« November 2007 | Main | January 2008 »

December 31, 2007

WRFest 30Dec07(Business): Fragilities, Exposures & Soundness

Well here are the interesting stories on business for the week for industries and individual companies. Rather than summarize them, and there are worthwhile comments on the rising bankruptcy risks, the implosion risks as big banks and the finance industry being re-structuring (!), oil & energy, the wild world (literally) of the auto industry and more on tech, let's set the stage.

If it's not clear at this point we think the economy is slowing and seriously exposed to sudden & sharp disruptions as Housing and the Credit crisis worsen and it becomes more fragile. We also think that the Markets still haven't grasped this nor, definitely, is it reflected in pricing, earnings outlooks or valuations. Even on current course and speed with no major disruptions there's some serious re-thinking that needs to happen, at least IMHO. But if you start looking now and understand what's going on then there are going to be industries and enterprises that weather this storm, if not with style and grace. Finding them will be the trick and the trick to the trick starts with understanding the deeper structural fragilities that have been created by non-organic earnings and liquidity-driven buybacks. Well as is becoming a practice Paul Kasriel has already done the heavy lifting so we'll let his comments and charts speak for us. Here's the key point - on a macro level buybacks, real declines in profits and increased leverage indicate that business enterprises are very exposed to shocks if/when they come. In other words a hurricane will breach the dike and it'll take a well-founded company to manage the floods :). So pay careful attention to Paul's words and charts - think about 'em, 'cause they could be incredibly important.

Now it’s your turn, Corporate America. For starters, the growth in your “operating” profits has slowed to a crawl – just 1.9% year-over-year in the third quarter (Chart 13). Moreover, if it were not for your earnings from overseas operations, which are inflated when translated into depreciating greenbacks, your profits would be contracting (Chart 14.) As Merrill Lynch’s chief North American economist, David Rosenberg, has reminded us, corporate hiring of U.S. domestic residents and capital spending in the U.S. depend on corporate profits generated in the U.S., not corporate profits generated in Germany or China. And while we still are on the subject of domestically-generated profits, note that profits from the nonfinancial sector have contracted four quarters in a row and the growth of profits from the financial sector have slowed significantly (Chart 15). 

And the 2nd excerpt:

Despite this relatively poor corporate profit performance, the prices of corporate equities are up on the year. We wonder if it has something to do with the record amount of corporate equities that have been “retired” via share buyback programs and leveraged buyouts of late. Nonfinancial corporations have stepped up their credit market borrowing of late, both in absolute terms and relative to their cash flows from operations (Chart 17). Have nonfinancial corporations increased their borrowing to fund capital outlays? Apparently not, inasmuch as the ratio of their borrowing to their capital outlays is rising and now is just a shade below where it was in the first quarter of 1999 (Chart 18). So, as corporate profit growth is slowing, it appears that corporate treasurers are tapping the credit markets more to fund their share repurchases. With corporate borrowing costs rising absolutely and relative to the U.S. Treasury’s borrowing costs, how much longer will corporations be able to levitate the value of their shares via levering the corporation itself ?

Business

2008: Year of the bankruptcy Market analysts warn that more U.S. businesses are likely to hang "going bankrupt" signs on their doors next year as the twinned blows of slower economic growth and pricey commodities force the weakest companies to seek refuge from creditors. In a twist from this year's trends, the pain is likely to spread from mortgage lenders, homebuilders and consumer-oriented firms - all areas that contributed to a 40% jump in bankruptcy filings in 2007 and are expected to play a role in 2008's misery. Next year, industries at risk for the biggest increases in Chapter 11 filings include electronics makers, energy miners like coal companies and agriculture firms, according to Global Insight. Makers of durable goods like machinery are also more at risk and will likely contribute to a 13% rise in bankruptcies in 2008, says the private research firm, which bases its estimates on issuers' credit quality and operating conditions.

Outlook Darkens for Big Banks For major banks, the next few years will be a return to a simpler and possibly less-profitable time. The subprime crisis and ensuing credit crunch have thrown a wrench into the highly profitable bank business model: Make loans that are then sold off to investors while arranging corporate financing through off-balance-sheet vehicles that keep banks' capital costs down. Now, banks are holding on to more of the loans they make, as they did years ago. And the off-balance-sheet lending business is crippled. It isn't clear how long this will last, or how the banking model might evolve in response to the current market crisis. What is clear is that some of the banks' more profitable lines of business have been shut, either temporarily or permanently. The upshot: Bank investors expecting a big rebound in earnings growth after the debacle of 2007 will likely be disappointed.  Wachovia CEO ready for dour 2008, Citi, HSBC reportedly eye asset sales

  • Happy New Year? Don't Bank On It  In the credit crisis, banks have been taking extraordinary steps to shore up their finances, selling stakes to foreign investors and snapping up loans from central banks. Now comes the yard sale. In a sign that they see tough times ahead, U.S. and European banks are considering sales of everything from branches to entire units. Buyers could be hard to find in an environment where many financial companies are in trouble. Still, say analysts, the motivation to sell is strong. For one, asset sales generate immediate cash at a time when banks are likely to face persistent difficulties borrowing money. Despite extraordinary efforts by central banks that appear to have fended off a year-end funding crunch, the interest rates at which banks lend to one another are still elevated amid worries about further losses on subprime mortgage investments.


Citigroup May Cut Dividend by 40% to Preserve Capital, Goldman Sachs Says Citigroup Inc., the biggest U.S. bank, may cut its dividend by 40 percent to preserve capital and write down more fixed-income securities than it has told investors to expect, according to Goldman Sachs Group Inc. The New York-based bank may write off $18.7 billion in collateralized debt obligations such as subprime mortgages, up from its Nov. 4 estimate of as much as $11 billion, Goldman's William F. Tanona wrote in a note dated Dec. 26. Citigroup, which paid out 54 cents each quarter this year, will have to raise $6.2 billion in extra capital to reach its target.

Bottomless Buffett Warren Buffett didn't call the bottom.That is the main takeaway of investors from Berkshire Hathaway's takeover of the Pritzker family's Marmon Holdings industrial complex. Markets have been abuzz with expectations the billionaire would use some of Berkshire's $50 billion war chest to scoop up financial firms floundering on the sandbars of the credit crunch, such as Countrywide Financial or Bear Stearns. Instead, Mr. Buffett, 77 years old, is making his first major acquisition in years in the dowdiest of sectors. Marmon operates more than 100 businesses making such heart-racing products as specialty tubing and intermodal tank containers. It couldn't be farther from the alchemy practiced by Mr. Buffett's rumored financial targets. It is, however, classic Buffett. It isn't just that the kinds of companies the Pritzkers built up over three generations are a type that Mr. Buffett, whose investments range from Coca-Cola and Benjamin Moore paints to an Omaha furniture emporium, understands well. The circumstance under which he is acquiring them is textbook Berkshire.

Oil gusher: Tough act to follow It's been a phenomenal time to invest in oil, but analysts say the huge gains of the last year are most likely a thing of the past. 2007 was truly a banner year for the industry. The big integrated oil companies - ones that produce and refine crude - saw stock gains in the 30 percent range. Oil company stocks tend to rise and fall with the price of crude, so any prediction on stock prices needs to start with a look at the underlying commodity. Although U.S. crude is trading near $100 a barrel, 2007 was a very volatile year. Prices began the year by dipping below $50 in January, spiking above $75 in July, then pulling back to the high $60s by the end of August before embarking on its recent record run. For the year, the average price for crude was around $72. Most analysts have bumped up their estimate for 2008to around $80 to $85. But others think the sector is played out. "Fundamentally, it's expensive," said Jack Ablin, chief investment officer at Harris Private Bank in Chicago. "A lot of investors are eager to get into energy, and it's pushed the values to unattractive levels." Ablin said stocks of energy companies are expensive by a number of metrics. Their price-to-book value - the value of all their outstanding stock compared to book value of their underlying assets - is about 5 percent higher than the S&P average. Normally, energy companies have a price-to-book value about 15 percent lower, said Ablin. He said he sees a similar pattern with other measures like price to cash flow and price to sales.

Autos' year of living dangerously If you followed the money in the auto industry in 2007 you got some clues about where the industry is headed. And the future doesn't look anything like the past. Start with Chrysler going private. The money guys at Cerberus Capital who now own Detroit's Number Three automaker are turning it upside down. They brought in industry outsider, Bob Nardelli, as CEO and Nardelli is taking a fresh look at everything. Going forward, Chrysler will be eliminating models and possibly some brands, closing dealers, and laying off workers. One area where Nardelli has been particularly aggressive is in pursuing foreign partnerships. But if Chrysler succeeds, it could create a new model of cross-national alliances. Meanwhile, speculation is building about Cerberus' exit strategy from Chrysler, as well as its timing. For another cataclysmic change, how about minnow Porsche moving ahead with its plan to swallow whale-like Volkswagen? Finally, there is the evolving adventure of India's Tata Motors pursuit of two iconic British brands, Jaguar and Land Rover. At $2 billion, the price could be a secondary concern. The larger question: is the manufacturer of a $2,500 car is capable of designing, building, and marketing luxury vehicles? If the Tata deal goes through, it turns the entire auto industry into a global bazaar. What's next -- a Chinese company buying Alfa-Romeo? With rivers of capital free-flowing across national boundaries, the possibilities are endless. The failed marriage of Daimler and Chrysler may have been only the beginning of a global shuffling of brands and owners. The other day, a GM executive was speculating that the auto industry was sorting itself into two categories: two super-companies, GM and Toyota, with annual production of nine million vehicles each, and all the rest.

Toyota Raises 2008 Sales Target to 9.85 Million Vehicles on Global Demand Toyota Motor Corp. raised its sales forecast for 2008 to 9.85 million vehicles, cementing the company's lead as the world's most profitable carmaker. Sales will rise 5 percent from an estimated 9.36 million this year, the Toyota City, Japan-based automaker said in a release today. Toyota plans to make 9.95 million vehicles, also a 5 percent increase. The company previously forecast sales of 9.8 million next year. Toyota, close to ending General Motors Corp.'s 76-year reign as the world's largest automaker by sales, needs to sell more vehicles in emerging markets to achieve its targets, as demand for automobiles is forecast to decline in the U.S. and Japan, the company's two biggest markets. Toyota opened a factory in St. Petersburg, Russia, last week and will add production in China next year. Automakers are boosting sales and production in emerging economies such as China, Russia, and India, where rising incomes are making automobiles affordable to more people. The growth is offsetting slumping sales in Japan and the U.S., the world's biggest auto market.

Faces of Enterprise: Ratan Tata The ‘one-lakh car’ continues the chairman’s transformation of the group to global conglomerate, challenging preconceptions. Mr Tata will be one of the most visible faces of the new India in 2008. He was on Friday waiting to hear whether Tata Motors, a truckmaker that has diversified into passenger cars, had been successful in its offer for Jaguar and Land Rover, luxury brands put up for sale by Ford. In the wake of this year’s audacious $13bn (€8.4bn, £6.5bn) purchase of Corus by Tata Steel, the Indian company’s bid for these two prestige marques has again highlighted the risk-taking verve of one of India’s most ambitious corporate empire builders. The news will come as Mr Tata prepares to unveil the most keenly awaited car ever to roll off an Indian assembly line. Tata’s small car, which the Cornell-trained architect helped design, is slated to appear at the Delhi Auto Show on January 10. It will sell for Rs100,000 ($2,550, €1,730, £1,275) – a rupee figure known in India as one lakh – and bring motoring to a mass market. With a new plant in West Bengal able to make 250,000 a year, the “one-lakh car” will more than double Tata’s car capacity. “Mr Tata encourages us to take big, calculated risks,” says Ravi Kant, Tata Motors’ managing director.

Tech can fly high and crash hard, too The real appeal of tech is the potential for hypergrowth by any company, at anytime. And it can happen with new companies and old ones. Any company in the sector can have a burst of phenomenal growth because there is a fashionable aspect to technology, whether at the base semiconductor level or the consumer-electronics level. Much of this has to do with infrastructure in which the better part of a tech company is virtualized through the use of chip foundries, outsourced manufacturing, contractors and other ancillary operations. This allows for quick growth . So investors are generally enamored with tech, and if you discuss the topic with many of them you discover that they are often so enamored that they can't imagine technology being subject to the whims of the business cycle. In fact, many will deny the business cycle exits.

New Dell PC Design Rivals the iMac Something interesting is going on at Dell. The Texas personal-computer behemoth, long associated with boxy, boring machines, has started emphasizing industrial design. And the company, which in recent years seemed to care only about corporate customers, techies and hard-core gamers, appears once again interested in average, mainstream consumers who value simplicity. The most tangible example of this new approach is Dell's XPS One desktop -- an elegant, handsome, cleverly designed one-piece computer. If it didn't have the Dell logo on it, the XPS One might be mistaken for a product of the PC industry's design leaders, Apple or Sony. Like Apple's iconic iMac, the XPS One looks like it's simply a sleek, flat-panel monitor. The guts of the computer have been stuffed into the back of the screen. But this new Dell is no mere iMac clone. It makes its own style statement, even though it shares the same 20-inch widescreen display and a similar Intel dual-core processor with the base-model iMac.

Motorola's pain is Samsung's gain An emphasis on the fast-growing global market for cell phones costing around $40 has catapulted the South Korean company into the No. 2 spot in handset sales. Samsung Electronics confronts bad news on many fronts. The South Korean company is facing probes into an alleged bribery scheme, and its money-spinning memory-chip business is in the worst slump in five years. That's why Samsung executives must be thrilled to have their mobile-phone business, where the future appears upbeat. The numbers tell the story. Samsung surpassed struggling Motorola in 2007 to become the world's second-biggest handset maker after Nokia . Samsung's global market share is up about 3 percentage points from last year, at 14.5% in the third quarter, compared with Motorola's 13.1%. Samsung has set sales records in every quarter this year, with the 115 million phones sold in the January-September period exceeding the 114 million sold during all of last year. And Samsung believes its record-breaking run is just beginning. The company expects to sell 160 million handsets this year, a 40% improvement from 2006. Executives expect sales of 200 million mobile phones next year and a growth pace that's about double that of the rest of the industry.

Bewkes May Dismantle Time Warner, End Its Reign as Largest Media Company Jeffrey Bewkes, who takes over as chief executive officer of Time Warner Inc. next week, may be measured by how quickly he can dismantle the world's largest media company. Bewkes may spin off the cable-television division and sell the AOL Web and Time Inc. magazine units, said Gamco Investors Inc. fund manager Chris Marangi and National City Bank analyst Daniel Poole. The remaining company, anchored by the film studio and cable-TV networks, would resemble Viacom Inc. -- and accordingly command higher multiples, Marangi said.

December 30, 2007

WRFest30Dec07 (Markets): Up, Down & Around

Well another interesting week in the markets, to say the least. Not quite the end of the year rally everyone was planning is it ? This living in interesting times bit is getting very old indeed but, if you've read any of our prior posts on the Economy, Business Cycle or Credit Crisis, we've got a long way to go. And the normal stable of prognosticators is just beginning to acknowledge all that, at least to some limited extent. In fact the "standard model" so far of an '08 outlook is for a not-so-good first half with a 50/50 shot at recession if something tips us over with a recovery in the second half of a sorts. In fact apparantly analysts consensus is for 15.7% earnings growth ! Now how one gets an economy growing at, at best 2%, and then gets 15% EPS growth is not only beyond us but beyond even the stretch of good YOY comparables :) ! Or should be.

What we've got and had for some time now is a sideways market, as benchmarked by the SP500, with some wild swings around the central trend. Which you can see in the above chart. Notice in the sub-chart btw that the Euro/Yen spread which has driven the market thru the carry trade mechanism is beginning to break down a bit. Also notice that, looking at the 90Da/200Da MA's that the market is consolidating but has huge swings around that center unlike earlier consolidation periods this year. What we think is going on is that reality is slowly seeping into market valuations but the uncertainty in sentiment and outlook is so high and the economic future so "unclear" that nobody can make up their minds to go or stay (thank you Jimmy Durante).

Meanwhile if you look at x-market comps (RUT, Nasdaq, Europe, EM, etc.) you can notice these general trends but with some of our earlier guestications being born out, e.g. the likely fading of the EM markets as the bubble begins to leak. This has shown up all of a sudden in the EM indicator (the ETF for Pacific ex-Japan, EPP). Similarly if you look across sectors (in the 2nd and 3rd sub-charts) what used to be a clear seperation between winners (better than SP vs worse than) is fading lightly as well. Only Energy is holding up, and while the outlook for oil prices is continued "strength" there's a good argument that that's already factored into valuation and prices.

BTW - a major point and the first time we've seen it in print. Floyd Norris reports on the widening of the credit crisis beyond mortgage related instruments. Hallaleuh ! An argument we've been making for quite some time (you may accuse us of shrillness hear and we'll bear that cross willingly if more folks will pay attention). Just for the record we refer you to Cracks in the Shell: Credit Crisis and Bubbles , which will also point to several other postings in the genre.

 

Markets & Investing

Credit Crisis? Just Wait for a Replay What if it’s not just subprime? As 2007 ends, it seems that the financial world shakes every time a company reveals some new exposure to the disastrous world of subprime mortgage lending. But just how different was subprime lending from other lending in the days of easy money that prevailed until this summer? The smug confidence that nothing could go wrong, and that credit quality did not matter, could be seen in the many other markets as well. That was particularly true in the corporate loan market. Loans were cheap, and anyone worried about losses could buy insurance for almost nothing. It was not an environment that encouraged careful lending. . Already, even without defaults, he says, about a tenth of high-yield bonds are trading at distress levels — levels that provide yields of at least 10 percentage points more than Treasuries. If a recession does occur, one can easily foresee a wave of defaults in junk bonds and their bank-loan cousins, leveraged loans. With highly leveraged structures supported by some of those loans, the surprises could be greater. It is sobering to realize that the issuing of leveraged loans set a record in 2007, even though the market contracted sharply late in the year. One of the more remarkable facts about the subprime crisis is that total losses to the financial system may be about equal to the amount of subprime loans that were issued. On the face of it, that appears absurd, since many such loans will be paid off, and those that default will not be total losses. But, Mr. Seides said in an interview, “the financial leverage placed on the underlying assets was so high” that the losses multiplied, as the profits did when times were good.

·         .Prior Posts Cracks in the Shell: Credit Crisis and Bubbles, Greasing the Skids or the Gears: Credit Repairs Working ?

·         ,LinkedIn Q: How widespread is the credit crisis, is it widely understood and what do you think the impacts will be ?,

 

Cracks Differ In Housing, Finance Shells It's now conventional wisdom that a housing bubble has burst. In fact, there were two bubbles, a housing bubble and a financing bubble. Each fueled the other, but they didn't follow the same course. Housing peaked in 2005. By early 2006 it was widely recognized the boom was likely over, and by mid-2006 it was beyond question. In June 2006, sales of existing single-family homes were 9% below their year-earlier level, sales of new homes were down 15% and framing lumber prices were down 19%. The Dow Jones Wilshire index of home-building shares had fallen 41% from its July 2005 peak. Yet throughout 2006, the folks who financed the housing bubble turned up the volume on their party. Issuance of collateralized debt obligations -- investments that held heaps of risky mortgage securities and other asset-backed securities -- hit $187 billion in 2006, according to Dealogic. That was up 72% from 2005. The biggest single month for such CDO issuance was March of this year, at $38 billion. By November, there was just one issue sold, valued at $23 million. Lenders wrote $600 billion in subprime mortgages last year, down a little from 2005's $625 billion, according to Inside Mortgage Finance. But they also wrote $400 billion "Alt-A" mortgages -- a category between prime and subprime loans -- up from $380 billion in 2005. The path of these two bubbles has a lot to do with the way mortgages are now made. In this boom, the financial institutions that wrote the mortgages didn't keep them. They sold them to firms that then repackaged and sold them to investors in the form of CDOs and other instruments. Lenders had less incentive to worry about the financial health of their customers. Why worry when you're just going to sell the loan to somebody else and make a big fee in the process? The same went for the Wall Street banks bundling the mortgages into securities.

J.P. Morgan Chase: Bar Is Rising for Rate Cuts In their weekly report on the global economy, J.P. Morgan Chase economists say the bar for Federal Reserve and European Central Bank easing is rising, even as the two central banks pump money into money markets to relieve unusual tensions. The ECB, they say, “is not persuaded that the disruptive repricing of credit risk will have significant negative growth consequences. And it remains concerned about the rise in inflation now under way.” As for the Fed, they conclude, “the path ahead is uncertain.” All is not well, though, in the J.P. Morgan Chase crystal ball: “Reduced stress in money markets will not deliver a cure for financial markets, which are absorbing the pain of substantial credit losses and a contraction in the use of structured products. Indeed, corporate credit spreads have drifted wider in recent weeks and US jumbo mortgage rates have moved higher.” J.P. Morgan Chase economists predicts a one-quarter point cut in the Fed’s key rate by March and then a one-half percentage point rate (ital) increase (end ital) by the end of 2008. It doesn’t anticipate any ECB rate moves in either direction.

Company Bond Sales Fall in Europe for the First Year Since 2002 on Rates Corporate bond sales fell in Europe for the first time since 2002 this year as companies abandoned borrowing because of soaring interest costs. Sales slumped to 285 billion euros ($417 billion) in the last six months from 616 billion euros in the first half, reducing the total for the year by 3 percent from 2006, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Companies with ratings below investment grade haven't sold any bonds in euros or pounds since August, the longest shutdown in at least nine years. ``I've been in this business for 20 years and never seen anything as bad as this,'' said Eirik Winter, co-head of fixed income capital markets in London for Citigroup Inc., the third- biggest underwriter of corporate bonds sold in Europe. ``We're going to feel 2007 for a long time.'' ``Many corporates thought the subprime issue wasn't going to hit them because they're good companies with good ratings,'' Citigroup's Winter said. ``Now, most treasurers would admit that we have a completely different credit market out there.'' Citigroup, Goldman, JPMorgan Discount LBO Debt Up to 10% to Clear Backlog

Oops...Real Rally or Time to Rethink MSN Money Central is a pretty good finance and economics web site. In particular several of their regular columnists have proven out very well over the last several years (particularly Jubak and Markman). They also run a very interesting set of contests between investment pros. Two of whom had recent posts that are well worth thinking about. Paraphrasing them might go something like this, "hmm this really isn't working out well. What's going on here and how do I re-think my strategy, tools and techniques ?" Otherwise known as the Oops factors. Now one of the things I've noticed about the contest results is that their timing on market cycles has been extremely fortuitous indeed. No conspiracy just coincidence by and large. So contest results are skewed toward those folks who's style aligns with current conditions, the context.

Emerging Market No More? A combination of tighter credit conditions and rising inflation will make life tougher for many developing countries in 2008. South Korea may be the exception. Stock markets in emerging economies have had five very good years in a row. Don't bank on a sixth. A combination of tighter credit conditions and quickening inflation domestically will make life tougher for many developing countries in 2008. The two biggest emerging markets -- China and India -- have more downside potential than upside. One of the few bright spots in the year ahead is South Korea.In the past five years, high world liquidity -- caused by rapid U.S. money supply growth or a world "savings glut" -- produced rapid world-wide economic growth and a commodity-prices boom. These enabled indebted countries such as Brazil and Argentina to escape their trap and nourished a corresponding economic boom in China and India. This has become too good to last. The credit crunch, while it hasn't affected emerging-market credit directly, has forced many big international banks to reduce their off-balance-sheet assets and has lowered the appetite of both capital markets and banks to absorb the issuance of new debt. This will reduce the flow of funds to emerging markets, particularly those dependent on foreign debt such as Turkey, Brazil and Indonesia. The two largest emerging markets, China and India, have their own problems. China is determined to tighten monetary policy, which is already resulting in dwindling investor enthusiasm for thinly traded stocks. In India, the budget deficit is expanding, with spending up 28% in the first seven months of the current fiscal year. In both, the inflation rate is well above official targets. Thus both markets seem likely to be less robust in 2008.

WRFest 30Dec07(Economy): Review & Outlook

After the continuation you'll find the "usual suspects" - our collection of the week's most interesting stories and data. Rather than summarizing them or point to key articles though we took advantage of the holidays (loosely speaking) to develop a bunch of deeper background postings on the nature and structure of the Business Cycle and high-frequency indicators so you can do your own regular spot checks. Or at least, at a minimum, have a better set of filters for collecting, collating and interpreting the flow of headlines and data. So we're going to point you to the four posts we made in the hopes that they'll be helpful and add to you toolkit.

To just dive into the high-frequency indicators and get a feel for just what the outlook is start with this one:WTWW Part 3: Jitterbugging - the High Frequency Indicators. And in particular we think Paul Kasriel captures the essence of things in this excerpt: 

Probing the Probabilities of a 2008 Recession What is the probability that the U.S. economy will fall into a recession in 2008? We would answer, 65.5%. We have been talking about the probability of a recession occurring without defining what a recession is. A popular misconception is that a recession occurs when real GDP contracts for two or more consecutive quarters. Although most, but not all, recessions do include two or more consecutive quarters of contracting real GDP, this is not the criterion for defining a recession used by the arbiters of such, the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). According to the NBER, a recession is a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in real GDP, real income, employment, industrial production, and wholesale-retail sales. It just so happens that these four variables are the same four variables in the Conference Board’s index of Coincident Economic Indicators. We are amused and you are confused by those talking heads on Bubblevision who claim that a recession is not imminent because payroll employment and/or personal income continue to increase. To repeat, these are coincident economic indicators and, thus, provide some information as to the current performance of the economy, not the future performance of it. I Have a Lot of Problems with You People!

Taken all together this is the best toolkit we can make available for diagnosing the economy. Bon Appetit' and good luck to us all in the New Year. 

Also for more background on our adaptation of his monetary base and spread indicators try this

Xmas Cheer ? - Disingenousness, Conundrums and Early Warnings.

 For a deeper background on the nature, structure and patterns of the business cycle along with some nifty pictures & graphics we point you to: Weigh the World Works: Understanding the Business Cycle.

 The first thing we'll start with is the linkages in the business cycle and what drives what - which ultimately tells you what data is important and what to look for. Digging in the patterns and structures will help out with getting the interpretations of headlines done a little better as well. We like to think of the business cycle as the "Great Circle (Economic) of Life" [Media file]. Also consider the metaphor which is really more like a model of how everything x-links, interacts and feedsback. Which takes us to the diagram. Oddly enough business cycles aren't as much talked about in your college econ classes though everybody recognizes them and applied economists deal with them all the time. Part of the problem is that modeling them turns out to be very difficult. So we end up with our best pass that's nonetheless consistent with both business and economic theory discussions (readings below).

And for a discussion of the actual time-series histories, patterns and interpretation, i.e. what data is interesting, why and it all relates to one another the follow-on is worth your time:WtW Part Deux: Patterns, Cycles & Indicators.

 We sincerely hope you'll find these writeups useful and helpful and plan on being able to use them as baselines to refer back. As for whether there're worthwhile or not we'll also point you to a post that excerpted some work based on these toolkits from this time last year which is also available online and, oddly enough, anticipated many of the years characteristics and consequences. It was, if anything, not pessimistic enough about the Housing and Credit Market problems. But the point remains - despite all the "woe is me" running around it is possible to frame the outlook: Looking Ahead:Seeing the Avalanche Before It Lands.

Economy

Don't count on a 'normal' recession Wall Street expects financial innovations and global growth to keep any US slowdown in 2008 short and shallow. But the stock market is likely to be seriously disappointed. The stock market doesn't much care whether a 2008 slowdown in the economy is an official recession or not. As far as Wall Street is concerned, there's just not much difference between economic growth falling to 1% or to minus-0.5%. As long as the slowdown, recession, whatever, is short. No more than two quarters. Over and done with by mid-2008. Then the economy and the stock market, Wall Street believes, can look forward to another long boom. But what if a 2008 slowdown or recession isn't normal? What if it drags on for 12 months and not just six or eight? Then the stock market has set itself up for serious disappointment, with multiple dips in the major averages as investors gradually realize that 2008's economic slowdown will be lengthier than expected. The odds of that kind of disappointment in 2008 are, unfortunately, high. This sure doesn't look like the "normal" recession. Because so many consumers got used to drawing against their rising home equities to fund their spending, the bursting of the housing bubble and the crisis in the subprime-mortgage market have resulted in far more damage than usual to consumer cash flows. The drop in consumer demand is well beyond what you'd expect in an economy that's still producing jobs at a decent rate.

·         Are you aware of and following the data on real retail sales and consumption ? Do you see it as impacting the '08 outlook ?

 

Plan ahead for a tough 2008 It's not difficult to get read on the economic year to come. Whether there's a recession or just a slowdown in our future, on one thing there is general agreement: 2008 figures to be a tough year for just about everyone -- employers, employees, homeowners and investors -- so plan accordingly. Don't wait for the National Bureau of Economic Research, the official arbiter of the business cycle, to make the call. I would remind readers that the initial look at the first quarter's GDP won't be available for another four months. If you haven't planned for tough times by then, you'll be way behind the curve. A look at the real world will give you better information sooner. Point in fact: Those who deny even a slowdown note that residential fixed investment accounts for less than 4% of real GDP, so housing alone is unlikely to exert much downward pull on economic growth. But this overlooks that home prices are falling, thus reducing both people's wealth as well as their ability to take out a home equity loan. Add to this the effect on households' budgets of rising food, energy and health-care prices, higher state and local taxes and transit fares, little or no savings, huge debts and stricter borrowing requirements and you have a consumer in distress. Even more important, the credit markets remain frozen. This means that, besides consumers, businesses and local governments -- even banks -- can't borrow needed funds. As you can imagine, money and credit grease the wheels of economic activity. Without them, business would inevitably grind to a halt. Central bankers are trying feverishly to inject liquidity into the system, but they won't be able to thaw out the frosty markets until lenders have confidence that borrowers can repay their loans. Too bad they did not think this way sooner. Tough Outlook for '08: Kellner on Avalanche Warnings, Rough Patch Ahead for US Economy (Mark Zandi of Economy.com video)

 

Food prices soar in America "That's the reason I cut down on milk consumption - so I can drive my car," said Norris. The Norrises aren't the only family getting pinched at the grocery store. Prices of food and non-alcoholic beverages rose 4.7 percent since the beginning of the year through November, outpacing the 4.3 percent increase in the overall cost-of-living, according to the federal government's Consumer Price Index. Everyday foods like fruits and vegetables, beef, poultry and cereals are on the rise. The price of milk is the biggest culprit, with a staggering increase of 23.2 percent through November. And with basic foods like dairy and wheat driving up the cost of other groceries, almost everyone is feeling the squeeze. Of the Brooklyn shoppers interviewed for this story, none of them said that they were eating less, but a couple of them said there will be fewer Christmas presents under the tree this year. Santa's tightening his belt, so the kids don't have to.

Oil-price prognosticators, bruised by volatility in the oil patch, have reached a rough consensus on next year: Oil will be even costlier, even if the economy cools. Prices are likely to be up at the pump, too. Consumers are likely to pay a lot more at the pump, too. The Energy Department predicts that far higher average oil prices will force gasoline prices to even out at $3.11 next year, up 10% from the average price of $2.81 this year. World crude prices have long tracked the thirst for oil in the U.S., which consumes about a quarter of the world's oil output. But recent months have shown how decoupled the oil market is becoming from the economic ups and downs of the world's largest energy consumer. Even amid fears that the U.S. could slip into recession next year, world-wide consumption is expected to strengthen, driven mostly by more demand from Asia as well as from Middle Eastern economies awash in oil revenue. That, of course, will further tighten global supplies.

Housing Futures: 11% Price Decline in 2008 for 25 Largest Cities Radar Logic provides a daily estimate of house prices for 25 MSAs in the United States. If you click on Historical Data, you can see price charts and data for each city. The Radar Logic data is similar to the Case-Shiller indices. I mention the Radar Logic data, because according to Goldman Sachs, the Radar Logic futures data is forecasting a price drop of 11% over the next year, and close to 25% over the next 3 years for the 25 largest MSAs. Home Prices in U.S. Fell 6.1% in October, More Than Estimated, Survey Says, Pace of Decline in Home Prices Sets a Record, More on New Home Sales

  • How they got housing wrong Experts thought 2007 would bring a real estate recovery - not the worst collapse on record. What does that say about forecasts of a turnaround next year? Before you put much hope in forecasts for a 2008 rebound in the battered housing market, consider this: A year ago at this time many top economists were looking for that recovery to begin in 2007. Instead, the year saw historic declines in nearly every measure of housing strength and home building, and left a trail of predictions from some of the nation's top economists that look - at best - foolish.

Looking back at 2007 Housing Predictions  At the end of 2006, I offered some predictions for housing in 2007. Looking back it's hard to believe these predictions were out of the mainstream. My overall view for the 2007 housing market was "falling prices, falling sales, falling residential construction employment, falling starts, falling MEW, falling percentage of equity, and rising foreclosures". Tanta and I have been writing about subprime loans for as long as this blog has existed. And as far as a credit crunch, back in January I mentioned the possibility of "a credit crunch based on bad loans in the RE sector (and possibly in CRE and C&D too)". And many others were discussing these issues too. We all make errors in forecasting - no one has a crystal ball - but I'm endlessly amused by the 'no one could have known' excuse.

More Retail Sales Hype The most recent example of this are Holiday Retail Sales data. If you rely upon the Commerce department, then sales are going just swimmingly. However, looking at the actual Retailers sales data, you reach a very different conclusion.  Rather than take either the Commerce report or the sentiment surveys at face value, why not take a closer look at the various retail sales data we can find to prove -- or disprove -- about these conflicting reports. First, let's note that the Bureau of Economic Analysis Personal consumption expenditures (PCE) increased $110.6 billion, or 1.1% last month. To put that into context, this was ~triple the October gain, and was the highest sales gain in three and half years. Spending data shows:Personal Spending in ‘Chained Dollars’ (meaning, inflation adjusted dollars) was +0.6% in November.  Ex-food & energy it is 0.2%.  So to put all this econo-statistical gobbledy-gook into plain old English, food and energy price increases accounted for a full 67% of the November spending gains. (So much for ya merry retail Christmas). Weekend Surge May Not Rescue U.S. Retailers From Holiday Shopping Slump, Target Says December Sales May Fall, Missing Forecast

U.S. Durable Goods Orders Rise Less Than Forecast on Defense-Spending Drop Orders for U.S. durable goods rose less than forecast in November, restrained by a slump in defense procurement and declines in capital equipment. The 0.1 percent increase, the first gain in four months, followed a revised 0.4 percent drop in October that was larger than previously reported, the Commerce Department said today in Washington. Excluding transportation, demand fell 0.7 percent. Tougher lending standards, bloated inventories and slowing sales are causing some companies to limit spending on equipment such as communications gear and machinery. The report suggests the worsening housing recession may be spreading to other parts of the economy. Economists forecast durable goods orders would increase 2 percent in November, according to the median of 67 estimates in a Bloomberg News survey. Projections ranged from a drop of 0.2 percent to a gain of 5 percent. Excluding transportation equipment, orders were projected to rise 0.5 percent

December 29, 2007

WTWW Part 3: Jitterbugging - the High Frequency Indicators

In the two prior posts we worked thru the nature of the business cycle and our current situation and then looked at the recurrant cyclical patterns. The latter worked thru Consumption, GDP and Investment as well as linking in Employment. Previous posts were referenced in the business cycle post as well as some useful background readings. By this time if you've been playing along you've got a pretty good idea of how the thing works, why it's important and what data to watch and what it'll tell you. In other words how to turn a swarm of data and headlines into useful information. Now it's time for one more pass to look at more current, high-frequency data that will keep you more in the loop and might, potentially, allow you to have a feel for what could be coming. The table at right presents the last several months of key data elements we've found worth following and the associated charts are in the read-on section. But let's set the stage with a couple of interesting excerpts, one from Alan Sloan and the other from Paul Kasriel.

Sloan makes an interesting point that's worth paying close attention to when he says you should be looking forward:

Beware the dreaded R word Everyone and his brother seems to be talking about recession these days. It dominates every public investment discussion and is the topic 24/7 on cable TV. But let me tell you a little secret: When it comes to investing, the question of whether we're in a recession (or are heading for one) just doesn't matter. It's actually elementary. Investing successfully is about looking ahead, while determining whether we're in a recession involves looking behind. Way behind. We won't know that a recession has started until months after it's begun. And by that time, things in the economy may well be getting better rather than worse - which might make it a good time to invest. I have no idea if we're in a recession or heading for one. Nor do I know where the market is going over the next few months. If I did, would I tell you for $4.99 ($5.99 Canadian)? What I do know is that if you want to do well in the market, you've got to think ahead, not behind. The "R" word isn't helpful. What you need is the "F" word: foresight.

Unfortunately while interesting that didn't strike me as constructive though it does, hopefully, convince you to pay attention. Kariel is much more constructive:

Probing the Probabilities of a 2008 Recession What is the probability that the U.S. economy will fall into a recession in 2008? We would answer, 65.5%. We have been talking about the probability of a recession occurring without defining what a recession is. A popular misconception is that a recession occurs when real GDP contracts for two or more consecutive quarters. Although most, but not all, recessions do include two or more consecutive quarters of contracting real GDP, this is not the criterion for defining a recession used by the arbiters of such, the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). According to the NBER, a recession is a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in real GDP, real income, employment, industrial production, and wholesale-retail sales. It just so happens that these four variables are the same four variables in the Conference Board’s index of Coincident Economic Indicators. We are amused and you are confused by those talking heads on Bubblevision who claim that a recession is not imminent because payroll employment and/or personal income continue to increase. To repeat, these are coincident economic indicators and, thus, provide some information as to the current performance of the economy, not the future performance of it. I Have a Lot of Problems with You People!

Now that provides some useful definitions and explanations along with a pretty hard-nosed outlook based on very well grounded analysis. If you read nothing else read his Dec07 outlook as well as his Econtrarian piece adding on a diagnosis of all the problems that are likely to turn this into a real bear-wrestling match. 

The idea with the data tables is not to bore you too much but to let you look at it a bit and get some feel and also to see what drove the following charts and discussions. It takes a bit of work to collect but it's all readily available and freely downloadable, often from the STL Fed site FREDII. And it's worth just looking at the numbers (we won't put them up often) to get a feel. For example look at the accelerating decline in New Home Sales, continued negative capex spending (xAC), the decline in real wages and so forth. Generally, where appropriate, the data is YOY% terms, real as opposed to nominal and often moving averages, e.g. Auto Sales, Employment.

 

Basic Indicators

Let's start with what we know are the two primary drivers, Consumption and Investment, and look at the monthly series we feel are worthwhile to follow. The first chart shows data for both C & I. For consumption the indicators are real personal consumption (PCER), real retail sales (Sales) and autos, on the r.h.s. Autos continue to show negative growth - what does that say about Detroit's outlook, or Cerberus for that matter ? Both PCER and Sales have been downtrending though they've flattened off recently. Notice though the numbers bear NO resemblence to the headlines.

Investment is yet another story where we look at New Durable Goods orders, non-defense & excluding aircraft (xAC), which is about as pure a capex indicator as there is, Industrial Production which is a look at current economic activity and New Home Sales. The latter couldn't be any worse, to date. It's likely to keep falling off the cliff though. But notice that while IndProd's decline has leveled off, albeit at a low level, xAC is continuing to show negative YOY trends, although at a slower pace of decline. For anybody who thinks business spending's going to pick up the economy we give them these numbers. And for anyone sanguine about Technology we'd ask - hun ? Since when is Tech spending not capex ? This'll be interesting. Also bear in mind that capex is a lagging indicator and that New Homes are a leading indicator. 

Future Demand Indicators

In an earlier post we talked about how the outlook for consumer spending was largely driven by current and expected Jobs and Wages, along with financing (MEW). In the chart at left we start by showing the trends in Real Weekly Wages and in Employment. Job growth hasn't been robust and has never reached the level required for organic economic growth while Wages have been in a fairly  pronounced downturn. But the real interesting indicator is their combination, W+E. I don't know about you but the sudden sharp downturn there is a little scary. The indicator is also a pretty good diagnostic. Last year the anticipation was for a downturn/slowdown in the economy much worse than what we got but you can see the upward spike in real wages last Fall due to the major, suprise drop in Oil prices and drop in Inflation. Now that factor is running in reverse. 

Inflation, Rate and Credit Indicators

All of which naturally brings up the question of inflation, interest rates and the general credit situations which are charted at right. In the first sub-chart you can see that we were trundling along very nicely with CPI relatively flat while PPI was doing it's usual dance around it. Unfortunately about Aug. of this year PPI took off under Oil price increases and that inflation is being passed on this time. The Fed hopes that a slowing economy continued thru 2010 will bring it back under control and that the drop in 10Yr-Treasury rates (r.h.s) won't let the tiger out of the barn. Let's hope along with them but given the state of the economy, its' pronounced fragilities and all the major fault lines we've discussed along with Kariel's Econtrarian diagnosis I'm with them.

Meanwhile the second sub-chart has some very powerful, and in this case powerfully scary, rate and monetary indicators. It shows the spread between 10Yr's and Fed Funds, which is shrinking. An indicator of a downturn being anticipated. The spread between 3Mo Treasuries and Commercial Paper which has spiked severely as a result of the continuing seizures in the credit market, something which you can follow on a daily and weekly basis as well. And a very interesting indicator that Kariel pointed out to use - the inflation-adjusted Monetary Base on the r.h.s. This represents the real money base with which people buy things. And as a result of credit being destroyed faster than the Central Banks can inject it, it's not only declining, it has actually gone negative recently. That is really....really...really not good. 

December 28, 2007

WtW Part Deux: Patterns, Cycles & Indicators

The prior post laid out the "Weigh the World Works (WtW)"  by putting up a model of the business cycle, it's general time patterns and referenced some background readings along with some prior posts that illustrate the applications. We'd like to continue that line of investigation here by addressing the last of the four key questions. The first on Consumption and the second on Investment. As you probably know Consumption is approximately 70% of the US economy, though far lower a portion of other developed economies and far...far lower of the major developing economies. Investment, taken all together, has run about 14% of the US economy. The engine therefore that drives the economy is consumer spending while investment is the super-charger that acclerates it. That is if businesses anticipate a need for additional capacity thru capital spending and hiring. These in turn feedback on consumer spending by increasing Employment and Wages and so on. Of course that means that the feedback loop can run in reverse just as well. That's why everyone should be so concerned about how well Consumption, Investment, Employment and Real Wages hold up. It also explains why the ability of consumers to sustain their spending thru MEW resulted in a very abnormal spending pattern where Consumption has held up much better than post-WW2 experience would have suggested.

Macroeconomic Indicator Data 

Normal business cycles are consumer-driven, as we observed above and discussed in more detail in that prior post. The last boom/bust cycle was Investment-led because businesses were over-investing in technology. When a boom goes bust the "normal" result is a major economic downturn, with historical examples including 1928, 1912, the 1890s and so on. Since 1980 we've been experiencing what is called the Great Moderation where growth has been sustained, major downturns avoided and the duration of downturns has been minimal. Whether that will remain true or not this time is unknown but the odds against a benign downturn mount daily. Understanding how these business cycles work and the patterns thereof becomes critically important for investment, invidiual and business planning therefore. The accompanying table will give you a numerical feel for the size of the various key numbers and indicators that are worth following. It also includes YOY% changes, which we've previously gone into as great diagnostics.

Below we provide a couple of key longer-term business cycle charts that let you see the key relationships between Consumption, GDP and Investment. But before going there let's set the stage with the following excerpt:

Don't count on a 'normal' recession Wall Street expects financial innovations and global growth to keep any US slowdown in 2008 short and shallow. But the stock market is likely to be seriously disappointed. The stock market doesn't much care whether a 2008 slowdown in the economy is an official recession or not. As far as Wall Street is concerned, there's just not much difference between economic growth falling to 1% or to minus-0.5%. As long as the slowdown, recession, whatever, is short. No more than two quarters. Over and done with by mid-2008. Then the economy and the stock market, Wall Street believes, can look forward to another long boom. But what if a 2008 slowdown or recession isn't normal? What if it drags on for 12 months and not just six or eight? Then the stock market has set itself up for serious disappointment, with multiple dips in the major averages as investors gradually realize that 2008's economic slowdown will be lengthier than expected. The odds of that kind of disappointment in 2008 are, unfortunately, high. This sure doesn't look like the "normal" recession. Because so many consumers got used to drawing against their rising home equities to fund their spending, the bursting of the housing bubble and the crisis in the subprime-mortgage market have resulted in far more damage than usual to consumer cash flows. The drop in consumer demand is well beyond what you'd expect in an economy that's still producing jobs at a decent rate.

Take another minute or so and review the table to get a feel for the relative magnitude, the YOY changes, notice key things like the drop in Investment which is (to date) largely Housing related and other key variables like Employment, Wages, etc. Notice that these real numbers aren't as good as the headlines had it a while back nor as immediately dire as some of the bubblicious talking heads have it now. Nonetheless we've been in a very visible slowmotion slowdown for some time and the question is no longer is Goldilocks in the house ? It's what time is Cinderella's party and who's going to clean up the mess.

GDP, Consumption & Investment

The chart at the right shows YOY% changes in GDP and Consumption going back to 1960 using real (inflation-adjusted) GDP and Consumption data on a quarterly basis. Hopefully the first thing that leaps out at you is that there are indeed cycles. And despite various rhetorics from time-to-time the business cycle is alive and well. The next thing that should jump out is how closely correlated Consumption and GDP are, in general. In fact Consumption declines are leading indicators of overall economic health, though it's a little hard (click to enlarge) to see on this scale. As a result declines in consumer spending tend to foreshadow GDP declines by several quarters. Also notice, more specifically to our key points about differences this time around, how relatively well spending has held up despite an overall GDP drop. And also how both have shown that slowmotion decline. Also remember that there is no well of untapped spending to go back to this time because we've borrowed against it via the MEW ATM.

The next thing to look at is Investment and GDP. These days Investment is reported and available with some sub-detail by major category but not back to 1960 the accompanying chart has a shorter time-frame. Nonetheless it's very revealing as well. It shows both Resident and Capex investment on a YOY basis by quarter since '91. Notice that Capex is a lagging indicator while RE investment is a leading indicator. If you go back to the 1960s there has never been a recession no preceeded by a downturn in RE investment ! And this one looks pretty severe to me.

So there you have it - hopefully a good addition to your toolkit AND a set of data filters that will allow you to turn headlines and stories into meaningful information. (Looking Ahead: Seeing the Avalanche Before It Lands)

To summarize we're in a new kind of business cycle having gotten there thru unusual and sensible policies but are in uncharted territories. Because this slowmotion slowdown has been underway for some time now it is also unusual. Normally that would mean we could look forward to several quarters of sub-par growth (a growth recession). In fact the Fed's published outlook which we reviewed in an earlier post shows such sub-par growth thru 2010 ! The problems are a) that from the point of view of all of us the differences in hiring, outlooks, spending and investments is not much different. And b) such an economy is very fragile and "tender", i.e. sensitive to the boat being rocked. And with the Housing and Credit market situations we can guarantee more shocks are on the way. And that's before we talk about such things as geo-political suprises.

A final crucial point we've made before and the Jubak excerpt reinforces - the earnings outlook and general investment thinking is based on a 2nd half "recovery", such as it might be. Even for the core slowmotion slowdown that's unlikely. Factor in these other things and well...you decide. It's left as a question for the reader to think thru. Feel free to comment though :) ! 

And oh yeah, btw, the prior post has a listing of earlier discussions of applications and specific indicators like Retail Sales, Inflation, Employment & Wages, etc. If you want to follow up that'd be a good place to start. 

December 27, 2007

Weigh the World Works: Understanding the Business Cycle

Well this morning's headlines on durables goods orders and new orders have, along with the geo-political news from Pakistan, sent the markets back down. It may not be entirely clear why this is important let alone how it should be interpreted and applied. Since it's coming onto the end of the year it struck me as a good time to review the nature and structure of the business cycle and what some answers might be to all those questions.

Specifically we'll look at four things:

  1. The Nature of Business Cycles
  2. The Time-structure and Phasing of the Cycle
  3. GDP and Consumption
  4. Investment and Acceleration

We also end up with a few recommended readings if you'd like to dig into things a little more on your own. If nothing else think of them as candidates for "putting-you-to-sleep" books :) ! The first thing we'll start with is the linkages in the business cycle and what drives what - which ultimately tells you what data is important and what to look for. Digging in the patterns and structures will help out with getting the interpretations of headlines done a little better as well. We like to think of the business cycle as the "Great Circle (Economic) of Life" [Media file]. Also consider the metaphor which is really more like a model of how everything x-links, interacts and feedsback. Which takes us to the diagram. Oddly enough business cycles aren't as much talked about in your college econ classes though everybody recognizes them and applied economists deal with them all the time. Part of the problem is that modeling them turns out to be very difficult. So we end up with our best pass that's nonetheless consistent with both business and economic theory discussions (readings below).

As you've heard endlessly by now Consumption is 70% of the US economy - which is a post-war high btw. But what it really means is that consumption is the primary driver. The thing to get our minds around is that economic logic is not simple A --> B linear it's more A->B->C->D->A non-linear feedback loops. The other thing to get wrapped around is that while specific prediction are nearly impossible the patterns are structured and repeat themselves and hence are open to informed analysis and interpretation. Another thing to bear in mind is that these patterns have a time-structure of leads and lags that's critically important.

Here we get around some of the "black box" nature of things by plugging in our own. Start with Consumption which is the engine. Then Business looks at and fulfills existing demand but also evaluates trends and events thereby setting Business Expectations for future demands. A major part of this is the availabilities of investment funds and the cost of those funds, i.e. the Credit Markets. The consequences of this evaluation result in spending to increase, maintain or decrease capacity by hiring, buying capital equipment or both. In other words Investment and Employment are derived decisions based on future expectations and lag both Consumption and Output (GDP).

So what drives Consumer decisions ? Well a similar evaluation process where expectations on future/continuing employment and wages are used to make consumption decisions. Hence good leading indicators of future consumption demand are changes in Employment and Real Wages. Consumers also evaluate their ability to borrow against future income and/or current/future assets. This is a Credit Market based analysis, however well done, as well and Mortgage Equity Withdrawls (MEW) have been the primary driver holding up consumer spending in this cycle.

Time Structure and Patterns

The next thing to look at is how the Business Cycle plays out over time which is illustrated, at least conceptually, in the diagram at left. There are two basic cycles - one that is Consumer-led, which is the one normal in the post-WW2 economy. Since it's almost the only one anybody's seen it's also (a really critical point) the one that forms most of the basis for judgments and the rules-of-thumb everybody uses in their investment decisions. However the Telecom boom resulted in the 2nd type of cycle, an Investment-led cycle where capital was invested in equipment in anticipation of major growth in demand ahead of its' existence. When a boom turns to bust the normal result is a major economic downturn and between 1870 and 1950 the US economy went thru several of these on a much more frequent basis. When business economists and others talk about the "Great Moderation" the avoidance of these wide and wild swings and their frequent occurances were what everybody had in mind.

Only this time thru emergency measures we invented a 3rd kind of cycle - call it the policy avoided or arrested cycle. In this case drastically lowered interest rates allowed housing prices to be bid up, equity was created and consumers were enable to borrow against the huge increase in equity to keep on spending. The bad news is that we now have to deal with a new set of linked bubbles in the Housing and Credit markets which may turn out to have major negative consequences.

The good news though is that we avoided a Depression. And in '00/'01 that was exactly what the Fed was and should have been worrying about. Go back and read their pronouncements. And then think about what happened in Japan which to this day has never yet recovered any serious economic growth. And in fact has seen serious social damage as a result and also seen their economy drop to the lowest proportion of the world economy in decades. All-in-all this seems like a brilliant policy to me.

The results of this effort though are that there's no "store" of pent-up consumer demand waiting to stimulate new growth. In fact while extremely low interest rates and the tax cuts were abe to maintain consumer demand it has never resulted in the development of a new and healthy cycle. A phenomenon sometimes referred to as alack of organic growth. Otherwise known as a failure to grow employment, stimulate consumption and have new investment & hiring accelerate the economy to longer-term, sustainable and organic growth. There are always tradeoffs. An earlier post on long-term employment delves into this (What Are They Smoking:Latest Payroll Data,More On Payroll Numbers). And the conceptual time patterns are illustrated in the 3rd curve where GDP growth is shown not dropping as far as it "should" have but not recovering either.

If you stop and think this thru it also resolves many of the dilemmas and conundrums that have bothered everyone. Why has employment growth been the lowest in any post-WW2 business cycle ? Why did long-term rates not rise ? Where have all the excess "savings" and liquidities come from that have helped create the credit bubbles we're now living with. 

Readings

  1. Ahead of the Curve: A Commonsense Guide to Forecasting Business and Market Cycles by Joseph H. Ellis 
  2. The Irwin Guide to Using the Wall Street Journal by Michael B. Lehmann
  3. Macroeconomics by N. Gregory Mankiw 
  4. Prior Posts on Macroeconomic Data

December 26, 2007

Xmas Cheer ? - Disingenousness, Conundrums and Early Warnings

Well it looks like the holiday spirit might fade rather rapidly. Barry Ritholz starts us off with a post on real retail sales over the holidays and makes a well-reasoned argument that sales growth was zero or less. These conclusions aren't a great suprise however if you've been following along with our looks at real sales and consumption (Reality Bites: Real Retail Sales).

Over the weekend we ran across an interesting WSJ editorial that argued that increased spreads between high (AAA) and low (Baa) quality corporates indicated an increased likihood of recession, or least a downturn. Unfortunately, that interesting indicator, when you dig into doesn't quite hold up with the arguement IMHO very well and the attack on Fed policy seems both gratuitous and ill-grounded. However that poking around did cause us to revisit the yield and other early warning (leading) indicator signs. In particular the work of Paul Kasriel at Northern Trust whose KWRI proprietary indicator indicates that recession might be approaching a 65% probability. Paul also looks at real money balances and the spread on the yield curve. We reproduce two of his key charts at right for your review and contemplation.

We found Kasriel's warning indicators so interesting that we did our own digging along with looking at the AAA/Baa spreads. Taken all together our digging around led to three arguments:

  1.  Real money balances are declining sharply on a monthly basis and indicate both a reduction in the money supply AND turmoil in the credit markets despite the best efforts of the Fed.
  2. The Fed Funds/10Yr yield curve spread is going negative further indicating a poor outlook since longer-term funds rates drop when economic growth is expected to be poor and the anticipated demand for funds drops.
  3. The short-term spread between 3Mo Treasuries and 3Mo Corporates has spiked quickly, abruptly and sharply though. Which indicates that the problems are in the credit markets not in Fed (or central bank) policy on rates. A point we explored earlier as well (Let's Blame Uncle Alan)

Let's set the table with an excerpt from the WSJ editorial that triggerred our digging into all this.

The Fed's Predicament Day by day forecasters, already pessimistic, lose further confidence in the economy. I too must plead guilty to being drawn in, although I had argued for months that the economy would come through the subprime mess more or less unscathed. However, the indicator on which we at my firm rely most -- the tightness of spreads in the quality end of the corporate bond market -- has abruptly changed. As recently as a couple of weeks ago, these spreads were tighter than they had been all year. Now it seems that the corporate bond market has begun to corroborate the general panic. But just in the last couple of weeks, the Baa/Aaa spread has broken through 100 basis points for the first time in several years. Having traded in a range between 85 and 95 basis points all year, it had widened to nearly 120 basis points by mid-December, suggesting a hit to GDP and consumer spending by the first quarter of 2008.

 Actually when you look at the composite chart the AAA/Baa spreads have gone up slightly, as they should considering the gross mis-pricing of risk, but in our humble opinion they haven't moved out of the realms of historical norms at all. What does look more than a little scary is the 3Mo Treasury vs Corporate yields which were abnormally low for similar reasons. And have now spiked so sharply. As you can also see on the expaned sub-chart the 10Yr/FF spread (on the r.h.s. axis) has conversely narrowed a great deal. In fact it's been dropping since '04 and gone negative since later last year. This is the famous conundrum dilemma full-bore btw and now indicates at best a slowing economy.

In the second composite chart at left we mimic Kasriel's early warning indicators by looking at the inflation-adjusted  monetary base on a YOY% change basis and the 10YR/FF spread on the r.h.s. axis. As you can see from the longer-term sub-chart (top) they were both good indicators of the '01 recession (Kasriel's chart above takes the analysis back to the early 70s !). As you can see the YOY% growth of the monetary base has been at or below zero for some time - in other words the real spendable capacity in the economy is actually shrinking and has been declining for some time. Or put alternatively despite all the Central Bank efforts to unseize the credit markets in fact credit tightening is foreshadowing a downturn.

The shorter-term expansion of the chart shows that 68.5% of the variability in the base is captured and explained by a downtrend which is accelerating. All in all we think Kasriel's arguements prove out with the data and more while Ranson's about Fed policy mistakes do not. Aside from being back to the 3-corned dilemma of inflation vs recession vs credit collapse these early warning indicators endorse both the slowmotion slowdown AND rising risk factors.

December 25, 2007

Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays

May the best of the Spirit of Christmas find you and yours.

 

 

If you've read on perhaps you're wondering about the relevance to business. Well aside from business not being all there is of course but vitally important to my mind there are critical and wonderful messages and lessons in building a high-performance enterprise by instilling wisdom and compassion in the culture and HR practices. Perhaps, IMHO, best encapsulated by Bob Sutton in his "This I Believe" Rules:

15 Things I Believe

 

December 24, 2007

Tough Outlook for '08: Kellner on Avalanche Warnings

Well this seems to be the day for key columnists to catch my eye with appropriate diagnosis and warnings. This morning Bill Kellner has chimed in with a very timely summary of the environmental context and economic outlook. We don't have a lot to add per se though we'll point you to some earlier postings that put some charts and tools behind his cautions.

So he....er's Bill: 

Plan ahead for a tough 2008 It's not difficult to get read on the economic year to come.Whether there's a recession or just a slowdown in our future, on one thing there is general agreement: 2008 figures to be a tough year for just about everyone -- employers, employees, homeowners and investors -- so plan accordingly. Don't wait for the National Bureau of Economic Research, the official arbiter of the business cycle, to make the call. I would remind readers that the initial look at the first quarter's GDP won't be available for another four months. If you haven't planned for tough times by then, you'll be way behind the curve. A look at the real world will give you better information sooner. Point in fact: Those who deny even a slowdown note that residential fixed investment accounts for less than 4% of real GDP, so housing alone is unlikely to exert much downward pull on economic growth. But this overlooks that home prices are falling, thus reducing both people's wealth as well as their ability to take out a home equity loan. Add to this the effect on households' budgets of rising food, energy and health-care prices, higher state and local taxes and transit fares, little or no savings, huge debts and stricter borrowing requirements and you have a consumer in distress. Even more important, the credit markets remain frozen. This means that, besides consumers, businesses and local governments -- even banks -- can't borrow needed funds. As you can imagine, money and credit grease the wheels of economic activity. Without them, business would inevitably grind to a halt. Central bankers are trying feverishly to inject liquidity into the system, but they won't be able to thaw out the frosty markets until lenders have confidence that borrowers can repay their loans. Too bad they did not think this way sooner.

Inflation Trends and Outlooks 

Real Retail Sales 

Payroll and Employment Realities 

Slowmotion Slowdown 

GDP Components and Spending Outlooks 

Oops...Real Rally or Time to Rethink

MSN Money Central is a pretty good finance and economics web site. In particular several of their regular columnists have proven out very well over the last several years (particularly Jubak and Markman). They also run a very interesting set of contests between investment pros. Two of whom had recent posts that are well worth thinking about.

Paraphrasing them might go something like this, "hmm this really isn't working out well. What's going on here and how do I re-think my strategy, tools and techniques ?" Otherwise known as the Oops factors. Now one of the things I've noticed about the contest results is that their timing on market cycles has been extremely fortuitous indeed. No conspiracy just coincidence by and large. So contest results are skewed toward those folks who's style aligns with current conditions, the context.

So, what's the context for investing right now ? 

Both of these "Oops" public confessions strike me, very strongly, as indicating that - as we've been saying - we're actually in a sideways market of increasing volatility of shorter periods. And part of th reason is the general lack of grasp of the on-coming avalanche. Remember that everybody was in denial about Housing until this Summer and there were widespread expectations that the Homebuilders were in recovery mode this time last year. Instead how many of them are teetering on the edges of the abyss right now ?

Well it might be worth thinking about, reading these columns and thinking thru your position, outlook and strategic adaptations. Mighten it ?

To help our with framing you thinking here are a couple of posts that ought to be worth your time:

 The column excerpts are below along with clickable URLs for the whole thing. Also to frame your thinking check out the homebuilder stock chart at right.

2 promising stocks and a course correction When you are losing money, do you stay the course or adjust your strategy? The decision to change your strategy is always a difficult one. It means selling stocks in industries you know well and investing in industries you do not have as much experience in. It also means the entire team you've selected and trained to assist you needs to be retrained to look for stocks that fit a different profile. Add to that the tax consequences of closing out a lot of positions, and it's easy to understand how a portfolio manager can decide to stay the course if there is even the slightest possibility that the reasons for the losses are short-lived. Deciding to stay the course is by far the easier choice. But when the reasons for the poor performance are not short-lived, it is the wrong choice -- whether for yourself or, in my case, for those who've invested in your fund.

So much for the 'reliable' fourth-quarter rally It used to be that the fourth quarter was the biggest no-brainer in global markets. In fact, I've even called it "the last free lunch in global investing." Well, 2007 proved me wrong. With global markets trading down for the first time in Q4 since the dot-com collapse in 2000, it looks like the time for this free lunch is over. My Strategy Lab global-megatrend portfolio has experienced some remarkable ups and downs. Recall that it was whipsawed out of all but one position within weeks of the launch of the contest in July. I re-entered the market in September and in October prepped the portfolio for a year-end rally that has remained a figment of my hope and imagination. With those two bets in place, there's been little to do or say since. So what lessons can we draw from the performance of the portfolio as we head into the homestretch of the contest?

Cracks in the Shell: Credit Crisis and Bubbles

Justin Lahart as an interesting column in today's Journal that nicely captures the situation in the cojoined housing and financing bubbles that's well worth your time to find and read. While he captures the unrealities of those immediate markets there are several things that deserve further investigation, reporting and thinking because we've got much farther to go than he reports with these problems. And as an interesting test of how far I posted a question on LinkedIn to which you're all invited. It asks "how widespread is awareness of the credit crisis and what do you think the consequences might be ?". The timing's likely bad right now but so far the responses aren't encouraging when judged by a large-scale grasp of the issues. Below we also point to some earlier posts expanding on these breakdowns.

So he.....er's Justin:

Cracks Differ In Housing, Finance Shells It's now conventional wisdom that a housing bubble has burst. In fact, there were two bubbles, a housing bubble and a financing bubble. Each fueled the other, but they didn't follow the same course. Housing peaked in 2005. By early 2006 it was widely recognized the boom was likely over, and by mid-2006 it was beyond question. In June 2006, sales of existing single-family homes were 9% below their year-earlier level, sales of new homes were down 15% and framing lumber prices were down 19%. The Dow Jones Wilshire index of home-building shares had fallen 41% from its July