due to the housing downturn, past Fed rate increases and a lingering credit crunch, with some banks still refusing loans to low-rated corporate borrowers and consumers. Oil futures have pushed above $90 a barrel, reawakening inflation fears. Higher inflation would push interest rates higher, making it harder to borrow money and taking away one of the main underpinnings of the economy and the financial markets -- cheap credit.

Haunted houses on Wall Street Despite massive misses and multibillion dollar writedowns from Citigroup Inc., Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc., UBS Ag and a slew of other financial heavyweights, we've gotten encouraging news from tech titans such as Microsoft Corp., Google Inc., Apple Inc. and Intel Corp. The market is a discounting mechanism where headlines are best at the top and the worst at the bottom. It's the fatal flaw of fundamental analysis and why trading is more of an art than an exact science. It is also why so many smart folks are spun around right now. The credit front is pretty spooky with looming unknowns, but the averages remain near all-time highs. Typically when news is scary, as it was in 2003, stocks are deeply discounted and there's nary a buyer in sight. This cycle, for lack of a better word, has snubbed historical precedent as it twists and turns through the path of maximum frustration. But the structural imbalances, hidden risks, counter-party collateral exposure and embedded insecurities aren't one-and-done writedowns. That's not how the knitting is weaved with $500 trillion dollars of derivatives in play. In fact, one could argue that the inherent learning curve needed to unwind these interdependencies will allow the issues themselves to manifest.

Some Bulls See Hope in Buybacks Net equity issuance — the amount of stock sold by companies minus the amount bought — is tracked by Wall Street strategists because of its strong correlation with stock market moves. High issuance often heralds falling share prices; low figures tend to precede periods of market strength. Recent data should provide cheery reading for bulls. Equity is being withdrawn from the market at a record annual pace of roughly $800 billion, according to the Federal Reserve, mainly as a result of a record amount of share buybacks and extensive spending by private equity firms taking public companies private. Extremely low interest rates on loans and bonds have made debt financing far cheaper than issuing stock; some companies, in fact, have borrowed to finance buyback programs. Net debt issuance is at record levels, a $600 billion annual rate, as equity issuance has hit bottom. THE math that made borrowing so appealing changed months ago, however, when lenders yanked credit from the shakiest borrowers and raised rates on all but the soundest ones. That may reduce the money available to finance buybacks and private equity deals, which often involve borrowing to acquire the equity in a targeted company. It may also drive companies to sell stock instead of tapping bankers or the bond market.

November 02, 2007

Think Like a Private Equity Guy ? No, Think Like An Owner !

I'd like to weave several threads together here and a recent CNBC vidclip offers up a perfect excuse. In it Robert Pozen, MFS Investment CEO says public companies should think like PE guys. Well, maybe, but there are a couple of caveats and exceptions. But take a look for yourself to start. In fact our argument is that there's good, bad and incompleteness - the trick though is to think it thru against the right shopping list of understanding performance.

The threads we're weaving together are the role of enteprise performance in generating profits and earnings (Have You Seen the Elephant ?: More on Earnings) with some earlier discussions of the widespread failures of enteprises to deliver value (Kaptain Karl's Test: an Icahn-like Inventory of Enterprise Performance). Pozen suggests five factors as a good starting place for unlocking value - his hypothetical example envisions a PE firm buying a company for a 20% premium (original value of $5B with a PE purchase at $6b) leading several years later to a $15B sale, a 300% increase in value and a 200% (or better) return. Impossible !

His five factors are Cash (too much on the balance sheet), Capital Structure (not enough debt), the Operating Plan, Management Incentives and Board involvement. Well that's all great in theory. In practice the theory hasn't held up very well though the argument for PE firms is that they can radically improve performance. In actual practice, and especially over the last several years, PE firms buy a company, Fluff it and Buff it, Leverage it up using funny money, drain it with special returns (lowering their risk and investment while guaranteeing return) and Flip it.

Yet at the end of the day many namebrand supposedly bluechip companies are NOT performing the way they could or should. And Pozen's suggestions are a good starting point for management and investors - but sadly and dangerously incomplete. Instead an investor should take a page from Benjamin Graham or Warren Buffett - think like an OWNER ! In other words ask yourself what makes a company work and work well.

There are five factors any long-term investor should investigate and that define a performance evaluation checklist that goes a long way toward improving the odds of a lower-risk and higher return. Enterprise Performance results from five key factors:

  1. Core (concept, product/service, value proposition, and business model)
  2. Strategy (goals, activities and actions, resources & capabilities, plans & controls and timeframes)
  3. Operations (core, e.g. manufacturing operations, product development, marketing & sales, procurement, customer service, technology, etc.)
  4. People
  5. Execution

At any given time you should know what these factors are for a value investment, how well the company is doing with them and what's likely to happen in the future. If you look at the good companies, for example Toyota, P&G, Tesco, GE, McDonald's, et.al. it's pretty clear where they're firing on all cylinders or not. And conversely if you look at the headlines for mal-performing namebrands, MSFT, WMT, Dell, Citi, Pfeizer you can see where breakdowns that are destroying value are happening. 

A previous post complete's a series of deeper digs into these factors for Home Depot and is worth taking a look at: Performance Re-visited: Another Trip to HD's Woodshed 

Let's consider the five factors in a little more depth:

1. Core - they key questions to look into are what products or services is a company providing and what value do they provide to their target customers. And then what is their Business Model. Many of the badly performing bluechips problems stem from the exhaustion of the business model and the need to re-think it. You also need to apply this to investigating each major line of business for large companies.

  • For example WMT's basic model is EDLP (Every Day Low Price) yet it's saturated the domestic US market and getting beat by TGT which has higher priced products but much better service and higher value. Similar assessments could be made of Dell, MSFT, PFE and others.

2. Strategy - what methods or approaches are these companies taking to realize their value ? What actions and activities are they pursuing, are the right resources and capabilities in place, is there a good management system to provide the right plans and controls, and is the right set of timeframes being pursued ?

  • For example the recent headlines on Citi, Bear-Stearns and Merrill suggest, at least to me, that they all jumped on the structured debt bandwagon late and in a me-too fashion. And without the right capabilities, people or managment controls, especially for risk. They've basically shot off their own feet - at the knee and we're in the process of finding out if it's higher.

3. Operations - are all the right functional capabilities in place to suppor the core value proposition and are the right resources in place or being developed ?

  • MSFT gets its' money from Window and Office where the core competency is coding and product development. Yet Vista has orders of magnitude less functionality than Longhorn was intended to. Why ? Because (do a search on Code Red and MSFT) they lost their touch in this core capability.
  • Dell's value proposition was a good box at a decent price. Plus the customer service wrapped around it that made them a safe, reliable choice and was really the key strategic factor behind their early acceptence and growth. When they started treating Customer Service as a cost to control instead of a strategic investment the handwriting was on the wall - three years before it blew up visibly. Imagine, taking a critical & differentiating factor that made your whole business model work and letting it wither in support of cost control.

4. People - are the right people with the right skills and right attitudes in place ? You can judge this just by talking to the frontline folks - are they interested, attentive and customer-oriented ? If no there's problems big problems. On the other end are the right executives in place ? Both Chuck Prince and Stan O'Neal drove off their competitors for the top job, in a set of maneuvers worthy of an Italian city-state's princely court and testimonials to Machiavelli. In the process deep skills in the critical risk management core competency were driven off. More to come on that.

5. Execution - is there a plan in place, is it backed up by firm commitments of time, returns, actions and measurements ? In other words is the strategic plan being executed, in support of the business model and are the operating plan and strategy aligned ? If you look at our shopping list of troubled bluechips the thing you find most often is a lack of effective execution. And a substitution of internal agendii for focus on value delivery. That's otherwise known as politics - the bane of empires and enterprises. At least when narrow political goals are given priority over doing what's best for the business.

  • Pozen suggests a critical factor is management having the right incentives - Here, Here ! When executives are getting the vast majority of their compensation from stock options and when they are rewarded for short-term stock performance all their incentives are to manipulate stock price at the expense of long-term performance. A perfect case in point is Eisner and Disney (the book to read is Disney Wars -outstanding and insightful).
  • Pozen also suggests that Boards are not paying enough attention, don't have the right skills and are spread too think. Again, Here,Here ! When companies lack a good management system that lays out a clear strategy based on the Business Model, when operations and strategy are mis-aligned and when there are not clear measurements of success then there's little chance of the Board knowing what should be done. Let alone being capable of getting it done. If Executive management had to present worked out operating plans and demonstrate strategic alignment Boards would have the sort of control mechanism that would be reduce or eliminate many of the problems we've seen; and are seeing again with the credit market problems and the financials.
  • Ironically a good integrated operating plan coupled to a decent management system would make the company run better, define a whole new way of measuring executive performance, give Boards a clear, simple and structured way of monitoring and managing that performance and enormously improve communications to the market. In other words the right kind of structured execution framework fixes both the management incentive and board oversight problems. And does so organically and constructively.

Taken all together these factors define the beginnings of a blueprint for evaluating company performance and for thinking like an owner. Sometimes they'll be tought to dig into but on the whole the information required is available and easier and easier to get. But these days online resources take you a long way. 10-Ks & Qs are readily accessible, analysts presentations are online and a search will often find details of suppliers, customer and markets. All without too much cost or effort.

It's up to the investor, or employees for that matter, to do their homework. But there are major opportunities here - if you seize them. And don't we come full circle or won't we ? In other words more than any other investor the PE guys should be applying versions of this sort of analysis.